National Championship Game Open Thread

Submitted by M-Wolverine on
You're on this blog, I don't have to tell you who. And yeah, it's early, but it's not like it's going to get bumped off the front page with the board shut down. Plus you know you're watching the pregame anyway.

bronxblue

January 10th, 2011 at 9:48 PM ^

I really don't like Cam Newton - just so annoying to see a guy who clearly cheated be given a free pass while UM was dragged through the mud for basically nothing.

bronxblue

January 10th, 2011 at 9:50 PM ^

Newton really does remind me of Tebow - a big athlete who probably won't make it in the pros because he has wonky mechanics and won't be able to just push guys around at the next level. 

bronxblue

January 10th, 2011 at 9:55 PM ^

That was the most predictable playcall I've ever seen, and exactly the result I expected.  Just through it - you are not going to push Auburn back on the 1 yard line.

Hal_Victor

January 10th, 2011 at 10:05 PM ^

I don't understand something about the NCAA and Cam Newton.  Fine, his father managed to keep Cam completely in the dark about shopping his around.  Even if that were true, why wasn't Auburn punished for paying Cam's father? 

Maybe I'm missing whether that's been established or not but it's a reasonable inference that if other teams were offering to pay, the team he ended up gave some consideration too.

bronxblue

January 10th, 2011 at 10:14 PM ^

The problem is that you can't really "infer" NCAA violations like that - too high a burden of proof to rely on conjecture.  I fully expect there to be an expose after the year that shows Auburn knew and probably even paid him, but without that level of proof the NCAA couldn't/wouldn't be able to impose major sanctions.

profitgoblue

January 10th, 2011 at 10:17 PM ^

As far as I know, there was never a payment made by any school. The violation was the demand and Cam got off because the demand was not made of Auburn. If I had to assume, I bet the demand was made of Southern Miss (?) because Cam wouldn't have attended there otherwise. In other words, Auburn was in the running without having to pay.

jmblue

January 10th, 2011 at 10:08 PM ^

Why punt there?  There were 39 seconds left and they were at the Auburn 40.  Auburn had no timeouts left, so even if UO had turned it over on downs, they still would have been hard-pressed to score. 

KBLOW

January 10th, 2011 at 10:17 PM ^

I hate this so much of this game has come down to poor play from Thomas. However the rest of it seems to be Auburn out RPS-ing Chip Kelly.

profitgoblue

January 10th, 2011 at 10:57 PM ^

My neighbor played for the Ducks on the team that beat Michigan in the Big House. He's now with the Carolina Panthers and, since they suck, he was able to make it to Arizona to be on the sidelines for this game. I was messing with him earlier in the year about him beating Michigan - he said it was one of the highlights of his college career.