[Patrick Barron]

And Then It Got Worse Comment Count

Brian October 23rd, 2023 at 12:48 PM

10/21/2023 – Michigan 49, Michigan State 0 – 8-0, 5-0 Big Ten

Somewhere in this country there is a person making approximately minimum wage who is tasked with finding benign videos to put on scoreboards across the country. It is a hideously dull job and he or she spends most of their time at work staring blankly at a screen, half focused. When something useful shows up, it's bookmarked and put in a bin.

This person is not watching question #28 in a 40-question quiz that takes 16 minutes to get through. After the second question is "what are crayons made of" they put it in the Michigan State bin on the off chance it convinces Spartans to draw with the things instead of eating them*. Then they spend 15 minutes playing solitaire. Some weeks or months later, a jaunty Hitler shows up on the Spartan Stadium scoreboard next to an ad for Meijer.

That person did not have a bad day on Saturday. That person got fired, shrugged, and had an edible.

That person's boss had a bad day. And that person's boss, and that person's boss, and so forth and so on up the chain until we reach the Michigan State administrator who chewed out a person at Company X after being chewed out himself.

These people have living wages and car payments. Our quiz selector has… edibles. You can only lose something if you felt like you had something. The person at the bottom of the totem pole with a life of dull-eyed drudgery stretching out for eons in front of them feels nothing.

This is the bright side for Michigan State fans.

------------------------------------------------

On the other side of the equation, Michigan dominated a rivalry game to an extent not seen since the 1950s. Every box was checked: abject humiliation, fancy QB stats, taking over the opponent's stadium in the first quarter, revenge for all the various offenses perpetrated.

In the aftermath, Michigan sang a very silly song at piercing volume…

…and Mike Sainristil took 12 seconds at the end of his NBC interview—12 seconds NBC did not want to give him—to say "real quick, hey, c'mere, c'mere—real quick."

At this point the interviewer interjects with "Mikey, thanks so much" because she has been directed from on high to get this back to the studio. Mike Sainristil says no, you will not do this, and then he grabs Ja'Den McBurrows and says "the adversity he went through, what happened last year in that tunnel, to come out and have game like he did tonight—an interception, three-four tackles—Ja'Den McBurrows! Stay tuned!"

As he is doing this, JJ McCarthy is putting the imaginary crown on McBurrows, like he does everyone who scores a touchdown, or blocks for a touchdown, or happens to be in the area when a touchdown happens. It feels like he is overjoyed that he can put a crown on someone on defense for once.

Here it is: Michigan does not forgive or forget. But the way they get revenge is to go about their business. Michigan didn't endanger anyone's health or safety outside the rule book Saturday, as the Michigan State athletic department ludicrously suggested they might. They treated Michigan State just like any other opponent… mostly.

It was in the back of their heads, the way a one-sided assault on two innocent players had been both-sided by the media, the way an as-yet unsubstantiated report has caused the college football media's various MSU/OSU partisans and Medill graduates to wishcast absurd punishments on the nation's most dominant team. McBurrows responded by coming after the beatdown had commenced and simply continuing it. Michigan put German Green, Gemon's twin brother, on the field for the last snap and he came up with a TFL.

There's no need for revenge. The fact that this is Michigan's team and that is Michigan State's team is revenge enough.

53275959949_18051273fc_k

[Barron]

*[Quiz questions that get filed in the Michigan bin include "What was Erwin Rommel's fatal mistake during the Siege of Tobruk?" and "What is your most passionately held opinion you have absolutely no evidence to support?"]

AWARDS

Known Friends and Trusted Agents Of The Week

53277701290_b90acc5f08_k

[Barron]

you're the man now, dog-2535ac8789d1b499[1]

#1 JJ McCarthy. A confession: I do try to switch it up in the Known Friends and Trusted Agents to prevent the monotony of the same guy being at the top constantly. This is not really possible this year. Your new Heisman favorite was 21/27 for 287 yards and four TDs in 40 minutes of gametime. Agog.

#2(T) AJ Barner and Colston Loveland. Harbaugh probably thought the rapture was going on as Michigan beat MSU 49-0 and his top two tight ends combined for 178 receiving yards and three touchdowns—and it would have been four but for a Donovan Edwards flinch at the end of the half. Barner mostly shed whatever reputation he might have had as a blocking tight end with a bevy of downfield catches, some contested and others difficult. Barner continues to turn in improbable YAC events. Loveland, meanwhile, is pure death whenever he gets a LB assignment. Five points each; they deserve it.

#3 Ja'Den McBurrows. Had an interception and a TFL; had a couple more good tackles in space; dominated a slant route and only failed to get a PBU on it because the ball was wide. Given the dispersion of defensive snaps—he tied for fourth in tackles!—this is only kinda sorta about last year. Dude looked like a worthy replacement for Sainristil. As the man himself said, stay tuned.

Honorable mentionMike Sainristil had an admittedly free pick six and, more importantly for this section, demanded that NBC not cut away until he could shout out McBurrows. Junior Colson was everywhere; Derrick Moore had a thunderous sack and only missed a second by a bare margin. Kris Jenkins and Mason Graham were entirely unblockable.

KFaTAotW Standings.

(points: #1: 8, #2: 5, #3: 3, HMs one each. Ties result in somewhat arbitrary assignments.)

43: JJ McCarthy (#1 ECU, #1 UNLV, #2 Rutgers, HM Nebraska, #2 Minn, #1 IU, #1 MSU)
23: Kris Jenkins (HM ECU, T2 UNLV, #1 BGSU, HM Rutgers, #1 Neb, HM MSU)
15: Mason Graham (HM ECU, T2 UNLV, #1 Minn, HM IU, HM MSU)
13: Mike Sainristil (T3 ECU, HM BGSU, #1 Rutgers, HM IU, HM MSU)
10: Blake Corum (HM ECU, HM UNLV, #2 BGSU, HM Rutgers, HM Neb, HM IU), AJ Barner (HM BGSU, HM Neb, HM Minn, T3 IU, T2 MSU)
9: Roman Wilson (T2 ECU, HM UNLV, HM BGSU, #3 Nebraska)
8: Mike Barrett (HM UNLV, T3 Rutgers, #2 IU), Colston Loveland (HM Rutgers, T3 IU, T2 MSU)
7: Braiden McGregor(T3 UNLV, #2 Nebraska), Cornelius Johnson (T2 ECU, HM UNLV, HM BGSU, HM Minn)
6: Kenneth Grant (T3 ECU, T2 UNLV), Junior Colson (#3 BGSU, T3 Rutgers, HM MSU)
4: Ernest Hausmann (T3 ECU, T3 Rutgers), Max Bredeson (HM Rutgers, HM Neb, T3 IU), Derrick Moore (T3 UNLV, HM Neb, HM MSU)
3: Will Johnson(#3 Minn), Jaylen Harrell (HM UNLV, HM BGSU, HM IU)
2:  Josh Wallace (T3 ECU)
1: Tommy Doman (HM ECU), Donovan Edwards (HM ECU), Tyler Morris (HM UNLV), Semaj Morgan (HM Rutgers),Quinten Johnson (HM Rutgers), Kalel Mullings (HM Minn), The Offensive Line (HM Minn), Keon Sabb (HM Minn), Josiah Stewart (HM Minn), Ben Hall (HM IU)

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

JJ McCarthy gets set up with a third and thirteen on Michigan's first drive, gets late pressure, moves out of the pocket, and calmly nails AJ Barner to convert. In itself, not incredible. As an emblem of JJ McCarthy in this game, ah yup.

Honorable mention:  uh… everything else.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK: SPECIAL EDITION

Since literally one thing of import went wrong AND MSU center Nick Samac deployed the double bird IN HIS OWN STADIUM, IN THE THIRD QUARTER, this section is dedicated to birds, not bad things that happened. About a dozen people @'d me on Twitter about this even before I asked, and there was a lot of discussion about replacing Marcus Hall with Samac.

I don't want to do this, because Marcus Hall got ejected from a Michigan-Ohio State game that Ohio State won; his birds were a roar of defiance. Say what you want about Ohio State but they're not ankle biters. I feel like having the bad things about a game represented by Hall is fine. My man did some dumb shit and went out on his own terms. There's a level of respect in this section.

Samac's birds were pathetic. MSU was down a billion, Michigan fans had taken over his home stadium, and per Seth's reckoning the Michigan fans' response was to sing "For He's A Jolly Good Fellow" at him. I'm not dumping Hall for this joker. Just compare the two screenshots we have. Hall is out there with it; Samac seems embarrassed, because he should be.

What I am doing: NICK SAMAC PATHETIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK. I'm not going to issue this after every game, only ones in which something unsporting, cowardly, incredibly stupid, infuriating, unethical, or downright-not-right happens. I'm guessing it'll be about a third of Michigan games and 100% of Michigan-Michigan State games.

Honorable mention: The illegal motion at the end of the half takes a touchdown off the board.

NICK SAMAC PATHETIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEKsamac

Spencer Brown gets ejected for a an ultra-targeting on Braiden McGregor:

I'd say suspend him but it's probably meaner to let him play.

Dishonorable mention: Nick Samac issues double birds to Michigan fans that have taken over Spartan Stadium up 42-0 in the third quarter. MSU takes three personal fouls in two plays in the third quarter. A cheap shot on Alex Orji gives Michigan a shot at a seventh touchdown that they take. The replay official in Iowa-Minnesota takes a Cooper DeJean punt return TD off the board for a ticky-tack invalid fair catch signal.

[After THE JUMP: JJ out of pocket]

OFFENSE

A youtube feature. Got a note from a guy who wanted to see the embedded plays multiple times, which is not as easy as hitting the "again" button when it's a subclip from a larger video. Solution: the left arrow button will take you back five seconds.

53274670642_5539ab1e51_k

[Fuller]

Why even rush? For a second consecutive week, JJ McCarthy was beyond lethal when allowed to leave the pocket. Defenses are going to have to make a Hobson's choice between keeping him contained but letting him have time to pick apart zones and getting this on their faces:

Neither of these choices prevents McCarthy from wrecking you.

Note that the OL does have a role in making this happen, because when they give up a pressure it is almost always just one guy. In this example the DT who stunts outside gets put on the ground by Zinter. That gives McCarthy the room to WOOP the looper, and then it's game over. Many quarterbacks can avoid one guy (not Drew Allar) and make something productive happen afterwards (not Drew Allar). When I charted the defense I often said something like you need two pressures to sack a QB unless you get a +3 from someone; when Michigan gives up a pressure it is almost always just one guy, and it's almost never a +3 kind of rush.

Updated JJ under pressure stats: 64% completions, 11.6 YPA. His YPA when kept clean is 10.4. Pressuring JJ McCarthy is worse for your defense.

The Loveland strikes. Both of Colston Loveland's touchdowns were "oh my god" throws. The second is just obvious:

If you're wondering what a +3 UFR throw is: it's that.

The first, though, appears to be McCarthy reading that Angelo Grose is going to have to flip his hips around to get back to Loveland; the ball is out as soon as McCarthy sees the lateral separation between Loveland and Grose and is there before Grose can get all the way around and get even a desperate poke at the ball. Stay for the replays:

That was indeed a free play—Noah Eagle's call there was confusing—so maybe McCarthy is incentivized to make a riskier throw, but that's not risky. It's deadly.

The one JJ nit. For the second straight week we've got a completion that is a bit of a hair-raising experience:

This is a bit different than last week's against Indiana. That one looked like McCarthy did not see a robber and may have been fortunate to throw a ball behind Cornelius Johnson. This one is just late. Ideally the ball is out when Barner comes out of his break but there's a couple beats before McCarthy gets there. Also if this ball is off the likely outcome is a PBU, not an INT.

I'm not too concerned about this since McCarthy is doing this approximately once per game. PFF has him for 5 turnover worthy throws on the year, three of which came against BGSU. That's two(2) in the other seven games.

53274671552_736388f7f7_k

[Fuller]

An Edwards thing. Michigan converted a third and thirteen on an Edwards flare screen:

I think Wilson might get away with that in the charting because the reason he gets blown back is the MSU defensive back gets over-aggressive and ends up falling as a result. Anyway: this is a very good Edwards use because he is stupid fast and going all speed in space is likely to be productive. Given the way they're able to use their tight ends I'd like to see versions of this play with Loveland and Barner out there; those guys aren't screen tips when lined up out wide.

Screens have never been a major part of a Harbaugh offense at Michigan, even when the offensive coordinator arrived proclaiming that his offense was going to literally be "speed in space," and this year isn't much different. Amongst QBs with at least 100 attempts McCarthy is 126th of 150 qualifiers in screen rate. (Gavin Wimsatt, of all people, is dead last; Joe Milton, of all people, is #1.) I'm not saying this is wrong when they score touchdown after touchdown, but it does feel like a couple more Edwards screens a game would be productive.

Michigan potentially had a second lined up when they went to a very weird formation where all three guys to the trips side lined up on the LOS but whatever read they had on indicated a give to Corum, who picked up five.

53276023360_b7ebe6f2bc_k

[Fuller]

A Barner thing. Barner is oddly good at getting YAC. In this game he had one catch where he was able to extend himself another couple yards to convert a second and ten, and then there was this near the end of the half:

Alex was right when he suggested Barner could be an All Big Ten tight end. I'm not sure I'd trade him for anyone in the country right now. Brock Bowers is incredible but on this team I'm taking the guy who is an elite blocker and can do stuff like that downfield as a treat.

Another Morgan blip. Hard-earned experience about little slot dudes makes me skeptical they're going to have an impact unless they get targeted downfield, so I'm more intrigued by this Tuttle dart to Semaj Morgan than the preceding tunnel screen jaunt:

That's two tough catches downfield for Morgan, and another indicator he's going to be a guy.

The other cheap shot. No replay of this on the broadcast but just watch Orji on this play:

The final touchdown was richly deserved.

DEFENSE

53275574061_fa954a0e06_k

[Barron]

The stuff. MSU's first drive ended on a fourth and two that went nowhere; unfortunately the video does not show Michigan's line shift before the play but:

You have Braiden McGregor moving down to become a four-tech and on the other side of the line Jaylen Harrell will back out into the flat. A twist on the frontside gets Jenkins through, erasing those gaps, and forces Carter to an overloaded backside where Rod Moore and either Colson or Barrett are unblocked.

Later in the game MSU attempted third and short that saw them make a quick pitch to the boundary; Michigan had this same thing on and Harrell backed into the flat, cutting off the outside and letting Hausmann get a TFL.

When motion lies. Loved this disguise from Minter. Slot moves across the formation, Sainristil goes with him. Presnap assumption is man coverage, and it is… except for Wallace running trap two:

We're getting more of these whoopsie throws as the season goes along and Minter mixes in coverages that defeat the little hitches and outs that were annoyances against Rutgers.

53277150191_ae8a653f1b_k

[Barron]

Playin' a few weird guys. This was exactly the thing you'd expect when Michigan played Yet Another Overmatched Offense, so maybe the most interesting thing on this side of the ball were early cameos from DJ Waller and Amorion Walker. Waller was in position to intercept on a corner route that ended up wide and short because of pressure; Walker got the PBU you see above on an out route.

Early in the year Keshaun Harris was starting in Will Johnson's stead and we were hoping that maybe Jyaire Hill would come on late. It's unclear whether Hill is still hurt (he wasn't on the injury report but it's possible Michigan doesn't put guys who didn't travel on the report), but Waller and Walker getting first-half snaps seems to indicate that they've climbed up the depth chart to be CBs 3 and 4. In Walker's case especially that seems like a good sign for next year. He's the highest-upside option in the CB room.

Switching it up. Michigan's DT rotations have generally been Graham and Jenkins together with two of Benny/Goode/Grant in unit two. In this game Michigan played a lot of snaps with Graham or Jenkins, which is kind of like when you break up your top line on a hockey team. I'm still hoping we get a preponderance of Graham/Jenkins in the closing stretch. Rotation is good but I'd rather see more 70/30 than 50/50.

I'm still not sure Michigan has a dominant DE, but… PFF charted Michigan with 20 pressures on 29 pass drops. Nobody had more than 3 individually because no one rushed the passer more than 16 times. And PFF's grading is kind of nuts in this department.

  • Derrick Moore: 89 grade, 20% win rate
  • Jaylen Harrell: 88 grade, 19% win rate
  • Mason Graham: 80 grade, 15% win rate
  • Josiah Stewart, 79 grade, 25% win rate
  • Braiden McGregor: 74 grade, 17% win rate

This is a spot where performance is extremely dependent on level of opposition, so judgment should still be withheld. MSU's offensive line is not great but neither is it outright bad; this was a step towards belief that this will continue against PSU and OSU.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Nah. Not relevant. Seems like Tyler Morris won the full time punt return job.

MISCELLANEOUS

53274672542_9977a519ee_k

[Fuller]

Can we stop with the ultra-delayed touchdown signals? I'm not sure when this started happening but these days you can be lying on top of a teammate three yards in the endzone and the line judges will take five seconds to indicate that, yes, this event that is physically impossible to not be a touchdown is a touchdown. When you are a football paranoid like myself that five seconds is an interminable period of conspiracy-addled thinking. The Roman Wilson overturn against TCU has only made this worse. Won't someone think of the football paranoids?

The only Rutger. This game narrowly missed various Rutger events. For the second time this year Michigan scored exactly as many points as opposition rushing yards, and the Iowutger—more INT return yards than passing yards—didn't hold up. But we do have one unsurpassable Rutger: the Hitlutger, where you have more Hitlers on your scoreboard than points. Unless Michigan plays Liberty that's never being matched.

End of half discussion. On the one hand that was maybe the best two minute drill Michigan has run in Harbaugh's tenure. On the other, there were two critical mistakes. One was the six yard run that caused Michigan to take its final timeout. I don't mind that when you have multiple timeouts but for the very reason we saw, it is not worth the minor surprise of a run. Especially when your QB is a flamethrower.

The second mistake was McCarthy's; he dumped it down to Edwards once Michigan got to the ten yard line, causing the clock to run. This resulted in the scramble drill and the Edwards penalty.

That said, Michigan got off a play with twelve seconds and scored a touchdown; if that was incomplete they would have eight seconds, easily enough to throw it into the endzone on third and goal and still have a field goal attempt. So maybe it was all fine?

As far as the penalty goes: yes, I believe it was correct. You can go in motion backwards but the whole offense has to be set for one second and I don't think Edwards was. So they call a false start and it did look like the clock had just ticked down to ten seconds before the snap. Alas.

KINGS OF WIKIPEDIA. Shot:

Chaser:

This has since been changed, but we can edit war it back. I believe in Michigan Wikipedia editors.

Larger view. The weekly occurrence:

F9ISBm7bEAAQ4Ts

Michigan's lead at the top of SP+ is now sort of terrifyingly large:

image

Georgia's season-ending gap over #2 Alabama was 6 points a year ago. Michigan is also #1 in Resume SP+, which is defined thusly:

It is a look at two things: (1) how the average SP+ top-five team would be projected to perform against your schedule (in terms of scoring margin), and (2) how your scoring margin compares to (1).

I'm much more interested in the predictive version of SP+ but it is interesting that the ain't played nobody accusations don't prevent computers from saying "gosh dang!" when presented with what Michigan has done to date. This weekend alone, Washington barely escaped against Arizona State; Oklahoma barely escaped UCF; Texas scraped by Houston. Consistently sending bad teams to Tartarus is the mark of a potential national champion.

Also, remember our relative consternation during the nonconference portion of the schedule and theories that Michigan was basically treating it like the preseason? Seems accurate:

Michigan has been No. 1 in SP+ for four games now and has exceeded projections by 19.3 points per game in that span -- SP+ knows the Wolverines are the best team in the country at the moment but hasn't caught up to how good they actually are yet. That's a scary thought.

The faffing about with the tackles and outside zone and massive defensive rotation is baked into those numbers and they're still those numbers.

A dollar to the headline man. Well done:

Michigan football steals all signs of hope from Spartans during emphatic shutout victory in rivalry game

NBC takes. I generally like the NBC broadcasts aside from the cringy use of Smashmouth Equivalent to open the game. There's more pregame and postgame frippery; the reviews are plentiful and useful; the camera is not zoomed in to a silly extent. One minor irritation from this game was a tendency to not show an injured player being treated, leaving one wondering just why in the hell we're looking at teams huddling on the sideline instead of playing football.

HERE

I hope you're reading Best and Worst every week and I demand that you do this week, because bronxblue absolutely nails Michigan State's program in a diatribe I want to frame:

Up until about 4 days ago, the big story surrounding this game was what happened last year, where a number of mostly-former Spartan players attacked a couple of Michigan defenders in the tunnel after the game.  The video was pretty conclusive the order of operations, who was responsible, and how, frankly, dangerous it was and could have gotten.  To his credit, Mel Tucker did come out and condemn the actions of those players and the MSU athletic department suspended them, and at least one player faced criminal charges.  Yes, I’m giving credit to a millionaire and a major athletic department for acknowledging that smashing some players with helmets after a football game isn’t copacetic, but (gesticulates toward East Lansing), you know, take what you can get.  Now, that didn’t stop Sparty faithful in the media, from Graham Couch to something called a Jim Comparoni, to either (at best) both-sides the assault or (at worst) frame it as something Michigan “deserved”, and in general the MSU fans and the program took on a veneer of victimhood, that Michigan had instigated this issue by having a single tunnel and it was inevitable that this powder keg would go off a mere century later.  It always rang hollow, as a program that once talked about pride, toughness, and “60 minutes of unnecessary roughness” lacked the ability to now plead for temperance and composure exactly when they were no longer the bully on the block.

It escalates from there.

The State of Our Open Threads:

Indeed, if you're a Michigan fan, you probably feel fucking great at the moment, and we should, and given the data from the open thread, the only regret might have been that we didn't score more, and maybe some of the idiocy from the refs on the odd weak call (Edwards not being set, so they say, the late hit which was really a failure to cease momentum, etc...). It's all certainly a departure from how this game has made us feel in the past, at least at various points. Here, for example, is a history of fucks given for Michigan State in the Harbaugh era to date:

Buried in that chart, of course, is a certain snap, a driving rain, a season that was brief and forgettable, and Kenneth Walker, but also so many smaller frustrations. Buried in it are some highlights as well, of course, including "Defeated With Dignity" and last night, which was "Defeated Without Mercy, As It Should Be".

Even so, 135 fucks given was our highest total of the season so far, and as you might guess, MSU has traditionally been one of the highest in seasons past, generally being in the top three among fucks given. First, of course, is OSU almost always, so whenever a Spartan fan tries to discount that rivalry and tout theirs as the most important to us, well, they don't know and the data isn't there either.

Iowatch!

One-Phase Football

No ranking changes from last week. Iowa’s defensive SP+ rating actually improved this week…and their offensive SP+ rating…did the opposite of that.

As a casual fan of Greek Tragedies, I often wonder about causality: does Iowa have the best defense in the country because they play some of the worst offenses in the country, or does Iowa’s defense make their opponents’ offenses so bad? I’m honestly leaning towards the former, but there IS a tipping point; Wisconsin came into last week’s game with a pretty decent 38th ranking in SP+ offense, and Iowa shut them down hard.

Stats/Takes:

A NEW HEISMAN FRONTRUNNER

I was pretty pessimistic last week that J.J. McCarthy’s absurd efficiency could win out over Michael Penix Jr.’s absurd volume and nearly-as-absurd efficiency. Then, Penix posted a poo-poo (65.9% completions; 6.7 Y/A; zero TDs; two INTs) against Arizona State (who people point to being poo-poo, but they actually have a solid pass defense [26th in adjusted EPA against the pass] which is worth mentioning) and now McCarthy is Vegas’ betting favorite to win the Heisman. Below is a table with the five players (all QBs) with odds of +1200 or better on FanDuel.

LSU fans will probably be clawing up the walls if we don’t address the fact that, yes, Jayden Daniels has better rushing numbers than McCarthy, or, should we say, more rushing numbers. He has 624 yards and five TDs on the season to McCarthy’s 219 yards and three TDs, but McCarthy bests him in Y/C (8.4 to 8.2), in missed tackles forced per carry (0.43 to 0.37), in 10+ yard runs per carry (0.31 to 0.28), and in PFF’s elusiveness score (112.1 to 98.4). Especially considering what Oklahoma did against UCF this week, this case is closed until further notice.

Comments

FreddieMercuryHayes

October 23rd, 2023 at 1:08 PM ^

I think I saw something that said it was a student at MSU who was in charge of/put the YouTube quiz on the board.  So yeah, I'm guessing making less than minimum wage if that is true.  In all honesty, it's a fuck up, but a pretty benign one in the grand scheme of things and most likely one of those honest human fuck ups we all do throughout our lives.  At least it wasn't some healthcare worker where someone ends up in the hospital or worse when they do one of those fuck ups.

J. Redux

October 23rd, 2023 at 1:19 PM ^

I'm sure it was an honest mistake and not an intentional plot to link MSU forever with Smiling Hitler.  But there may still be repercussions.  Unless MSU has an agreement in place with Google, you can't just broadcast YouTube videos to 70K people.  And, even though it was a free quiz, unless the creator explicitly marked it as public domain, or gave a license to allow its use in public performances, it may also be a violation of the Copyright Act.

Whoever greenlit the plan to have a student pick YouTube videos to entertain the crowd is going to be delivering for Little Caesar's by the end of the week.

DaftPunk

October 23rd, 2023 at 2:42 PM ^

FWIW 

The idea that 'medical errors are the third leading cause of death' has become a powerful cultural meme immune to correction.

The rebukes point out many fatal flaws: Medical error death rates extrapolate from small samples, generalize local data to national contexts, ignore the limited life expectancy of many patients, and gloss over the myriad uncertainties in defining error, preventability, and causality. Yet the idea that "medical errors are the third leading cause of death" has become a powerful cultural meme immune to correction. This claim shows up in newspaper articles and TV shows. It's been repeated on the floor of the Senate. Nursing unions have used the "third leading cause of death" mantra to advocate for new legislation. A sensational patient safety documentary relies on it. It's even been spotted in a college sociology textbook

Follow the links, learn the data, read with an open mind.  It's the Michigan difference, right?

 

WindyCityBlue

October 23rd, 2023 at 2:56 PM ^

I'm in the business and I do keep a close eye on this.  Below is a recent article that took a closer look at the studies and used larger sample sizes to determine that, yes, healthcare workers kill a shit ton of people by accident in the US.

 

https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-07-20/new-report-measures-scope-of-damage-from-medical-mistakes

GBBlue

October 23rd, 2023 at 2:25 PM ^

More than half of college football controversies are just like this. People, especially rival fan bases, pretend they're outraged (BurgerGate, Sign Larceny) when, in reality, they're up to their gills in schadenfreude. Smiling Scoreboard Hitler is the same. No sentient being believes there was malicious intent, just an obvious screw up.

But what a screw up it was! Hitler? Hitler?! Posing there like he's about to pick up his date for Prom? Terrible, but terribly hilarious. It's also laugh-out-loud funny that just as Spartans are enjoying their favorite thing in life -- something bad happening to Michigan -- they step on the story through sheer incompetence.

For the umpteenth time, the universe is trying to tell them something, but they just won't listen.

Blau

October 23rd, 2023 at 2:54 PM ^

The MSU quiz gaffe has "copy/paste and call it good" written all over it and that's a bad thing when hosting 75,000+ attendees with a giant screen at night. Somebody last week made a board post about why UM can't get the sound right for some highlights/clips at home games and I responded that I hope operators/staff do a dry run of sorts before game day.

It goes without saying this is another reason a run-through is important. 

Mgrad92

October 23rd, 2023 at 3:19 PM ^

There's a reason fuckups on this scale don't happen just everywhere, tho'. On one hand yeah, no one was warning MSU there was a Hitler kiss-cam appearance coming, exactly — but on the other hand it's the kind of accident that's not an accident; it's the predictable outcome of an administration not having its shit together.

JHumich

October 23rd, 2023 at 1:10 PM ^

That's a big chunk of the roster in the KFaTAotW Standings. And many wonderful, exceedingly joyous things for Brian to write about and us to read. 

We never could have understood, during the BPONE years, how good this would be when it came. (and of course, in BPONE, many never even had hope that it would come).

Who's got it better than us?

winterblue75

October 23rd, 2023 at 1:23 PM ^

I know it's out there somewhere, but does the CFP committee look at advanced metrics or are they just 12? old guys thinking they know what's best? I have an irrational fear that all they are doing is listening to idiots on TV saying that UM hasn't played anybody and that the initial rankings are going to be:

1. UGA

2. OSU

3. FSU

4. UW

with UM and OU on the outside (for now)

stephenrjking

October 23rd, 2023 at 1:33 PM ^

They view advanced metrics.

If they rank OSU, FSU, and UW above their AP position, it will be because they have high quality wins.

But that means UGA will be ranked lower, too. Worse than us.

The committee has, in its history, generally been pretty fair. Certainly never absurd.

Besides, Michigan plays Ohio State later on. It will work out just fine. 

Carpetbagger

October 23rd, 2023 at 1:48 PM ^

Yeah, no idea why people get vexed over ratings nowadays. Big 10 champ and SEC champ are going, unless something stupid happens like Iowa wins the B10CG 5 to 0 or something.

Runner ups for those conferences will be considered if they are OSU/Michigan/Georgia/Alabama. However, they are only considered if there is not two other P5 conference champs with 1 loss.

Buy Bushwood

October 23rd, 2023 at 2:43 PM ^

They were pretty absurd last year when the demoted USC for losing a conference championship game (to the only team that had beaten them that year) while OSU sat home with a zero-risk weekend and got to move up simply by proximity.  Both teams had a common quality opponent in ND.  

The committee should have published rules that the only teams that can move up after conference championship week are teams that played.  

Buy Bushwood

October 25th, 2023 at 12:59 PM ^

That's silly.  Alabama is always the best team.  And, despite our horrendous gaff, TCU was not one of the 4 best teams.  Their job should be to pick the 4 best resumes, not try and interpret who the 4 best teams are.  What if OSU had had to face UM again the B1G Championship and lost again?  Then what?  That's exactly what happened to USC.  Would another loss to UM mean OSU wasn't in the 4 best teams.   

Goblue89

October 23rd, 2023 at 1:24 PM ^

Regarding Jyaire Hill, I could have sworn I heard/saw Sam (or maybe Steve) allude to some off-field shenanigans with him.  Didn't sound serious, but I think that might be why he's not playing.

stephenrjking

October 23rd, 2023 at 1:27 PM ^

Michigan hasn't played anybody...

Is sort of true. Ohio State has two really good-looking wins, and FSU, Oklahoma, and Washington have one each.

But:

Michigan has played four teams that are currently above .500, and BG is 4-4. Three of those winning teams are in our conference (surprise, it's Rutgers, Minnesota, and... Nebraska). 

Michigan has eviscerated all of them.

Georgia has played one team with a winning record, a decent Kentucky team, and they trucked them. But they've looked only ok against a schedule that includes 1-win Vanderbilt, 1-win South Carolina, and losing-record Auburn.

I'm still waiting to see how Michigan performs under the real pressure of a road test at Penn State and you-know-who and the end of the season. But what Michigan has done so far could not be better, and they've done it in a way that suggests it can be scaled up to the biggest opponents. As Brian says, teams that do this are serious national title contenders.

BTW, regarding the column: most fun I've had reading one this season. Outstanding. (Could have done without the Liberty shot given current events, but whatever). These two lines:

This is the bright side for Michigan State fans.

and

There's no need for revenge. The fact that this is Michigan's team and that is Michigan State's team is revenge enough.

shoud be textbook reading for classes in knife-twisting in either english composition or various martial arts disciplines.

CompleteLunacy

October 23rd, 2023 at 2:00 PM ^

All of this, and I'd add that I'm baffled as to why so many have selective amnesia about Michigan. "We just don't know how good they are until they play PSU and OSU".  

While technically true, this also isn't 2021 Michigan or 2023 PSU, where each program had to that point more often than not fielded a generally great team who just couldn't seem to get over that last hump to make it to elite. The doubts were there. They were real. 

No, this is 2023 Michigan. A team that lost ZERO regular season games last year, and returned most of its talent this year.  A team that is bludgeoning everybody on their schedule - weak or not, that includes now 5 Big Ten opponents, and three opponents who have winning records. Mediocre schedule so far, sure, but it's not like they're playing the worst team in CFB every week.  

They're elite. They look elite. Advanced stats consistently say they're elite. I don't think it's some unknown question mark. Of course, this being sports, nothing is guaranteed and heavy favorites can and do get upset sometimes. But that's the fun of sports, if it were guaranteed what's the point of watching at all?

stephenrjking

October 23rd, 2023 at 3:00 PM ^

That’s not loose or tenuous. That’s non-existent. He’s citing the strategy of known malevolent forces, as a danger. It is no more a connection than a member of Michigan’s staff stating  “Ryan Day recruits talented receivers” as a motivating factor for recruiting good defensive backs is an endorsement of Ryan Day.

I’d give a pass on the usual “hur hur Evangelicals are fascists” bit most of the time—I regularly attack Liberty publicly!— but not this month, not right now. 

blueheron

October 23rd, 2023 at 4:55 PM ^

Eh, here's what Brian wrote:

But we do have one unsurpassable Rutger: the Hitlutger, where you have more Hitlers on your scoreboard than points. Unless Michigan plays Liberty that's never being matched.

I'd argue that a university spokesperson is effectively a scoreboard. Hitler is being mentioned in a very public way. Never mind (teldar) the context and the validity of the comparison. Because of the general touchiness, that's not something you see too often in corporate environments or higher education unless someone screwed up. (History classrooms, etc., are exempted.) Whether Evangelicals have fascist tendencies or not is beside the point.

My interpretation, anyway.

DaftPunk

October 23rd, 2023 at 5:48 PM ^

There's a big difference between saying "Oligarchs use their money to manipulate the political system to their favor," " or "all gender and sexual expressions are healthy and normal," in a Poli Sci or Sociology class, or whatever indoctrination to which you might refer in your comment, and indoctrination that leads to committing genocide.  It is an error of category, not degree, and not one of which reasonable people accuse other reasonable people with whom they have ideological disagreements. 
 
"My opponent has bad ideas which will harm the public" is not the same as "My opponent has bad ideas which lead to genocide."

njvictor

October 23rd, 2023 at 2:40 PM ^

Ohio State has two really good-looking wins

I mean they're solid wins, but "really good?" Notre Dame is a 2 loss team that OSU beat partly due to just straight up coaching incompetence at the end of the game. PSU was a team that always had a bad offense, but people just kinda ignored it until this weekend. I'm just not really sold on those 2 wins being that meaningful, but it also might just be a down year for CFB and those are good wins

NittanyFan

October 23rd, 2023 at 2:53 PM ^

ND and PSU are both Top 13 teams per FEI. 

Take that FWIW, but one thing I like about FEI is that it is translated into another metric: if a hypothetical Elite team (Elite = +2 standard deviations versus average) played this schedule, how many losses would they most likely have:

  • For Ohio State, they are 7-0 in actuality, and per FEI, if an elite team played their same schedule, they'd be 6.23-0.77.  So OSU is +0.77 here.
  • For Michigan, they are 8-0 in actuality, and per FEI, if an elite team played their same schedule, they'd be 7.91-0.09.  So U-M is +0.09 here.

That's essentially a "strength of resume"* rating.  It's not wrong to say OSU's resume is stronger than this point.

------

* FWIW - ALL undefeated teams necessarily have a positive number for this metric (call it "wins over elite").  Of the 9 currently undefeated teams, how they compare in rank order: Ohio State, Florida State, Oklahoma, Washington, Georgia, James Madison, Michigan, Liberty, Air Force.

https://www.bcftoys.com/2023-rs

J. Redux

October 23rd, 2023 at 3:19 PM ^

OK, but that particular metric loses a ton of data.

Michigan isn't merely beating its schedule, it's eviscerating it.  I'm not suggesting that it's a murderer's row, but I'll state flat out that OSU would not have dismantled the opposition to the extent that Michigan has -- and Michigan has been doing it largely without trying.  JJ McCarthy has something like four fourth-quarter snaps all season.  This is based on the highly scientific methodology of "OSU's win over Indiana would be Michigan's worst offensive output and smallest margin of victory of the season, and Michigan has also played Indiana."

Michigan is #1 in Résumé SP+ due to this.

Regardless, it'll be settled on the field.  If you're going to the game, I hope you have a great time.  But I think Michigan will win, and I'm not convinced it will be close.  If you can't score on OSU's defense, I don't think you can score on Michgan's, even in Happy Valley.

NittanyFan

October 23rd, 2023 at 4:07 PM ^

You're right on all of that ---- philosophically, it comes down to (1) should we judge a resume based on strict wins and losses or (2) should we judge a resume, based on wins and losses and margin of victory.

I admit to being more in camp 1.  Resume SP+ is in camp 2, of course.