OT: Pistons acquire Motiejunas/Thornton for Anthony + Pick
Who would have thunk that SVG would be so active as the deadline approaches?
See: ESPN Article
February 18th, 2016 at 2:24 PM ^
I love how SVG is so agressive. It makes the trade deadline so much fun. I like Motiejunas, but I think a 1st round pick is too much.
February 18th, 2016 at 2:35 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 2:37 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 2:39 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 2:51 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 5:05 PM ^
that puts them in the middle of the pack, right, and not top 10 or barely 15.
February 18th, 2016 at 2:58 PM ^
Yup, and no need to spend first round money when you believe your core is in place. A backup center who's a little stretchier than Baynes and offers a bigger contrast to Drummond's style is as good a use as any for the pick, and you just replace the development risk with the health risk.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:14 PM ^
Also has a very nice post-up game:
February 19th, 2016 at 2:27 AM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 3:01 PM ^
but it will likely be between 12-16. This might be a good draft.
That said, I think people are underplaying the acquisition of Thornton. As streaky a 3 point shooter as they come, but theoretically a need.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:08 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 3:06 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
February 18th, 2016 at 6:35 PM ^
You can't name one late first round pick that made a difference to the Pistons in the last 20 years.
February 18th, 2016 at 6:45 PM ^
He didn't really blossom until after the pistons traded him, but Arron Afflalo was taken 27th by the pistons.
February 18th, 2016 at 6:59 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 2:26 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 2:26 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 2:32 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 2:41 PM ^
Motiejunas should be back soon though
http://www.chron.com/sports/rockets/article/Donatas-Motiejunas-could-return-as-soon-as-Friday-6838269.php
February 18th, 2016 at 2:28 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 2:31 PM ^
he thinks they can make a run at the ECF this year. They are not beating Cleveland but if they make a push here and get a decent seed they could beat anybody else. Toronto, Atlanta, Chicago, blah. If the Pistons get this thing clicking they have the talent to beat any of those teams in a 7 game series. One moderately deep playoff run and this entire State will go Pistons crazy again. We are fareweather when it comes to the Stones but when we are board we are REALLY on board.
February 18th, 2016 at 2:33 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 2:40 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
February 18th, 2016 at 2:45 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 2:49 PM ^
think that has anything to do with it. Yeah, I think attendance would be a little better in Detroit when they sucked because people would just make it part of a "night out" on the town but it would not make the actual fan base any stronger. You Tube some of the games from the 04 and 05 Finals. That place was absolutely electric. The Pistons should play in the Palace of Auburn Hills.
February 18th, 2016 at 2:53 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
February 18th, 2016 at 3:00 PM ^
Doubled? Ford Field seats 65,000, you're saying that when the Lions had losing seasons the Silverdome only had at most 30-some thousand people in it? No.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:12 PM ^
Historically, the Pistons were one of the worst-supported franchises in the league when they were in the city of Detroit. Their attendance spiked up once they moved to the Silverdome and remained very high for a long time when they moved to the Palace.
I think things are different now and fans will come downtown to see them, if they're good. But if they're mediocre, I don't think it matters if they're in Detroit or Auburn Hills.
NBA franchises in general tend to have more bandwagon fans than the other leagues. Baseball can sell the experience of going to a game in the nice weather. NFL home games are relatively rare events, happening only eight times. The NHL seems able to form a hard core fanbase in each (non-Sun Belt) city that shows up to all the games. But the NBA seems to have a harder time motivating fans to come to 41 home games a year if the team isn't good.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:18 PM ^
Historically, the Pistons were one of the worst-supported franchises in the league when they were in the city of Detroit. Their attendance spiked up once they moved to the Silverdome and remained very high for a long time when they moved to the Palace.
That's because they played at Cobo Hall and were a very bad team (in their first 27 years in Detroit, they only had three winning seasons). Plus you can't really compare the NBA of the 70's to now.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:38 PM ^
Did you read my second paragraph?
February 18th, 2016 at 3:55 PM ^
But don't oversell the rabid hockey fanbase. The Red Wings have been great for so long, it's hard to know what we have here. Before drafting Yzerman and shooting up the standings, the Wings were crap and NOBODY went to hockey games.
If Detroit goes in the tank for few years, I think you'd find the same fair-weather attitude out of our hockey fans.
February 18th, 2016 at 4:09 PM ^
I do remember the "Dead Thing" era, but it seems like nowadays most NHL teams can reliably fill up their arenas. Their bigger problem is getting people to watch on TV. The NBA and NHL are opposites in that regard.
February 18th, 2016 at 4:21 PM ^
But I remember NHL powers Chicago Blackhawks and Boston Bruins playing in front of empty seats as recently as 06-07. These are Original 6 franchises and top US sports markets and they coudn't draw fans if their life depended on it. New owner and a couple cups and now they're top-5 in attendance.
Everything is peachy right now in Detroit, but look at those two. Bad owner, bad team, lots of losses and nobody cared anymore.
We've had Ilitch and Playoffs for a quarter century. How could we have any idea? But look around the league and you'll see - American sports fans don't much care for losing hockey.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:59 PM ^
And I'm telling you that Detroit is more centrally located and would do a better job at supporting the Pistons even when they are not winning.
It would never be this bad (the team is actually playing well this year) if they played in Detroit.
February 18th, 2016 at 4:05 PM ^
actually think it would be. You have to remember, when the Pistons are bad they don't even get the benefit of the one star player that signed here for the money that people will just come to see play even if the team stinks. When the Pistons are bad they are very bad.
February 18th, 2016 at 4:06 PM ^
Your claim is impossible to prove. I submit that NBA fans in general tend not to support mediocre teams (and the Pistons, at 27-27, qualify as mediocre), so it's not surprising that the Palace isn't full. The fact that the Palace is also larger than a typical arena (22.076) doesn't help matters.
February 18th, 2016 at 5:51 PM ^
Downtown Detroit is the historic core and all, but it's not really that centrally located, as far as the ticketbuying public is concerned. The best location in that regard would probably be around Royal Oak or Ferndale.
The best argument for building an arena downtown is to help the city. While the impact of sports teams on urban development is overstated, in the case of Detroit I do think it would bring some important business downtown.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:13 PM ^
They are the DETROIT Pistons not Auburn Hills Pistons. The new arena going up in Detroit is gonna be the best in the country when its finished (the unique deconstructed design is already being copied by LA for their new stadium). Basketball is an urban game, which is why most teams (Milwaukee, Sacramento and San Francisco) are building their new arenas close to downtown. Fans (especially the millennial crowd) want an urban setting for pre and post game activities. The Palace is still a good building, but the location sucks. Making the trip for a weekday game is huge pain in the ass for anyone in Washtenaw and SE Michigan.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:18 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 3:33 PM ^
The Wings currently have a 200 game sellout streak, the Tigers have drawn more than 3 million fans for three of the past four years (over 2 million for ten straight) and the Lions have regular sellouts. None of those fans have any problem coming to Detroit.
February 18th, 2016 at 4:10 PM ^
2. The Tigers have been good for the last four years
3. The Lions play in the NFL, the most popular sports league on the planet.
The Pistons have been terrible, like the worst franchise in the league-terrible for like 5 years before Van Gundy. If you want to say they would have gotten, on balance, 1,500 more fans on any given Tuesday for a game I would buy it but moving to Detroit would not completely change the entire dynamic of the organization and the fan base. The owner of the team owns the building and it is a great venue that has history and has been the home of legendary teams. Why move?
February 18th, 2016 at 5:02 PM ^
February 18th, 2016 at 6:06 PM ^
Making the trip for a weekday game is huge pain in the ass for anyone in Washtenaw and SE Michigan.
How are you defining "SE Michigan"? For people in Oakland and Macomb counties (which have a combined population of 2 million), the Palace's location is pretty good. I'm guessing the majority of ticketholders for all the Detroit teams come from those two counties.
I think it might be nice for the city of Detroit to have another pro sports team, but I'm not sure it'd make a huge difference in terms of attendance. As others have said, basketball fans in general tend to be more fairweather.
February 18th, 2016 at 7:26 PM ^
I do think you miss out on the Toledo market with the Palace. I know plenty of people from Toledo with season tickets to the Red Wings, Tigers and Lions. That being said, it’s not worth moving them for that market but I think would add at least some season ticket holders.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:37 PM ^
...and you're dead wrong.
In 2001, the Lions went 2-14 under Marty Mornihnweg, and averaged around 75,000 fans per game in Pontiac.
Ford Field's capacity is 65,000.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:46 PM ^
Silverdome had a capacity of 80,000 and there was a lot of blackouts because they didn't sellout. Hell, even the 1994 playoff game against Green Bay (Favre to Sharpe... doh!) was blacked out.
February 18th, 2016 at 5:49 PM ^
I remember my Dad and I rotating the roof antenna to the west and trying to pickup Fox from the west side of the state. Damn blackouts.
February 18th, 2016 at 3:43 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad