Types of Rutgering pTomorrow

Submitted by Commie_High96 on November 9th, 2018 at 4:39 PM

What types of creative Rutgering could we see tomorrow?  We have the Rusing Rutger, Passing Rutger, etc, already defined

I would like to propose the Time-of-Possession Rutger (doubling opponent TOP, which we nearly did last week). Any new unofficial “Rutger” suggestions?  What could we reasonably see tomorrow?

JRED

November 9th, 2018 at 5:22 PM ^

These are good jokes, especially the one about the Colonel suiting up. I agree that the program is a dumpster fire and Ash should be fired, etc. However, this is Veterans Day weekend and I'm sure the great minds of Ann Arbor can create some sort of witty Rutgers University burn without dishonoring this very distinguished veteran.

markp

November 9th, 2018 at 5:29 PM ^

I think there's a disconnect here.  I've never heard of anyone associating football trash talk with a university's founder. If someone said "Stanford sucks" I would not imagine they were disparaging Leland and Jane Stanford.

I can't speak for others, but my poking fun at the Rutgers football team has absolutely nothing to do with it's namesake (which I knew nothing about until a few minutes ago).

PopeLando

November 9th, 2018 at 5:58 PM ^

Keep digging this hole buddy. I'm sure one more post will make us take you seriously. 

And if you are a really good boy, we'll all tell you that we did intend to insult Col. Rutgers by laughing at your laughable football team, and you can feel better about yourself...

Dickbag.

RedRum

November 9th, 2018 at 6:26 PM ^

I'm going to asssume you mean well. I have respect for our men and women in uniform. I do not have respect for someone trying to correlate a college football team to a dead military person. If you are offended by rutger, buckle up, this blog may not be for you. I hope you have a great Veterans Day weekend. 

Arb lover

November 9th, 2018 at 5:37 PM ^

The Rutger rutger in which the opposing team has fewer first downs and/or passing completions than letters (6) in the word Rutger.

This also correlates highly with the traditional full Rutger.

JRED

November 9th, 2018 at 7:01 PM ^

Who else remembers October 4, 2014? You know, Rutgers first ever B1G football win ever. Let me help y'all out. You, Brady CHoke, and Big Blue Nation got RUTGERSed 26-24!!! Thanks for playing, and good luck in your eventual Harbaugh-ing of your CFP quest. I hear Columbus is beautiful in late November. 

Slim Whitman

November 9th, 2018 at 7:41 PM ^

You were doing so well. Then this.

We remember 2014. We know Rutgers has a nonzero chance to win. It has a seemingly larger nonzero chance to rutger itself. Please come back and pout/gloat if either of those chances come to be. Actually, only come back if Rutgers doesn't rutger. If Rutgers were to win, this blog and the heads of every poster you might want to mock will probably go

bomb.gif

before you can even log in.

--------------

I used to be somebody else on here. F***ing password reset fail.

TennesseeMaize

November 9th, 2018 at 11:34 PM ^

We’ll have more field goal attempts than they have yards (spoiler alert, both will be less than zero) 

 

seriously, I could see a game with negative rushing yards. They might complete a pass or two, but there will be more sacks than touchdowns 

 

 

pinkfloyd2000

November 10th, 2018 at 2:13 AM ^

The Rutgers beat writers certainly don't think much of tomorrow's chances, and that's an understatement. Damn. Look at some of the score predictions from their guys.

https://www.app.com/story/sports/college/rutgers/2018/11/09/rutgers-rutgers-football-michigan-football/1920876002/