Please explain this contradiction to me
- The inspiring story of a young athlete struggling to overcome the bad decisions in his past, and;
- The inspiring story of a coach who had the guts and compassion to take a risk on a troubled yet promising young man.
While the Glenn Winston situation represents:
- The story of a piece of shit criminal athlete, and;
- The story of a corrupt "win at all costs" coach whose lack of integrity allows him to welcome piece of shit criminal athletes into his program.
Please enlighten me.
February 5th, 2010 at 12:15 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:13 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:13 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:22 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:35 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:43 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:01 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:07 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:17 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:43 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:15 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 6:30 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:15 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:17 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:25 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:02 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:13 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:26 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:18 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:21 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:25 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:30 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:39 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:52 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:56 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:49 AM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:04 PM ^
Winston committed and was convicted of committing a violent crime. Demar Dorsey wasn't convicted of any crimes and never committed a violent crime.The kind of ignorance it takes for you to equate "convicted adult criminal" and "juvenile not convicted of anything" has to be willful, IMO. Stupid like that doesn't happen by accident, you worked hard to be this stupid. Heckuva job.
February 5th, 2010 at 1:24 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:07 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:09 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:45 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:19 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:36 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 12:44 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 1:07 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 1:14 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:47 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 1:28 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 1:41 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 5:42 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 1:45 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 1:44 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:43 PM ^
I'd suggest running back to RCMB where your groupthink mentality can justify a coach that allows 7 men that beat students of your eminent University back to represent said University as athletes.You mean as opposed to the groupthink mentality at this internet site which willfully ignores the irony of lauding one troubled athlete for receiving a "second chance" while condemning another for the same?
February 5th, 2010 at 2:59 PM ^
You mean as opposed to the groupthink mentality at this internet site which willfully ignores the irony of lauding one troubled athlete for receiving a "second chance" while condemning another for the same?You do understand that the biggest problem we have with this is not necessarily with MSU or Dantonio, but with the Freep's explicit double standard in its reporting on troubled athletes, right? Please tell me you're not this dumb. Nobody rational, here or on any other fanblog, is going to pretend that every team member is a saint and every team member of the opposition is a devil. There's good and bad everywhere, and it's all in how the coach deals with it. Everybody (rational) here understands that, and there's nothing in the comments here to suggest otherwise. But you can't tell me with a straight face the Freep understands the above. That's the problem. This is a conscious decision by the Freep to hold RichRod and Michigan to a different, higher, and arguably unreasonable standard than it holds Dantonio and MSU. Dorsey is the latest example, and there are plenty others. I'm wondering what kind of thrill travels up your leg when you argue in bad faith, as you've been doing on this thread all freaking day. Could you describe that feeling to me, and why you like it?
February 5th, 2010 at 6:35 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 7:03 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:15 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 7:18 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:00 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:18 PM ^