OT: Pistons Trade Morris for Avery Bradley, Renounce KCP's rights

Submitted by uncle leo on

Hats off to Stan for this trade, this is a great one.

Avery Bradley is a damn good player. Morris is a good role player at best, he never really impressed me with the team.

http://www.mlive.com/pistons/index.ssf/2017/07/report_detroit_pistons_t…

 

Update to this story, KCP's rights have been renounced, and he is no longer a restricted FA.

 

potomacduc

July 7th, 2017 at 1:18 PM ^

I was starting to think Drummond's contract might be a bit of an albatross, but with players now signing "super max" deals out there going for $40M+, his $24M is beginning to sound positively middle class.

It's still probably more than he's worth, but I can at least pciture him being a #2 or #3 option on a championship caliber team. In my opinion, Jackson's  role on a championship caliber team is off the bench. Jackson's contract is double what it should be, even if he was healthy. He's a high level back-up PG and a mid-level or worse starting PG. You don't pay $16M for that.

 

 

NowTameInThe603

July 7th, 2017 at 1:51 PM ^

lol I'm not pretending that but its nice to compete in ECF and rebuild at the same time. Thanks Brooklyn.

If the Celtics pulled off Hayward and George. Yes they could have beat Cleveland and would have probably been favorites.

I will say if Lebron wants to leave for LA and is checked out then Boston has a chance for an upset.

BigBlue02

July 7th, 2017 at 2:34 PM ^

Lol. Cleveland could make zero moves going forward, Lebron could check out, and Boston still wouldn't push it to 7 games. Trading Hayward for Bradley, Olynyk, and Crowder is an awesome way to get the series to 6 games instead of 5 and still have no chance

NowTameInThe603

July 7th, 2017 at 6:02 PM ^

"6 games instead of 5 and still no chance" 1 game swing to determine series equals no chance? solid logic.

Basketball is my least favorite sport so I am a true bandwagon homer. I have no illusion of what the team is but I know when someone sounds like an idiot hater.

BigBlue02

July 7th, 2017 at 6:44 PM ^

If they got it to 6 games, that means they would still lose the series 4-2. That isn't a one game swing to determine the series. My point was that Boston could gain one game (and not lose 4-1 like they did this year) and they still would have no chance to win the series. Boston was extremely lucky to even get one game on Cleveland this year, so I don't even know if they could get 2. If you don't like basketball much, why are you trying to argue how good Boston is? They had no chance at all to beat Cleveland or Golden State and they still don't have a chance next year with Hayward. But yeah, totally I sound like an idiot hater because Boston still isn't anywhere good enough to beat Cleveland

mGrowOld

July 7th, 2017 at 11:26 AM ^

I was at game 3 of the NBA Finals and if not for two wide open corner 3's that Kyle Korver missed at the end of the game that series is going 7, not 5.   Cleveland dominated both games at home except for the last three minutes of game 3 but all that's been lost as we've now annoited the might dubs as being unbeatable.  

The Cavs were not that far behind the Warriors in the most recent finals IMO.  Our bench and Tristin Thompson shit the bed and that was the difference.  Not our big three.  In fact Lebron had a positve plus/minus when he was on the floor but couldnt overcome how badly the bench performed during those few minutes he was out.  

mrkid

July 7th, 2017 at 11:40 AM ^

I'll have what mGrowOld is having. We must have watched a different series. I wouldn't say Cleveland dominated Game 3 but they definitely should have won that game.

The bench didn't shit the bed, the bench just isn't talented. Cleveland needs more talent if they expect to beat Golden State next year.

SpinachAssassin

July 7th, 2017 at 11:45 AM ^

I didn't even know it existed, much less to shit a bed!

While I agree some seemingly higher percentage shots could have changed outcomes had they fallen in Game 3, it's not unrealistic to think Game 4 would have been different if Game 3 went the Cavs way. LBJ is a beast, and while I'm not a fan of some off-the-court musings he makes, it's impossible not to respect his will on the court. And even given he's in a class by himself as a player able to influence games, the Cavs just didn't have enough. Everything broke right for the Cavs in Game 4, and nearly everything in Game 3 (LBJ/Irving had 77!). Klay on the other hand was only a factor in Game 3 when he dropped 30 with 6 3s. Otherwise the Warriors were not exactly firing on all cylinders.

Warriors got better this offseason, if that was even possible. Jordan Bell in the draft (Draymond 2.0, minus the nut-kicking), underrated Casspi (i remember watching him in Sacto), and a delicious, oft-boneheaded yet no less lethal Swaggy P to do very little yet do it well. All while keeping Iggy, Shaun and David West to have the core death squad and depth intact (TBD on Zaza/McGee, yet likely).

TL;DR - see you for part 4 in June!

 

mGrowOld

July 7th, 2017 at 11:56 AM ^

Hardee-har-har my friend.  While you were wasting your time signing such low-level talents as Bell and Casspi and resigning everybody else we made a move that counters EVERYTHING you've done and then some.

Behold.  I present to you the ultimate "Warrior-killer".  The man, the myth, the LEGEND that is....

Jose Motherfucking Calderon.

Suck that Warriors fans.  We got this.

Hey...does anybody know any other ex-Pistons that might like to be our GM?  Have to work for cheap but hey, at least you get to report to Dan Gilbert.

Gucci Mane

July 7th, 2017 at 1:26 PM ^

If cavs can add Melo without losing Love then maybe they have a chance. Right now it's just not happening without a huge upset. They are one top 30 player away (without losing anything) from making it a serious contest. As of now they have a chance....but not more than 10% or so.

SpinachAssassin

July 8th, 2017 at 12:27 AM ^

Yet let me stop by the store and pick up some spaghetti and meat sauce for all those strained hamstrings he has.

I don't know what the answer is for the Cavs to get over the hump for one last title in what may be James' last year (?). Boston got marginally better with Hayward yet losing Bradley in the process was not smart on Ainge's part. Not sure why he publicly committed himself to dispose assets on the cheap to make room. Yet even then, they don't have enough to beat the Cavs.

Good news for you is the East is DREADFUL. LBJ could take off 20 games this year and the Cavs would still sleepwalk to 50 wins and a top 3 seed. He'd be fresh for the playoffs and all bets are off (as we saw in 2016).

mGrowOld

July 7th, 2017 at 1:34 PM ^

Series goes back to Oakland tied 2-2 with both teams having one blow-out win each.  You're saying you dont think the Cavs could hold serve in game 6 and force a game 7?  

Cavs dont blow game 3 this thing is going 7, just like 2016.   Now I think we'd probably lose game 7 to be honest but the thought that there's this giant chasm between the two teams is almost funny to me.  The Warriors are better but they're not THAT much better.

FWIW there was something "off" all year with the team.   Lebron, Kyrie and Kevin looked fine but JR was never right (injury plus premie child issues), Shump was a total mess, TT looked disinterested in playing, Deron Williams was fat, Derick Williams played great for about 10 games then Ty Lue decided he wasnt allowed to play anymore and Richard Jefferson, God love him, is about my age.

OwenGoBlue

July 7th, 2017 at 2:30 PM ^

Cavs had a chance in three games and they just played inexcusably bad defense the first two. 

The whole "the talent on GSW is just on another level and LeBron has no chance without PG, Melo, and/or Wade" idea is an apologist take that seems to have been pushed by LeBron's camp because so much came from Windhorst, Chris Hayes, etc. (or it could just be those guys trying to further ingratiate themselves). 

(Sorry but I don't think you're getting either Banana Boat guy on a buyout - Dolan has a cable empire to feed content to, Reinsdorf is a cheapskate, and the players association doesn't want anyone giving deals on buyouts because it makes for terrible precedent)

DMack

July 7th, 2017 at 2:51 PM ^

I agree with you and think that defense on the block was the difference in that series. The Cave. 4 & 5 spot wasn't great and the Warriors were better. I said that if the Cavs had a healthy Bugut at 7ft. 280lbs. blocking shots, rebounding and controlling the paint, they go seven games and possibly win.

nerv

July 7th, 2017 at 12:16 PM ^

Far better version is quite a bit of hyperbole. Bradley is a more polished offensive player than KCP. But Bradley also had a lot more talent around him to take the pressure off him on offense. KCP rates out higher than Bradley in the majority of advanced stats and is certainly a far better defender and a more natural fit at the 2 while being a bit younger as well.

Edit- Looks like KCP's rfa rights were waived so he gone. Another sub 25 year old player that SVG has let walk and gotten absolutely nothing for. Not really sure what he is trying to do at this point. The exact same issue with KCP will be here next year with Bradley as well.

DMack

July 7th, 2017 at 3:00 PM ^

They need to fire SVG. He's like the movie National Treasure. There is one clue after another after another with no treasure to ever be found. He gets continues to trade players with no real long term vision of how they eventually win. None stay around long enough for the last big plan to materialize. It's a vicious cycle.