Michigan Monday v. Miami is up

Submitted by StephenRKass on

Michigan Monday vs. Miami is up over at The Ozone. As always, there's a lot of material there, but the opening statement sums things up well:

The Michigan Wolverines did exactly what they were supposed to do in their 34-10 win over the Miami RedHawks on Saturday, it just took them a little while to actually do it.

When the offense had the ball:

The one aspect of this game that jumped out at me more than any other was how much better Derrick Green looked compared to a week ago.

I'm not saying his problems are over, I'm saying it's good to know that he actually has the ability to see a hole and his brain can tell his legs to head towards it. Usually, the message from his brain to his legs ends in, “This seems like a good place to rest.”

Thoughts on Gardner:

Every week Gardner throws about four passes that should be intercepted, and whether Michigan wins or loses generally depends on how those throws end up. 

I don't know if he is lacking confidence, but I imagine that his coaches lack some confidence in him, even though they would never admit it.

For me, whether or not this can become a high-powered offense depends more on Gardner than it does the offensive line right now. 

On the stout run defense:

There's no need to show much defensively against Miami, but somebody in the front seven should be able to bring a running back down in the backfield. Obviously the front seven is doing something right because nobody is running on them, but it's almost like they just put up a wall at the line of scrimmage and don't try to cross into the offense's territory.

I don't understand how they are so good against the run, but I can certainly acknowledge that it's happening. Is it because they haven't yet played a team who lives on the run? At least in some part, definitely. I'm just wondering where the penetration is.

On the secondary:

The pass defense had some issues in terms of personnel. 

It was good to see Peppers get some extensive time at cornerback instead of nickel. He responded well and I wonder how long it will be until he's starting.

It was also good to see Dymonte Thomas out there at safety for some snaps. He's a big hitter who is still looking to become the player that so many saw when he was a five-star prospect out of Ohio.

On special teams (blistering comments on clock mismanagement)

Lastly, I suppose this would be the best place to talk about an instance in this game that pretty much characterized everything wrong with Brady Hoke as a head coach.

The crowd was booing from the first time Hagerup was sent out onto the field. They've grown tired of this mentality at a time when it shouldn't even be in effect. This is Freaking Miami Freaking Of Freaking Ohio. They didn't win a game last year. Are you that unsure of your team or your own ability to coach them that you think not getting six yards with under a minute to play is going to allow them to go the 40-odd yards necessary just to get a crack at a long field goal attempt? How does this instill confidence in anybody?

The execution was horrific, but the mentality was even worse. Brady Hoke went full Ferentz, and you never go full Ferentz.

There's much, much more, but I've already quoted too much as it is. Read it all if you're starving for content prior to the UFR's coming up mid-week.

EDIT:  So, going forward, I'll probably continue to link to Michigan Monday if no one else does. (Brian linked there after ND, and someone else did the week before against ASU. I don't own MM or have a particular claim on it . . . just think that Gerdeman is one of the better reads out there.) However, I think my use of block quotes was egregious, and so I will shorten that down a bit. On a different yet related note, I'd love for someone on the staff to watch the OSU game weekly, and provide a similar synopsis of the Buckeyes for MGoBlog as we head toward the end of November.

Roc Blue in the Lou

September 16th, 2014 at 12:38 AM ^

You mean the same Brady Hoke who went for the TD at UTL One with 7 seconds left to win the game, eschewing the tie???  Really...that punt nearing halftime with a chance to pin em deep and let your defense, maybe, get a turnover or score, that's what "characterized everything wrong with Brady Hoke as a head coach"????  Maybe having 3 turnovers in 5 minutes that quarter had something to do with it as well.  Drama much???  Too many question marks????  Deal with it.

jtmc33

September 16th, 2014 at 10:03 AM ^

Remember that one time when Ferentz went for 2, down by 1, on the road for a shot at winning rather than playing it safe for OT?  

Hoke is not Ferentz.

Hoke "went" for the 1st down... before the 5 yard penalty made him change his mind.

The legit bitch is in the delay of game... that is more of a problem than not going for a 4th and 6 up 7 before the half.

Gucci Mane

September 16th, 2014 at 12:51 AM ^

I disagree with the decision to punt, but I can understand the reasoning behind it. It was clear Miami had no business being down only 7. If you don't get the first down or Turn it over again it could have given Miami legitimate life. Hoke knew that Michigan was going to come out in the second half and stomp them. If were in this same situation vs. MSU or OSU you can bet were going for it.

wile_e8

September 16th, 2014 at 11:35 AM ^

This sounds good in hindsight, but the same thing could have been said about the first half of the Akron game last year. Akron didn't really belong in the game either in the first half, but then we kept turning the ball over and they started making a few plays and suddenly we had a ballgame on our hands. If the coaches really knew we were going to stomp them they should have agressively stomped them on 4th down and got some breathing room on the scoreboard. A one score differential at halftime is legitimate life too.

alum96

September 16th, 2014 at 2:40 AM ^

 

Offensively, one of the problems with doing this piece weekly is that Devin Gardner is so inconsistent that he forces differing opinions in any given two-week period. There were times when he has looked like the best quarterback in the conference last year, and other times when he looked like maybe wide receiver could use him more than quarterback.

 

Ultimately, the only conclusion to draw with Gardner is “I guess we'll find out when we see him the next time.” That's who Devin Gardner is. He's full of possibilities, and half of those possibilities are good, and the other half are bad, and you never know which you're going to get on any given snap. Though right now, I'm wondering how many more of the good half we're going to see.

 

Someone said it best on another thread. Devin Gardner is like a box of chocolates. None of know what we're going to get from week to week.  Or heck drive to drive.

I do think Nuss just went away from Devin throwing much at all for quite a significant period of timeafter the INT since it was so easy to run on Miami of OH.  I found that troubling - yes we needed work on the run but it signaled a lack of confidence, perhaps justly at this point.  If I am a DC I am going to stack the box against the run and take my chances against Devin's arm.  On obvious passing downs you bring pressure and throw in various coverages that might confuse.  It will be up to him to show he can consistently make people pay for that.

I didn't see any issues with the rest of the piece - it was interesting to note that no runs were stopped behind the line just as it was interesting how the run defense is working without really getting much in the way of TFL vs the Miami of OH and App States. 

Hail-Storm

September 16th, 2014 at 11:42 AM ^

I understand having hatred for another fan base, but these are quality pieces written by someone who knows Michigan football.  He understands us, and his writing is both perceptive and humorous.  It is actually nice to have this type of analysis outside of a Michigan Blog. Try reading through most of the crap written by the BIG ESPN guys.

I think a couple block quotes are fine, but this one was too much. 

I do think that Mr. Kass should continue to post and link to these though. A couple block quotes are good to add a little content and also to force the reader to go further if he likes what he read.

Former_DC_Buck

September 16th, 2014 at 10:28 AM ^

Sure a TFL is nice, but I think I would be happier with fewer of those if the average carry you give up is smaller.  I could maybe understand it better if it was a lack of TFLs and sacks, but he clearly excluded that.  In his defense, he himself admitted he's not sure why he is nitpicking it.  It may just be how he is wired.  I recall he used to complain about Toussaint's running game last year making the argument, well, if you take out a couple big runs, he only went for a much smaller average. That one I could understand a bit, though I didn't agree, this one I don't understand at all.