DC candidates if Durkin leaves?

Submitted by DISCUSS Man on
  1. Vic Fangio
  2. Jeremy Pruitt
  3. Les Miles (had to do it for the people here who think he's a defensive coach)

 

DISCUSS

ak47

December 2nd, 2015 at 10:53 AM ^

Obviously grain of salt coaching search information but from the people I know who follow MD now that richt and Mullen turned them down officially Durkin is the top choice and going to receive an offer.  Highly doubt he turns it down.

JWolve

December 2nd, 2015 at 10:49 AM ^

The question isn't if Durkin leaves. It's whether that happens this year or next year. No way Mattison gets re-upped to DC. I wonder if he'd promote Zordich or Jackson.

StephenRKass

December 2nd, 2015 at 10:49 AM ^

You can't hire based on one recruit. Still, if Pruitt was DC, that would make it a slam dunk for Mecole Hardman to come to Michigan.

My personal hope obviously is that Durkin stays at least one more year. Our defense was good this year, but exposed by the three injuries on the DL and the lack of raw talent in the LB corps.

alum96

December 2nd, 2015 at 11:03 AM ^

Georgia was a top 5 D last year and top 15 this year.  I believe the 1 year he was DC at FSU they won a NC.  You are not getting him for Hardman - you are getting him because he delivers good defenses.

p.s. your rationale for Durkin staying might get exposed even more next year as the LB core could be the same or worse and you never know on injuries.  Maybe Lewis or Peppers is inured next year and then your DBs are a weakness along with LBs.  Or 1 of the only 2 proven safeties goes down.  There will be injuries every year - and we have a thin team outside of DL to absorb them. Etc.  

That said I hope he stays but I dont expect a massive jump in D next year due to similar holes.   It was a top 5 D most of the year - hard to improve much on that with a LB core that currently consists of Gedeon and pray.  Hard to improve on top 5 period.

UMichMSW07

December 2nd, 2015 at 10:50 AM ^

would be my #1 choice. He would continue the tenacious recruiting down south. may also help with Hardeman. that being said.. Pruitt is a long shot at best.

alum96

December 2nd, 2015 at 10:51 AM ^

Vic is not coming here.  He has been an NFL guy all but 1 year of his life and he went to Stanford for 1 year due to being out of work.  That said it was by far the best defense Stanford had that 1 year.

I'd like Shoop or Pruitt in a dream world but dont see those happening this year.

No on Mattison because he wold have been offered to stay as a DC if thats what Harbaugh wanted. 

I think Wisconsin's young DC is also very good - he doesnt get the talent level UM OSU or even MSU gets but they have generally good defenses when not playing Ohio State in a Big 10 championship game.  He has developed some incredible players like their LB this year and Wisc is generally top 20 in D every year with him there.

Bleedmaizeblue

December 2nd, 2015 at 10:51 AM ^

Can we get a good defensive coordinator that knows how to stop spread offenses? We seem to always get the best DC that struggles against the spread. Will we ever be able to defend against the spread???

alum96

December 2nd, 2015 at 11:18 AM ^

have we ever had a core of 2/3 top end LBs at one point?  That would help.  We usually have 1 very good LB at a time surrounded by some "solid Big teeeeen" types.  I agree with others it doesnt need to be straight line speed but look at MSU LB core - they diagnose and flow to the ball faster then we do almost every year.  They are not all elite athletes as shown by their NFL prospects but we need to evaluate, teach, and find the right guys who react and attack faster then we have had for yrs. 

We are not going to stop a great pass spread / air raid - they just are built to score - you have to contain them to 30ish but not give up 40-50.  But great LBs combined with a very good DL will help with a run spread like OSU runs. And we need to focus on stopping OSU.

Mr. Yost

December 2nd, 2015 at 11:02 AM ^

He's worked at UF and with the Ravens. Just like Greg Mattison. He's been at Michigan before, so he knows what we're about.

I'm sure he knows just about everyone on our staff and has probably worked with a number of them.

Seems like a seemless transition to me. Not to mention he a very solid football coach. I'd take him in a heartbeat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teryl_Austin

Mr. Yost

December 2nd, 2015 at 11:57 AM ^

Doesn't get a HC job and Harbaugh backs the truck up and we get him. Could be wishful thinking...I don't know. Admittedly, I don't follow the NFL very closely.

That said, I'd like to just keep Durkin and keep rolling (assuming he's learned his 3-3-5 lesson from the OSU game).

CarrIsMyHomeboy

December 2nd, 2015 at 10:55 AM ^

I think moving GMatt would be reasonable--he's great!--but significantly downgrade the whole coaching staff for unusual reasons.

The insane value of our coaching staff this year stemmed from everyone's wild over-qualification for their current jobs. 7 or so former NFL coaches. A bunch of guys who accepted hierarchically lower positions here than at their last gig just to work with Harbaugh.

Moving GMatt to DC makes our DC qualified, not overqualified, and opens the possibility that we replace him with a "merely" qualified DL coach as well. No thank you.

Ali G Bomaye

December 2nd, 2015 at 10:57 AM ^

To be clear, I'd be thrilled with either Fangio or Pruitt.  But if Durkin leaves, I have full faith that Harbaugh will hire an excellent candidate.

Look at how he put together the current staff.  Durkin and Drevno weren't on our radar until they were hired, and they've been great.  Harbaugh is respected throughout the coaching world, and the fact that Durkin is in consideration for a top job after just one year here is a huge selling point for other young star coordinators.

He'll hire somebody good, and I have a feeling it won't be anyone we're thinking of.