Meta: On Moderation

Submitted by vbnautilus on

Well it has been almost two weeks since the moderation system floated to the top of the page and then disappeared completely. During this time of great hardship I have learned to appreciate what I had in the past, and how important a moderation system is to a board like this. I have come to realize in its absence, how much I relied upon it. These days I have no mechanism at my disposal to avoid reading posts that lack insight, posts that contain grammatical errors, and those that are simply not funny. I am at a complete loss in identifying the currenty popular opinions in order to align myself with them; I can barely identify bandwagons to jump on to, and my motivation to post is at an all time low. How am I, a simple blog reader, to singlehandedly separate the wheat from the chaff, the sheep from the goats, in each individual thread?

If I look back at when this feeling began, I can trace it back more than two years to April 27th, 2011 when Brian first implemented the slashcomments system, effectively limiting the rainbow spectrum of communal expression to a palette of 5 basic colors. Trips to Darkest Bolivia were replaced with the less ominous "-1", and posts that inspired rolling laughter were now simply "Funny". There was much protest, but we continued on, and made do.

At certain moments it seemed that our respected leader was on the verge of delivering us back to the promised land. For instance, in October of 2012 he wrote to us:

I am planning a move to Drupal 7 as soon as it is feasible and will be starting that process as soon as the OSU game ends. Unfortunately, that process is going to take a while because some critical modules are still not updated. So the site will remain static until then; when I move to 7 the full glory of pos/negbangs will return. Prepare thy anus.

Nearly a year later our anuses remained at the ready, when things instead took a turn for the worse, and our 5 remaining colors faded to total blackness. All I can say is that during these difficult times we must stick together and keep on posting. We will post not in an ordered hierarchy of merit, rather we will post in a chaotic soup of equality, but we will post nonetheless. I have hope that one day this board will rise again, that one day excellent posts will again receive their rightful level of exaltation, and that terrible posts by trolls will be driven down depths of derision that they deserve. I have hope.

Nosce Te Ipsum

August 19th, 2013 at 6:26 PM ^

No system is perfect, least of all that one. Group think is, and forever will be, a folly of said system.

LSAClassOf2000

August 19th, 2013 at 6:28 PM ^

I will admit that I used the moderation system that was in place until recently to actually moderate the board to some extent. Long strings of "-1 Flamebait", for example, got an extra careful look. Now, it's very easy to get disoriented reading straight comment threads without any "cue", if you will. Granted, much of the time, it was just general sniping, but now and again, it was burying an actual board offense. 

Erik_in_Dayton

August 19th, 2013 at 6:35 PM ^

I liked being able to pat people on the back for posting something insightful or funny without having to clutter up the board with a post that just says something like "+1 funny."  I don't miss negging because I can stil do what I've always done, which is to respond to posts I don't like by finding out people's mailing addresses and then sending them a dead rat and/or a note that says, "please be more considerate :)." 

Erik_in_Dayton

August 19th, 2013 at 6:44 PM ^

I don't make those posts, and no, the follow-up post of course has nothing to do with being funny.  My point is that I Iiked being able to give positive feedback in some small way, i.e., upvoting, without cluttering up the board.  The point of upvoting to me is not to say to the board, "hey, this post is (funny/insightful/etc.)" but rather to say to the poster "thanks for posting this" or "that made me laugh." 

Nosce Te Ipsum

August 19th, 2013 at 6:53 PM ^

Is adulation really necessary? I don't understand why a comment needs any extra attention. If a commenter comments for the sole purpose of acclaim do they deserve any? If a poster posts to receive anything other than a question to lead to debate then why post? All other comments seem to fall into the pointless chasm that suck all other posts in with them.

In reply to by Nosce Te Ipsum

Fhshockey112002

August 19th, 2013 at 8:19 PM ^

Could just be me, but I liked when there were consequences for peoples posts/actions on the board.  It allowed good posters to be rewared with lots of points shortly, and punished trolls to the point of Bolivia. 

Nosce Te Ipsum

August 19th, 2013 at 9:11 PM ^

Is this blog learned enough to cast those people and their threads out? It used to be, but many of the intelligentsia of MGoBlog have abandoned their posts and have either left entirely or lurk, abashed at what this place has become.

BlueDragon

August 19th, 2013 at 9:35 PM ^

It's hard to incentivize people to want to take ownership of a message board, especially one where idiocy has taken root. Common sense could take care of 80% of the problems on the board but this is the Internet so that is a pipe dream. I think there is still room for intellectual growth on the board without a Lord of the Flies-style realignment some fear. The old moderation system had just enough incentive - and silliness - to motivate people to make the right decisions for the board, cat pictures and all.