Blue in Yarmouth

March 13th, 2014 at 7:46 AM ^

but it could be based on the double negative. There's a reason there are rules regarding the use of them...they make the intent difficult to determine. It's much easier to understand what someone means when they say "I will always upvote that" as opposed to "I will never not upvote that". 

Again, I didn't down vote the guy because I'm not the grammar nazi type, but that could be the reason why someone did. 

steve sharik

March 12th, 2014 at 7:51 PM ^

Playing RB is about YAC and/or being a 3rd down back, including being very good in pass protection.  He's going to have problems convincing teams he can do those things.

LSAClassOf2000

March 12th, 2014 at 8:04 PM ^

(LINK) - MGoBlue had some stats for virtually everyone that tried out. 

Some of the highlights on those who also participated:

In the bench press, defensive lineman Jibreel Black led all participants with 29 repetitions, while fellow defensive lineman Quinton Washington finished with 26. Wide receiver Joe Reynolds and defensive back Courtney Avery recorded vertical leaps of 37.5 and 36.5-inch jumps, respectively. Reynolds also posted a stellar broad jump with a distance of 10 feet, 5 inches. Linebacker Cam Gordon posted a 36-inch vertical and ran the 40 in 4.65 seconds.

bronxblue

March 12th, 2014 at 10:14 PM ^

Seems like good performances.  I have no idea if this bumps anyone's stock up or down, but I kind of hope a couple of these guys catch on if they aren't drafted.

kehnonymous

March 12th, 2014 at 11:29 PM ^

Ya know.... Thomas Gordon may not have been Brian Dawkins, but he was a competent starting safety and if we're being honest, a three-toed sloth could probably count the number of those we've had the last six years on one hand.

thisisme08

March 13th, 2014 at 8:35 AM ^

I know the Lion's just signed Golden Tate but seriously do they not need more WR/slot WR's? Perfect guy to pick in the 3-5 range and  he would be on a nice cheap rookie contract. 

MGoStrength

March 13th, 2014 at 11:22 AM ^

Those are some pretty solid numbers, but unfortunately for both them and the Combine-type tests, they correlate poorly with NFL success, which is exactly why guys like Gallon should be thought of highly based on his ability to play the game.  For example, a test like the bench press makes it beneficial to have short arms, yet in almost every position in football it is beneficial to have long arms.  It really makes you question why they even use the test.

Magnus

March 13th, 2014 at 1:16 PM ^

While I agree that bench press in itself isn't that helpful, neither is the number of receptions. Or the forty-yard dash without pads on.

When it comes down to it, all these things are data points. No one thing will make or break a prospect. If a guy runs for 2,000 yards and can bowl over every tackler in the way, the NFL's not going to care much if he runs a 4.6. If a quarterback completes 68% of his passes and wins a national championship, some NFL team is going to want him, even if he only completed 2 reps on the 225 lb. bench.

MGoStrength

March 13th, 2014 at 3:44 PM ^

My point, which maybe wasn't that clear, is that these tests from the Combine or Pro Days don't mean much.  Not saying that scouts don't care about them, but they aren't highly correlated with future NFL success.  What should be important is how they actually play football with pads on.  

 

Much of the data and studies to date on performance training are in regards to efferent/motor processes as opposed to afferent/sensory processes. AKA it's all about producing force. So, athletes look like studs in the weight room, but not of the field. The Combine/Pro Day is the same way, the athlete always knows what's coming...it's closed loop. A major distinction of elite athletes is that they can process, predict, and/or react to unpredictable actions. So, it's more about motor control than force production.  This is primarily why scouts should put more stock on how a football player actually plays football rather than a battery of controlled, predictable, power production tests, which may be why a guy like Gordan looks like a stud, is muscular, is strong, can jump, and runs fast, but plays so so (for NFL standards).

MGoStrength

March 13th, 2014 at 3:20 PM ^

Sorry...not sure why this posted twice aargh

 

My point, which maybe wasn't that clear, is that these tests from the Combine or Pro Days don't mean much.  Not saying that scouts don't care about them, but they aren't highly correlated with future NFL success.  What should be important is how they actually play football with pads on.  

 

Much of the data and studies to date on performance training are in regards to efferent/motor processes as opposed to afferent/sensory processes. AKA it's all about producing force. So, athletes look like studs in the weight room, but not of the field. The Combine/Pro Day is the same way, the athlete always knows what's coming...it's closed loop. A major distinction of elite athletes is that they can process, predict, and/or react to unpredictable actions. So, it's more about motor control than force production.  This is primarily why scouts should put more stock on how a football player actually plays football rather than a battery of controlled, predictable, power production tests.