Tater

August 22nd, 2010 at 8:37 AM ^

Threet is tall, but it's going to be hard for him to be effective in the pocket when he practically throws sidearm.  I don't see him turning into a mobile, roll-out guy, either.  I would imagine that coaches are still working with him to at least tweak his motion, which will probably affect his consistency.

XxNoRemorsExX

August 22nd, 2010 at 1:02 PM ^

Threet did his best in the spot he was in at Michigan.(i.e. zone read shotgun)  He may thrive in ASU's offensive system.  You never know.  I'm not saying they'll be world beaters, but at his height and, um, "speed", at least he's not being asked to be a zone read qb anymore.  Maybe Dennis Erickson can turn him into something.

Drill

August 22nd, 2010 at 2:37 AM ^

I really liked Threet, so I really hope he is successful at ASU.  Best of luck to you, Threet.  Unless you happen to be facing Michigan in a bowl game or something. :)

HartAttack20

August 22nd, 2010 at 2:49 AM ^

Threet is a great guy and everything, but I can't imagine that this is good for the ASU offense. After what I saw during his short stay at Michigan, I'm skeptical. He must've improved a lot since then. And when I say a lot, I mean A LOT.

Njia

August 22nd, 2010 at 9:14 AM ^

Of course he improved. He's in a system somewhat more favorable to his physical attributes and style of play. He's probably bigger, much more mature, more used to the speed of play, etc. Certainly more so than when he played here.

I'm sure it doesn't hurt that Dennis Erickson is one of the Wise Old Men of college coaches. He's seen his share of quarterbacks, and coached some very, very good ones.

MGoRob

August 22nd, 2010 at 3:24 AM ^

Wow, sounds like fun.  SIgn me up.

"Actually," Mazzone said, smiling, "we're not yelling at the quarterbacks nearly as much as we use to."

bronxblue

August 22nd, 2010 at 9:07 AM ^

Good for him.  He always seemed to have horrible timing (first going to GT before they switched to that flex/wishbone/whatever run-based offense, then to UM before they switched to the read-option), but it looks like ASU is a good fit.  Wish him the best.

Sporchek El Basha

August 22nd, 2010 at 9:38 AM ^

Thought highly of Threet coming out of high school. I don't understand why one season with the worst football team in Michigan history, in an offense no one on the team understood, after the team lost something like 147 players during the offseason, would cause others to think Threet has no potential to be a good player. Sad.

I wish him the best, and with real QB coaching, Threet will probably have a very solid career out there.

PurpleStuff

August 22nd, 2010 at 9:59 AM ^

The guy was also basically a true freshman (and they don't tend to be any good playing quarterback no matter where they play).  Add in a pretty lousy offensive line and a group of skill players that was just oft-injured Brandon Minor and a bunch of freshmen and no young quarterback is going to be successful under those circumstances.

Hopefully he gets a shot to play and has some success at ASU.

M-Wolverine

August 22nd, 2010 at 4:17 PM ^

Why so many thought "Oh, he sucks" even though 3 major Division I programs thought he was worth a scholarship just because he was playing with all the above mentioned going against him, as a first time starter. Everyone wants to bend over backwards for other Freshmen QBs, but he couldn't have been young, playing in the wrong system...no, he just sucked. Sometimes the fanbase's excuse making powers....

MGoKalamazoo

August 22nd, 2010 at 9:41 AM ^

Good to see things are turning for Threet. I think ASU is a great fit for him. The PAC-10 looks to be down a bit, which should help his case a bit more. He will get tons of help from their D as well.

Magnus

August 22nd, 2010 at 10:41 AM ^

I don't know why so many people are down on Threet.  He played fairly well for Michigan, considering he was thrust into a bad situation unsuited to his skills.

I hope he tears up the Pac-10.

bacon1431

August 22nd, 2010 at 11:12 AM ^

Exactly. He was a redshirt freshmen, who probably didn't expect to contribrute until his junior or senior year. He showed flashes of good things while he was here, it was just an offense that didn't suit him very well. I think he had some potential had Michigan stayed in a pro-style offense. Would been a good QB here.

bronxblue

August 22nd, 2010 at 4:50 PM ^

I agree.  His elbow seemingly exploded and he was out for the rest of the year, but he played reasonably well while out there and I would have liked to see him return last year (even though Tate played well, having Threet as a backup would have been better than DR).  Again, I expect him to play well at ASU, especially in an offense that will highlight what he can do well.

blueheron

August 22nd, 2010 at 11:23 AM ^

First, as always: Threet seemed like a good guy and I wish him well.  (Aside: This is the first place where I've seen his family accused of helping the clowns at the Freep.)

Here's why I think he's a somewhat controversial character, in no particular order:

1. National CFB writers have appeared to universally buy into the idea that he is an elite (not just solid) QB in the making.  For example, Mark Schlabach of ESPN listed him among his top four "impact" transfers (with McGuffie, who I'll buy for sure, and two others).  He's on numerous other similar lists.

2. Based on '08, point #1doesn't completely square with reality.  He had a lot of bad moments.

3. But, that was his first on-field experience and he was playing in a new system (and one poorly suited to his drop-back-ish skills) as a freshman.  He seemed to grasp the ideas (reads, etc.), but he didn't have the physical ability and seasoning to make the plays.

4. Part of #1 I personally find annoying is the complete faith that so many people put in the rankings of Rivals and Scout.  Threet was a 4-star, so he *must* be good, right?  Kevin Grady is the appropriate response.

5. As noted out front, he seems like a good person.  He didn't do any public whining during '08, so good for him.

6. In tandem with #1 (but not always explicitly stated) is the idea that he was "misused" by Rodriguez, who apparently couldn't recognize top-flight talent even if it bit him on the nose.  (Not my opinion... just relaying the message.)  Accordingly, every bit of success he has at ASU is going be used as ammo by the Les Miles Fan Club and everyone else who wants Rodriguez fired two years ago.

- - -

Anyway, I could see where it would be possible to wish the guy well and cringe just a little bit if he tears it up at ASU (assuming that you're a RichRod fan).  I hope that makes sense.

PurpleStuff

August 22nd, 2010 at 4:36 PM ^

To me the "system fit" argument gets annoying.  Threet didn't struggle because of the system or because of a lack of his own natural ability.  He struggled because he was essentially a true freshman playing on a pretty terrible offense.  The system wasn't the reason he got no pass protection and had virtually no experienced talent to get the ball to.  The system also didn't cause the players who finally did get the ball to fumble half the time.  New coaches and terminology was just the crap icing on an already shitty cake.

Jimmy Clausen has proven himself to have been a pretty damn good college quarterback and a great fit for Charlie Weis' offense, but he absolutely sucked as a true freshman in a similarly unspectacular offense.  Give him Tate/Floyd, a decent offensive line, and a bit of experience, and he played like an all-American.  Why would anyone have expected Threet to do any better in the same bad circumstances?

I love Rodriguez as much, if not more, than anybody, but the excuses people make based on "system fit" are just ridiculous.  Urban Meyer is running essentially the same system and he doesn't have any problem finding 5-star athletes to sign up.  Percy Harvin and Noel Devine didn't have prototypical NFL size coming out of high school, but the recruiting services still recognized their talent (though some would have you believe Rodriguez is looking for a different "type" of athlete than anybody else).  The last two years haven't sucked because Rodriguez had to tear things down to play his system, they sucked because our entire (very talented) offense left to go to the NFL, Boren and Mallett bolted, and we were stuck with freshmen skill players and an offensive line starting a guy like John Ferrara who at the time was a sophomore just moved over from the defensive line and who is now not even on the two deep (not to mention all the roster issues on defense).

Things are about to get a lot better real soon, but let's stop pretending that the struggles were the inevitable consequences of transition to a spread offense when the fact remains that no matter what system you play, the talent and experience level of the players has a lot more to do with a team's success.  Now that those two factors are on the rise at Michigan, I think Rodriguez is magically going to start coaching a whole lot better.

/End rant.

M-Wolverine

August 22nd, 2010 at 5:16 PM ^

When things are rolling, people should listen. This is no one who has misgivings about Rich as a coach.  But he's spot on.  I never want to hear about getting "guys who fit his system" and "coaching them up" again. Program like the aforementioned Florida run similar systems, AND get the best talent. In all our programs, it's not about out-systeming guys...it's having better talent (by being a great recruiter), and then maybe out=coaching them a little. But you need the players first.

PurpleStuff

August 22nd, 2010 at 5:40 PM ^

One further gripe of mine is the view that if Rodriguez were to be fired (something I think would be borderline retarded to do), we would be doomed to another 2-3 years of painful rebuilding, when in reality the new coach would be walking into a great position to benefit from the 2-3 years of roster building that has already gone on. 

On the other hand, I do think a basketball team full of gangly white guys who shoot the three can win championships.

SysMark

August 22nd, 2010 at 2:25 PM ^

IMO he did his best in a very tough situation.  Also took a pretty good physical pounding and kept on going without complaint.  I personally wish he had stayed but he made the right move for himself.  Betting he will do pretty well at ASU.

Flying Dutchman

August 22nd, 2010 at 9:35 PM ^

He's a big, big boy, and apparently a real bright guy as well.   Plus, its been 2 years since since that debacle with the 2008 Wolverines, I'm sure the kid has worked hard and improved.

Still, glad we have the option of Tate, Denard, and DG instead of this guy.   Would he have been a senior this year?

goMichblue

August 23rd, 2010 at 8:41 AM ^

I think that Threet was underappreciated by UM fans.  He was tough and played fairly well for a freshmen in a system not suited for him.  I think/hope he tears up the Pac 10.

monuMental

September 14th, 2010 at 2:09 PM ^

Althought he was a terrible fit at Michigan I really like Steven Threet as a player. I got the chance to see him play in person last weekend against NAU in Tempe. He is a big kid with a cannon arm and actually looks bigger now than he did at Michigan. He had a run or two which got my wife and I talking about his long, lumbering run against Wisconsin in 2008. Threet didn't look great against NAU but he plays on a very undisciplined team with not a ton of talent around him.

Magnus

September 14th, 2010 at 2:25 PM ^

That run wasn't exactly "lumbering."  Threet ran 58 yards and one of the Big Ten's fastest linebackers, Johnathan Casillas, had trouble catching up to him.  That run was pretty damn impressive for a kid Threet's size who isn't a "dual threat" QB.

monuMental

September 14th, 2010 at 11:15 PM ^

Taking nothing away from Threet with my comment but he was clearly not built for that type of long run. We were sitting at the 30 yard line and had a pretty good view of the tail end of the run where he ran out of gas (looked very lumber-y at that point). Our former 6-5 240 rocket-armed pocket jockey gave his all for Michigan. I'm hoping he has great success at ASU.