Details on removed football player Logan Tuley-Tillman available

Submitted by StephenRKass on

Details are out there on the incident leading to Logan Tuley-Tillman's dismissal from the Michigan Football team. Because the article and details are found only at the Freep, and are somewhat sordid, I'm not providing a link. Suffice to say, there was significant alcohol consumption and impaired judgement by both parties involved. The article is largely factual, and not editorial in comments. Poor decisions were made, with sad consequences for all, and Tuley-Tillman being removed from the team. I hope he turns his life around and learns from this incident. I also hope this is somewhat of a teaching tool for all those currently on the team.

EDIT:  Masses have spoken. Here is the article. Someone in the thread below has pasted the whole thing in.

LINK:  Ex-Wolverine Logan Tuley-Tillman was too drunk to recall filming sex act

EDIT 2:  Apparently much of this information was posted already. In a thread which I missed somehow. I searched for it, but because the thread was deleted, I didn't find it.

mtzlblk

October 20th, 2015 at 5:17 PM ^

that was visible in the video and LTT copped to that being his watch.

In isolation, this might not appear as serious as when there were less details available, however hearing that there were multiple other girls that allege the same thing sort of implies this is an ongoing problem with him, not one bad decision.

 

Mr. Owl

October 20th, 2015 at 5:27 PM ^

If he's drunk, neither can he.

Oh wait, yes he can.  He's very fortunate she remembered that she consented to sex, but not to it being filmed, even though she can't actually remember either and knows she wouldn't have had sex with him if sober.

Two young people made a mistake.  Nobody, including them, knows what happened.  I'm not saying that she should be publicly shamed, but it's awful that he will have this hanging above him the rest of her life.

I just hope they both are able to get themselves together, grow up and lead excellent lives.

alum96

October 20th, 2015 at 4:58 PM ^

Not condoning this and agree he should be gone and don't want to hear about it anymore but aside from the videotaping (which her phone of all things and not his) this is what happens on every campus in America countless times every weekend. Drunk people having consentual sex with people they normally wouldn't. 

It would actually be worse to me (on a scale of bad) if he had it on his phone because then you'd think he was distributing it to buddies.  Sounds like he put it on her phone and never distributed.  The "distribution" was google backing up the video to the cloud.

Maybe he did it without her consent, maybe they were so drunk neither could remember - it sounds like they both blacked out part of the night.  Who knows.

Maybe I am not reading it correct and videotaping someone without consent (if that is what happened - both parties seem to not have a clue) is a bad thing but 95% of this night was what happens (again) countless times every weekend on every campus.  The only variance was the videotaping.

jblaze

October 20th, 2015 at 4:59 PM ^

was somebody (allegedly LTT) sending the video from her phone to his phone. She only knew about the videos since her phone backed it up to google or icloud or whatever.

I do wonder why LTT spoke to the police without a lawyer, especially when Minick seemed to recommend he getting one. Don't students get free/ severly reduced legal service?

alum96

October 20th, 2015 at 5:10 PM ^

Maybe I missed the part where he sent it from her phone to his.  It was on her phone and on her laptop.  Forensics could not find it on his phone.  They are usually good at finding anything even when it is "deleted".  So not sure where the judgement of it went from her phone to his came from?  Unless I am missing a paragraph the only distribution I see is when (her) Android phones backup stuff to (her) laptop's google drive.

So we have an allegation about a situation neither one remembers " if she consented to being video - taped" but it was done with her phone.  Wouldnt a guy doing it on the down low and behind the girls back use his phone and not hers?  Seems strange to me.

 

They asked to search the phone forensically, and he allowed them to take his phone.

After handing it over, according to the report, he said “he believed he had a significant drinking problem and wished to address it immediately.”

The next day, the woman gave her phone and laptop to police. That same day, U-M coach Jim Harbaugh issued a statement that “Tuley-Tillman has been dismissed from the football team for conduct unacceptable for a Michigan student-athlete.”

The forensic analysis found the videos on the laptop but not Tuley-Tillman’s phone. It geo-coordinated the videos to the location of the Sept. 5 incident.

bluepow

October 20th, 2015 at 4:57 PM ^

Rush to judgement is ugly and frankly was rampant on this blog over this entire episode.  The censorship kind of sucked too.

There are real issues here to discuss and differing opinions should be welcome if kept respectful.  It was of course inappropriate to have the alledged "victims" name up for review, but many other posts should not have been taken down.

I mean, now supposedly the video wasn't even on his phone?  WTF is going on here?  Character assassination, that's what.  Although perhaps not entirely innocent (who can know?) the outcome for LTT seems unbalanced to say the least.

StephenRKass

October 20th, 2015 at 5:09 PM ^

It isn't my place or my intent to judge. Which is why I simply said it was sad, and hope that LTT gets things turned around.

As for whether the post is relevant, my personal feeling is that this is extremely relevant. When Jim Minick had his incident, it was relevant. When details were put out on ESPN about Louisville, it was relevant. Same with Miami several years ago. Same with MSU. Same with OSU. Michigan fans can't just focus on what happens elsewhere and not cover what happens here. Yes, I feel bad for LTT. What he did is done but tons of other people make poor decisions without having something so severe happen. Heck, plenty of Michigan students have done stupid things like this and not been expelled or had anything happen. The consequences are harsh. Perhaps we can have a discussion about what we think Harbaugh should do. But whatever the answer, this is a relevant topic to discuss on a sports blog about Michigan.

gmoney41

October 21st, 2015 at 9:39 AM ^

My main question is if they were sent to LTT's phone, why is there no forensic evidence to back that up.  I think the double standard here is ridiculous.  If they both were drunk then neither had consent according to the rule, not just the woman.

Lie-Cheat-Steal

October 20th, 2015 at 5:03 PM ^

This girl ruined his life, or at least his football career at Michigan because they both behaved like drunk fools.  He deserved punishment, but he is not a rapist.  What he did is wrong,  but alcohol, college, etc.  

bluepow

October 20th, 2015 at 6:30 PM ^

Now that we have more details, please do tell: what exactly did he do wrong?  What does he deserve punishment for?

Getting drunk?  Having consensual sex?  If he really wanted to be deceptive and get video, why on Earth would her use HER phone?  With all the other background I find it hard to believe she wasn't ok with that at the time too.  ((EDIT - This last sentence goes too far; I have no idea about that.  Let's just say the context does not allow any of this to rise to criminal behavior.))

It just doesn't add up to the punishment and public thrashing he has endured. 

stephenrjking

October 20th, 2015 at 5:52 PM ^

This, and the comment that follows, are despicable. This defines "victim-blaming," and I am saying this as someone who generally thinks the "rape-culture" hysteria is overblown. Or I did, because this is a perfect example. Logan committed a crime. He appears to have deliberately covered his tracks. He freely admits to a serious alcohol problem. There may or may not be other instances of this. But it's HER that is ruining his life? Read closely, man. She was asked directly if she was raped. She could have said "yes," and that would be the investigation right now. It would be an un-falsifiable accusation. Instead, she did what those who would plead for calm in the current "rape-culture" crisis would ask--she declined to call "rape" when it was two people who were drunk. THAT would have ruined his life. But he certainly did do something wrong. And to have you and others just explain it away is reprehensible. He got drunk. He had consensual sex. He recorded it on her phone. He sent it to his device, then, supposedly in the alcohol, thought clearly enough to delete the videos. He did it. His choice. Not hers.

bluepow

October 20th, 2015 at 7:01 PM ^

"He got drunk. He had consensual sex. He recorded it on her phone. He sent it to his device, then, supposedly in the alcohol, thought clearly enough to delete the videos."

Thank you for laying it out.  We agree on those facts.  We disagree (particuallarly in context) that there is any criminal wrongdoing.  

I will add (so you don't think I am "victim-blaming") that she had every right to seek counsel.  It is the police that overreacted by pressing silly charges, not her for seeking guidance.

StephenRKass

October 20th, 2015 at 8:00 PM ^

I'll leave criminality to others. Can't comment intelligently on that because I don't know the law. But it sure sounds as if non-consensual filming is breaking the law.

But the threshhold for being a member of the Michigan Football Team is not the same as criminality. If Jim Harbaugh determines that a minor, drinking to excess, and doing drugs, and filming sex, and deleting sex, is behavior not to be tolerated on the Michigan football team, isn't that his right and prerogative? When Moeller had incidents as coach many years ago, they weren't criminal, but they were sufficient for him to be removed as coach.

I am uncomfortable with lawyers suggesting he should have hid his behavior. If he broke the law, shouldn't he be held responsible for that? This is another instance of lawyers being motivated not by what is legal, but by the desire to win at all costs.

StephenRKass

October 20th, 2015 at 9:56 PM ^

If I understand you correctly, you're saying that drinking to excess, and doing illegal drugs, and filming yourself having sex with someone without their clear consent, and then deleting the film to cover your tracks, are things that everyone does? And therefore, if we kicked everyone who did these things off the team, we'd have no team? Are you further saying that the first time you're apprehended doing these things, the punishment, if any, should be different? Is that what you're saying?

reshp1

October 20th, 2015 at 10:41 PM ^

Your post I responded to simply said filming sex (i.e. didn't say without consent, which hasn't been proven to be the case here), in which case, yes, I believe there is plenty of all of the above going on on any given college football team. I don't really need to guess on the alcohol and drugs, there are plenty of examples of guys getting multiple second chances. I guess I don't have data on the sex tape stuff but knowing college and how football players are, I can safely assume you have to be into some pretty kinky shit before it even registers with the coaches. The only guys I can think of that got insta-booted like this are Csonte York and Brendan Gibbons,and both those cases seem an order of magnitude more awful than what LTT did.

StephenRKass

October 21st, 2015 at 9:37 PM ^

First, I don't agree with your assertion that there are plenty of guys on the team who drink AND do drugs AND film sex without consent AND distribute same AND delete the same to cover tracks. But, there is no point in arguing the point, because we simply don't know.

A simpler test is to boot people off who commit felonies. If filming sex without consent, and distributing it, are a felony, and LTT in fact self-identified himself, then he committed a felony (according to the current law) and Harbaugh has grounds. If the law is wrong, change the law. But so long as it is a felony, that would be grounds.

bluepow

October 20th, 2015 at 8:56 PM ^

I actually don't have a problem with Harbaugh kicking him off the team.  That is his perogative and I trust him to wield it appropriately.  There could easily be other things there we do not know.  

I do have a problem with law enforcement pressing charges where I see no serious wrongdoing (it seems he 'broke" the weakest of laws within very questionable context) and the tar-and-feather reaction of the masses.  As a patriot this is the type of story where you must question authority and tell everyone to chill out with the throw away the key mentality.

reshp1

October 21st, 2015 at 12:01 AM ^

The lawyers aren't advocating hiding his actions, just that you shouldn't speak to police without legal representation. Your question is framed under an assumption of guilt, which is exactly the opposite of how it's supposed to work. The goal isn't just to convict the guilty, but to also (especially) acquit the innocent. It takes both the prosecution and defense both doing their jobs to the fullest extent of the law for that to happen. If you waive representation, you upset that balance and open yourself to incriminating yourself to things you didn't do or to the extent you are accused of doing them. If you have time or interest, watch this video. He does a nice job laying out why you should always have a lawyer and illustrating how easy it is to get yourself into trouble by trapping the audience into appearing suspicious of hypothetical crimes they obviously didn't commit. https://youtu.be/6wXkI4t7nuc

03 Blue 07

October 20th, 2015 at 11:08 PM ^

I have to take issue with the statement that "he sent the video to his phone." The physical evidence does not support this interpretation. If he had completed the "send," it would be found by the forensic investigation. The forensic investigation found no such evidence. I have some professional experience dealing with forensic investigation of electronic devices in legal proceedings, and will say that if his phone ever received the video, the investigators would find evidence of it in the forensic investigation. Therefore, I don't agree necessarily with the statement that he sent the video without some physical evidence from the woman's phone indicating he either had sent the video to his phone or had attempted to send it but it did t go through to his phone. So far, no word of any such physical evidence from her phone, though of course such evidence may exist.

reshp1

October 20th, 2015 at 6:47 PM ^

I agree he goes too far by saying *she* ruined his life, but none of the things you are alleging have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt either. Whether he committed a crime hinges on consent, which is murky at best. The fact that you are willing to make assumptions and pass judgement on him is on equally reprehensible as the assertions the person you are responding to is making. Edit: also, not accusing someone of rape when you dont think they did is literally the least you can expect from a decent human being, she's not doing him a favor as you seem to be implying.

stephenrjking

October 20th, 2015 at 7:03 PM ^

I implied no such thing. What I argued is that if she was being excessive or attempting to assassinate his character (which is a term that has been used in this thread) she had every ability to use the "R" word to do so. She chose not to. I am not bound to wait for this to be litigated to draw personal conclusions; neither is Jim Harbaugh. I actually think that they were both unwise; any assumptions you suggest are pretty easy conclusions to draw based on testimony and evidence available from the report. I've worked with people with, for example, porn addictions, and have seen the behavior of people who know how to cover their tracks. I believe the "boys will be boys" attitude that kinda sorta writes off a guy secretly filming one of his conquests, as some people have done on other threads, to be disgusting. You can dislike that if you want, but tough rocks. I've seen too many people seriously hurt by that attitude to pretend it's no big deal.

stephenrjking

October 20th, 2015 at 7:27 PM ^

Call me disappointed. I have long held the position that the "rape crisis" panic has been overblown, that the occurrence of campus rape is exaggerated, and that many people attempting to make it a huge scandal are causing more harm than good. I've shared in the anger at false accusations that have seriously harmed men, and I've questioned whether protestations of "victim-blaming" had any basis in fact. So when I see some people actively blame a woman for coming forward because she's been filmed against her consent ("She has ruined his life" is pretty accusatory) and see others just blow this off as NBD when it apparently was to her, both attitudes that validate those I disagree with, I get disappointed. And yes, I'm not a fan of the "let's have fun and forget the consequences" lifestyle that crops up in colleges, because the consequences can be serious. For LTT and the girl, things got serious. Pretending it's nothing does nobody any favors.

Cope

October 20th, 2015 at 9:38 PM ^

And I won't wade into a debate about LTT because I don't see the facts clearly. But I thought rjking was taking up a stand on an issue of women being exploited, which is underrepresented in this society in my mind, rather than trying to trash LTT. The "despicable" comment is presumptive, at least until the facts emerge, so that I understand. I think restraint is the better part of fairness.

Cope

October 20th, 2015 at 9:13 PM ^

It's a loaded word, and really should be only applied to people who are being killed are maimed for their faith. I almost edited it for that reason. But denigrating someone for his religious affiliation irks me. Point received.

stephenrjking

October 20th, 2015 at 9:27 PM ^

I understand. And, yeah, maybe some people are handling it wrong. I can't pretend I haven't been inflammatory either, though. I used words like "despicable," and while I believe LTT did something wrong in the filming and think Reshp1's suggestion of "trashing" is excessive, upon reading my original comment they have a point: I stated, point-blank, that he committed a crime. And that has not been legally established. As reasonable as I believe it is to respond strongly to what I responded to, that probably deserved some pushback. It's the Internet. We've all seen worse. Thanks for looking out for me.

Lie-Cheat-Steal

October 20th, 2015 at 7:25 PM ^

Stop with the holier than thou hyperbole crap. We don't need your sanctimonious lecture...nobody said what he did is acceptable behavior.  There is, however, the need for nuance as there are degrees of misbehavior and conduct.  It's not a binary situation, but he has been crucified in the media as if he were of the rapist and pedophile sexual offender class.

He had a lot to lose being the campus "celebrity" and he lost all of it.  He did not rape her, they were both drunk, and both engaged in foolish behavior, as she said she would not have had sex had she been sober.  

If he published the content to some shame site or spread it to all his buddies then it would be a really screwed up hurtful thing and he would deserve severe punishment.  That was apparently not the case here. 

But hey, if it makes you feel like a better human being to have internet OUTRAGE!!!, congrats and enjoy. 

stephenrjking

October 20th, 2015 at 7:33 PM ^

Dude, I'm not the one who said "She ruined his life." You said that. If that's "nuance," you can keep it. I don't do Internet OUTRAGE!!!, but I'll occasionally stoop to calling out garbage. Perhaps you were just speaking a bit strongly, and perhaps so was I; but "She ruined his life" is pretty outrageous.