UM opens as 18-point favorite vs. Nebraska

Submitted by Jkello007 on

Title pretty much says it all. I have a feeling this line is going to change a bit before gametime depending on players's statuses currently unknown (Higdon, Evans, Adrian Martinez). Line according to VegasInsider.

UM 1-2 ATS

NEB 0-2 ATS

UESWolverine

September 17th, 2018 at 4:54 PM ^

Frost mentioned in the Troy postgame interview that Martinez looked good before the game but that he didn't want to rush him back as he will be the future there. He made it seem like he could play this upcoming week. Not sure if the Michigan D is the first thing you want your young QB to face after coming off an injury though. 

I figured this would be an eight point spread. Man, I was way off. 

mGrowOld

September 17th, 2018 at 3:34 PM ^

Wow.  That's sure gonna make Scot Frost's mom mad.

FWIW if I was a degenerate gambler I'd take Nebraska right now +18, wait for the line to drop to about +12 or so and then bet Michigan and hope for a middle where you can win both bets but cant lose both bets (a gambler's dream).

 

Nervous Bird

September 17th, 2018 at 3:39 PM ^

I'm not a gambler, but I see Michigan winning by at least 3 touchdowns against Nebraska. Some have been critical of the team's performance versus SMU, however I think it's difficult getting up for consecutive cupcakes. When a team is expected to win by a large margin, there can be some letdown with intensity and focus. That should be no problem this week since this is the first conference game, and Nebraska, along with their head coach, has some antagonistic history with the Maize and Blue program. 

There were a lot of positives to glean from last Saturday's victory, while the negatives I simply chalk up to boredom with the opponent. It's business time now, though. We'll soon know if the ND game was an aberration, or a continuing trend.

Go Blue!

ldevon1

September 17th, 2018 at 3:44 PM ^

That ND game is still weird to me. Yeah the Oline looked like shit, but some of the play calling was really suspect. I'm not sure if Shea was real comfortable with changing plays at the line, or if they even gave him the option. After watching the Amazon series, it was obvious they wanted the QB's to stick with certain calls. JMO, hell I don't know anything. 

ak47

September 17th, 2018 at 3:41 PM ^

Seems really high to me. Nebraska is #2 in the country in sacks, I'd expect Martinez to play, which given how Michigan's defense looked without Hudson makes me very nervous for the first half of that game. Throw in Evans likely being out (it looked like a hamstring not a cramp) and I could see a close game through the 3rd quarter without too much trouble. Nebraska might be 0-2 but they could just as easily be 2-0, they aren't that bad.

xtramelanin

September 17th, 2018 at 3:45 PM ^

remember when we were going to beat somnambulant SMU by about 100?   yeah.  we win even if martinez makes it out there, but by 18? 

xtramelanin

September 17th, 2018 at 5:08 PM ^

you're darn right we will, sal.

they're both in the central time zone.  what more proof do you need? 

actually, that SMU freshman QB was an eye opener.  kid could run and was big.  martinez is more of a jitterbug, but he'll have more of an O-line, too. 

pz

September 17th, 2018 at 5:14 PM ^

SMU isn't too far behind Troy in some of the advanced stats rankings... and Troy didn't have much trouble beating Nebraska at home.

Nebraska going on the road regardless of the QB does not seem like it will end well for them. 

Newton Gimmick

September 17th, 2018 at 4:12 PM ^

Too much negativity here.  I guess we know our own weaknesses too well, but Nebraska has many more of them and is playing their first road game.

Line is about right -- S&P difference plus home-field puts it at about 17, the Action Network's ratings, about 23.  I wouldn't be surprised if the line goes up, especially if Martinez is out.

Mr Grainger

September 17th, 2018 at 4:16 PM ^

Seems high to me. I would have guessed Michigan by 10-12 points. Maybe Vegas feels Martinez either won't play or, if he does, won't be 100 percent?

I think it will feel a lot like last year's Purdue game where it stays close for 2.5 quarters and Michigan is finally able to put some distance between the two. But I don't know that the distance will get to 18 points.

ChicagoB1GRed

September 17th, 2018 at 4:22 PM ^

Frost is making wholesale changes to the team - he's been given a long leash and he's going for a complete overhaul/rebuild. 

At last count, added 51 new players to the roster. 140 currently on the roster, largest in the B1G I believe, 35% who are new since December, including lots of walkons:

38 freshmen and 3 redshirt freshmen, 3 sophomores, 6 juniors, and a senior. And I expect some more transfers. 

Not to mention 2 QBs transferring. And a flashy new QB who hadn't played in 2 years. And a completely new offense, 100% coaching staff turnover, and a new AD.  

The Huskers have 16 scholarship seniors and 21 total seniors and plan to sign another full recruiting 2019 class and more walk-ons. By next year Frost likely will have added 90 new players.

I can't recall, but did Hoke or Harbaugh put the Wolverines through that level of transformation? 

It would certainly be a longshot to upset Michigan this week, but I think anybody who bets the spread on any game either way on the Huskers this year is making a bad bet - everything's too unpredictable and in flux. 

greatlakestate

September 18th, 2018 at 6:12 AM ^

I can't recall, but did Hoke or Harbaugh put the Wolverines through that level of transformation? 

No, but Rich Rodriguez did and you saw the result.  3-9 in season one.  He did improve and it's an enduring academic question whether he would've succeeded had he been given more time. 

Frost does have the advantage of being an alum and understanding the culture.  RR never "got us."

My question is does your fanbase have the patience for an overhaul?