The Snowflake Thread: Offense

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on

This will be the repository for snowflakes regarding the offensive and offensive playcalling.

MaizeNBlueTexan

September 13th, 2014 at 7:15 PM ^

The interesting stat that I am seeing, is that Shane held the football once. For 27 yards. 

There is no way he is faster than DG, and DG had more carries and chances to run.

 

I think Shane's overall vision is better than DG. However, I'd start DG every single game. It's frustrating to have his turn overs sometimes, but spread out over the course of the season, I think 2014 DG would be better than 2014 Shane by quite a bit.

Give Shane one more year in Doug's system, there is a possibility he could be a beast of a QB for Michigan 2015. 

2014 is DG's time.

corundum

September 13th, 2014 at 6:47 PM ^

Subtract the onside kick, the Darboh fumble, and the tipped pass int, and this game is a convincing blowout. Green had much better vision today and Darboh / Canteen / Jones got valuable experience. I'll call it an overall step in the right direction, but I'm not feeling any better about the season's potential.

TheLastHarbaugh

September 13th, 2014 at 6:47 PM ^

Green's vision looked a lot better. He actually made something out of nothing mulitple times, and ran through tackles. That's something he hadn't done before.

Darboh and Butt showed we have options in the receiving game outside of Funchess.

It's Miami of Ohio but whatever, it's still good to see. Give the young guys some confidence going forward.

Boom Goes the …

September 13th, 2014 at 6:47 PM ^

thought the other recievers were adequate but not a great game for them

Butt coming back is a bright spot along with Green looking good

FreddieMercuryHayes

September 13th, 2014 at 6:49 PM ^

Ah who knows. They're figuring it out. I still don't know if it'll be good. Last week's ND performance just was not good, and they're not a great D O don't think. But hey, the RBs seem to have read holes better, so improvement?

LSAClassOf2000

September 13th, 2014 at 6:50 PM ^

The brief breakdown is like this: 

460 total yards of offense (184 passing, 276 rushing).

Devin Gardner and Shane Morris combined for 13-22. Shane was 0-2, but Devin was 13-20, so 9.20 yards per attempt and 14.15 yards per completion. 

Those 276 rushing yards were spread across 45 carries, so we managed 6.1 YPC overall. Roughly half of this, of course, was Derrick Green.

 

 

MaizeNBlueTexan

September 13th, 2014 at 7:23 PM ^

Keep in mind both of those Shane passes were almost perfect throws. 

Heitzman dropped a pass to him, in stride!, that should have been hauled in.

I believe the second was a pass to Jehu Chesson that he hauled in and then dropped. Yes DG > Shane, but Shane's 2 passes were good throws.

Take away the turnovers, offense played pretty well IMO.

Not trying to be argumentative, just trying to emphasize that even though we didn't win as we wanted. There were good things on offense.

Epic-Blue

September 13th, 2014 at 6:52 PM ^

Lost to Eastern Kentucky last week. This game was 17-10 at the half! A lot of problems down on State st. They better get the ship righted quickly because Utah is no Miami of Ohio!!! Frustrated!!!!

CompleteLunacy

September 13th, 2014 at 6:54 PM ^

The offense's biggest problem is mental. They are capable of moving the ball in the air and on the ground. But one turnover and they go into a shell. Especially Devin. Glad they got over it eventually, but Nuss really really has to work on their confidence.

Good they got experience without Funchess. Hopefully it helps Devin spread the ball around in the future instead of locking onto #1 too much.

Also Shane threw an end zone dart that should have been a TD catch by Chesson.

Blue NY Gold

September 13th, 2014 at 6:55 PM ^

Still underwhelmed, but a win is a win... I am seriously worried about the season and the development of our backups. If we can't get the backups (i.e. Shane, Canteen, etc..) game reps until the final drive of a game against a team we are suppose to blow the doors off, they won't get much experience for the 2nd year in a row.(obviously we had this issue last year as well) The cupcakes are where the young backups are suppose to get a lot of reps to develop.

Sten Carlson

September 13th, 2014 at 6:57 PM ^

I was glad to see Green's vision improved, and that Butt was able to pick up where he left off.

Watching Shane's delivery is impressive -- especially when comparing it to DG's.

I am not on the "Bench DG, Start Shane" bandwagon, but DG's mechanics seem to have regressed despite Nuss's coaching -- those two passes to Butt were scary bad mechanically.  I was also impressed with Shane's wheels on that zone-read he ran, and again, something is wrong with the way DG is running the ball -- it's like he's not attacking the defense, he's just running scared.  He seems to take an odd angle on his designed runs, not going straight up the field, but at a oblique angle.  I don't know the proper football terms, but it's odd to me.

Glad we got the win, and that the OL started opening holes -- finally.

Blue NY Gold

September 13th, 2014 at 7:03 PM ^

Something isn't right with DG still I think. The pick may not have been on him 100%, but he sure shouldn't have threw that ball.... Laid his WR out to dry....never mind the throw that Butt bailed him out. Still scared about his decision making, but he had plenty of company with bad plays today. Terrified against a team with a great run defense. Was very glad to see them settle down.... Hoping for continued improvement. We will need it.

1of12MattDamons

September 13th, 2014 at 7:00 PM ^

Green appears to be improving. He looked like he was running harder and with better vision.

Butt is awesome and I'm glad he's back. Recievers got experience and Darboh got open a lot. 

Morris came in and threw 2 money passes that were unfortunately dropped.

O-line got better as the game went on. 

If the attrocious and disturbing turnover shit-storm did not occur in the second quarter this would have had a very similar final score as the App State game. 

jsquigg

September 13th, 2014 at 7:01 PM ^

I'm optimistic that the line play will be consistent enough this year.  I'm a bit worried about Devin seeming a bit squeamish when he has time, but the offensive line seems much improved from last year, and if Devin gets comfortable I think the offense could keep getting better.  I just wish they would vary the pace a bit at certain times, but that apparently won't happen under Hoke.

kb

September 13th, 2014 at 7:01 PM ^

This team just doesn't know how to take care of the ball unfortunately. And, I think Gardner isn't going to get much better than what we're seeing now - TOs and almost threw his trademark pick six.

bronxblue

September 13th, 2014 at 7:06 PM ^

It's now, what, 3 games into his run under Nussmeier?  It takes QBs some time to get acclimated as well.  He threw for 2 TDs, 14+ ypc, and completed 65% of his throws.  He isn't great, but he looks WAY better than he did last year at this time.

Also, the one INT was a deflected ball that he shouldn't have thrown but that's true for anyone.  And the pick-6 would have been pretty tough for most college DBs to make.  

kb

September 13th, 2014 at 7:29 PM ^

The QB is in. Either you can make throws and good decisions or you can't. Does Hackenberg look bad in his "new system"? (many other examples exist across the nation). The bottom line is he stares down one receivers, can't make progressions to a second or third read, and doesn't have the best accuracy. It is what we have so we have to stick it out for the year.

AlwaysBlue

September 13th, 2014 at 8:36 PM ^

Did you see Eli Manning Monday? I'm not saying DG is trying to command that complex of a system but he's clearly not operating instinctively which tells me he's too much in his head. If he'd been playing in the same system for 2+ years I'd agree with you but this is basically year one for him with a real QB focused coach. And worse he's having to unlearn half of what he did just to survive last season.

Cville-Blue

September 13th, 2014 at 7:01 PM ^

Three games down, Turnover margin is 1:8 in favor of the bad guys. Yet, our cumulative score is 86 to 55, good guys. This will not hold up if we cannot take care of the football. What gives?

white_pony_rocks

September 13th, 2014 at 7:01 PM ^

this should have been one of those games where we don't learn much about this team, kind is like osu today, I mean 18 losses in a row and we look like this? a win isn't the only thing if you aspire for greatness, you also can't look like shit

bronxblue

September 13th, 2014 at 7:02 PM ^

It was fine.  Wasn't pretty, but 34 points is still a certain level of competency that people are downplaying.  Green looked good running the ball, and it seems like they are settling on him which will be good for continuity.

Darboh looks like a future playmaker, and Butt made a couple of nice catches.  Would like to see more Norfleet, but he had a nice return.

Not the greatest performance, but was a workman one that wasn't nearly as bad as people are making it out to be.

CompleteLunacy

September 13th, 2014 at 7:13 PM ^

I think there's a lot of confirmation bias on the board. They're all looking for negative things because of recency...they were 3-7 last 10 games and many had soured on Hoke after last week. So naturally every bad thing that happened today got amplified in terms of meaning. And when it happens one after another, we all just assume the game will end up like Akron last year. Even tho it didn't.

Like you said, it definitely wasn't pretty. But it's not as bad as some are making it out to be either. It's not like Miami was doing much to scare Michigan...it was Michigan doing it to itself.

TIMMMAAY

September 13th, 2014 at 7:28 PM ^

The spread for this game was 35 points. We didn't really even come close to covering. Now, there are reasons for that, sure, lots of guys injured, a turnover that really wasn't etc. We still played a pretty sloppy game, and it kinda feels like the team gets dangerously close to mentally unraveling in the bad moments.