Army has close win with lowly Rice

Submitted by Ezekiels Creatures on August 30th, 2019 at 10:58 PM

Rice, far from a powerhouse, gives Army a run for its money.

Last year, Rice's was 2-11. They had blow out losses to Houston, Hawaii, Southern Mississippi, Wake Forest, UAB, North Texas, and LSU. Their offense ended up ranked 125th. Their defense 106th. But they just ended a close game with Army.

If Michigan can get two blow out wins to start the season, it could help the new offense hit its stride, and the young defense gain confidence.

Good reason to be happy about your team.

Go Blue!!

Indy Pete - Go Blue

August 30th, 2019 at 10:59 PM ^

Are you saying that you are not concerned?  Millions of dollars in psychology and psychiatry bills have been generated from fears expressed on this blog about Army for >4 months, and now you are trying to convince us to not have any concern?  This - concerns me greatly.

kurpit

August 31st, 2019 at 12:51 AM ^

Anybody who has paid any attention would know that Army isn't going to blow out teams. They're just going to eat clock and give you little opportunity to score points.

Just look at their last touchdown drive. 18 plays. 96 yards. 9 minutes 21 seconds.

Yeeeeesh.

JonnyHintz

August 31st, 2019 at 1:17 PM ^

Rice went 2-11 last season, and ranked in the bottom 10 both offensively and defensively. I’m not sure how much improvement you think they can make. They’re not good. I can pretty much guarantee it. Maybe they make the jump to 5 or 6 wins. That’s still a .500 mid-major. Not good.

That being said, of you can’t move the ball on Rice, you’re probably not going to do so against Michigan. 

bronxblue

August 31st, 2019 at 8:29 AM ^

As a counter, the fact it took them 18 plays to score against Rice is not a good sign either.

Army is slow but on a per-play basis last year they were around 5.5 too (teams like Duke, Texas, and UCLA were in the same vicinity).  Rice was in the MSU/Rutgers territory of 4.8 ypp.  In this game Army averaged 4.4 ypp.  So against a terrible defense they really struggled to move the ball, and were helped that Rice couldn't get anything on the board either.  That won't remotely be the case against UM.

I think Army is good but they went something like 8-2 in 1 score games the last two years.  That's part of their system yes but part of it can just be you can get blown out if the other team doesn't shoot itself in the leg.

Ezekiels Creatures

August 30th, 2019 at 11:13 PM ^

I should have included this in the post: Oklahoma had an even worse defense than Rice last year:

Unicycle Firefly

August 30th, 2019 at 11:18 PM ^

Worry more about Wisconsin, they just beat the living holy hell out of USF in a game everyone thought they'd struggle in. Hard to not to see Jonathan Taylor gashing Michigan's D line in a few weeks.

WolverineHistorian

August 31st, 2019 at 12:39 AM ^

I'll worry about the tough environment.  There's no doubt it will be a difficult game to win.  And Taylor will worry me no matter how tough our defense is.  

But I'm not going to worry about them over the fact that they just beat the tar out of a team coming off a second to last place finish in the "mighty" American Athletic Conference.  And what's this about everyone thinking they would struggle in this game?  Against South Florida?!?  Did South Florida suddenly become this respectable powerhouse of a program while I wasn't looking?  

Unicycle Firefly

August 31st, 2019 at 12:59 AM ^

You might not have read the betting thread from a day or two ago. If some of those comments were accurate, then a lot of people on this board lost money tonight betting on USF to cover. Night game on the road, humidity, new QB (who is boring, but likely an upgrade from Hornibrook anyway), had everyone feeling pretty confident it was either going to be close, or an outright upset.

Wisconsin is going to be back to form after having a lot of terrible injury luck and some locker room issues last year, and Harbaugh's teams don't exactly have a stellar record in tough road environments.

DoubleB

August 31st, 2019 at 12:20 AM ^

Last year Army lost to Duke by 20 to open the season and couldn't move the ball on the ground like they were accustomed. It's Game 1 and it takes time to get things going full speed, especially with a precision offense like that and especially when you don't have an inordinate talent advantage. 

If Michigan can contain the flexbone offense and my guess is Army will operate it better after this week, they should be just fine. If not, all bets are off. Rice only ran 44 plays in the football game despite Army's poor offensive output.

As an aside, the Rice offense is a great example of thinking the scheme is more important than the talent. You can't run that offense if that's the guy you have at QB. They ran for 6 yards a carry (which is exactly what you want to open up big pass plays) and that guy couldn't hit a high school boot route. 

Durham Blue

August 31st, 2019 at 2:05 AM ^

Rice is awful.  They are one of the top 10 worst FBS teams.  That said, Army was looking ahead to our matchup with them and will likely be ready.  We better be ready.