all of the people
PA Blue
History
- Member for
- 3 years 22 weeks
Karma
- Current value
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 2 years 46 weeks ago | I agree |
Hawaii wasn't as great that year as their record, but it is the only way the argument that the regular season is a playoff makes sense. If we want to think of the regular season that way, you have to accept that an undefeated team gets in before a 2-loss team, no? Otherwise it isn't a playoff at all, which is OK as well but then let's stop giving lip-service to that notion. |
| 2 years 46 weeks ago | "Please people, don't vote |
"Please people, don't vote against posts because of disagreement, however. Then there would be no point of having a board. Vote against something because it's a troll'ish or dick'ish response." This is the key... if it happens the way you suggest, this will work very well. |
| 2 years 46 weeks ago | Yes |
You are absolutely correct that these things should be taken into account. If Michigan doesn't even offer the 5th ranked player in MI, and State gets him, so what? It is meaningless for the in-state recruiting debate. |
| 2 years 46 weeks ago | None of us know, you are |
None of us know, you are correct. But none of us really know the second part of your post... that UM guaranteed him he'd be a QB and Florida did not. One thing I am sure of... he'll have every opportunity to compete at QB from the start. If he is switched, it will be because he didn't win that competition, and he can help the team at another position. |
| 2 years 46 weeks ago | Yes |
In 2007 LSU won the title over OSU. LSU had two losses and Hawaii was undefeated. |
| 2 years 46 weeks ago | Great!! |
Thanks.... these things will get me through until Sept. 5. |
| 2 years 46 weeks ago | Hill wasn't offered....seems |
Hill wasn't offered....seems RR didn't want him, or has other, better options. |
| 2 years 46 weeks ago | Absolutely! |
Absolutely! |
| 2 years 46 weeks ago | Yes |
He's the prototype |
| 2 years 46 weeks ago | I'm willing to accept the |
I'm willing to accept the argument that the regular season is like a long playoff, with each game a potential eliminator for a team (actually, it is like a double elimination structure for most teams--lose once, you still have a chance, lose twice and you are in trouble) but would like to see a additional rules. For example, there should be a rule that no 2-loss team can play for the title when there is an undefeated team remaining. |
