Magnus

December 7th, 2012 at 10:01 AM ^

I think South Carolina has started to produce/recruit players on a level comparable to what Tennessee used to (John Henderson, Albert Haynesworth, Peyton Manning, Jamal Lewis, etc.), but Fulmer had those teams playing on a national championship-caliber level.  Spurrier hasn't reached that point at South Carolina; he hasn't been able to reproduce what he had at Florida, especially on offense.

Magnus

December 7th, 2012 at 8:25 AM ^

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I think Jones will do okay at Cincinnati.  Not great, but okay.

More importantly, though, I hope this hire helps Michigan's case with Derrick Green.

swan flu

December 7th, 2012 at 8:32 AM ^

Guys I'm shocked, absolutely shocked, that Gruden wasn't named the HC. The Tennessee faithful were so sure that he was coming. What happened!? obvious /s

State Street

December 7th, 2012 at 8:33 AM ^

They wanted Gruden as bad as we wanted Harbaugh...

They settled for Jones like we "settled" for Hoke...

...except Jones has never beaten a ranked team, is from the North, has never recruited SEC country, and could quite possibly cause some Vol fans to off themselves.

Good luck with that.

Mr. Yost

December 7th, 2012 at 8:42 AM ^

They wanted Gruden as bad a we wanted Harbaugh...

However the next part is completely wrong. Butch Jones was like #9 on their list. This is more similar to us and Rich Rod than it is us and Hoke.

They were open with their interested in Gruden, Strong, Briles, Petersen, Patterson and Gundy...then there were a few other names that didn't go public that also told them no.

This was baaad for them. Personally, I always thought they should've been after Kirby Smart because I knew they weren't getting anyone else other than MAYBE Briles or Patterson.

This is completely different from Hoke, we always had Hoke on the radar and when Harbaugh didn't come - Hoke was still there. Butch Jones wasn't anywhere NEAR UT's short list at the beginning of this process. Hell, he probably wasn't on the "long list" either.

State Street

December 7th, 2012 at 8:55 AM ^

Nobody actually knows for sure how the Michigan search played out in 2010.  DB kept it under wraps pretty good.  Can you definitively say how many candidates he went to after Harbaugh before he settled on Hoke?  Or if he even went to Harbaugh?

Nobody knows.

The bottom line is our fanbase was underwhelmed by Hoke similar to how UT is reacting to Jones.  Except Jones has no ties to nor experience with Tennessee.

johnvand

December 7th, 2012 at 8:45 AM ^

Now we'll see if Butch is any good.  Still not sold on the guy.  He landed at CMU after Kelly woke it up.  Landed at Cinci... after Kelly woke it up.

This is the first time he's walking in to a dumpster fire. Now we'll see what he's made of.  Seeing that Peyton will be retiring from the NFL in 3 ~ 4 years, that's about how long Butch has.

French West Indian

December 7th, 2012 at 8:48 AM ^

...should have hired Payton Manning to be their head coach.  They absolutely love that guy down there.

Mr. Yost

December 7th, 2012 at 8:51 AM ^

As soon as his playing career is over.

He'll have some great assistant coaches and they'll officially be back because of the buzz which will help recruiting.

No way Peyton gets anything less than the #3 rated pocket passer in the country whenever he wants him.

MGomaha

December 7th, 2012 at 10:29 AM ^

Tennessee has some really good offensive talent. If they had any defense, they could have went 8-4 or 9-3. Only the Alabama and Florida game were blowouts, and even the Florida game they were in it until the fourth. Lost to UGA by 7, USCe by 3, Mizzou by 3, Miss. State by 10 in games they put up a lot of points. 

Although they lost to Vandy by 23, LOL.

Good luck Butch.

Danwillhor

December 7th, 2012 at 10:32 AM ^

Anyone not fully in the "Tennessee is a traditional power and top job" camp is insane or 14 years old. They are a power on hard times and that is all. They, as much as I don't care for them, are a program that CFB would prefer to be good and not a complete tire fire like they are right now. Probably 2nd-3rd or so when you take the schools in the SEC on an all time basis.

Ali G Bomaye

December 7th, 2012 at 10:45 AM ^

Hopefully Narduzzi takes the Cincinnati job.  Say what you will about him, but he's done an impressive job in forming a very good defense out of some moderate talent.  Without him, Dantonio is just Jim Tressel without good players.

turtleboy

December 7th, 2012 at 12:20 PM ^

Depends on if he wants to be a HC or not, I suppose. Some coordinators want to be head coaches and dream of an NFL gig some day, others just want to be coordinators in the NCAA. Since he stayed at MSU this year I often wonder if he was an actual HC candidate at Cincy last time around, or if fans were just throwing his name out there.

saveferris

December 7th, 2012 at 12:24 PM ^

Is there a program that has fallen farther than Tennessee?  For all the program hiccups teams like FSU, USC, Texas, and Michigan have had; they come nowhere near the dumpster fire that is Tennessee.

I'd feel bad for them except....well, I digress, I don't feel bad for them at all.  Their struggles have been pretty hilarious to witness.

Needs

December 7th, 2012 at 12:56 PM ^

I think it's possible to suggest that USC's 1991-2001 decade is equivalent, particularly the latter half from 1996-2001 where their records were 6-6, 6-5, 8-5, 6-6, 5-7, 6-6, and losing every year to both Notre Dame and UCLA.

Now it doesn't seem as bad, since we know what followed, but that's a pretty significant collapse for a program of USC's stature with its built in advantages.

Bodogblog

December 7th, 2012 at 1:44 PM ^

But USC is in Cali, where D1 recruits are exceeded only by crushing state debt. Coming back was relatively easy. Tenn has great facilities, tradition, and fan support, and they can add the right coach. But it may be difficult to ever get back to where they were without that recruiting base.

Needs

December 7th, 2012 at 2:45 PM ^

I don't disagree that USC has considerable advantages, but it's certainly a comparable collapse.

I think Tennessee's recruiting disadvantages might be a bit overblown. If we think of a map without state boundaries, Tennessee's well situated to recruit from the talent rich upcountry south. Knoxville is 3 hours from Atlanta, Greenville, and Charlotte. What hurts them is not so much their weak recruiting area but all the other programs that compete for players within it. USC's advantage is as much the lack of an alternate "home team" as its location itself.