OOT: Proposed Interstellar Mission To Alpha Centauri! (Kinda!)
It's projects like this that make me realize how truly mediocre I am.
This will be great for MSU's recruiting
a series of lasers instead of one giant laser? You put a laser on your postage stamp and point it at the postage stamp in front of it. You end up with a sequence of laser postage stamps pushing other laser postage stamps. This might just work.
Why are we putting arbitrary criteria on this? Why do we have to go 20% the speed of light and get there in 20 years. Would the effort be any less awesome if it took 30 or 40 or even 100 years? Yeah, none of us would be around to see it, but future generations could look back at our foresight and wisdom and label us the greatest generation because we studied the universe using laser propelled postage stamps.
P.S. and in the effort of studying this concept, we might just end up with Tang 2.0
is anyone considering the laser hitting you in the dong concern, to me that is the biggest concern
We still wouldn't know whether the mission was a success or not for many more years, right? How fast could the data travel back to earth?
A little over 4 years. Unlike postage stamps, presumably the data is traveling at the speed of light.
The data would travel back at the speed of light and Alpha Centauri is ~4.4 light-years away, so it would take ~4.4 years to get the data. It would probably take even longer due to compression, encryption, transfer rates, etc, but I do not know much about those.
Once they showed up through a wormhole and zapped Congress
We must take this risk.
two way communictors that can put all the worlds knowledge in your hand, let you talk on the phone while at the beach and have more porn than you could watch, This will never happen. Until it does.
Digging into this a little more, the postage stamps have an outer lining made of hemp. 40 bucks a piece.
I welcome these posts, as the number of satellite camp-related threads has been out of hand this week.
There exists a theory/postulate regarding when is the best time to launch something to other stars based on two competing factors.
1 - The earlier you launch it, the sooner it will reach its destination.
2 - The later you launch it, the more advanced technology there will be and thus your vehicle will get there faster.
Surely 20 years from now will not be this "knee in the curve" moment when we should go to the stars. 1,000 years from now maybe. If we launch too soon, we'll just smoke past whatever we launch now with whatever we launch 100 or more years from now.
We should focus now on manned exploration of the solar system. Interstellar exploration will come when the time is right. But we don't have reasonable technologies yet.
This reminds me that we're in crunch mode for the Star Trek timeline to actually take place - we've only got about 47 years until we're supposed to test the first warp engines and introduce the Vulcans to hard rock and another 20 or so after that until we start the first colony on an as-yet unspecified planet in the Alpha Centauri system. We need to get with it, folks.
Fair trade, back to the unlimited porn.
This gives me an intense desire to play Kerbal Space Program.
As a UM undergrad in the early 90s, groups of us used to take over computer labs for all night Spaceward Ho marathons. I have no idea why that game was so addictive, but I now see that there's an ios version so I guess I'll see if I can remember.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
It looked good on paper until this guy showed up
I'm going to make spaceships the size of stamps and send them on an interstellar mission by blasting them with friggin' laser beams
I'd pay yo
by using many lasers circling the sun, run the postage stamp in orbit around the sun so that it passes each laser during its orbit. time each laser to bump the speed of the stamp as it passes. When you reaches the speed they want have one of the lasers bump it out of its orbit towards the solar system of choice. That is how a large particle accelerator works.
Great post, superstringer. Thanks for the information. I hadn't heard about this, and you broke it down nicely.