SP+ Predicts UM 27-Iowa 16

Submitted by BlueLikeJazz on December 1st, 2021 at 9:18 AM

Title basically says it all.

https://twitter.com/ESPN_BillC/status/1466022511334805506?s=20

Also, since someone will inevitably ask, SP+ is the best prediction metric out there. Using it to bet against the spread would win you a lot of money most of the time. As it turns out, the SP+ predictions for this week align with the spreads really closely.

It has Georgia, Cincinnati, and OKSt all winning, in which case I think those would be the other three playoff teams. 

ShadowStorm33

December 1st, 2021 at 11:58 AM ^

You're both right. Yes, PSU being forced to play a very much not ready QB played a leading role in their collapse, and Neb is Neb, collapsing is what they do. But Iowa didn't quit, and their propensity for big plays on D and ST means they can turn around a one or two score game in a hurry.

Priority #1 will definitely be taking care of the football. Make their O score their points (not their strong suit as of late), and hopefully get a nice lead early and let Hutch and Ojabo go to work on their QBs...

FlexUM

December 1st, 2021 at 9:27 AM ^

Michigan should win this game if they play a sound fundamentally focused game. The biggest thing Iowa has going for them is UM coming off the most emotional win in 20+ years. That isn't a small thing. 

I truly believe we find out how much the culture has changed this week. It has changed a TON...but we see if we have found the ceiling. This is gong to take a hell of a job from coaches and team leaders to refocus and play a sound game. They won't be able to match the intensity of the osu game and that's also ok. You can only do that a few times a year. But you can get refocused and play sound, mistake free football. 

I'm an athletic trainer that has worked in college for years and my buddy who works for Iowa is saying they are 100% using the typical motivation you'd expect "Michigan isn't even focused on us", "Michigan thinks they already won", "Michigan doesn't respect us". All the stereotypical things any team would do...they are doing it. They are going to try to do exactly what Michigan did to osu. Punch UM in the face to shock them, and see how they respond. 

UM has to be focused and not turn the damn ball over to this Iowa team. I will be as impressed as I've been from any game this year if they come out and play a clean and crisp game. 

It's championship week now boys!!!!!

bklein09

December 1st, 2021 at 9:36 AM ^

It’s going to require the team to walk the line between letdown and playing tight. Yes there’s a risk of a letdown, but there’s also a risk of playing tight given the circumstances.

The pressure is on us, just like it was on OSU last week. Iowa can play like they have nothing to lose, because after all, they didn’t even expect to be here.

What gives me a lot confidence is our leadership. Hutch, Haskins, Cade, Vastardis, Hawkins, etc. Those guys feel like they can will this team to victory. I’m counting on it. 

lhglrkwg

December 1st, 2021 at 10:34 AM ^

The mental make-up of this team seems stronger than any I've seen in my ~15 years following Michigan. They've taken haymakers from all sides and haven't crumpled like we've all come to expect that Michigan teams will. You won't get that same emotional high you got for OSU, but they're going to be focused

charblue.

December 1st, 2021 at 12:08 PM ^

The difference is that Michigan built up to last week's performance against the Buckeyes. The victory over Maryland was just as dominating as last week's performance and featured the same kind of all around effectiveness, which means to me, this team is on a mission.

In watching them celebrate afterward, their body language wasn't so much an indication of Mission Accomplished, but as hurdle cleared to reach bigger goals. What did our coach say, it feels like the beginning. We did it! Now do it again.

FlexUM

December 1st, 2021 at 9:30 AM ^

I have not watched Iowa at all...not a single game. Is this the type of game for Hutch and Co to feast?

Assume the Iowa o-line is good but is their qb play as bad as people say?

Watching From Afar

December 1st, 2021 at 9:36 AM ^

Their QBs are mediocre. Petras' stat line is 58% completions, a little over 6 YPA, and a 9:6 TD:INT.

Their Center is probably the best in all of college football and their RB is good, but the rest of the OL isn't very good. They've given up 1 less sack than PSU on the season, putting them at 2nd to last in the conference. Their TE is their leading receiver (no shock) but even then he isn't a Hockenson level Iowa TE.

If Michigan can get them off schedule and force them to drop back (and not get caught with misdirection), it could get ugly, fast on that side of the ball.

Hail to the Vi…

December 1st, 2021 at 11:00 AM ^

This, and I think you could argue their QB's are less than mediocre. Against top 30 defenses, their production falls off a cliff. This is not an offense can hit on explosive plays with any consistency really at all. I could see them putting together a nice scripted drive to start the game that will make us all pucker a little bit, but they won't be able to sustain it, and their offense will bog down quickly.

They have a pretty solid rushing attack, and their defense is excellent. But over the course of a 4 quarter game, really their only option will be to drive the field on our defense. I really don't like their chances there at all.

For Michigan, I think the key will be to not let their defense or special teams make any game changing plays. The first quarter could be a little suspenseful for us, but we can grind them down with our running game mixed with RPO/play action to keep them off balance. Our guys have demonstrated all season they don't panic in tight games and have the mental fortitude to stick with the game plan throughout the ebbs and flows of a competitive game. We should be fine as long as we don't turn it over or make a plethora of mental mistakes. Even if we come out a little flat after a big emotional win after last weekend.

outsidethebox

December 1st, 2021 at 11:37 AM ^

"A pretty solid rushing attack"...oh my no. Iowa at 121 per game with a 3.3 ypc would be well below mediocre. Michigan at 225 per game and a 5.3 yards per carry average-now we are talking better than "pretty good". 

It is most difficult to envision Michigan lacking emotional and psychological engagement for this contest. 

WolverineHistorian

December 1st, 2021 at 9:41 AM ^

I've only watched Iowa twice this year.  Penn State was dominating them until they lost Clifford.  Then PSU's offense was non-existent and that was just enough for Iowa to barely to squeak out the win.

When I checked scores on my phone, it said Purdue was kicking Iowa's ass at Kinnick so I watched the entire second half.  

Despite Iowa's coma inducing style of offense, they're one of those pain in the ass teams that will play you annoyingly close the majority of the time.  And I don't think it's going to be easy for Michigan to just come off the most emotional victory in forever and just pick up where they left off.  Hope I'm wrong.  

Many people seem to think this will be a 21-13 type game.  

UMProud

December 1st, 2021 at 10:26 AM ^

Agree...I think this game is going to be closer than most fans expect.  KF is a smart head coach and likes to lay in the weeds to capitalize on mistakes other teams make.  Their defense is pretty good and we've seen middling QBs turn in Heisman performances against us at various times for some odd reason.

I think we win but I'm going to keep some Tums handy for this game. 

BluePhins

December 1st, 2021 at 9:45 AM ^

They're gonna run, they're gonna throw screens, throwbacks, wheel routes to rb's (like Nebraska did), end-arounds, TE pop passes...anything and everything to avoid Aidan and Ojabo and to keep our defense off balance.

Their defense is very good, they'll sell out against Haskins and switch up coverages on passing downs, baiting McNamara to throw over the middle. It's going to be a long, annoying grind it out game. Michigan could create some space early by hitting a deep shot against one on one coverage and capitalizing on an Iowa mistake, but I wouldn't count on it.

jmgoblue83

December 1st, 2021 at 9:46 AM ^

Of the Iowa games I’ve watched they rely entirely on their defense. At least earlier in the year when they moved to #2, they would have one 5-10 minute stretch in the game. During this time they would score on defense once or twice, and play suffocating defense. The remainder of the game would be sitting on the lead. Best bet for Michigan is to stop their opening scripted drive, and not turn the ball over. Michigan should win a field position game based on how abysmal Iowa’s offense is. 

Watching From Afar

December 1st, 2021 at 9:55 AM ^

Michigan should win a field position game based on how abysmal Iowa’s offense is.  

My biggest concern is that Henning is still a bit shaky in the punt return game. The weather obviously played a roll against OSU, but he's had a few muffed punts and tries to catch punts off the bounce. Iowa's special teams are really good so I worry that field position battle could flip given 1 or 2 bad returns.

BlueMetal

December 1st, 2021 at 10:21 AM ^

Iowa special teams are second only to Michigan's. Henning hasn't been perfect but he makes up for slight shakiness with a lot of excellent returns. He was really good against OSU. The one he caught off the bounce bounced right into his chest. That should be, and looked like it was, easy for him to field. The one he muffed was a blow-by that should have been flagged for interference. 

Watching From Afar

December 1st, 2021 at 11:06 AM ^

Yeah I'm not so concerned about the muff that should have been flagged. He's dropped 2 others I think this year though.

And yes the bouncing punt landed right in his chest, but footballs aren't round and that's a huge risk. It bounces 6 inches lower and he doesn't field it cleanly and there are problems.

That's kind of my point, his returns are high variance. Could go for 20 yards on a clean catch and run. Or he could not field it and it's a turnover or loses 20 yards of field position.