Monday Presser Transcript 10-14-13: Brady Hoke Comment Count

Heiko

Bullets:

  • Taylor Lewan will play Saturday against Indiana. He had a "hip deal" or something like that. Maybe something else too, but more the hip.
  • Hoke was pretty defensive about the coaches and the players. Attributes most of the problems on the offensive line to youth. There could be some changes this week, though. Maybe. Wouldn't really commit to anything.
  • Running Devin more is "unwise" because of the lack of quarterback depth.
  • Play-calling at the end of the game wasn't conservative, per se. Hoke went with the high-percentage strategy. Delay of game penalty was a big mistake, however, and Hoke accepted full responsibility.
  • Channing Stribling played the last drive and was told to go for interceptions. He had been doing that in practice a lot. 

---------------------

Podium

Opening remarks:

“It’s obviously disappointing to lose. You don’t play to lose. It is disappointing. Need to execute in multiple areas better. When the opportunity comes, you have to take advantage of it and you’ve got to make plays when you need to make plays. We didn’t do that throughout the game. There’s also an awful lot of good things that our football team did. I can tell you I was pleased with the physical effort that they put through. Tom Gordon played 91 plays and played a fast 91 physical plays. So did Jarrod Wilson. Both of them are key elements in our punt team. I’m just talking about those two guys, but you watch Jeremy Gallon, and you watch our team play, the physical effort was very good.

"Now let’s go back to the mental effort, because it takes both. Mentally we had some things that we need to do better from the standpoint of your targeting the line of scrimmage and blocking or finishing a little better on blocks with the angles or if you’re playing a coverage, making sure that we’re playing the coverage out. If you’re the nose tackle, you have to make sure we’re stepping with the proper foot there. We need to execute there better, and we will. I like our football team. There’s elements of it that need to produce a little more, need to have a little more urgency to how we’re playing. But I like our team and we’ve got Indiana coming in here this weekend. They’re a good football team. Kevin [Wilson’s] done a nice job offensively. They’ve got a lot of skill sets that they use. Defensively they’re more athletic than they’ve been the last couple of years.”

Can you update us on Taylor Lewan’s status?

“He’ll be fine. I think he got really two things a little bit. A little bit of a hip deal. Probably was most of it.”

You played Joey Burzynski and some other guys. Could we see a different starting lineup against Indiana? Could Schofield move inside to guard?

“Uh, probably not. The one thing – Mike Schofield in that football game I thought really, because he was asked to do a lot. When Taylor went out, with some of the unbalanced stuff, the shifting, he orchestrated all that with those guys. One time I think there were three redshirt freshmen, redshirt sophomore and Schofield in there. He did really a nice job. He played well but he also did a nice job of organizing those five guys. We had Chris Bryant come out and Burzynski come in. He did a nice job.”

Could we see a different starting lineup against Indiana though?

“We’ll go through Tuesday and Wednesday and see.”

MGoQuestion: It seems like the offensive line has had decreasing production over the last three years. The lack of depth has been well documented, but the talent does seem to be there. At what point do you start getting concerned about the coaching?

“Well the talent’s there. It’s young talent. I mean, redshirt freshmen playing, and they have a long ways to go.”

MGoFollowup: Are you concerned with the way they’re being coached at all?

“No, not at all.”

What can and has to get better now, especially with the young guys?

“I think when you look at it, they’ve been hit and miss a little bit. There’s times when they played well, and there’s times when they haven’t played as well. Now. You have to look at their preparation and talk to them about it. We had good preparation all week. We were physical, we were – watching the things we do against each other, I thought they were really good. Now we just have to keep taking them further.

Have you thought about reverting to the spread?

“Well, I think there’s times when we have still done that. The problem is Devin ran the ball I think 27 times the other day. Most of them, a lot of them were called runs. Not scramble runs. You worry about how many hits he’s taking. We’ve got to get production from the back end. The running back.”

Looking back, do you think the play-calling at the end of the game was too conservative?

“No. At the end of regulation we put ourselves in position to kick the 52-yard field goal with 20 seconds left. Could have just taken a knee and played for overtime. So I would say no.”

Is this team having a hard time understanding exactly what kind of team they want to be?

“Heh. If they are, then I haven’t done a good enough job of expressing what kind of team we need to be and want to be. Physical at the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball.”

But it seems like you’re trying to make this team be something they’re not yet. Shouldn’t you consider doing what works instead of what you want them to be?

“Yeah, and I think we do that weekly as we look at the opponents you’re going to play. We played a lot of snaps last week out of a nickel defense. And because of number one how we kind of thought we stood up to them with their passing game, I think there were some pretty good things about it. We hit the quarterback 18 times, sacked him 4, two interceptions. From an offensive perspective, point of attack blocking has to be better. I know it can be better. Our fullbacks are pretty good lead blockers when we’re in 21 [personnel]. There’s times when everything’s blocked play-side, which were blocked really well, and a guy slipping off the backside because we weren’t doing a good enough job at cutting off. I think every week you have to look at what gives your guys the best chance to win. I think we look at that and make evaluations. Now did we think we could run the ball more effectively? I don’t think there was a doubt. Did we? No. Well then you have to change a little bit, and I think Al did that over the course of the game.”

When Devin lost his helmet, did you think about taking a timeout?

“Did. Thought about it, but it was the second half. It was that kind of game. I don’t know anybody who didn’t think it would be a game that went down to the wire. I certainly did, so I didn’t want to use the timeout then. ”

Delay of game at the end of the game?

“That’s me. Totally. Totally. That’s my fault. I have to help [Devin], and I let him down.”

What’s the process? Is there someone that gives you a heads up that the clock is running down?

“Yeah … yes. Yep.”

You put the headset on sometimes. When does that help you?

“End of game. End of half. Greg [Mattison] and I talk all the time, so I don’t have to, because we’re standing next to each other. I talk to Al [Borges] before halftime about what we wanted to do at halftime. What his thoughts were. What we wanted to change a little bit. Talked in there. And talked at the end of the half, end of the game. Do you take the knee with 20 seconds and play for overtime and try to throw it down the field with the possibility of fumbling it or them intercepting it, or do you take the chance of completing it and moving forward?”

----------------------------

Roundtable

Why was Channing Stribling on the field at the end?

“Strib’s coming on. He’s come on. If there’s anybody I would want back there, I’ll be real honest, in the secondary to make the interception, it would be Strib. I would still do this day, because of his skill level and his ball skills are really realy good. I watch him every practice. He’s going to take two or three balls. We wanted to get him in the game because of exactly what we asked him to do.”

He was in position both times.

“Yeah, but there’s a lot of tough lessons in life, you know?”

Why didn’t you play him earlier in the game?

“He might. He might play more.”

Any changes going forward?

“Could. Could.”

No issues about bringing him in cold?

“Well he plays on all the special teams almost, and he’s getting experience.”

Concerns about the kicking game?

“Well, he was 23 for 23 at 40 yards coming in. He hit the ground on the first one with his toe. Obviously it was low. He pushed the other one. He nailed a 40-yarder down at the other end and 52-yarder was right there at the limit.”

No concerns about the mental aspect of his game?

“I think you could have killed the guy if I had switched kickers. I know one thing: he won the Sugar Bowl for us. Made a kick here at home to beat Michigan State. I have a lot of faith in that guy.”

With how good he’s been, does it change how you play offense in overtime?

“I don’t think so. You have all kinds of positives and negatives. I think every game, your strategy because of how the game goes has a lot to do with it. I mean, Bill Belichik called three timeouts yesterday. How they manufactured that win, at the end of the day it was guys making plays.”

What did you see from Erik Magnuson?

“I was happy enough with Magnuson for once, let’s put it that way. He did some good things in there. It was kind of up and down.”

What about Jake Ryan in his first game?

“I thought he got around pretty well. I don’t think there were any ill effects. I think he ended up playing 31 or 32 plays. It was great to have him out there. I think he brings something to our team.”

Did it help you get into the backfield more?

“I think it was a combination of guys. Chris Wormley and Jibreel [Black]. We hit the quarterback five times. Frank [Clark] did some good things. I think Cam Gordon at times was good. It was just good to have Jake back out on the field.”

How many plays could Jake play against Indiana? How do you use all three SAM linebackers?

“Well, the tempo this week will be as high as it’s going to be all year, between them and Northwestern. We’re going to need bodies to come in and out. I think that’s fine. And then when you get in sub groups, it changes a little bit. But the more depth, the better you’re going to be. And you can see that. You can see Chris Wormley is a better player than he was four weeks ago because he’s been playing football. I could go through that whole group of redshirt freshmen. Willie Henry’s better than he was four weeks ago. And I think that’s part of it because we’ve had some depth.”

Now that Jake is back on the field, can you share the history of his recovery? How hard did he work?

“Well, since the day he had surgery and came back to Schembechler Hall, he’s worked tirelessly with the rehab specialist, the docs, the trainers, the strength staff. I don’t think there was any doubt in my mind that he would be back about this time. Just because, John, what he’s done – he gets voted captain on a football team by his peers because they’ve watched him and what he’s done from that leadership standpoint and example standpoint.”

You traveled with Kyle Bosch but he didn’t play. Is he up for that spot?

“Well I think the left guard spot, yeah. Does Bosch have a chance? Sure he does. We traveled him for a reason, and it wasn’t to feed him.”

You mentioned running back production. Is it blocking? Vision?

“We never got the running backs started. We never got him started. He had a 13 yard run? 12? Early in the game. Guess what? We got him started at the line of scrimmage. I mean, they had 11 tackles for loss. That’s not getting him started at the line of scrimmage.”

How do you fix that?

“Number one as a coach, you have to look and see, ‘Am I coaching it the way we should coach it?’ We are. What are we doing in practice to make sure we’re giving them the looks that they need? Am I motivating them to knock somebody off the football?”

You talked about the progress of your young defensive linemen and how quickly they’ve moved along. Do offensive linemen just take longer?

“It’s definitely a more encompassing position from a mental standpoint than defensive line. Defensive linemen, you’ve got certain things, there’s always fundamental parts of it. But there’s not the checks at the line of scrimmage as much. Do we have that? Yes. But not as much defensively. And protections. We’ve cut down on protections, believe me, because of the youth. And the different schemes you want to run, the different fronts you’re going to see and the movement of the defense and how that affects you. Does it take a little longer? I believe that does.”

To the outside observer, it appeared like you were scared to let Devin make a play with his arm. Was there any fear about turnovers? If so, is that a lack of confidence in your quarterback?

“Not at all. We wanted them to have to use their three timeouts. I think we started the drive six minutes and seven seconds. We take the drive all the way down to 52 seconds left on the clock, right? We have one penalty in there that hurts us a little bit because it stops the clock. Took all their timeouts, called a quarterback draw. We never took the ball completely out of his hands. I would expect our defense [to make the stop] if we had to make somebody go 80 yards in 52 seconds to make the stop. ”

If your best playmaker is your quarterback, shouldn’t you put him in positions to make plays instead of milking the clock?

“I think again, you have to look at the percentages. You have to look at what is the benefit of the team and the benefit of what the percentages are. How much time are you going to give them and where are you going to give them the ball? If I had no confidence in our quarterback, with the interceptions that we’ve had, he wouldn’t be our quarterback. I have all the confidence in the world in Devin Gardner. I have confidence in our offensive line getting better.”

So he’s not a short leash?

“No.”

You talked about the power plays and managing the hits Devin takes. How do you balance QB runs and RB runs? Should Devin get more carries?

“I don’t think that’s wise to have Devin take more hits.”

Even if that’s the only thing that’s working?

“Who’s going to play quarterback if he takes all those hits?”

Shane Morris?

“You have to be conscious enough about the team. And he’s had 10 starts, right? 10 starts. He has improved every week. Even though we had two turnovers the other day. The fumble? That’s not his fault. It’s a blindside deal. One bad throw. He had no turnovers the week before. There is no short leash.”

Will Taylor Lewan play on Saturday?

“Yeah. He’ll play.”

Has the offensive line improved?

“I think it’s a bit of hit or miss. Graham, a week ago, played pretty daggone well. Not as well this week. So I think it’s a little bit of hit or miss. If you don’t have consistency, you’re not going to win. We have to be more consistent.”

Are Glasgow and Miller still competing?

“Yeah they’re still doing that.”

Do you plan to spend more time looking at the offensive line?

“I don’t need to do that. I’ve got a great offensive line coach. I’ve got a great coordinator. I’m with them enough because we go so much against each other. I don’t need to do that. That’s some coach trying to think he’s a hero. That's not me. I'm not a hero.”

Comments

Mattinboots

October 15th, 2013 at 12:04 AM ^

Why wasn't Stribbling playing to not let them catch the ball? With so little time left just pass interference the hell out of them unless there's a 100% incompletion or 100% interception.

Bando Calrissian

October 15th, 2013 at 12:55 AM ^

What's amazing to me, and I say this as a total Brady Hoke apologist, is that this is so much worse than Lloyd's post-loss boilerplate presser comments. Lloyd consistently would just heap the blame on himself without saying anything that indicated they were committed to something totally flawed. He'd cover his assistants' asses without essentially calling them misunderstood geniuses.

This is pretty much the exact opposite. Boilerplate paired with blind committment to something totally flawed. Total regression in multiple position areas, but who are we to question it? It's sheer lunacy.

I feel like we're heading for a bizarro version of Michigan Football like what would have happend if Lloyd decided to stay the course with OC Fred Jackson. Anyone else remember that hilarious disaster? Sure, we need 8 yards to convert on third down, but that same 2-yard play action pass we always call in this situation might just work this time! Great plan, let's do it again! (Cue the No More 8-and-4! chants...)

HAIL 2 VICTORS

October 15th, 2013 at 3:28 AM ^

Between you and MGrowOld these are the two scariest posts I have read on this board...genuine fear making me sick to my stomach.  This has to be the product of youth and inexperience.  Hoke turned around two programs that have gone back to inobscurity without him.  If Hoke gets the time he needs great things will happen at Michigan.  3 Redshirt Freshmen, a walk on and one upperclassmen playing on the o-line, 3 missed FG's from your kicker who had made 16 straight, deflected balls that allow for 80 yards in 30 seconds...ugh.  Borges was a genius against ND and now he is the brother in Something About Mary for PSU.  All seems too drastic and reactive.

uminks

October 15th, 2013 at 1:00 AM ^

We may be headed for a ND like period during the 90s and the 00's. Where we get a lot of recruiting talent but our coach cannot win. I still believe in giving a coach 4 to 5 years but if in 2015 we are still looking at near .500 conference records with 4 to 5 losses per year, it could get really ugly! And who would we get as our next coach? The top coaches avoided us during the last two searches.

hitinropes

October 15th, 2013 at 6:02 AM ^

I am tired of hearing that we have a young line. Ok fastforward a couple of years. Now we should have a veteran line, but with a young QB or young somewhere else. Will this be the excuse then that we aren't winning? I love Hoke, but really we need to quit making excuses about how young we are. FERGODSAKES COACH!!!!

Brandon_L

October 15th, 2013 at 8:23 AM ^

This is how the game works. Youth happens. At least we have a competent defense this time around. We will be in every game we play this year because the defense. Youth will always be an issue somewhere on a team. We will be spoiled next year when Jabril gets here at least. I dont think his youth will matter.

InterM

October 15th, 2013 at 11:19 AM ^

but last year's OL was far more seasoned and, like this year, only the QB was able to generate any sort of rushing yardage.  The commonalities between last year and this year are poor run blocking and the coaching staff, which doesn't provide a whole lot of confidence that things will improve as the current OL gains more experience -- especially when Michigan loses both its tackles at the end of this year.

Michigan football

October 15th, 2013 at 8:21 AM ^

Everyone can point at one or two things about each player, youth, and lack of effectiveness. But the biggest thing that I don't understand is this. Your QB is getting more yards than your runningback (the only one they keep using), how is that?  How is that runningback still playing, and no one else gets a  chance?

These coaches claim they have all this talent but somehow they never make it in games. In (4)OTs you used a runningback that was ineffective for (4) qrts, to waste crucial downs in OTs, by running up the middle (hadn't been successful for four quarters) but kept setting up for a fg everytime. Never threw the ball to the endzone once. But the coach on the otherside did whatever it took, including going for it on fourth down (and was losing at this point), to win a game. Why didn't you do whatever it took to win this game?

Does Michigan have MAC coaches or BIG TEN coaches?

SDCran

October 15th, 2013 at 12:55 PM ^

After that game winning drive we weren't going on about what great coaching we had or ND didn't. We talked about players making plays. In the end Strib was in position and PSU made the plays to win those long passes. Love it when it's our guys, hate it when it's theirs. But get over it, our coaches had our guys in position to win, that's all they can do.

FlexUM

October 15th, 2013 at 9:16 AM ^

Can someone explain the big deal abou the DOG? In the post game presser it sounded like he thought about a FG but it sounded like he decided before the flag was even thrown that he was going to punt...in that case why is that such a big deal?

Granted it's a different story if he was 100% going for the FG but then pushed out of range. Going by his comments that doesn't sound like his thought process. 

umfanchris

October 15th, 2013 at 10:42 AM ^

Michigan was at the 27 before the Delay of Game. That would have made for a 44 yard field goal attempt. Obvisouly brady thought that  Gibbons had a good shot at 44 since he felt Gibbons could make a longer one at the end of regulation and also since he gave him another chance from almost the same exact spot in the 1st overtime. So he would have been insance not to go for the field goal there. 

Had Michigan kicked that field goal they would have won the game as that would have put Michigan up by 2 scores with less then a minute left (and no PSU timeouts). If he had already decided that he was going to Punt before the penalty then he is even more of a conservative wuss then people were thinking. 

FlexUM

October 15th, 2013 at 11:11 AM ^

Thanks I just took the post game presser to mean he really felt he was going to punt but he had a fluttering thought of the FG but in reality he was going with the punt pretty much 99%.

I actually think he was thinking punt 99% and to be honest had it been a good pooch I really don't think it's that bad of an idea. I mean they killed a bunch of time and if they had the ball on their own 10 what are the odds of them scoring...shat what are the odd of them scoring a TD from their own 20 in 50 seconds...slim to none.

I'm all for being agressive I really am...but damn they went 80 yards in 23 seconds...wtf.

umfanchris

October 15th, 2013 at 10:28 AM ^

Looking back, do you think the play-calling at the end of the game was too conservative?

“No. At the end of regulation we put ourselves in position to kick the 52-yard field goal with 20 seconds left. Could have just taken a knee and played for overtime. So I would say no.”

 

Not sure why another question wasn't asked about conservative calling in overtime? So Hoke doesn't think 2 Runs up the middle with your RB (that has averaged 1 yard a carry all game) and 1 run to the middle of the field (losing yards) is the most conservative thing you could do? That wasn't an easy field goal. On top of that it was a away game in a hostile environment. 

Pluto1600

October 15th, 2013 at 12:08 PM ^

it seemed to me that PSU no. 91 (davis) was killing the o-line. It;s confounding to me see him beat the sht out of our lineman and we not double him. PSU had very little d-line production from anyone else - we get that guy neutralized and it changes everything. In addition, running the stretch is not working when the back side d-linemen are chasing down the play ebfore Fitz can cut (not that there's much push up fron). This season's coaching seems very questionable