OT: UofM Library's Prized Galileo Manuscript is a Forgery?

Submitted by It'sNotAToomer on August 17th, 2022 at 4:28 PM

I was today years old when I learned the Library had what it thought was a manuscript by the venerable Galileo Galilei. I was also today years old when I learned the manuscript was a forgery. What a kick in the tacopants for the home team.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/17/arts/galileo-forgery-university-of-michigan.html?smid=url-share

And here's a direct link to the Library's story, if you want to go right to the source:

https://www.lib.umich.edu/about-us/news/researcher-discovers-galileo-manuscript-forgery

Blue Vet

August 17th, 2022 at 4:40 PM ^

Yah, but the good guys (UM Library) did the right thing.

Instead of sweeping it under the rug, they addressed it and might use it for an exhibit or symposium on forgeries and ever improving methods of determining authenticity.

Y'know: trust the science, not only for what's known now but trust science will keep evolving based on new evidence.

(Also, it's not like they paid big bucks for it. It was a donation.)

DairyQueen

August 17th, 2022 at 11:41 PM ^

As this is somewhat in my wheelhouse of anal-retentive documentation, there are many works that univerities hold that they do not actually let the public access (and even then only a few "scholars" retain possible access to), there are many reasons but not the least of which is there are likely many forgeries in holding that the colleges would just rather not reveal, diminishing their prestigious claim to these works.

 

The same is true of fine art works, many ultra-wealthy paid massive sums for total fakes, and would simply not like this to come to light (partially for their tax-evasion scheme, partially for their own ego/prestige)

If you think this sounds outlandish/ridiculous, I beg you, read some fun history of fine-art collectors/sales and of forgers and thieves, you'll be entertained I promise. Scandals everywhere!

It'sNotAToomer

August 18th, 2022 at 9:29 AM ^

Well that's all just sad to read. I wonder, after I'd personally sunk millions into a work of art, would I *want* to know whether it was a forgery? Assuming I'd done my due diligence before the purchase, would I be excited about a new technique that could better measure the veracity (voracity?) of the art's history? Maybe not. For once I can be thankful I don't have the millions to spare.

Zoltanrules

August 17th, 2022 at 4:53 PM ^

Al-Biruni (b.973) figured out the movements of the Sun, Moon and Earth six centuries before Catholic Church excommunicated Galileo and imprisoned him, but Notre Dame did get a heck of a TV contract based on the universe revolving around South Bend.

MGoStretch

August 17th, 2022 at 5:00 PM ^

On a positive note, his tomb in Florence is sweet. Highly recommend hitting up Santa Croce if one is ever in the neighborhood. Pretty crazy that he, Michelangelo, Machiavelli, and (kinda but not really) Dante are all buried in the same building.

SalvatoreQuattro

August 17th, 2022 at 7:36 PM ^

Just saw a video from the Clements library that announced that they had acquired a French fort map(that was “acquired” by the British) of Fort Detroit. It dates from the 1760’s.

Clements is a crown jewel of the university.

ShadowStorm33

August 18th, 2022 at 8:45 PM ^

I'm obviously late to this party, but does anyone with a NYT subscription have a friends' link or whatever it is that allows others to read the article without the paywall?