OTish: What is the most important position group on a football team?

Submitted by Cousin Larry on June 2nd, 2021 at 2:02 PM

Thought experiment: If you could design a football team where every position group is average, but you got to choose one position group to be elite, which would you choose?  As in, which group is the most determinative of team success, in your opinion?

UM85

June 2nd, 2021 at 5:13 PM ^

Fair point.  However, you could equally argue that a highly skilled defensive lineman (Branch) was able to defeat the offensive lineman and hit Morelli before he could complete a TD pass.  Anyone who watched Michigan's DL the last couple years and its failure to apply pressure on the QB or stop the run might agree.

The Deer Hunter

June 2nd, 2021 at 7:01 PM ^

No...it's because there is no picture of Branch running over an OL here. This was a stunt where AB lined up as NT and nailed Morelli pretty much untouched as we had a plethora of bigtime DLs that no one could collectively block. The DLINE was the difference in this game period. Ironically Morelli completed this pass for a first down, but this was the key play as PSU had no little chance without Morelli as this knocked him out of the game. 

Edit, I actually found the play 

 

Wallaby Court

June 2nd, 2021 at 2:08 PM ^

This depends so much on how you define and divide position groups. Is DL a position group, or do you divide it into DTs and DEs? What about OLBs in a 3-4 defense? On offense, does the OL get subdivided? What about various flavors of WRs, TEs, and RBs?

Operating on the assumption that the OL is a single unit, I would choose either OL or QB. An elite OL can elevate otherwise average QBs and RBs. Similarly, an elite QB (presumably with some mobility) can hide sins on the OL and make pedestrian WRs look great.

Tunneler

June 2nd, 2021 at 4:08 PM ^

I agree that raisins are wonderful, but what we are talking about here is football.  Specifically, football position groups.  Discussing these types of things is practically the general purpose of our little soiree.  What is d'etre anyway...  Some kind of jelly?

AlbanyBlue

June 2nd, 2021 at 3:28 PM ^

An excellent take that did not deserve to be negged. +1 to you.

My first thought is/was QB, but upon more thought, I think it's OL. An excellent OL can protect the QB and open up the running game, making the QB's job easier. An excellent QB can mitigate the performance of a poor OL, but only to a point.

Overall, for a team to be successful, it needs strong OL and DL, solid QB play, and excellent corners/safeties. But OL overall is most important.

amedema

June 2nd, 2021 at 2:09 PM ^

QB, OL, DL are the top three. I think arguments could be made for any but personally think QB is top. 30 years ago, DL would be top. 

Germany_Schulz

June 2nd, 2021 at 2:23 PM ^

Offensive Line.  If they have no penalties, allow QB to throw/plays develop and steam roll on run-plays, generally that's the team that wins. 

Go Blue. 

BursleysFinest

June 2nd, 2021 at 2:26 PM ^

Would have to say elite DL, The Dline would make average CBs and LBs look elite, and not only that, but they generate offense  (in the form of field position, forced fumbles, and interceptions from newly-skittish QBs)

snowcrash

June 2nd, 2021 at 2:30 PM ^

Offensive line. With an elite OL but average backs and receivers, you always pose a threat both on the ground and in the air, and you can design an offense that can cause problems regardless of how the opponent plays you.

If you have an elite DL but an average back 7, the opponent can use a lot of quick throws to limit the impact of your DL.