we are all incensed rutgers man [Marc-Gregor Campredon]

We're On The Verge Of Not Having A Season Here Comment Count

Brian August 10th, 2020 at 9:53 AM

Remember when Jim Harbaugh was perpetually almost hired but nobody was quite ready to come out and say this is 100% happening? Feels like we're in this holding pattern about the cancellation (or possibly delay) of the 2020 season. Pat Forde last night:

And today on his radio show Dan Patrick is reporting that the Big Ten and Pac 12 are set to cancel tomorrow:

Reportedly there was a vote that was 12-2 for canceling, with Nebraska and Iowa opposed. Seems like it's all over but the shouting, which there will be plenty of.

There is no content after the jump.

Comments

bluebyyou

August 10th, 2020 at 10:06 AM ^

If a postponed season happens, it will hardly be a surprise.

Is it not a big disingenuous, to say the least, that certain universities, including Michigan, are about to resume classes?

ndscott50

August 10th, 2020 at 11:02 AM ^

Ignores the thousands of students returning to live in dorms and other student housing in a city where the K-12 school system said its not safe to have in person class.  At least we removed the risk of them being in class 16 hours a week.  I'm sure the other 152 hours a week they spend in the city will be much lower risk. 

Magnus

August 10th, 2020 at 11:19 AM ^

K-12 schools and college are not the same thing.

Many K-12 kids need day care if not in school, and all of them are required by law to attend school.

College kids are all 18+ (except for a few who enter younger than 18) and have high school diplomas. None of them need day care. They go to college by choice. 

ndscott50

August 10th, 2020 at 11:51 AM ^

Help me out with the logic here. So, K-12 kids, specifically K-5, need things like daycare if not in school and also are much more likely to struggle with on-line learning.  It seems like its important to get them back in school but we can’t do that until we dramatically reduce the amount of the virus spreading in the community.  College’s are offering the vast majority of their classes on-line and college students, being much more mature and already having high school diplomas, are much better equipped to take on-line courses.  So the best move is to bring them back to live in dorms, where there is a high likelihood that they will increase the spread of the virus in the community, to take on-line classes? We will then decide its impossible to have in person K-12 schools because the virus is increasing in the community due to the college students living in dorms taking on-line classes.

Magnus

August 10th, 2020 at 12:00 PM ^

We can go back and forth on this kind of thing forever. The whole thing has a chicken-or-the-egg feel to it.

The fact remains that college kids have a choice to gather together, which will spread the disease.

K-12 students do not have a choice.

You can twist that or interpret it however you want, but that's a basic fact that needs to be acknowledged for anyone who's in a position to make decisions about this sort of thing.

bluebyyou

August 10th, 2020 at 11:54 AM ^

Having gone to college and had two sons follow suit at Michigan, I am aware of the distinctions you noted Magnus.  My concern is about spread of CV19 in the Ann Arbor community and I am hardly alone, I hate to acknowledge anything that Michigan State does but in this regard, I think their approach of going remote is better for the fall.

Many communities that are college towns are apprehensive about what students on campus will bring with them and a piece in yesterday's Washington Post noted these concerns:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/in-college-towns-and-neighborhoods-permanent-residents-brace-for-students-return/2020/08/09/f4fdfc50-d760-11ea-9c3b-dfc394c03988_story.html

bronxblue

August 10th, 2020 at 10:14 AM ^

The vast majority of those classes are online or remote, and those that require in-person access (such as lab usage) will be greatly restricted.  And last time I checked, an educational institution trying to keep teaching going isn't "disingenuous".  Now, it would be disingenuous if they pushed for athletes to play so that they could collect millions of dollars while letting "normal" students stay home.

bronxblue

August 10th, 2020 at 10:08 AM ^

I assume at this point it'll be the SEC, Clemson, FSU, and, like, Oklahoma playing for a championship with the biggest factor being which team happens to have missed an outbreak the week of the game.

I've said this elsewhere, but if an unintended consequence of this pandemic is death to the NCAA's BS amateurism cudgel, 2020 won't be a complete wash.

bronxblue

August 10th, 2020 at 12:04 PM ^

Huh?

My point is that the NCAA has for years tried to convince us that student-athletes are just students and shouldn't be able to, you know, create a union to advocate for their own interests, have a say in how their likenesses are used by the billion-dollar organization that sells them, etc.  Certain member schools largely tried to strong-arm kids into playing games without a coherent plan for keeping them safe, and as we saw when teams started practicing a decent number of them had outbreaks.  This led to a number of athletes pushing for better care and more of a say in how they're treated both on and off the field, changes the NCAA has pretty consistently pushed back against in the past, usually with the amateurism argument being central to that resistance.

grumbler

August 11th, 2020 at 8:55 PM ^

The problem with the professionalization of college athletics is that no NCAA school has a remit in their mission statement to operate professional sports teams.  Sure, they can make their teams professional, but then they'd have to sell them off. 

The problem with that, of course, is:  who would buy them?

If you want to kill college sports, just keep pushing to professionalize them.

The current system has many flaws, but the fact that athletes don't collect a bigger salary isn't one of them.

trueblueintexas

August 10th, 2020 at 10:36 AM ^

Add OSU to your list and I think you nailed it. 

I was checking on a couple of D3 schools and in their announcements postponing fall sports (which was a conference decision led by the presidents and AD's) the presidents and AD's openly stated, if it falls within state laws and guidelines, they might be able to play a few games against teams if they can prove the proper procedures and cautions have been put in place, however it would not be conference sanctioned events. 

If D3 schools are looking for ways to at least play a couple games despite their own leadership voting not to play conference games, you can bet OSU says, yes the Big Ten said we couldn't play Big Ten conference games, they didn't say anything about playing SEC conference games! They will not miss out on a chance to compete with Justin Fields this year even if it is a farce.

kehnonymous

August 10th, 2020 at 11:09 AM ^

Wussification of America continues

This characteristically awful shittake is currently at -22 and plummeting as it should be, but can we take a moment to appreciate that he at least had that grace to (unintentionally?) not also double-dip into misogyny and say 'pussification' instead?

dragonchild

August 10th, 2020 at 11:53 AM ^

That's the point.  This isn't an argument to win, because the winning position for this kind of HOT TAKE! is the destruction of discourse.  Consider that it's not some original thought.  It's the same right-wing sound-bite nothingburger regurgitated into every damn comment thread just because these twatwaffles have nothing better to do.

As one person wisely point out, arguing with willful ignorance is like playing chess with a pigeon.  You could be Garry effin' Kasparov and it's just not going to matter.  Your "opponent" is going to blissfully knock over the pieces, crap all over the board, and fly off with the smug satisfaction of having done whatever it wanted.

The negbang is the only appropriate response.  One click and move on.

BlueTimesTwo

August 10th, 2020 at 10:11 AM ^

Of course the SEC will play.  They will all play one game, and declare half of the league national champions.  The scoreboard has always been, and will always be, their only concern.  Sacrificing safety and integrity is just the ante to play in the SEC.

goblueritzy92

August 10th, 2020 at 10:12 AM ^

If the B1G and the PAC cancel, but the other 3 conferences play, that would be catastrophic for Michigan and the conference at large. Selfishly, I hope it is all P5 or nothing.

L'Carpetron Do…

August 10th, 2020 at 10:27 AM ^

America's woeful and willful ignorance is why we can't have nice things. This totally sucks. It's bad enough we have dual economic and public health crises (both of which were somewhat preventable or at least should not have reached this level) but now we're losing symbols of American life and culture too. Thank god baseball and basketball figured it out. I'm praying they can keep it going. 

ESNY

August 10th, 2020 at 11:04 AM ^

The surprising thing is doing it now. Not sure what has changed in the last few days since they released the schedule. 

I always assumed the season would ultimately get cancelled but figured it would be a game or two and then a few players on one of the P5 teams test positive and the impact of that would just put an end to the season.

Michigan Arrogance

August 10th, 2020 at 11:18 AM ^

what's changed is that the players are organizing their influence and the CFB "leadership" shat themselves b/c them playing an unnecessary sport in which it's impossible to be socially distant, thereby putting thousands of lives at risk by adding another vector for xmission of a virus that is out of control in much of the nation (but not the rest of the 1st world) puts the sham of ammaturism into such clear focus that their cartel of money laundering will go up in flames.

or something...