Rawls if he can hang onto it, I'd guesss
quakk
History
- Member for
- 3 years 26 weeks
Karma
- Current value
- 1
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 3 days 6 hours ago | well, they did a darn fine job... |
if you know them, give them my compliments. |
| 5 weeks 3 days ago | well... |
at least your post sheds some new light on the situation... |
| 8 weeks 1 day ago | the chocolaty goodness of polls... |
never underestimate the power of the people to manipulate an opinion poll. i don't see how either of these can defeat the raptor, though. |
| 8 weeks 4 days ago | of course we feel glad for them... |
i don't like their chances going up against a veteran bc/mn/nd team in the finals, but i love a good underdog story. especially since bc/mn/nd have won it before. i go to the frozen four frequently and when michigan isn't there, i cheer for the team with least obnoxious fans. that is never, ever mn or nd. umd last year - do they have fans? - picked up the nd fans after michigan beat nd. nd fans seem to be generally insufferable. go bulldogs (of either variety), eagles or dutchmen. -- while i'm here, how about a big shout out to shawn hunwick for the most improbable and incredible career ever. i'm there with the guy who said 'oh, crap,' when hogan went down against nd in 2010. hunwick has replaced my fear with confidence and he's such a quiet leader. almost like denard without the electric smile and dilithium. |
| 19 weeks 2 days ago | purple face |
what the #*?! is a grimace? |
| 23 weeks 6 days ago | How'd they get the cats in |
How'd they get the cats in there? |
| 28 weeks 3 days ago | As a UCLA alumnus... |
I'd love to see Rich Rodriguez at UCLA. Just hope he can get his defense straightened out (read: keep his damn hands off it). |
| 34 weeks 5 days ago | Don't you think... |
your gloating is a little premature? It's only 4 games into his regime, and he's not coached a Big Ten game, yet. That said, so far the results are promising. |
| 51 weeks 5 hours ago | USC plays in the Coliseum. |
UCLA plays in the Rose Bowl. Still a home game for SC. |
| 1 year 4 weeks ago | stupid test... |
i took this thing 3 times, 4 if you count the first where my answers were off by 1. in my not-so-humble opinion, it's a glorified sat; that said, they say it correlates well to performance in grad school. i agree mostly with what's been said about the math. it's very practical; you can learn some principles and practice to improve your score. as for the verbal, don't get bogged down in memorising a huge list of words. as you're a med student, i'm sure you can relate to learning prefixes, roots and suffixes, and using the combination to make an educated guess at the meanings of words you don't know. this was certainly very useful for me in vet school. the writing - it seemed to me that the idea is to write a coherent, logical argument, with various points and supporting text for those points. i don't think you have to write pulitzer-quality work, just a logical argument. for what it's worth, i scored reasonably well all three times, with a slight improvement the third time. my scores were more than competitive for vet school. do well, whatever you choose.
|
