Vaccine Optimism

Submitted by Gulogulo37 on August 9th, 2020 at 9:13 AM

Since everyone will likely be arguing and rending garments in the other recent threads, I thought I'd post this that I saw today

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html

You may need to create or log in to an account to see it, but you likely don't have to pay for it. I don't have too much to say about it because I'm not that knowledgeable about vaccines. However, there are 6 vaccines currently in phase 3, which is large-scale testing. Apparently then government agencies need to look at the results and see if they're satisfactory. They want at least 50% efficacy to be approved. A vaccine is almost surely coming in the near future. Don't ask me what "near" means, again, not an expert. It does say one has been approved but apparently it was made for the Chinese military and it's really only cleared for emergency use in China or something? So we can probably pass on that one. Anyway, I just thought I'd share some promising news.

Spring football or bust.

SugarShane

August 9th, 2020 at 9:26 AM ^

Spring football is not happening. 
 

even if a vaccine is proven effective by New Year, college students would be last in line to get doses 

WestQuad

August 9th, 2020 at 1:22 PM ^

That's horrifying to think about.  A fake vaccine a week or so before the election in order to take a fake victory lap....   I have to think that even if there were politically motivated rubber stamps in the CDC/HHS/FDA that there would be some scientific hurdles that would still have to be cleared making something like that impossible.  

Rhino77

August 9th, 2020 at 3:59 PM ^

Reading a bunch of articles today on immunity and t-cells and what they are seeing. From what I’ve read you don’t need everyone to be vaccinated, just enough to create a herd immunity with the factors above. Plenty of articles out there on it. 

OSUMC Wolverine

August 9th, 2020 at 4:59 PM ^

i suspect it will be a much larger percentage  than 33% that will opt out for quite a while. i dont know a single physician, APP, or RN that has any intent of being vaccinated any time in the near future. Reasonable PPE used correctly has shown near zero transmission rate in my area....as a result the potential risk of an unsafe product outweighs the perceived benefit when transmission can be near zero properly utilizing masks, distancing, and hand washing. That being said...most people utilizing masks in the community are not using them properly....a vaccine when safe and effective will be welcome.

bluebyyou

August 9th, 2020 at 11:16 AM ^

Billions of dollars have been provided to the companies developing CV19 vaccines so that adequate quantities of the vaccines under development will be made available in short order.

To give some perspective, for the '18-'19 flu season we had 170 million doses of influenza vaccine available.  https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/vaccine-supply-historical.htm  

 

raleighwood

August 9th, 2020 at 12:46 PM ^

I work for one of the companies developing a vaccine.  It's in Phase 3 trials in Europe and US.  It's my understanding that doses are being made in advance with the expectation that the vaccine will be approved early next year.  The goal is to have 1B doses by the end of 2021.  I don't think supply will be a major issue......but distribution could be another story.

njvictor

August 9th, 2020 at 11:22 AM ^

This is going to be a major issue. When an effective vaccine is announced, everyone is going to let their guard down and there's going to be huge spike despite the fact that no has gotten the vaccine and it will take many months for everyone to get the vaccine

SalvatoreQuattro

August 9th, 2020 at 3:25 PM ^

It probably is. They already are working on mass production,

 

To vaccinate players you need a few thousand shots which is a pittance.I am not sure why you think they couldn’t or wouldn’t get vaccines to all athletes ASAP when a relative small amount is needed.

 

champswest

August 9th, 2020 at 9:53 AM ^

Herd immunity is still our best hope. A vaccine of greater than 60% effectiveness, is a long shot, in my opinion. Mask up, wash hands and space out is going to be with us for a long, long while.

umchicago

August 9th, 2020 at 10:37 AM ^

well, from what i hear, flu vaccines are hit or miss; approx 40-50% effective this year.  covid, like the flu, is mutating so a new vaccine is needed each year.  so getting anywhere close to 100% seems unlikely to me.

for this reason, treatments for covid are every bit, if not more, important.

Gulogulo37

August 9th, 2020 at 10:45 AM ^

"covid, like the flu, is mutating so a new vaccine is needed each year."

I haven't read that anywhere. How would we know we need a new vaccine next year before getting one in the first place? Gotta love these armchair virologists. Complaining about the doom and gloomers and then just denying a vaccine is going to help things.

BroadneckBlue21

August 9th, 2020 at 11:45 AM ^

All viruses mutate to survive. They’ve said the coronavirus is mutating much slower because it is effectively spreading itself. 

By the same measure, what makes you think treatments will be anymore effective against this theoretically mutating virus? 
 

Not only will we have to rely on vaccine and therapeutics, but we will have to maintain social distancing, mask wearing, and hand washing practices for at least the next few years. We need to take all these actions and also hope the virus mutates into something weaker—but we cannot count on this or just one of the above.The sooner a large majority realizes that, the faster we can heel the virus and heal society.

MichiganTeacher

August 9th, 2020 at 12:41 PM ^

Why would you think it would be more effective? There was never any commerical SARS or MERS vaccine, the dengue vaccine isn't even good for people who haven't already had the disease once, the malaria "vaccine" is quite low efficacy, the flu vaccine is famously unreliable, the HIV/AIDS vaccine never materialized, the hepatitis E vaccine isn't even available in our country, and on and on. The real question is why would you think there would be a sars-cov-2 vaccine that's highly effective? There might be, but the evidence doesn't point strongly in either direction.

bronxblue

August 9th, 2020 at 10:07 AM ^

The flu vaccine, which we've been constantly updating for damn near a century now, has an efficacy between 40-60%.  From all I've read, C19 doesn't appear to evolve as quickly and the common flu but it's still unlikely a single vaccine, or even a combo, would be much more effective.  And even the most optimistic prognostications recognize access to a vaccine won't be generally available for months later.

I have my doubts spring football will happen anyway, and I wouldn't bank of a vaccine demonstrably changing that.

Jonesy

August 9th, 2020 at 5:34 PM ^

The flu vaccines are far more effective than that. However there are lots of strains of the flu and each year hospitals try to predict which strains will be most prevalent and they provide a vaccine for that/those ones. Anyone who gets a different strain of flu will be less likely to be protected the less their vaccine matches the strain they contract.

That doesnt apply to covid which so far is not mutating much and as far as i know not in ways that would require different vaccines for different mutations.

SecretAgentMayne

August 9th, 2020 at 10:28 AM ^

Both the Oxford and Moderna vaccines in phase 3 right now are currently being mass produced, and we should have millions of doses ready sometime in the fall after the results come out. Fingers crossed!

Perkis-Size Me

August 9th, 2020 at 10:58 AM ^

Nailed it. If it works he’ll take the credit for himself and his base will shower him with it on their own. F&F will coronate him as the savior that the rest of the world and half this country doesn’t deserve, but one we all need anyway. If it doesn’t work he’ll lash out at his enemies about how it’s all their fault and he’s getting a raw deal from the MSM.  

Sparty Doesn't Know

August 9th, 2020 at 7:14 PM ^

The irony of somebody saying nothing except calling him an idiot thanking him for contributing nothing to the conversation.

He is technically right.  All the libs I know are proud that the MSM is always all over Trump.  If he personally found a cure for cancer the coverage would absolutely be negative.  I think that is a good thing.  The press should be antagonistic towards the government.  They should not be so unabashedly biased.

As pragmatic as that sounds, I have to admit if I knew a democrat was stuck in a burning house I would throw gasoline on it before I would call the firemen.  

SecretAgentMayne

August 9th, 2020 at 11:25 AM ^

Are you reading a little bit too much into my statement? Definitely. I wasn’t making any political talking point, I simply want a working vaccine for the sake of humanity.

 

Do I think the idiot in chief will try and take credit for it while his cult showers him with completely undeserved praise? Yes, I think you’re completely right about that too.