Most Expensive Navy Carrier Ever Built Named After Gerald Ford

Submitted by Santa Clause on

Supercarrier named after the 38th President of the United States and Michigan's own Gerald Ford. It was a slow day on the board so I figured you guys/ladies might find this interesting.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/07/politics/us-navy-aircraft-carrier-shipbuilding-plan/

True Blue Grit

April 7th, 2016 at 6:25 PM ^

What an amazing ship.  I really liked the photo of the U.S.S. Ranger (CVN-61).  I spent a part of one summer in San Diego crawling and walking all over that ship on a repair project.  I gained a big appreciation for the engineering and technology behind these aircraft carriers.  

B-Nut-GoBlue

April 7th, 2016 at 6:29 PM ^

Funny story, sort of...maybe.

 

On vacay to Virginia Beach back in the mid-late 90's we drove up to Newport News and Norfolk and tooled around the areas...and at one point (in NN I assume) came to an area where we had a nice view of a newly-built/in-the-process of being built Carrier.  They were doing catapult testing and we could see things shooting off and flying into the water far below.  Pretty cool.  And then a tap on the window from somone saying to, in nicer words, "Put that videocamera down and get the fuck out of here this is "private property" and you're trespassing".

That carrier would become (well, was already) USS Harry S. Truman.

StephenRKass

April 7th, 2016 at 6:45 PM ^

Go on a tour of a ship if you ever get the opportunity. In a couple weeks, I will be on my daughter's Destroyer for a day cruise out of Norfolk. Looking forward to seeing the 5 inch guns in action, and how fast the thing goes and takes turns.

You can go on museum ships as well. I greatly enjoyed spending a day going through retired Battleship Wisconsin, which is in Norfolk, and retired Carrier Lexington, in Corpus Christi. Both were active through the early 90's. And for perspective, tour the German U-505 at the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago, or the USS Cod Sub in Cleveland. There are plenty of other ships out there too . . . the oldest I've been on is USS Texas out of Houston. When you think about everything that goes into the design and construction of any ship, whether a carrier, destroyer, submarine, or a different kind of ship, it is mind boggling. The precision needed, the welding, the wiring, all of it, is incredible.

As mentioned above in the thread, there is a distinct purpose for each kind of ship. At the very least, you need carriers (as a floating airbase that can go anywhere), submarines (stealth), destroyers (ballistic missile platform, speed, and protection for the rest of the fleet), along with LSD's to carry troops.

I could go on a long time, which I won't but there are some very good reasons why ships cost as much as they do. (yes, there are bad reasons too, but the ability to design and build a warship is something very few countries can do well). Regardless of your personal politics, we can appreciate those who serve in the military (and yes, I'm biased, because of both my father and daughter serving in the Navy).

1VaBlue1

April 7th, 2016 at 10:22 PM ^

Being qualified in submarines myself, I have a deep appreciation for the design and capability of complex machines of any kind.  But having seen, studied, and worked with the intricacies of submarines, I haven't seen anything that comes close, yet.  I'm sure they exist, I just haven't seen them.  I highly recommend touring a boat (submarine) if you get the chance, but also recommend any naval vessel for what they are.  The most impressive I've seen?  The USS Missouri in Pearl Harbor, the ship the Japanese surrendered on.  Fucking impressive!

ford_428cj

April 7th, 2016 at 9:57 PM ^

I'm sure our carriers have good defense against subs. We usually have a whole fleet of destroyers etc to accompany them. Plus our subs are lurking below as well. We have planes that search for subs also. 

 

 I'm thinking they should paint a winged helmet on the new carrier by his name!

BayWolves

April 8th, 2016 at 8:36 AM ^

Destroyers and carriers are sitting ducks for advanced subs these days. Also new hypersonic ballistic misses are a major threat that cannot be countered with today's carrier defenses. Carriers will soon be rethought but can still be used against third world countries, of course.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad