Ole Miss's Petulance Shouldn't Matter To The NCAA
i don't even own a gun, Ole Miss, let alone the many guns it would take to necessitate an entire rack. what am i gonna do with a gun rack? [Bryan Fuller]
The various single elimination tournaments are over. The spring game is this weekend. And Shea Patterson remains in eligibility limbo a month and a half after Michigan's case for his immediate availability went to the NCAA. Every so often someone asks me if this is a bad sign.
It's not. The delay is entirely because Ole Miss is doing everything they can to continue screwing the 2016 recruits they lied to just before the relevant Signing Day. Michigan gave Ole Miss the whole package before they even sent it to the NCAA; Ole Miss, like the Michigan FOIA department, took every last nanosecond available before filing a reply. Their reply then required a reply:
Michigan’s petition to the NCAA on Patterson’s behalf was sent to Ole Miss, according to standard practice. Ole Miss had the option to not respond but chose to file its objection to the NCAA on March 28. Patterson has since supplied answers to questions the NCAA asked regarding issues Ole Miss raised.
And so we're here, waiting for Shea Patterson and summer. When Shea Patterson is eligible it will stop snowing.
But none of this should impact what looks like a slam dunk. Ole Miss's problem—one of Ole Miss's many problems—is that they didn't just lie to their recruits. They lied to anyone who would listen, planting a series of credulous stories from friendly local reporters. This move backfired spectacularly when Houston Nutt sued Ole Miss, winning a settlement and a public apology for lying about their NCAA troubles. This is literally a thing Ole Miss said in public because of a lawsuit:
“Certain statements made by University employees in January 2016 appear to have contributed to misleading media reports about Coach Nutt,” Ole Miss said in a statement without a specific name attached. “To the extent any such statements harmed Coach Nutt’s reputation, the University apologizes, as this was not the intent.”
In addition to this, Michigan submitted reams of communication between Shea Patterson and various other Ole Miss athletic department employees; five other 2016 recruits seeking immediate eligibility are telling parallel stories to the NCAA.
Ole Miss's NCAA case is over. The NCAA itself has declared that Ole Miss was lying. Hugh Freeze is fired, in part because of Ole Miss's institutional decision to lie about that case. Ole Miss can gain nothing by denying the obvious, and after discovery in the Nutt case it is very, very obvious:
In Mars’ work as counsel for Nutt and, later, the transfers, he revealed Freeze’s misinformation campaign was initiated when Ole Miss received a notice of allegations from the NCAA two years ago. Mars uncovered through text messages, phone logs and interviews, how Freeze and the athletic department launched a plan to mislead media and football recruits — including Patterson — telling them the bulk of the violations involved women’s basketball and track and that Nutt was responsible for issues regarding the football program.
This has been to NCAA court. It has been to real court. Ole Miss has gotten a pie in the face both times. Even the wildly unpredictable NCAA shouldn't be able to screw this up.
The length of time here is more about the unprecedented amount of information that's been submitted here, the likelihood that the NCAA is regarding these six appeals as one larger decision, and Ole Miss's final middle finger to college football before once again descending into irrelevance. If Patterson doesn't get a waiver nobody can ever get a waiver.
I still won't believe it until it happens. When the NCAA needs to enforce against a corrupt member institution, it ignores the rules. When it wants to impede the freedom of a 19 year old kid who helps it earn millions of dollars, it suddenly is felicitous to the rules. Try being humans for once.
"If Patterson doesn't get a waiver nobody can ever get a waiver."
Except dubious 6th years, unless they're our 6th years.
How wild is Ole Miss? Almost every D-1 football program has some degree of shady practices. But for Ole Miss (OLE MISS) to start snagging 5 stars from north of the Mason-Dixon line to go a school with Rebels as the mascott...when everyone in college football knew exactly what was going on and then to act like this is crazy. How dumb do you think we all are? Not as dumb as you fucking morons. Give this up and go back to irrelevance and being the second to worse program in the SEC.
it continues to amaze me that Hugh Freeze compared himself to Jesus being crucified to a recruit. The balls of some of these fake religious dudes from the south to put on a face like they are holier than thou when they're actually some of the sleeziest dudes around. It's amazing. They have no shame.
I had a total scumbag who worked for me years ago as an outside sales rep. Total sleezeball who submitted fake expenses, didnt show up for conferences (or at least not sober) and generally just stole money from the company. So I fired him.
About a month later the owner informed me we were hiring back Tom. Why? Because Tom told the deeply religious owner he had "found Jesus" and had mended his ways. So over my objections Tom came back.
Well guess what? Tom must have lost Jesus cause the same shit started happening again. Same sleezeball doing the same shady shit. So after I compiled an even longer list of transgressions I fired Tom a second time.
About 90 days pass and the owner informs me we've hired back Tom again. Why? Because THIS TIME TOM REALLY, REALLY HAS FOUND JESUS. Yes I know before he said he did and he hadnt (cause Satan was still in his heart) but now, this time, it's real and he's coming back.
Well he must've lost poor Jesus yet again cause it only took about 6 weeks the third pass for Tom start doing the same shit all over again. Same shady sleezeball playing the Jesus card to the owner. So when I fired Tom for the third (and last ime) I gave the owner my undated, signed resignation letter. I told him if he hired back Tom again just fill in the date at the top and look for my replacement. I would quit immediately - Jesus or no Jesus.
Tom didn't find Jesus. Sounds like he found the owner's fly on his pants.
I really can't understand what Ole Miss is thinking with this position. How in the world does it benefit them in any way unless acceptance or being neutral would be viewed as an admission of guilt?
what's going on with the other 5 former Ole Miss players? Are they in a similar situation with their respective transfers, i.e., Ole Miss objecting to immediate eligibility?
Ole Miss is doing what they have to, and I don't blame them for this. The AD was atrocious and their coaching staff lied to everyone, but Ole Miss has to fight every step of the way because to concede wouldn't be in their best interests.
Patterson will be cleared. It'll just be annoying.
TL DR: why doesn’t ole miss just shut the fuck up? Do they have to speak/respond?
I mean, they have to respond. If they say nothing, it's the same as conceding the arguments put forth by Michigan and the other schools.
They have the #1 class per 247, but as noted below it's due to size and not quality. For perspective, their average rating on 247 is 6 points below Michigan's average. MSU's class is 4 points higher per player.
But, I'm quite certain they can. I don't have any faith they get this right. The good bit is that it's probably better for all our QBs to push themselves in the event Shea might not be eligible for as long as possible to give them the belief that they might be the starter until about August.
should never underestimate the ability of the NCAA to screw something up.
As I type, the NCAA is creating a giant flow chart that all points to "screw Ole Miss players/screw Michigan" because that's how they work.
turn a one day issue into a two day issue.
April 11th, 2018 at 12:32 PM ^
Ole Miss has no choice but to do this - the only petty part is waiting until the end of the deadline. They are formally disagreeing with the NCAA and are in the appeals process, if they didn't object to Shea's version of events they're essentially admitting the wrongdoing they are appealing against.
The NCAA still makes the final decision, and as Brian said, nothing indicates it should be anything other than favorable for us.
Ed: I suppose they could've just not responded at all (neither object nor endorse), but I suppose silence is sometimes construed as guilt and it really doesn't hurt them to respond.
April 10th, 2018 at 10:29 PM ^
April 11th, 2018 at 12:30 PM ^
Comments