s1105615

September 12th, 2021 at 5:51 PM ^

You clearly didn’t watch any of the Iowa games.  They scored 14 points on offense on the opening 3 minutes against IU and they completely dominated ISU.  The D smothered ISU so badly Campbell basically threw in the towel with 10 minutes left in the 4th quarter while down 3 scores.  The Iowa offense has a strong run game, and a passable throwing game, though that is clearly it’s biggest deficiency.  Add in top notch special teams kickers and you have a recipe for an elite team that can have success against anyone.  The offense probably doesn’t need more than 20 points against anyone left on their schedule as the D and Special Teams will likely hold anyone (PSU is probably the toughest opponent left on the schedule before the CCG) below that.  Iowa also has the longest streak of holding teams below 24 points (24 games).  

Will Iowa be able to win a CFP game?  Totally depends on who they get.  Alabama?  No.  Clemson?  They certainly could by controlling field position and grinding out a 13-7 type game.

All that to say, don’t kid yourself.  Iowa does cycle through and have mediocre seasons 3/4 years, but this the year where the schedule and talent is lining up for Iowa to win the West and make a game with whoever the East champ is, including OSU.

JonnyHintz

September 12th, 2021 at 5:57 PM ^

Clearly YOU haven’t watched Iowa. Considering their second TD against Indiana was an interception returned for a TD. How is that an offensive TD? 
 

303 total yards against IU. 173 against ISU (ISU almost doubled their offense) Iowa isn’t winning because of their offense. They’re winning because of their solid defense and turnovers. Once the turnovers stop, Iowa is back to being a good, albeit flawed team. Certainly not top 10. 
 

rice4114

September 13th, 2021 at 2:10 AM ^

Doesnt Iowa beat Indiana and Iowa state without the turnover scores? Maybe they arent as pretty on the scoreboard but i would kill for Indiana and Iowa st type wins back to back. Indiana cant be a worthless win only because of the way Iowa whooped them. That doesnt make any sense. 

JonnyHintz

September 15th, 2021 at 5:51 AM ^

Without directly scoring from the turnovers? Probably. But The field position gained from the turnovers was worth points as well.  
 

Iowa scored on a fumble return. Kicked a field goal on a -8 yard drive following an interception at the ISU 33. Another field goal on a drive that started on the Iowa 18 following an interception. And the other interception gave Iowa the ball on the ISU 49 that also resulted in a TD. 
 

The fumble TD and the -8 yard drive that resulted in a TD alone would have made it a tie game. Positive field position from the other two turnovers led to another 10 points for Iowa. 

Bo Harbaugh

September 12th, 2021 at 3:03 PM ^

Meh.  Iowa is a top 20ish team with a prehistoric offense that was just massively outgained in yardage by another top 20ish Iowa state team that turned the ball over 4 times including a scoop and score.

Does anybody really believe Iowa’s run left strategy and throw to the tight end on 7 yard rollouts would be enough to hang against possibly the best d-line in college football (Clemson).

If you can’t threaten down the field you aren’t beating Bama, UGA, Clemson and generally OSU.

We’ve seen this script multiple times in the B1G when meat machine +sound defense Wisconsin plays OSU and inevitably falls short due to a lack of big play potential.

Quailman

September 12th, 2021 at 3:07 PM ^

I'm not going to debate whether Iowa is a real contender or if they can hang with Clemson/UGA/Bama, but the polls are not supposed to be predictive of that, they are supposed to rank who the best teams and resumes are. Iowa has two pretty impressive looking (by score) wins over two teams thought to be good and ranked highly. It's reasonable to think they could be higher based on body of work so far combined with initial ranking, and to at least think they should be higher than A&M 

outsidethebox

September 12th, 2021 at 3:36 PM ^

It would be just as fair to predict that Michigan would shallack them in similar fashion to which they did Washington-likely even worse. They are a hard-nosed, fundamentally sound team. They are not a particularly physically gifted team-mediocre to poor team speed. Watching that game was painful. 

True Blue 9

September 12th, 2021 at 2:10 PM ^

Personally I think OSU and ND's drops are appropriate and make sense. OSU's drop is even further than I thought the coaches would do. 

With that said, I was surprised that A&M didn't drop a spot. I think Iowa being ahead of them and perhaps Clemson seems about right. 

And I can't wait to hear about all of the chips on MSU's shoulder for not being ranked yet....

bronxblue

September 12th, 2021 at 4:21 PM ^

And ND gave up 264 yards rushing to FSU at 5.5 ypc (JSU gave only 202 yards at the same 5.5 ypc) and threw so much because they haven't been able to crack 3.5 ypc against either FSU or Toledo.  

See, I'd argue that ND having to rally to beat Toledo at home because they only scored on 5 of their 13 drives (including a pick-six) while giving up 22 points to Toledo shows a worse offensive output and defensive performance than Michigan scoring on 5 of their 10 drives and holding UW to 10 points (7 of which they scored while down 21 points in the middle of the 4th quarter), but that's just me.  

UMBSnMBA

September 12th, 2021 at 3:11 PM ^

I think that the imbalance in the offense probably contributed to his.  I have no doubt that when we need it, the forward pass will be there.  I'm guessing they pass a lot this coming weekend just to get some game practice with it.  Washington with their good DB's and potential for coming back wasn't an optimal situation for practicing passing under game conditions when you were beating them easily on the ground.

SD Larry

September 12th, 2021 at 3:00 PM ^

It's early but last year is over.  Honestly think Michigan would beat more than half the teams on the board based on their play these first two weeks.  Just sayin.