"It’s the block M that has power, not Denard Robinson"
Full quote from Michigan CMO Hunter Lochman on college athletes potentially being paid:
“The athletes are there for four years. At Michigan, it’s the block M that has the infinity and power, not Denard Robinson. Those are fleeting, four-year relationships, but it’s the block M that’s been there for over 150 years.”
uh wut
December 12th, 2014 at 2:08 PM ^
Fuck that guy. Seriously. Fire his ass. We'll see how strong a brand the block M is if they fuck up this hire.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:12 PM ^
needs to clean house in the AD after the CC is done.
Fire everyone that has ever given a hand job to DB.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:08 PM ^
...is nothing without its people, and without the people that have built the brand, the brand value is zero.
If Hunter Lochman thinks the university added more value to Denard than vice versa, he needs a CAT scan.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:14 PM ^
Exactly. How many thousands of these were sold:
Denard made the university LOTS of money. I don't see why he would belittle his value to the university.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:19 PM ^
Yea, but look at the big block M on the front!
December 12th, 2014 at 2:30 PM ^
The block M on your avatar is more interesting.
December 12th, 2014 at 4:20 PM ^
Agreed. Now THAT'S a block M that has infinity and power!
December 12th, 2014 at 4:45 PM ^
not what is behind it that is captivating your attention.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:24 PM ^
December 12th, 2014 at 2:28 PM ^
How many minor league baseball jerseys does anybody buy? Or Arena Football? A lot of those guys are probably better at what they do than Tate Forcier (who sold a few jerseys himself).
If Denard (or anybody) had played for the Ann Arbor Scalawags instead of the University of Michigan, no one would own his jersey or know who he is.
The money comes into college football because the schools and their history provide the value. On the free market, less than 10% of the players would have a place to play and they would probably be making less than $50,000 a year (just like in the XFL or Arena League).
December 12th, 2014 at 2:37 PM ^
Just like there are a bunch of Steven Threet jerseys out there? (No offense to the guy)
What makes the history at these schools? The fact they've had a long line of players that have created said history. History doesn't just happen.
Denard made Michigan exciting to watch. Just like Johnny Manziel made Texas A&M exciting to watch.
I'd love to see how much tradition and history matters if Michigan continues to perform the way they have for the next 3-4 years.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:53 PM ^
That's right. It's a chicken and the egg situation. Michigan adds value by itself, but that value has been built by generations of great players.
While you can't say as many Denard jerseys would have been sold had he been playing for Eastern Michigan, you also can't say that as many Michigan jerseys would have been sold if Denard wasn't as special of an athlete as he was. Both Michigan and Players bring money into the university.
As someone above pointed out, it's the same thing with the NFL. When the USFL was "challenging" the NFL, they were stealing a lot of the best players coming up from college. The level of play was probably closer to the NFL than the NFL would have ever admitted, yet the USFL had to fold because it wasn't as popular. The NFL brands had value irrespective of the players playing. Yet, the NFL players are still highly paid because without those great players, those same NFL brands quickly lose value.
December 12th, 2014 at 4:33 PM ^
A) college talent isn't nearly as good as pro talent.
B) If the NFL were to fold tomorrow, a replacement league would quickly form and would be very popular very quickly.
C) If college football ceased to exist, a minor league would likely form and wouldn't be popular at all.
So, without college football the kid's would have no major place to sell their services (for the most part). It's the "college" aspect of it that makes these guys marketable. Stipends, guaranteed scollies? sure. Pay for play doesn't make sense. It's not a "free market" in the first place.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:28 PM ^
Never did like the number 16 until Denard came along...
December 12th, 2014 at 3:48 PM ^
His neck really was proof positive that Cardassians exist and walk among us.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:29 PM ^
OT: that might be the ugliest jersey I have ever laid eyes on... Someone please get adidas out of here.
December 12th, 2014 at 4:22 PM ^
is how many people that bought the jersey in your picture have also bought Denard Robinson's jersey with the Jacksonville Jaguars?
I'm guessing not many. Why? Because the jersey in your picture is associated with the University of Michigan.
December 12th, 2014 at 4:13 PM ^
If you ask me, Dave Brandon's lasting legacy at Michigan will be the fact that you will probably never be able to attend a Michigan football game in the next 10-20 years (maybe longer) without seeing one of these abominations in your section.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:09 PM ^
Why can't both the players and the school have power?
December 12th, 2014 at 2:11 PM ^
We like Denard Robinson much more than we like you.
Sincerely,
Everyone
December 12th, 2014 at 2:25 PM ^
December 12th, 2014 at 2:29 PM ^
December 12th, 2014 at 8:44 PM ^
Yeah, right after yours. Or something.
/yourmomcomeback
December 12th, 2014 at 2:10 PM ^
I'm only aware of 1 person named Hunter who isn't a massive tool... and he's a professional golfer.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:10 PM ^
Yo, dude should read the Daily article that came out LESS THAN TWO MONTHS AGO... http://www.michigandaily.com/article/block-m 1888 isnt even 150 years(!) boom, semantics'ed
December 12th, 2014 at 2:10 PM ^
December 12th, 2014 at 2:11 PM ^
If Dave Brandon was called Hitler by former players (according to Gregg), then Lochmann is Joseph Goebbels.
Chief propaganda officer.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:27 PM ^
Well that Godwin'd rather quickly, didn't it?
December 12th, 2014 at 2:12 PM ^
Go back to the NBA, with its incessenant advertising and RAWK music and tastlessness.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:14 PM ^
What a terrible way to make a point.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:14 PM ^
Has he been fired yet? I'm sure kids will line up to play for michigan with some dickhole in the AD promising that they will be tossed aside and forgotten after four years.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:17 PM ^
There's definitely a good degree of truth to this. Any time you reference the monetary value a player brings to a school, particularly when making the argument that players should be paid, you need to break out how much of that value is attributable to the player himself, and how much is attributable to the program. Take Denard for instance; put him at a MAC school, and while he's essentially the same player, he doesn't bring in nearly the same amount that he does at a big program. To take it a step further, imagine if Denard and Jordan Lynch from NIU were switched (or Kaepernick at Nevada, etc.). Denard doesn't bring in nearly the same amount of value there as he does at M, and Lynch or Kaepernick or whoever, while probably not going to match Denard's value, would likely come fairly close.
TL;DR version: it's true that a good portion of the value a player brings in comes from the program, and so regardless of your view on paying players, players certainly aren't entitled to the value created merely because you put on the winged helmet instead of a MAC one...
December 12th, 2014 at 2:23 PM ^
December 12th, 2014 at 2:24 PM ^
December 12th, 2014 at 2:26 PM ^
I definitely agree. Almost as if he had a good week of practice, but just couldn't execute.
December 12th, 2014 at 3:04 PM ^
he's an unfeeling corporate stooge who sees people as annoying obstacles to be worked around, just like our previous AD.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:23 PM ^
It's a bit unfair to look at straight dollars here due to the histories and notoriety of the different schools. It would be a better analysis to look at percentages.
Here's the other thing...the block M's power was built on the backs of "fleeting" players. Without the history of great players, that M has no power in the way Lochmann uses the term.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:31 PM ^
Denard's a bad example because he's such an awesome person, but for your average good player, I think it's pretty fungible. People weren't buying the #1 jerseys because of Terrell's ("bomb-ass") personality; they bought them because Terrell was a talenter receiver who wore a winged helmet. Replace him with Randy Moss (at Marshall) and I don't think you see any difference.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:41 PM ^
I still don't think it supports the point Lochmann tried to make about why athletes shouldn't be paid, so it's stupid regardless.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:29 PM ^
But if Denard played at say, BGSU, I'd argue he would have a larger impact on the amount of money the program made than he would at UM.. Michigan is a large program with millions of fans that support it.. so they are going to make money pretty much regardless if Denard played there or not.
But Denard at a MAC school would create excitement and fill a lot more seats than if they just had a normal MAC-level QB playing there. Increased ticket sales, more jersey sales, and an increased chance at a bowl game would have a far greater economic impact.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:36 PM ^
If putting Denard at some random school is a massive upgrade, then sure. But if you put him somewhere like NIU or Nevada, who had their own very talented duel threat QBs, I'm not sure how significant the increase would be.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:19 PM ^
December 12th, 2014 at 2:43 PM ^
This is probably the best comment in this thread. Any alumnus has a lifetime relationship with the school, and so do the diehard fans. As do loyal employees of the school. And many native Ann Arborites.
Because the comment appeared to downgrade Denard Robinson (and the OP's caption), most of us reacted to that. But I think HELLE has zeroed in on the really offensive part of this.
"Fleeting four year relationship"? That's astoundingly tone-deaf.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:42 PM ^
December 13th, 2014 at 1:08 AM ^
The hardcore business-types Brandon brought in all seem to fail to see the difference between college athletics and corporate America. They see money untapped and if they can increase the money in then they're doing their job. College athletics is so so different though. There's tradition, loyalty, experience. So much more than "Is product X worth Y dollars to me?"
When guys like Lochmann think things like forced ad revenue is a gain for the University, they completely fail to see the damage they do to their customer base which is the near-everlastingly loyal fans and alums
December 12th, 2014 at 2:20 PM ^
Man, this is some dumb dumb stuff.
December 12th, 2014 at 2:21 PM ^