US Women vs. Thailand in FIFA World Cup

Submitted by VCavman24 on June 11th, 2019 at 4:30 PM

With 20 minutes left in its opening match, the US National Women's Team is up 7-0 against Thailand.  Morgan and Mewis both have a pair of goals.  The US won in 2015 and is looking good so far!

WolverineinLA

June 11th, 2019 at 4:42 PM ^

Love it! At a certain point, might hear some sportsmanship jeers which I get (could just pass the ball around or put in some more subs, how many subs can you put in the game in soccer?). 

However, if this were football vs Ohio State, pour it on them. Gimme another 10 touchdowns.

Hopefully they can keep this momentum up past group play!

WolverineinLA

June 11th, 2019 at 5:15 PM ^

By that logic, none of Beilein's teams were great then :/

 

https://studybreaks.com/culture/running-score-sports/

Again, if this were Michigan Football vs. Ohio State. Run up the score and make them say "Daddy". I would love that. But say its 48-0 in the middle of the 4th against Army, I'd say put in some second stringers, run the ball, etc. 

Honker Burger

June 11th, 2019 at 5:31 PM ^

As I said it's incredibly unlikely. This (13) is the most goals scored by a team in a women's world cup game. 

But that doesn't mean that Sweden can't come out and put 14 up against Thailand. The US could theoretically tie with both Chile and Sweden and then end up losing a GD against Sweden. This scenario is incredibly improbable, but things happen in sports.

If you saw the brief post coverage, the only person who took issue with the 13 goals was the host (a non professional athlete). All the other former players said you never stop playing no matter the score.

Honker Burger

June 11th, 2019 at 5:45 PM ^

Where do you draw the line then? If he was a sophomore is it still ok? What if we were up 70-3? I'm asking this as a hypothetical and not as a direct attack on you btw.

But there is no reason to stop playing. You can obliterate teams while still playing with sportsmanship, so long as you aren't showing people up and embarrassing them in ways unrelated to the game.

As a side note, this is why some of the 'unwritten rules' of baseball are so stupid. For example, not stealing or bunting when you are up by X number of runs. Big comebacks happen all the time. You should stop trying to win the game to avoid hurting somebody's feelings?

WolverineinLA

June 11th, 2019 at 6:01 PM ^

I totally get that, I'm with you. I would say the line is where a game is 99.99% likely that you will win. Say it was 49-3 with 5 min left in the 4th. It's almost impossible just due to time for a team to come back and win the game. I would say you put in your subs at that point and let them have 1-2 drives. Don't necessarily have to run the ball exclusively. 

In this case, I don't think Bell was "technically" a starter and inexperienced so to me thats ok. But like throwing bombs to Nico or DPJ with 5 min left up 46, eh. 

I guess now that I think about it, it's less about sportsmanship to me and more about preventing injuries/getting experience for younger players.

For example, that Rutgers game like 2 years ago where we won something ridiculous like 79-0, I believe we had our 2nd and 3 stringers out there pretty early, but we just kept scoring haha. I'm cool with that. 

saveferris

June 12th, 2019 at 7:46 AM ^

FIFA rules allow for a maximum of three subs in regulation, plus a fourth in extra time; so you can't just sub out your entire starting side should the score get extremely lopsided as a gesture of "sportsmanship".

The US showed sportsmanship by giving Thailand the respect entitled to any World Cup opponent by giving them their best effort for 90 minutes.  If Thailand doesn't want to get blown out, play harder. 

This post-game narrative of the US showing bad sportsmanship is bullshit.  They're in France to win the World Cup and every minute they're working on their game will serve to benefit them down the line.  You can't just throw away minutes passing the ball around midfield, running down the clock.  Mallory Pugh should be denied the chance to score her first goal in World Cup play simply because the US had a huge lead?  Stop it. 

The US showed respect to Thailand by never letting up for a second; if that grates on some of them, then they can only look in the mirror for whom to blame.

B-Nut-GoBlue

June 11th, 2019 at 4:50 PM ^

Ummm...I just turned to Fox and saw this...what.  thee.  fuck.

I hope the bench was cleared and has been playing since oh I dunno, 6-0.

Alex Morgan, a measly 5 goals, eh?  Wow.

Michigan Arrogance

June 11th, 2019 at 4:58 PM ^

missed extra point gonna cost them in the end.

 

side note, interesting that womens intnl football is a thing - seems like it came out of nowhere. wouldn't expect Thai to end have a team but what do i know

bacon1431

June 11th, 2019 at 5:08 PM ^

Women’s World Cup started in 1991...not like it’s a new thing. 

Their football federations are not nearly as supportive as they are of men, which is no surprise. The Argentine team slept in the bus when they got to France. Then went on to draw one of the two teams to be a finalist in the last two world cups. Their first point in World Cup history. 

bacon1431

June 11th, 2019 at 5:05 PM ^

Thailand is the only team in the women’s World Cup that has looked outpaced so far. Argentina, Chile, South Africa and Cameroon all held their own against solid teams IMO. Even Jamaica and Nigeria looked ok. 

People were afraid quality would drop a ton with an expansion for the women’s World Cup. I think they could go to 32 teams in 2027. 

ToledoWolverine

June 11th, 2019 at 6:11 PM ^

Meanwhile the US men’s team is a total disaster..... 

blow them up, give all the money to the women’s side. The sham has gone on long enough. US women = source of national pride. US Men’s soccer = tire fire.