How is RR doing as a "Michigan Man"

Submitted by UMdad on
Michigan is a destination, not a stepping stone, and I have always loved that our coaches have tended to retire (or be fired) from the post rather than leave to coach somewhere else. I was one of the people who worried that bringing in an outsider who didn't understand that Michigan is a school and a program different from all of the others might backfire on us. MSU can trace much of its problems to Saban bailing on them and establishing them as a little brother program. That being said, how do you guys think that RR is handling balancing running the program his way with the traditions of UofM? Is he becoming a "Michigan Man," or is does that label not matter anymore?

turbo cool

June 18th, 2009 at 1:41 PM ^

Read the rest of that sentence, "an outsider who didn't understand that Michigan is a school and a program different from all of the others might backfire on us." Everything you'll ever read about Bo suggests that he knew exactly what he was getting himself into at Michigan and the type of tradition and history that we had.

Don

June 18th, 2009 at 2:24 PM ^

There's no question that Bo was quite familiar with Michigan going in, since he coached against Michigan at NW and OSU. RR had no such experience in his resume, and it's apparent that he knew relatively little about Michigan prior to taking the job. That's not something he can ever change; should it be held against him in perpetuity? Is it a permanent black mark? I'm not saying that it's impossible for RR to somehow sully the good name and reputation of Michigan; he's only been here a short while, so our experience with him isn't very long yet. I'm of the opinion that if he gets fired before his first contract ends that it as likely be for off-the-field transgressions as wins and losses. Recruiting violations, academic chicanery, etc. will guarantee his dismissal by Martin and the UM administration. As of right now, I'm not aware of any allegations of any wrongdoing, however slight. Have I missed something? As far as the various allegations of personal moral turpitude that have been leveled against RR, those have accompanied Miles as well, regardless of the substance or lack thereof. We'd be talking about the same stuff. We all know how Mo's tenure ended. One other change that RR has brought about is the program's dealings with the media. We're all familiar with the Fort Schembechler mentality when dealing with the press, and Carr's frequently churlish behavior was only a continuation of Bo's famously prickly relationship with the media. To put it bluntly, for much of Bo's career here he was a big-time jerk with the media. Many sportswriters hated covering him, and in 1979 or 1980 Bo even got into a physical altercation with a Michigan Daily sportswriter. I'm no particular fan of sports media people myself, but if anyone thinks Bo was sweetness and light to deal with back then they're fooling themselves. He could be a real ass. He just mellowed so much in the later years as coach, and then as the grandfatherly retired coach that people forget what he was like in his early days. By all accounts, RR has completely changed this relationship, to the point where some are even criticizing him for being so open and congenial with the media. Personally, I always thought that Bo's and Lloyd's relationship with the press was unnecessarily antagonistic, and frequently did not reflect well on Michigan the institution. Which one is the better "Michigan" tradition? In terms of things RR's done since he's been HC here, I'm curious about what it is specifically that he's done that gives so many people the willies, other than this vague, free-floating sense that "he's really not one of us." If RR wins the number of games that fans want, stays here 10-15 years, and keeps the program's nose clean to boot, he'll be a "Michigan Man."

wolverine1987

June 18th, 2009 at 7:07 PM ^

And I agree with the conclusion. This has been a culture change for the media, as well as for all of us. The verdict on any culture change (apart from yahoos) is always written after the fact, with results, both on and off the field. If the program stays clean and on field results are excellent, the issues people have now will disappear. If not, the the questions will remain, and have more validity than they do now. As far as your question about the "willies," some people have read the transcripts of the lawsuit from his leaving WVA, and I think the questions come from that, his departure, and calling Pryor before telling his players he was leaving. If you read it, that behavior was open to question--I'm not saying there was anything definitive or that I object to it, but it's debatable.

chitownblue2

June 18th, 2009 at 12:42 PM ^

That being said, how do you guys think that RR is handling balancing running the program his way with the traditions of UofM? I'm not sure how this is a balancing act.

cfaller96

June 18th, 2009 at 12:49 PM ^

Michigan not just SCHOOL but also DESTINATION. RichRod is an OUTSIDER and also HILLBILLY. Bo was not just GOOD COACH but also GOD. RichRod not only NOT BO but also NOT LLOYD. I am not only SCARED of change but also TERRIFIED of it. No sugarcoat.

Five In A Row

June 18th, 2009 at 1:11 PM ^

Just because I'm a Buckeye, I hope you won't take this as sarcastic or negative. Seriously, I've been saying for quite some time now...there IS a thing known as a Michigan Man. And, much as we don't care for the Wolverines, it is a very good thing, to be embraced in a tradition of excellence and character. Bo, Lloyd, definite Michigan Men. RR, however, I don't feel fits the mold of what a Michigan Man should be. I feel that he has character flaws that make him a square peg in a round hole in Ann Arbor. Winning cures a lot of ills - but I just think he was a bad hire ... someone you folks will have a hard times TRULY embracing. Frankly, you're better'n that.

PA Blue

June 18th, 2009 at 3:44 PM ^

But since you brought him up, the vest left Youngstown State under a cloud, and YSU would have had to forfeit their 1991 championship if the violations had been discovered before the four-year NCAA statute of limitations. The Clarett thing was a replay of the YSU issues, and so they are not isolated incidents. LINK https://goomer.ncaa.org/wdbctx/LSDBi/LSDBi.MajorInfPackage.ProcessMulti…

dmccoy

June 18th, 2009 at 1:59 PM ^

Right. And by cruising the internet, you somehow know that Michigan high school coaches believe RR has character flaws. Tell you what, you ask some coaches what they think, and get back to us with what you find.

ToledoMFan

June 18th, 2009 at 1:28 PM ^

paints RR as the devil. They blew up the West Virginia allegations and never mentioned the responses or reasons behind what happened. Even my level headed buckeye friends are ignorant to most of what happened and assume Rodriguez is Sabanesque. I also think there are quite a few that are afraid and are trying to stir things up to make us have a short fuse to fire him.

Coldwater

June 18th, 2009 at 1:25 PM ^

All RR needs to do to become a "Michigan Man" is win. And Beat Ohio State. If he does neither, he'll never be a Michigan Man. He has embraced the traditions, he has an open door policy for ex-players. Sure he has tweeked some things, but that's every coaches right.

ShockFX

June 18th, 2009 at 1:36 PM ^

RIP FJM: "True Yankee A leader. A guy who’s full of intangible qualities that help him triumph – with class. Derek Jeter. A guy who has a certain look in his eye, like he knows what it means to don the pinstripes with some motherfletching pride. Bernie. Mantle. Joe D. Jeter. A guy who you want in the trenches with you. Mattingly. Joe Girardi. Derek. Jim Leyritz. Posada. Derek Jeter. A guy who stares adversity in the face and says, “I play for the Yankees, and that means something, and I am going to hit a HR off BK Kim in this World Series Game because I am a New York Yankee." Scott Brosius. Tino. Dave Justice. Derek Jeter. A winner. Derek Jeter. Here are some people who are not True Yankees: Alex Rodriguez, Mike Mussina, Jason Giambi, Alfonso Soriano, Carl Pavano, Jaret Wright, and every other New York Yankee who has never been on a Yankees’ World Series winning team. If you ever – ever – hear someone use the phrase “True Yankee,” for any reason, I want you to find the nearest exit, form an orderly line, and leave the premises quickly and calmly. Seek shelter. Cover head. Report the incident to your nearest FJM representative immediately. You are in great danger, because the person you are talking to is an idiot."

Fuck Lion

June 18th, 2009 at 1:59 PM ^

Questions Ive been meaning to ask you Yankee fans on this site: what are your feelings on Nick Swisher? Could he be a "TRUE YANKEE," or is he just a welcome visitor? To what extent can you bring yourself to root for him? I like him. I think hes good for the team, the clubhouse, and the fans. However, I don't think I could bring myself to buy a Swisher jersey. His likability has some Ohio State caused limit for me, and I am reluctant to go be all out pro-Swisher.

M-stache

June 18th, 2009 at 1:32 PM ^

. . . but he's wrong. I'm assuming the "character flaws" refer to the messy divorce from W.Va. I think both sides handled that one poorly, not just Rodriguez. Sometimes it's good to hire an "outsider." Other times, it's the right thing to hire the insider/heir apparent. When Bo retired, hiring Moeller was the right move. And when Moeller was forced to quit after the public intoxication episode, it was the right move to bring Lloyd up. But when Lloyd retired, there wasn't an insider Martin felt comfortable promoting to HC, and I think his instincts were correct. It's way too soon to know how RichRod will work out. Personally, I'm looking foward to this season, even if it probably will be 6-6 or 7-5. You have to give a college coach 4 years before you can judge him, IMO. Bo was an outsider. A Woody-trained, OSU/Miami(not that Miami)-bred coach. At that time, it was the right move to bring in an outsider. This is one of those times, too.

Don

June 18th, 2009 at 1:33 PM ^

you don't define what being a "Michigan Man" is. What you mean by the term? And if you say that a "Michigan Man" is someone who maintains our traditions, what are those traditions? When you say that Michigan is a "school and a program different from all of the others," what do you mean, specifically? The number of victories? Size of the stadium? Just curious... Was Fielding Yost a "Michigan Man" when he first came to Michigan? He had no prior connection to Michigan, and he job-hopped like mad before he came here. Fritz Crisler had no prior connection to Michigan, and even coached for one of our biggest rivals before he came to Ann Arbor. The same with Bo. What made them "Michigan Men?" right off the bat? What is it that RR is doing or not doing in his first 18 months on the job that makes people so nervous, in comparison to these earlier coaches? • He has instituted the post-game practice of having the team sing the Victors after a victory to the student section. That wasn't something that Bo, Mo, or Lloyd had the team do. • He has enthusiastically continued the yearly tradition started by Bo and maintained by Carr of being involved with Mott Children's Hospital, both in terms of regular visits by players and the yearly fund-raising program. • He has, by many accounts from alumni players, notably increased the outreach to former players both in terms of offseason involvement to game day visiting on the sidelines. Some former players have stated publicly that they did not feel welcome in Ann Arbor under the former coaching regime. That seems to be rapidly disappearing. • Prior to coming to Michigan, Bo was an assistant at Presbyterian, Bowling Green, OSU, Northwestern, and again at OSU, then was HC at Miami. RR was assistant at WVU, assistant and HC at Salem, HC at Glenville State, then assistant at Tulane, Clemson, then HC at WVU. That's six stops for each prior to coming to Michigan.

UMdad

June 18th, 2009 at 3:02 PM ^

I just wanted to throw the question out there. I guess I define a Michigan man as someone who thinks that the program is more important than they are. Sort of a mafia thing, I guess, 'never take sides against the family again, frodo.' The term came from Bo when Frieder decided that there was a better program out there for him and Bo showed him the door. I want a guy here that honestly wants to be associated with U of M until he coaches his last game and then wants an office next to Lloyd's. And actually, I think RR has been doing suprisingly well mixing in his traditions and the programs traditions, incorporating alumni and ex players, and I think the winning will come. I also don't read too much into the troubled players thing, because I remember Lloyd sticking with Mo Williams and even Brian Griese got into a bar fight at Scorekeepers. He is slowly winning me over.

cfaller96

June 18th, 2009 at 3:59 PM ^

There is no evidence to suggest that RichRod doesn't fit your definition of a Michigan Man. So if he fits your definition of a Michigan Man, then what's the point of stirring this crap up? On other parts of the internet, this post could be construed as "concern trolling." Please stop. (And Frodo was a character in The Lord of the Rings. Fredo was the traitor in The Godfather.)

sammylittle

June 18th, 2009 at 5:18 PM ^

IMO Frodo Corleone would have become Don over Michael. If Fredo had carried the ring, it would have gone to Saramon early on and all would have been lost. Also the quote he is using comes from an interaction Between Vito and his oldest son Sonny after a visit with Solozzo "the Turk" who was trying to convince the Corleones to sell drugs.