OT -- Joy and Happiness

Submitted by Enjoy Life on
It's 12:06 PM on Tuesday, January 20, 2009. My wife and I just popped the cork on some bubbly. I can honestly say I have never been happier or more joyful in my entire life.

Antwon Randel El

January 20th, 2009 at 1:57 PM ^

no man, the transfer of wealth ain't happening. that socialism not what america is about, that's not what Obama wants, and it isn't what Congress wants. All it is is just careful spending and budgeting.

I_Heart_A2

January 20th, 2009 at 1:53 PM ^

I like this site because Brian's posts on all this stuff we wonder about are completely pragmatic. It's about rationality and weighing the evidence and trying to see through our emotions to get as much clarity as any human being can possibly have when evaluating any issue or subject. Obama is a pragmatist, so I am happy. He seeks first to weigh the evidence, calculate the risks, and consult individuals more knowledgeable than himself. I know, absolutely know, that he will never walk out to the podium and tell me that he did what he just did because Jesus told him to. I know that he doesn't already believe that he has the answers, I know he doesn't believe that one can "will" the world to be something it's not. He is dynamic, capable of change; the most important trait there is in a world where the only constant is change. He's not perfect, he's inheriting some serious junk, not all of which is Bush's fault... but I am SOOOOOOO happy that the important questions will be filtering through a mind like his for the next 4 years. Careful consideration of everything is only a weakness when it is used as an excuse for inaction. I do not believe we are entering into a presidency marked by inaction, but careful consideration as a precursor to decisive action. Drink that champagne my friend, and good luck with the job search.

bronxblue

January 20th, 2009 at 2:04 PM ^

Because heaven forbid anyone be happy. I prefer that compared to trolling around MGoBlog, posting C&P stuff (http://www.mgoblog.com/diaries/why-4-3-defense-best - since taken down), and in general providing absolutely nothing positive to both this site in general and this conversation in particular. As for Obama - Sure, I don't expect him to save us all (I think some people believe that the president has access to some magical reset button every inauguration), but after the past 8 years I doubt many people would complain with the notion of rational, pragmatic thought finally being back in the WH. Nothing against emotion and the "gut" at times, but not when you are risking billions of dollars and millions of lives on a daily basis. Honestly, I would have been happy if McCain had won - people's excitement right now has more to do with the end of one era than necessarily the beginning of a new one. If you expect BO to save you from yourself, then you will be disappointed; if all you hope is for some competent direction, though, then today was long overdue.

Antwon Randel El

January 20th, 2009 at 2:05 PM ^

it's a shame you have to bring in Jesus and Christianity to bash Bush. As a Christian, I know that politicans often misuse christianity to achieve their own means, and that's what I think GW did. But you don't have to insult other faiths man. if you paid attention to Obama's speech, everyone in this country has their own views and beliefs, and it would be good to respect it and not talk shit about it.

STW P. Brabbs

January 20th, 2009 at 2:18 PM ^

You are a squirrelly one, that's for sure. Bragging about meeting Obama; defending Obama social policy; lashing out at those who level-headedly praise Obama's level-headedness; on some Satanic Verses No One Better Say Anything About My Religion shit ... a virtuoso performance. What are Obama's responsibilities in the 4-3?

Seth

January 20th, 2009 at 5:03 PM ^

We've come a long way in a millennium, but we're not that different. A thousand years ago, in medieval Western Europe, you lived and died with whomever your king was. If you were lucky enough to get an Offa, or an Alfred, or a Charlemagne, you were set. Peace and prosperity would be yours. Your lucky number is 4. If your ruler sucked, (e.g. Ethelred the Unready, Henry III, Louis le Effin Crazy, Martius Bar-is High-us Monrnhinwegius), then you'd best start studying up on whatever language the local marauders are speaking these days, 'cause yo ass 'bout to be SACKED! (Watch out for numbers ending in "ixty-six") In those times, people had good reason for rejoicing at the end of a tiresome reign and the rise of a new leader, particularly a promising one. Today, we plan the power transitions so well that the republic barely notices the change. 99.9 percent of people working for the federal government yesterday still have their same jobs. Yet I think we still retain a sense of attachment to our leadership. It's easier to smile when we have a leader we like, easier to despair when we don't. What's more, we morph ourselves to the spirit of our leadership, drawing on them for strength and direction when we can. Since we're not all fans of the same politics, take a look at Michigan fandom during the coaching changes of recent memory. When Bo left, there was an emptiness, but soon we all adopted, to a degree, the Moeller atmosphere. (Some of us cut the bottoms off our t-shirts. We're not proud of it.) When Gary's reign was cut short, we adopted the curmudgeonly attitude of Lloyd. Now, slowly, we are becoming mini Rich-Rods, believers in Barwis, quarterbacks who look like cornerbacks, and receivers who look like Smurfs. If you doubt it, imagine the head asplodom that Gred Robinson's hire would have created, say, four years ago. How does this apply? It wasn't easy going from Lloyd to Rod, but many of us made the jump much earlier. Curmudgeons in 1997 were by 2006 becoming converts, even after a season that gave us a taste of national acclaim. The waves of Rich Rod conversionism happened before Rich Rod was even known to us. It happened during the Horror, and a 7-5 season. Disappointments revealed inherent flaws, which we were more able to perceive. We lost faith in our leadership. Compare that to the administration of President Bush. When the soulless knocked down our towers, we wanted a mean, crazy, dumbass son of a bitch in the White House talking about terrorists with USA Patriot Missiles up their asses. What's more, we appreciated it when, in those weeks of uncertainty and exposure, he stirred the patriotic flags buried amidst the cobwebs in our hearts. But with each obvious failure, those who love the country more than party were turned off, and that made us more receptive to this administration's flaws. And after awhile of such dissonance, frustration and despair builds. With Michigan football, the decline and fall was two years. The level of patriotic ebulliences today is directly correlated to at what point you became disillusioned with the current leadership. If it was Harriet Miers, you might have a finger in the air and be going "wooo." If it happened at Katrina, you could be saying, "well, this is good." But for those of us who got fed up during the leadup to Iraq or before, the Bush White House was starting to become more like the reign of Matt Millen. There are a lot of people out there who imagine themselves leaders, not followers. Some of these people have posters with whales and quotes on them. Such people can hardly fathom why a planned transition that was scripted and released months ago can bring out such emotions. But there are those of us who can still be moved by the things that have moved our society for a thousand years and more. Maybe you're more of a fan of Edmund Burke, or Pat Roberts than American civicism. And that's totally totally cool. Seriously -- we're not all Anglo-Saxons here. If you don't subscribe your faith to these United States, or you do but you think the current management was doing just fine, that's totally cool. Patriotism is basically fandom anyway. And like fandom, to those not caught in the spirit, it is a little ridiculous. But I ask you, as a fellow sports fan, to remember that sometimes the ridiculous can be powerful. So have a little patience for us. We are but big-time fans of U.S.A., who didn't like the old coach, and after 8 years, have finally reached a much-longed-for Peanut Butter Jelly Time.

Goblue89

January 20th, 2009 at 2:43 PM ^

I wonder what Tim has to say on this matter? One would think he supports Obama since it's a known fact he is the 2nd coming and thus would not allow this to happen if he was not in favor of Obama... Politics aside this is a very historical election and I am very happy I was alive to see it!

chitownblue (not verified)

January 20th, 2009 at 3:48 PM ^

Fred's Muskrat Recipe Ingredients: 4 Muskrats (all fat and glands removed) 1/2 pound Bacon 1/2 Celery bunch, chopped 4 Onions, chopped 1/2 pound Oleo 1/2 teaspoon Cayenne pepper Salt Pepper 21 ounces Tomato soup Turn this recipe into a puzzle! [click] Directions: Saute bacon, celery, onions, oleo and cayenne pepper together for 10 minutes. Put rats in bottom of a pan you can cover tightly (my mother makes a double batch and uses the roaster she cooks turkey in). Pour sauteed mixture over the rats, and then cover with tomato soup (Don't add water to the soup). Bake, covered, for 2 1/2 hours at 350 degrees F or until done.

Zone Read Left

January 20th, 2009 at 4:40 PM ^

When Tyrone Willingham took over ND, one of the most storied programs in the country, there was a lot of excitement over the first black coach in ND history. Ty then preceded to suck royally, and set black NCAA head coaches back 10 years. Barack Obama has now taken over one of the most stories countries in the world. There is a lot of excitement over the first black President in USA history. IF Obama decides to suck royally, then he will set black politicians back 10 years. Hopefully, though, Obama is awesome and helps pave the way for other minority candidates.

Enjoy Life

January 20th, 2009 at 4:52 PM ^

Chitownblue, we always have and always will agree on this one. I am not trying to start a shit storm and I wish there was another way to say it but I can't think of any. Zone Read Left's statement: "Ty then preceded to suck royally, and set black NCAA head coaches back 10 years." is simply racist. (My opinion -- not necessarily chitownblue's)

Zone Read Left

January 20th, 2009 at 5:02 PM ^

Of course not. However, if Ty had been very successful then you would have seen a lot of schools looking for the "next Ty a Willingham". I've heard many people make that argument (and I believe it is valid) that the reason there is so few black HC is because there has yet to be a successful black HC at a traditional power. Once there is one, the floodgates will open and more programs will hire a black HC. Traditional powers very rarely have job openings and Black HC are very rarely hired on top of that. Therefore, there are not many chances for a black HC at a traditional power, and Ty may have been in the best chance for a black HC to succeed at a TP until 2012 (Ty was hired in 2002), which would set black HC back 10 years.

Zone Read Left

January 20th, 2009 at 5:32 PM ^

You make some good points. I've never really thought about the situation that much, and I beleive I heard the arguement I posted from African American sportswriter Jason Whitlock. However, your counter argument mostly consists of calling me a racist, a term which, when applied on the internets, destroys your opponents credibility and automatically wins you the argument. Instead, why don't you tell me the reason you believe there are so few minority head coaches?

Enjoy Life

January 20th, 2009 at 5:42 PM ^

Several reasons for so few black HEAD coaches: 1) Slavery for 100 years 2) Overt racism for another 100 years until 1964 3) Remaining racism Why does the NFL need the Rooney rule if racism no longer exists? I live in a small town just below the Mackinac bridge. The overt racism is crazy. The "N" word is used often. When we canvased homes for the election, life long democrats (yes, democrats) said they could never vote for a black man. BTW, you can be "African American sportswriter Jason Whitlock" and also be a racist. How can anyone say the poor performance by a black HC sets the cause back 10 years but that a Super Bowl win by a black coach doesn't obviously offset that?

Zone Read Left

January 20th, 2009 at 6:04 PM ^

So you're saying that the reason there are so few black head coaches is because the people doing the hiring are racist? I thought that was my original argument. In fact, chitownblue's attack on the argument was: "Do you really think that the Auburn, when not hiring Turner Gill said 'well Ty Willingham was a shitty coach'?" If the boosters at Auburn are racist, then yes, this is possible. As to your question "How can anyone say the poor performance by a black HC sets the cause back 10 years but that a Super Bowl win by a black coach doesn't obviously offset that?" Well, if the owners are racist, then it is possible for this to happen. (it's probably racist due to the fact that people feel more comfortable with others of the same race, and when it comes down to multi-million dollar decisions, white owners will pick the candidate they feel most comfortable with). In conclusion, since I in know way affect who gets hired, it would have been better for you to say that the owners and ADs are racist, and not that I am racist. BTW, I included Jason Whitlock becuase a great majority of his columns are on inequality in the coaching ranks, so he seems to know what he is talking about.

Craven Morehead

January 20th, 2009 at 5:13 PM ^

If Obama isn't successful, it won't be held against black politicians. Blacks will still be elected as they have before. All it will do is be just another indictment on Democrat Politics of big Government. The same type that RINO Bush engaged in that doomed the Republican Party. The fact that he's HALF BLACK raised by his WHITE MOM won't have anything to do with it.

Promote RichRod

January 20th, 2009 at 4:57 PM ^

I know exactly what you are feeling and no you aren't crazy. This is a great fucking day. It really has no place on a sports blog, but what the hell-suffering through 8 years of shit for this was almost worth it. To the cynics - you don't have to like politics, I respect that. I hope something comes along on either side that makes you care. Participatory Democracy works much better when people give a shit. To the haters - keep it coming. Your whining and self-pity is delicious. I drink your milkshake. I DRINK IT UP!

Seth

January 21st, 2009 at 9:30 AM ^

So living vicariously through the endeavors of 18- to 22-year-old athletes is cool, but politicians is messed up? At least the politicians can directly affect our lives. I don't get a better job or go to war based on a given week's ThreetSheridammit Chart. But Michigan's fortunes affect me deeply, as I'm sure they do you. Sports is basically just politics in miniscule.

arod

January 23rd, 2009 at 1:43 AM ^

and was pretty tame in its content. Yet, as usual here, commentators have taken it upon themselves to make the thread as abrasive and stupid as possible. And I've just added to it. Awesome.