A Deeper Look At GRIII's Offensive Struggles Comment Count

Ace


 Too many of these (Bryan Fuller/MGoBlog)

There's no question Glenn Robinson III is off to a rough start in his sophomore season. Tasked with creating more offense in the absence of Trey Burke and Tim Hardaway Jr., he's struggled to do so, and his efficiency has plunged—he's shooting 44% from the field after hitting 57% of his shots last year. In Michigan's three losses, representing three of the four toughest teams they've played, he's all but disappeared, and only one of those (Charlotte, against which he played nine minutes before exiting the game after falling on his back) can be explained away by mitigating circumstances.

In a highly recommended stat-based look at Michigan's offensive issues so far this year, UMHoops cited a major reason for GRIII's regression—his lack of attempts at the rim [emphasis mine]:

Last year Robinson attempted 43.5% of his field goals at the rim and converted at a 78% rate. You remember those plays: Trey Burke penetrates and finds Robinson creeping along the baseline for an alley-oop or Robinson leaks out for an easy dunk in transition. Robinson was among the best finishers in the country a year and was the 10th most efficient offensive player in the country because of it.

This year, just 21.4% of Robinson’s field goal attempts have come at the rim. He’s finishing at an improved 88.9% rate but the opportunities aren’t nearly as plentiful. That’s a major problem because that’s what Robinson does best.

Above all else, this is the clear issue with Robinson this year; without Burke—and to a lesser extent, Hardaway—commanding the full attention of opposing defenses, the easy looks that were there last year aren't happening this year, and Robinson's attempts to create his own offense haven't been nearly as effective.

In an effort to expand on this, I went back to the Iowa State game film—the only game in which Michigan faced a quality opponent, GRIII played extensively and commanded at least 15% of the team's possessions, and the opposing defense wasn't face-guarding Nik Stauskas—to see how his shots were created. This is every shot attempt and turnover by Robinson before Michigan was down multiple possessions in the final two minutes; you should see a common thread:

Most of Robinson's attempts are happening in transition, obviously. When Michigan was in their halfcourt offense, he was almost entirely a non-factor. A few more observations from the tape above and this season as a whole after THE JUMP.

[JUMP for stat wonkery, what's not working, and reasons for hope.]

DRIVING ISN'T THE ANSWER

Robinson attempted to drive to the basket twice in this game from something resembling the halfcourt offense; on the first (0:11 mark) he couldn't burrow into the paint and traveled, on the second (0:30) he goes straight into the defender's chest and his bank-shot fails to catch iron.

Simply put, GRIII hasn't developed a move—let alone an array of moves—that can consistently get him around a defender. Note that at no point does Iowa State consider sending help when he drives; they know that his man should be able to stay between him and the basket. This means that GRIII's drives aren't opening up shots on the outside for his teammates and opponents aren't scrambling to box out Michigan's bigs when he shoots—with no help necessary, everybody's still on their man. Even in transition, he doesn't get clean looks unless he's already past the defense; his ability to draw fouls in those situations mitigates that issue, however.

To add to Dylan's statistics above, I went to the new premium stats on hoop-math, which paint quite the picture about GRIII's lack of shot creation. He's made 16 shots at the rim this season on 18 attempts, which is an outstanding percentage but on a disappointingly low number of opportunities. 13 of those 16 makes were assisted. One of those non-assisted makes was a putback off an offensive rebound. That leaves just two instances in which GRIII has created his own basket at the rim all season. That's an ugly, ugly number for nine games that include several overmatched opponents.

TOO MANY LONG TWOS

Robinson's drives haven't been getting him to the rim; they've been getting him to the area where shots go to die—inside the arc but outside the paint. 34 of his shots this year are of the two-point jumper variety; he's hit just 12 (35%) and only four were assisted. A full 65% of his two-point attempts are jump shots. Last season that mark was just 43%.

There are a couple reasons for this, in my opinion. First and foremost is the overarching problem—GRIII can't create his own shot at the basket and instead settles for pull-up jumpers. The other is that his lack of confidence in his three-point shot (9/32 this season) leads to him passing up some good shots for worse ones. At the 1:48 mark of the video, Robinson passes up a wide-open look from three after taking a handoff from Mitch McGary, only to step into a contested 18-footer that caroms off the front of the rim. That's not the only time he's stepped into a well-defended long jumper this season instead of taking what the defense is giving him.

REASONS FOR HOPE

This post leads to a pretty grim outlook for GRIII being able to turn things around—players don't normally develop effective go-to moves in the middle of a season, and that's the biggest thing missing from Robinson's offensive repertoire. There are, however, some signs in both the video and the numbers that point to potential improvement in his efficiency.

The first thing is that he's missing a lot of open jump shots, especially from three, that I expect to start falling at a higher rate. While Robinson wasn't a great outside shooter as a freshman at 32%, that's still better than his current 28% mark, and he's displayed an improved instinct this year for when to attack the basket in transition and when to pop outside for an open three—he did that twice against ISU and knocked down a wide-open triple as a result. On the season he's just 1/5 on three-pointers in transition; that should improve since those tend to be open looks—the rest of the team is shooting 44% in that category.

The other positive signal is his free-throw rate and percentage, both of which have improved this season. There's a strong correlation between free-throw shooting and eFG% on jump shots (scroll down to the chart here). Robinson is currently hitting 75% of his freebies, up from 68% last season, while getting to the line more frequently. His jump shot hopefully will start following that trend.

Comments

El Jeffe

December 11th, 2013 at 1:52 PM ^

Nice analysis, Ace. I'd actually be more interested in video of GRIII's off-ball, non-shot activity. My impression is that he does three things

  1. Move the ball around in standard Beilein motion sets
  2. Wait on the weak side baseline for Trey Burke to get into the lane and give him an easy alley-oop
  3. Tear ass down the court on the break

As for (1), either his spot isn't the best for getting shots or he isn't aggressive enough (unlike Stauskas or LeVert).

As for (2), um... This is the problem when you lose the best player in the damn country. I would love to see the % of high pick and roll possessions last year vs. this year, especially ones that end in the paint. Stauskas and LeVert could be decent at getting into the paint (esp. LeVert), but they ain't no TB. The fact that "who is?" is the answer to this question doesn't change the fact that it's hurting GRIII's best shot--the weak side baseline flash for a massive dunk. (EDIT: second-best shot last year--the weak side corner three).

As for (3), he's doing okay there, I bet. I think maybe once our D gels a little he'll get more opportunities.

So then, it seems to me, JB has to figure out how to get GRIII more shots in the regular half court sets, if in fact that's what he (JB) would like.

TwoFiveAD

December 11th, 2013 at 2:15 PM ^

Where is the head coach designing specific plays for GR3 to be put in a position to succeed?

You think Coach K is running the same offense he had last year now that he has Jabari Parker?  Absolutely Not.  

There are sets in there to get Parker isolated one on one in the post to take advantage of his skill set.

JB continues to go into his offense no matter what and when GR3 is playing the 4, the 4 starts off in the corner and unless the PG goes his direction, rarely leaves it. 

Rinse and Repeat.

This slump is partially GR3's fault, but I put more blame on JB. 

I Like Burgers

December 11th, 2013 at 3:53 PM ^

Comparing Parker to GRIII is ludicrous.  Parker is a far better player capable of creating his own shots.  If GRIII as stated above can't do anything when he's 1-on-1 with a defender, then why bother creating a play that puts him in isolation?  Ace knows this.  And JB sure as hell knows it.  Running a successful iso play is highly dependant on the player having a skill set or a move that can win 1-on-1.  GRIII doesn't have that.

pb1234

December 11th, 2013 at 5:47 PM ^

Screw Beilein for not designing an array of alley oop plays for GR3, since that's literally the only thing he can execute with any consistency. If only he was like Coach K, who makes sure his players pass to the most talented player in America. Beilein would never do something so tactically advanced. 

Spontaneous Co…

December 11th, 2013 at 6:04 PM ^

Beilein changed a significant portion of his offense for Morris, then tweaked it again for Burke. And without Burke, he's already changed it a fair bit. I just flat out disagree with your post. Plus, you don't alter your offense to cater it to a player who either in uninterested or unable to make the team better by being the focal point of an entire offense, or even a number of sets. Out of the 5 starters, GRIII is either last or second to last in terms of players who would I would run the offense through.

hajiblue72

December 11th, 2013 at 10:09 PM ^

What plays would you design for him? Guys do sag a bit - you aren't going to run him for an open 3 as he has those if he wants now. I have seen no evidence you can post him on a smaller defender and he usually is guarding a taller man anyway. In my opinion he should use his athleticism and crash the boards, but he just isn't there. Beyond the alley oop plays and cuts that come from the offensive flow I am not sure what else you can do for him. He needs to create some easy opportunities himself. I was at the Concordia game and he never drove or posted any of their 6'2 un athletic guys that are basically glorified high school players. There is just no way u put this on coach B. You blame it on the hype machine. Bright side is we may get him back.

UWSBlue

December 11th, 2013 at 2:19 PM ^

I don't know if he has the motor to warrant the high expections. Reminds me a lot of the kids on Freider's teams who would struggle with NC A&T or FAMU.

knappianbum

December 11th, 2013 at 2:44 PM ^

To me, GRIII never looked like an elite ball player.  Never last year, never this year.  Weren't we all surprised at the projection of first round pick last year because he really didn't prove all that.  It was purely based on his athleticism.  His shot is mediocre and he can't create his own shots... at least yet.  Everyone wants him to get more aggressive on offense but I hate that!  Whenever he does he is a mess!  At least for this year, he needs to remain a support role. 

 

Hopefully next year and beyond (if he stays), he can develop more of skills to get to elite level.  I don't see it happening this year.

 

 

Zoltanrules

December 11th, 2013 at 5:22 PM ^

GRIII seems to lack the confidence to create his own shot and to hit an open deep shot. It's as if when the spot light is on him too much he doesn't have that swagger needed when things don't go right. Maybe it is the pressure of having to be "the man" this year vs supporting stars last year? Check out the last three minutes of the Duke game when the game was over - all of a sudden GRIII starts making great plays. The talent is there. JB and staff need to work on the in between the ears stuff.

mgofritz

December 11th, 2013 at 9:11 PM ^

GRIII's struggles remind me of Hardaway's last seaon. I totally agree with confidence issues stemming from a feeling of meeting high expectations whether they be name related or hype related. I, on the other hand, am fully confident that he will find his game this season. I think we are all waiting for him to have his "light bulb" moment.

trueblueintexas

December 12th, 2013 at 12:34 AM ^

Ace is dead on with his analysis. I will add a little. The easiest comparison to make is to his dad the original Big Dog. I know that is not fair but their body types are so similar it's a good starting point.

1) He has limited to no post game like his dad did. That is huge, because you can not use his height to get match-up advantages on smaller players. That's typically an easy source of points for someone with his height and with that much athletic ability.

2) He does not have a great jump shot. Defenders are able to sag off of him just enough to have the advantage if he does want to drive without getting consistently burned with a jumper.

3) He does not seem comfortable off of the dribble. Forget about having moves, he often doesn't look smooth. Look at the ISU video closely, there are at least two or three times he is driving into the chest of a defender and doesn't even get a good shot off. It's like he struggles coordinating his legs to jump while using his body to shield.

I disagree with Ace in one aspect. A player can learn moves during the season. There is enough support both with coaches and film breakdown. If you go back to the three points above, that gets a little harder to make a big difference on during the season.

Also, this was not meant to bash the kid in any way. These are just my observations.

NoVaWolverine

December 12th, 2013 at 2:44 PM ^

Your point #1 re: the contrast b/w GRIII's lack of post game and the Big Dog's masterful post game raises a question: Why wouldn't GRIII spend all summer learning his Dad's best post-up moves from the man himself, a la LeBron spending a summer learning post-up moves from Hakeem a couple years ago?

I realize that might not fit into what Beilein wants to do on offense with the 3 or 4 spot, but it seems like a no-brainer option for adding san arrow to GRIII's offensive quiver. 

Otisthebigdog

December 11th, 2013 at 7:19 PM ^

He's playing a new position this year. I have heard he worked hard on his ball-handling skills this past summer, this will eventually show out. He doesn't seem to have the motor his father had, but I'm betting that will come out yet. And I also think JB has him reigned in a little bit. But I'm betting that's JB's way of forcing him to develop half court skills instead of just top ten dunks of the week.

Prince Lover

December 12th, 2013 at 2:09 AM ^

How many NBA gm's are wiping their brow, thankful he wasn't there in last year's draft? He was a hot commodity and there would have been pressure to take him by some teams I'm sure.

Uncle Rico

December 12th, 2013 at 1:02 PM ^

My pet peeve in basketball analysis is bashing the 'long two'.  At any level of basketball, if the shooter is in rhythm, and has a good look, take the shot.  If you're GRIII, you're doing your team more harm than good by passing up an open look.  The 1:48 mark Ace references is a perfect example of this.  The 3 would have been contested, and his pull-up two off the dribble was great - got him into reasonably open space, feet squared and in rhythm - it just didn't go in.

And in response to another poster comparing him to his dad, Big Dog, (which, take it or leave it) I recollect him being an assassin with the pull-up, mid-range J.  His stats show he took 3x the 2pt attempts as the 3pt attempts.  

If you agree with regressing to the mean, then according Dylan's (UM Hoops) analysis, GRIII's best chance for improvement is from 2pt FG%.  It also seems like GRIII isn't great at finishing in traffic.  So, ...... I say let's see MORE mid-range driving and popping.  Those shots will start falling, and this can improve over the course of the season as he gets more comfortable with the new offensive flow and works out of his current shooting slump.