KRK

September 16th, 2022 at 11:41 AM ^

I feel like recruiting has fallen into the same trap as so many great black markets before it's time.  Once the politicians, finance guys, and lawyers figured out they could make money off it, all of the simplicity and charm was stripped away and out came budgets, contracts, and spreadsheets.  I miss the good old days.

MGlobules

September 16th, 2022 at 3:09 PM ^

I guess the question--one of them--is whether it remains more or less criminal//illicit activity, or is drawn into the light of day. To play devil's advocate: Spending 280 grand on a group of recruits begs the question whether you are treating your students fairly, let alone intelligently. What happens when a Math department tries to lure a future Nobel-Prize winner?

Now--possibly--if this money came out of NIL donations and business arrangements, it would not have to be ADs tapping boosters or department funds to foot the bill (Rick Pitino, come on down!) Maybe someone like Warde, even Jim, would prefer not to be sneaking around doing this kind of thing on the hushhush, just know the protocols/where the pin money is?

Seems like one helluva a lot left to settle here. May take a while. 

Robbie Moore

September 16th, 2022 at 1:51 PM ^

True, that. But the whole thing is becoming so tiresome. Everything is about money. Not just college athletics or pro sports. Everything is about the almighty dollar. 

Or as the supremely prescient Arthur Jensen proclaimed:

https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxMP9Oa0iTyAhcHwVY-pBemQm2ECx8wfXs

Go ahead. Click on it. A guy from a movie in 1976 describing 2022 perfectly.

R.I.P. Ned Beatty; Karen Allen Recalls Raiders; George Romero Advice

 

Amazinblu

September 16th, 2022 at 11:13 AM ^

These Texas figures turn out to be about $ 30K per prospect per visit.  Roughly $ 10K per prospect per day.

And, the Georgia number is very interesting - from 2019.  I would assume that reflects their entire recruiting budget - all classes - so, making the introductions to prospects who could be high school seniors.  But, if you just look at the signed players - Georgia is spending over $ 100K per signee.

A slightly deeper look into Georgia’s spending - since I don’t know if this is aligned with Calendar year, or academic year - but it really shouldn’t matter much.  In 2019, Georgia signed 24 players in 2020 - they signed 25.  For arguments sake, let’s use 24 players in 2019.  They spent about $ 150K per signee.  That’s just recruitment - I assume.  Not the cost of the scholarship - room & board - books - stipend, etc.

trueblueintexas

September 16th, 2022 at 1:27 PM ^

Yes, NIL has made it so new money will flow in expanding the overall pool. But you don't go from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions simply because "now it's legal". The base and infrastructure was already there. 

Texas A&M is a great example. The claim is they spent @ $25M to land the #1 class last year. That type of money didn't just spring up because of NIL. They have been paying guys pretty hefty sums for a while. The questions is did it go from $20 -> $25, $15->$25, or $10 -> $25? I'm positive it didn't go from $100K ->$25M.

Amazinblu

September 16th, 2022 at 2:19 PM ^

True blue - what is “fair” compensation for a five star prospect’s handshake?  An autograph?  

Let’s say I have a mocked up photo of a prospect in a team jersey - for argument’s sake - let’s sat it is an A&M jersey - and, I show it to the prospect.  “Hey, could you please sign this for me?”

He signs the photo - and, I give one of his friends a brown paper bag - with a few (let’s say a hundred) Benjamins in it.  Then, I say “Thanks.  A lot of friends of mine would like your autograph too.”

Under NIL, have any rules been broken? It’s up to him to report any income, and pay taxes on it,  Correct?

BuckeyeChuck

September 16th, 2022 at 4:12 PM ^

Gifts are not taxable to the recipient according to the IRS. But the IRS does want a 709 Gift Tax Return filed by the giver for any gift to an individual over $16k in a year. And the giver is not taxed on that gift but it does reduce the amount they are able to give without being taxed on their giving in their lifetime.

Crazy thing is that a giver can give about $12M (in excess of $16k per recipient per year) over the course of their lifetime before their giving becomes taxable. At some point, the ultra rich givers are going to run out of exclusion. Theoretically. I'm sure there are work arounds to avoid that.