“Non-Pro” Sports Cancelled - Does that Include College Football?

Submitted by tnixon16 on November 15th, 2020 at 6:49 PM

Anyone have any clarity on the new state order relative to college athletics? High school sports on hold for three weeks, but how does this apply to college sports in Michigan?

mpbear14

November 15th, 2020 at 9:16 PM ^

After spending the last 48 hours at Mott’s, there’s something unsettling about the football program having access to noninvasive rapid testing and Mott’s Children does not. Doesn’t seem right. 

One of our Physicians was clearly frustrated, making the comment to me and my wife: “the race horses down the street get whatever they want.”  
 

I’m firmly in the shutdown the season and reallocate the resources camp now. My perspective has completely changed and our record has nothing to do with it. 

Absorbine Sr.

November 15th, 2020 at 6:57 PM ^

What I don’t get is, if it’s non professional teams being suspended, then why are the Lions still being allowed to play their games?

Absorbine Sr.

November 15th, 2020 at 7:04 PM ^

So I pulled up to the grocery story and got out of the car just as the Lions went up by 21. When I started the car to go home, roughly 30-35 minutes later, the WFT had just tied the score. 

The saddest thing? I wasn’t the least bit surprised. 

tigerd

November 15th, 2020 at 7:06 PM ^

All I know is Chase Young did Lions fans a disservice today. By hitting Matt Stafford late and giving them 15 yards he helped them gain the necessary yardage to put Prater in field goal range thus providing Matt Patricia the opportunity to live another day as the coach of the Lions.

samdrussBLUE

November 15th, 2020 at 7:22 PM ^

Still don’t think dine in restaurants should be included. Blue Lep or Ricks? I can see. Your local Applebee’s or family restaurant? No

NittanyFan

November 15th, 2020 at 10:09 PM ^

So, to reset the status of this conversation:

(1) You responded to me initially, challenging my opinion with a thoughtful reply.  That is cool.

(2) I responded back to you, addressing your post and challenging you back with an admittedly difficult to answer question.  I think that was fine.

(3) Ever since, you have posted nothing but walrus pictures.

Hail-Storm

November 16th, 2020 at 9:30 AM ^

1) He posted Seals not Walruses

2) Our initial shutdown dropped the cases and deaths considerably in a short time. I believe the efforts right now are to reduce the new cases, specifically the new hospitalization rate, to ensure the death rate does not spike

3) If people wore masks and social distanced without being told to, we would not have this shutdown. I'm frustrated that my kids are missing their hockey and soccer, and I don't blame the Governor, I blame the people who refuse to wear masks, and wear them appropriately.

4) Now that it is cooler, masks are way more comfortable to wear

5) I wore my glasses for one day with a mask and hated it. Glass wearers I have no idea how you survive. Good on you. Keep it up

6) If people take this seriously and work together, this can only last for 3 weeks. If people are assholes, then we run the risk of not only extending this order, but having more restrictions

7) What is a scalpal method  that would be better.

TIMMMAAY

November 16th, 2020 at 11:02 AM ^

Obvious fucking troll is obvious. How/why you haven't been banned yet I will never comprehend. I will say, you play your part pretty well. Just trollolololol, and then when challenged you keep a veneer of civility as that seems to be protecting you so far. 

You don't deserve a more thoughtful response than seal pictures. I've tried having honest, genuine exchanges with you, but all you do is constantly "whatabout", move the goal posts, and generally do everything you can to confound the discussion with nonsense. It's transparent, and clear. 

Hey mods, how about some goddamn consistency? 

outsidethebox

November 15th, 2020 at 10:27 PM ^

This is the very simple and plain truth. Masks are very effective against the spread to others-and affords protection to the wearer as well. If 80 percent of the population properly wear masks the present emergent nature of this pandemic is arrested. It is that simple.

Defiant, willful ignorance does nothing to mitigate the effects of this virus. 

NittanyFan

November 15th, 2020 at 10:37 PM ^

Thanks for the response.  How do we then get to this "80 percent of the population properly wearing masks" metric?

Answers such as "better leadership from President Trump" or "if people will just do it!" are, frankly, non-useful answers at this point.  We've been hearing those talking points for months now.  Those talking points have done nothing to prevent us from being at the current moment.

SanDiegoWolverine

November 15th, 2020 at 10:57 PM ^

Based on your posting history I'm guessing you're asking in bad faith but air flow, air filtration, universal masking when inside outside your home at all times, and rapid free testing for all so people can safely visit lived ones over Thanksgiving.

No more Covid security theater of disinfectants and 6 feet, this thing is airborne. Act like it.

NittanyFan

November 15th, 2020 at 11:04 PM ^

I'm not asking in bad faith.  Thanks for your response.

Questions back:

(1) What exactly do you mean by "air flow" and "air filtration?"  What are the specifics on that?  

(2) "Universal masking when inside outside your home at all times" has been advised for months on end.  What is different about your current proposal?

(3) Daily testing levels have increased in this country by a factor of 3 since early summer.  Whereas in June we were conducting 500K tests in America per day, now we are at 1.5MM.  American testing levels are on above or on par with levels in every European or North American country outside of Iceland and Denmark.

How much higher do you propose we go?  Is it possible that the fact that we aren't higher is possibly due to logistical concerns?  If it is do to logistical concerns, how do we clear those concerns?  Should we at least acknowledge the progress made on this front to this point?