National Championship Game Open Thread

Submitted by M-Wolverine on
You're on this blog, I don't have to tell you who. And yeah, it's early, but it's not like it's going to get bumped off the front page with the board shut down. Plus you know you're watching the pregame anyway.

seattleblue

January 10th, 2011 at 10:52 PM ^

Clearly I dislike them both quite a lot, however Pryor is far more entertaining with his constant foot-in-mouth interviews and tweets.  As happy as I'll be when he ugh "graduates" and Michigan does not have to face him on the field, I will miss the feeling of moral superiority every time I see him in a tOSU uniform.

yoopergoblue

January 11th, 2011 at 12:23 AM ^

Oregon's offense to me is the epitome of the spread offense that I have seen.  I think that this is an offense that Rich Rodriguez would have liked to end up with at Michigan.  This prolific rushing attack only gained 81 yards the whole game!  Auburn was just too big and strong up front on the defensive side of the ball (really both sides).  It pains me to say it but  I just don't believe that a team with the small and quick players and all the gimmicky stuff on offense can win a BCS championship. 

bronxblue

January 10th, 2011 at 10:55 PM ^

Unless Oregon finds a way to stop Auburn on this next drive, this game may be over.  What kills me is that these SEC schools pay players, over-recruit, etc. and they are rewarded with MNCs.  I know UM will soon employ one of these SEC coaches, but man it is hard to enjoy college football when you see stuff like this go unpunished.

/steps off soapbox.

jmblue

January 10th, 2011 at 11:08 PM ^

Is this a fundamental flaw with these offenses?  It seems like they can never control the line of scrimmage in short-yardage situations.

West Texas Blue

January 10th, 2011 at 11:10 PM ^

Ah, the one weakness of the spread offense.  Smaller area in redzone and  defense can cheat up and overload the line.  Hmm if Oregon only had a big fullback or big, powerful RB instead of speedy midgets in James and Barner....   That might have just broken Oregon's spirit...

Beaver

January 10th, 2011 at 11:23 PM ^

Exactly...Many people view spread offenses sole purpose to spread the field horizantally. Just as importantly, spread offenses need to spread the field vertically. When the defensive back field gets mashed toward the LOS in the red zone, the typical speed of spread offenses becomes quite limited. I rarely feel confident of a spread offense's ability to score in the red zone.