Michigan Monday - Nebraska

Submitted by StephenRKass on October 11th, 2021 at 11:37 PM

Michigan Monday vs. Nebraska is up. I didn't bother putting up a link the last couple weeks. However, with the bye week and the paucity of real content, it seemed worthwhile today. Here are some quotes.

Overview:

Impressive is the fact that they lost the momentum in a hostile road environment and were able to get it back twice on the way to a 32-29 win over a Nebraska team that has now lost four games this season by a combined 21 points.

This was a perfect opportunity for the Wolverines to revert back to what they’ve been in the past, but they didn’t. They stood firm, directed their own narrative, and walked out of Lincoln with a 6-0 record and more confidence than they’ve had at this point in the season since 2016. That also happens to be the last time they began a season 6-0.

Offense:

For just the sixth time since Jim Harbaugh took over the Michigan job in 2015, the Wolverines rushed and passed for over 200 yards against a Big Ten opponent. 

We are starting to see some necessary balance coming to the Michigan offense. Balance doesn’t mean 50/50 in the stats, but rather the ability to throw the ball well when the run is being taken away, or vice versa with the run when the pass is taken away. Basically, can you succeed with either the run or the pass if one is hard to come by?

(Running game.) They did enough and they did it effectively enough to win on the road. Haskins led the team with 123 yards rushing on 21 carries. This game was made for him. There were no easy runs. Everything was difficult, which is how he seems to like it. He’s arguably the hardest runner in the Big Ten and he doesn’t quit. He’s relentless. I’m assuming when he’s not in class or at practice he’s calling people to let them know their car warranty is expiring.

(Passing game.) It was not a great performance and some of his throws were pretty far off from their respective targets. McNamara targeted receiver Daylen Baldwin 14 times, for instance, and only completed six passes to him. McNamara took some shots, but he’s definitely got some work to do with his downfield accuracy.

Slot receiver Mike Sainristil made an incredible diving catch on a deep pass down the middle, but had McNamara hit him in stride, the drive would have ended in a touchdown instead of a field goal.

Defense:

I wanted to see what the Michigan defense did against a quarterback who could run and throw, and it turns out they did okay. Martinez made them pay on some throws, but that wasn’t because of any running that he did. He only ran the ball seven times for 41 yards. Scott Frost could have used three times that number of attempts and things would have been better.

Michigan’s defense is rounding into form but I still think depth is a concern. Defensive tackles Mazi Smith and Chris Hinton were very effective early in the game. Nebraska rushed for just 29 yards on 17 carries in the first half. In the second half, however, the Huskers went for 101 yards on 15 carries. Was this just an adjustment by Frost, or did the constant pounding up the middle finally wear a bit on the Wolverines?

The outside rushers Aidan Hutchinson and David Ojabo were again very good. Hutchinson went TFL-less for the first time this season, but still recorded six tackles beyond the line of scrimmage. Ojabo only had one tackle — which was a sack — but you can see him more and more involved in creating chaos for the defense. He’s a guy who can go up against a tackle on one play and then the next sprint out wide and tackle a screener.

Safety Daxton Hill had an incredible interception in coverage when he batted a pass in the air and caught it after falling to the ground. He’s a natural and may be the first sure thing Michigan has had in the secondary since Marlin Jackson.

Special Teams:

Place-kicker Jake Moody hit all four of his field goals in this one, ranging from 21 to 39 yards. He was never put to the test in terms of distance, but his last two field goals tied the game at 29-29 with 3:00 remaining and then won it 32-29 with 1:24 remaining.

Michigan’s special teams continues to be very good with periods of greatness.

Conclusion:

It means that Michigan is finding winning ways to win games, if that makes sense. Or maybe I should say they’re finding ways to keep from losing games.

Coming into this season, the Wolverines were 18-22 under Jim Harbaugh when their offense averaged under 5.7 yards per play in a game. This year, however, they’re 4-0 when averaging under 5.7 yards per play.

Nebraska did them a favor by exposing some of their blind spots with the misdirection and deception. I’m going to assume Mike Macdonald was aware of the possible issues, but now it’s on tape for the players to see and learn from it.

The Michigan defense has continued to find answers this season, but pretty soon the questions are going to start changing.

How well the Wolverines respond will determine how successful this year ends up being.

JHumich

October 11th, 2021 at 11:40 PM ^

Gerdeman is a lot more respectful than their other writers. The "threat level" writer is an ass, and it won't surprise you that most of the commenters are as well. I often enjoy parts of the Michigan Monday articles.

Perkis-Size Me

October 12th, 2021 at 11:15 AM ^

I was talking with an OSU fan a few years back, right around the end of the Hoke era, who was (unsurprisingly) giving Michigan a lot of shit about how much infighting there was within the fanbase, the level of apathy a lot of fans were starting to have, and how confident and proud he was that OSU fans were so united behind their team. That something like that would never happen within the OSU fanbase. 

All I could tell him was "It's really easy to stand in a united front and stand behind your team when all they're doing is winning. Nothing in the world could be easier. How are you and every other fan going to react when/if they start losing? Do you really think you all wouldn't descend into utter chaos as well? Especially if all you're used to is winning, do you really think you're going to know how to handle losing?"

He had to stop and think about it for a solid few seconds. He just came back with "You may be right, but we're probably not going to be losing anytime soon so I don't have to worry about that." 

I effing hate OSU. None of them, at least not the younger generation that grew up starting in the Tressel era, have any idea how good they have it. 

MDot

October 12th, 2021 at 12:59 PM ^

That was a scheme issue, though. With Jourdan Lewis & David Long in particular, that’s a ridiculous statement by the writer. And I know it’s easy to overlook Jabrill, but he was a big time playmaker on D for us as well. Dax has been good this year, but statement is more of an NFL projection than anything else. 

Carcajou

October 12th, 2021 at 12:55 AM ^

Somebody needs to send Haskins that quote, or post it on his locker, or frame it and put it on his wall:

"This game was made for him. There were no easy runs. Everything was difficult, which is how he seems to like it. He’s arguably the hardest runner in the Big Ten and he doesn’t quit. He’s relentless."

 

gremlin3

October 12th, 2021 at 2:38 AM ^

He doesn't sound concerned about the Michigan offense, but a team that makes all the mistakes he claims and still scores 38 and 32 against two of the better defenses in the league would concern me if that offense put things together.

BlueMetal

October 12th, 2021 at 10:10 AM ^

You might be right, but that completely misses the point he's making. If Michigan can score 32 and 38 points against quality defenses with uneven quarterback play and leaving points on the field, then 45-50 is reasonable if we can improve and eliminate mistakes. And from what I've seen, I don't think Ohio State's defense is as strong as Wisconsin's.

 

CRISPed in the DIAG

October 12th, 2021 at 8:25 AM ^

In 2016 as we compiled wins, Herbstreit was complimentary but became saltier in every interview, eventually resorting to something along the lines "but they haven't really played anybody yet." By the time of his broadcast, he was one of the most shrill homers I've heard in a national booth.

As much you guys like this writer - I'll admit I've only read his work on this site - ostensibly OSU fans are still OSU fans. 

The Homie J

October 12th, 2021 at 11:30 AM ^

"but they haven't really played anybody yet."

This is the most annoying thing about in-season recaps and articles from rivals or just a bunch of fans in general.  We've played 6 games, 2 tough road games and several better than they appear type teams (Western Michigan, NIU).  And yet, week after week, it's lets see how they do against Rutgers/Wisconsin/Nebraska followed by "we didn't learn anything, move the goalpost back to October 30th."  Then if we beat Sparty, it'll be "lets see how they do against Penn State."

What the fuck is the point about scouting a team if your only takeaway HALFWAY THROUGH THE SEASON is waiting to see how they do against a team in 3 weeks?  Do a little research, make a fucking opinion and stop waiting until the goddamn 8th game of a 12 game season to finally decide one way or another if a team is good.

Ohio State fans are the worst when it comes to this.  It's like saying "let's decide how good this movie I'm watching is when I've watched it 8 times."  It shouldn't take that long to be able to admit a team is good or start making predictions about the big games coming up.  Or else, why even write any columns until week 9 or 10.

StephenRKass

October 12th, 2021 at 1:25 PM ^

So, I'm fairly salty about many OSU fans. And I actually think Nebraska and Wisconsin are better than given credit for. However, I can kinda see his point of view. If we had beaten Washington, Wisconsin, and Nebraska, and they had NO OTHER LOSSES, and were ranked in the top 25, yeah, that would certainly look more impressive.

While I don't care for Frost, nor Nebraska, I can't help but feel a wee bit bad for them. They should have beat Illinois, and really could have beat Oklahoma and MSU. The narrative would be quite a bit different if they came into the game with Michigan at 6 - 0 instead of 3 - 3.

Gree4

October 12th, 2021 at 8:36 AM ^

The tone of this article vs the others is a bit more concerned. He obviously isnt in the business to give them a "good job" so he reverts to the old adage of being lucky and not good. 

MGoGrendel

October 12th, 2021 at 9:13 AM ^

This was a perfect opportunity for the Wolverines to revert back to what they’ve been in the past, but they didn’t. 

What?  He didn't include 'no offense, but...', so I'm offended!

All kidding aside, it now appears to be safe to say the quiet part out loud.