Final B1G Bowl Record: 5-5

Submitted by FrankMurphy on
Wins

Nebraska 37, UCLA 29

Minnesota 21, Central Michigan 14

Wisconsin 23, USC 21

Ohio State 44, Notre Dame 28

Michigan 41, Florida 7


Losses

Indiana 41, Duke 44 (OT)

Michigan State 0, Alabama 38

Iowa 16, Stanford 45

Northwestern 6, Tennessee 45

Penn State 17, Georgia 24

DCGrad

January 2nd, 2016 at 7:28 PM ^

the records of each team were. For example we were 9-3 going against a 10-3 UF team so that's pretty even. But 5-7 Nebraska beat 8-4(?) UCLA and PSU lost to 9-3 UGA. The way Iowa and NW went down confirm the real strength of the B1G West. The way sparty lost confirmed what happens when you lead for 0 seconds in 2 of your wins.

LSAClassOf2000

January 2nd, 2016 at 7:36 PM ^

It's rather interesting when you look at them like this - the division champions both lose pretty decisively, one of them even failing to score. The two 5-7 teams that were let in both win, the 2nd and 3rd place teams in the Big Ten East both win, the 2nd place team in the West wins....

Overall though, a meh bowl season for the conference. I will agree with others though - Indiana really should have had that game. I mean, no one really wanted to win it, so it may as well have been Indiana.

gwkrlghl

January 2nd, 2016 at 7:37 PM ^

The three with abnormally great, lucky seasons are not great teams. They were lucky, found themselves in overmatched games, and were humiliated. Looking at you MSU, Northwestern, and Iowa.

Otherwise I thought the Big Ten did fairly well. IU and Penn State were even respectable in losses.

StephenRKass

January 2nd, 2016 at 8:22 PM ^

MSU & Iowa are very different teams. Iowa overachieved this year, and did a great job, considering their personnel. We are lucky, in certain ways, that they lost in the Big10 championship game. If they had won, I think the Big10 would have looked even worse. And I'd rather that MSU be embarassed. MSU didn't have to play OSU, UofM, or MSU during the season. If they had, they never would have had a perfect record. They did a great job in the games they played. And, from my perspective, they are now stuck with Ferentz for even longer. I'm thrilled with that, because I think he has a ceiling.

MSU, on the other hand, had another year with exceeding luck. They should have lost to Michigan. And they should have lost to OSU. OSU was screwed by a combination of bad play calling and bad weather. To tell you the truth, though, I'm really glad that MSU won. This meant more schadenfreude at their delicious loss to Alabama. Pretenders. But more than that . . . this also brought schadenfreude at the fate of OSU. Twice now, they have lost to MSU. And OSU, with a good game plan, would have played Alabama much tougher. OSU is losing a ton of seniors and a bunch of guys to the draft. Their loss to MSU meant that they had no possible chance to play for the National Championship. They had only themselves to blame. I'm thrilled that even though we lost badly to them, they didn't make it to the championship series two years in a row. I think it would have been horrible if they had won two National Titles in a row. That would only have helped them even more in recruiting. Oh, and OSU would have killed Iowa too. No, MSU barely beating both OSU and Iowa and then getting clobbered by Alabama was the best possible turn of events from Michigan's perspective.

Finally, I don't think Michigan was good enough in the end to play against a great team. I'm much happier with them clobbering Florida then making it to the National Championship series and getting clobbered themselves.

JayMo4

January 2nd, 2016 at 7:39 PM ^

So Northwestern beats Stanford by double digits (and would have been worse if that would-be pick six at the end wasn't downed) Iowa wipes the floor with Northwestern, and Stanford destroys Iowa.

If Stanford and Northwestern played again next week, I wonder how that one would play out...

bacon

January 2nd, 2016 at 7:41 PM ^

We won, that's the most important thing. MSU/bama and Iowa/Stanford came out as expected (more lopsided, but still, neither should have been in those games). Psu wasn't good, they made it a game vs Georgia. I thought NW should have beaten Tenn. I figured OSU would smoke ND and I was happy we smoked Florida. The other schools in the big ten were toss ups IMO.

gwkrlghl

January 2nd, 2016 at 7:43 PM ^

So far the Big 12's best defensive performance is OU giving up 37.

They're on their way to 1-5 right now (TCU down 21-0 in the 1st) and so far they've given up:

OU 37
Baylor 38
KState 45
Okie St 48
Texas Tech 56
TCU ???

The worst power 5 conference easily.

WichitanWolverine

January 2nd, 2016 at 7:46 PM ^

5-5 isn't so bad until you look at the NW, MSU, Iowa losses. They got completely crushed...and with Iowa and MSU being the division winners, it just looks really bad. I think the PSU and IU losses weren't so bad since neither team was great going in and they were at least competitive.

Saint_in_Blue

January 2nd, 2016 at 7:50 PM ^

It wasn't so much the 5-5 record as much as it was the blow outs that occurred. I'd be looking at this much differently if some of those games were a bit closer.

DoubleB

January 2nd, 2016 at 8:20 PM ^

You can't talk about the comeback of the Big 10 and have the two division champs get absolutely embarrassed. There's not a motivation issue with those games. As bad as MSU lost they were competitive til about midway through the 3rd quarter. Iowa looked like an FCS team in every sense of the word: coaching, talent, preparation, etc.

DoubleB

January 3rd, 2016 at 10:40 AM ^

Bama punted on their first 3 possessions. It was 10-0 at the end of the half and they had shown some ability to move the football (pick at the end of the half was a killer). It was 17-0 midway through the 3rd quarter. I didn't think MSU would win it at that stage, but I thought they might be able to find something. Obviously they never did.

The Iowa game was over after the first snap.

Everyone Murders

January 2nd, 2016 at 7:56 PM ^

My younger son is a big UGA fan (Michigan first, but UGA a close second).   Consequently, I pulled for UGA in the /pukes in own mouth, swallows discretely/ TaxSlayer Bowl.  I'm pretty sure I was pulling against PSU whoever they played.

Put another way, fuck those pedophile-enabling apologists.

(Dammit - my New Year's resolution to be more gracious just plopped into the proverbial toilet.)

ToledoWolverine

January 2nd, 2016 at 8:05 PM ^

I swear every year the powers that be do something to offset our bowl match ups. If you rearranged a few of the match ups I think the Big Ten could have easily gone 7-3 or 8-2.

Though it's fair to say they could have also gone 3-7. Overall I think the SEC hype train has slowed considerably while the Big Ten is gaining momentum. Big 12......defense guys, defense. Look into it.

DoubleB

January 2nd, 2016 at 8:24 PM ^

"Overall I think the SEC hype train has slowed considerably while the Big Ten is gaining momentum."

I mean really?? Based on what? All six original SEC West teams won their bowl game by 21 points. That isn't just winning. That is complete and utter dominance. And it won't happen again in our lifetimes.

The Big Ten has stopped the bleeding. Momentum would be doing something better than .500 in a few consecutive bowl seasons.

xtramelanin

January 2nd, 2016 at 11:11 PM ^

is that the bowl games are at a minimum hundreds if not thousands of miles closer for the other teams we usually play, and some of them (citrus v. florida; rose v. usc; alamo bowl v. T A&M, etc) are basically home games for the opposing teams.   that is a big deal that is worth points.  i mean, can you imagine if they played bowl games outside at, say, soldier field and we played a florida or TCU?   those teams' fans would be absent in droves and the teams themselves would freeze their derriers off during the game.  big advantage for us.

DoubleB

January 3rd, 2016 at 1:32 AM ^

competitive for a quarter and a half before it started to get out of hand. The other was over before half the fans found their seats.

The defining moment of iowa football under Ferentz: Down 35-9 with nearly a full quarter to go . . and kicking it deep. We talk about teams quitting . . . how about the coach quitting . . . in the Rose Bowl.

BuckNekked

January 3rd, 2016 at 12:08 PM ^

Yea they won all three but led for something like 37 seconds combined. If that isnt luck I dont know what is.

It was definately an interesting B1G season. A turn here or there and the standings look completely different in the East. 

vulture

January 2nd, 2016 at 8:22 PM ^

yesterday you primitive screw heads were happy MSU lost and some of you were wishing that OSU did lose. Today people are wishing the B1G went 10-0. "First you want to kill me. Now you want to kiss me? Blow."

jimmyshi03

January 2nd, 2016 at 8:25 PM ^

B1G was overrated, but really, this is much more on the Big XII. Only win over the Group of 5 was Minnesota, so it wasn't like they built up record against cupcakes. Conference beat both LA schools, ND and Florida. The margins matter, but the Big XII and maybe ACC should come in for more roasting.

look up see blue

January 2nd, 2016 at 9:06 PM ^

The Big XII won't last long. They can't get anyone worth a damn to join their conference and will always be at a disadvantage without a conference title game. It all comes down to when Texas decides to join the Pac-12. As soon as that happens, we'll have four super conferences with 16 teams each.

Yessir

January 2nd, 2016 at 8:39 PM ^

If there is such a thing as a silver lining to the cloud that was our botched punt, its that Sparty was sent to an embarrassing loss because of it.

m1jjb00

January 2nd, 2016 at 9:02 PM ^

So I'm not going to celebrate the fact that they got into the playoffs.  But, that punt was what kept Ohio State out of it.  File that under lipstick on a pig.