CC: Who Does Washington Hire?

Submitted by MaizeBlueA2 on January 12th, 2024 at 2:56 PM

With Kalen DeBoer all but signed in Tuscaloosa...who does Washington hire to replace him?

 

(FYI - I've already looked at their roster and their commitments...no one stands out as an obvious transfer candidate. Alabama seems to have more guys that Michigan has or would target.)

Derek

January 12th, 2024 at 2:59 PM ^

Jake Dickert

This is actually a legit suggestion. Dickert's the Wazzu HC whose team nearly knocked off UW in the Apple Cup, if not for the Odunze end-around on 4th and 1:

https://youtu.be/By7cVJvXEhA?si=krCI0aXkAy0TBCMy&t=458

MichiganFootball

January 12th, 2024 at 3:06 PM ^

I don’t think it’s at all a lateral move.  Washington is a much bigger job with a history of success that Arizona has never had.  And they’re going to be in a much better conference.  I imagine Washington will still be making more money from their partial Big Ten share compared to what Arizona is getting from the Big 12.

Needs

January 12th, 2024 at 3:22 PM ^

Plus, the University of Arizona has a massive budget shortfall that probably prevents them from matching any offer Fisch would receive. 

https://kjzz.org/content/1867904/university-arizonas-budget-crisis-just-got-more-controversial-tucson#:~:text=It%20wasn't%20too%20long,he%20attributed%20to%20financial%20miscalculation.

MichiganFootball

January 12th, 2024 at 3:36 PM ^

Yeah but he'd be going to a place with a much higher ceiling in a significantly better conference and who is going to have a much bigger budget over time.

Washington is head and shoulders a much better job compared to Arizona.  And I don't think it's at all clear Washington is going to be an average team next year.  

alum96

January 13th, 2024 at 11:39 AM ^

You do have a point there - the Big 12 is weakened without Texas and Oklahoma and Jedd has a veteran team returning.

UW is a better job longer term IMO with B10 backing now but for the next 12 months might be in for some struggles and Jedd has a pretty good gig.

superstringer

January 12th, 2024 at 3:11 PM ^

Arizona is a basketball school. They have little football tradition except here and there. And you can say that about PHX in general too. UW is defined a football school w proud and deep tradition, a Natty, and Seattle loves the gridiron generally. Then on top of that factor Big Ten/Eighteen >> Big 12/16.  

Squad16

January 12th, 2024 at 3:50 PM ^

^ This

UW, even at their peak, will always be a distant, distant second place to the Seahawks (i.e. the opposite of Michigan, where UM & MSU have much more dedicated fanbases than the Lions). 

Washington is a solid program with a history to be sure, but living in Seattle, their fanbase is much weaker than most in the Big Ten (even if their program is better). 

The only West Coast schools with good football fanbases (i.e. on the level of the Midwest/South) are Oregon and USC (and USC's are extremely fair-weathered compared to average). Utah does as well but they aren't really fully West Coast. 

alum96

January 13th, 2024 at 11:41 AM ^

Lions and Wolverines both have effin dedicated fanbases.  Even in RR year there were 100K in the stadium.  Yes here or there Lions fans didn't fill the stadium but fergodsakes it's the worst franchise in sports last 6 decades up there with the LA Clippers.  What the Lions have done to their fanbase is abuse for decades.  And yet still top of mind for every sports fan here even when Pistons and Red Wings reigned supreme. 

MSU football is an after thought - they can't even get 70K to show up some games.

Derek

January 12th, 2024 at 4:48 PM ^

It's a lateral move for Jedd. Neither UW nor Arizona is a premier program. His best chance to take one of those jobs is to continue to succeed with the program that he's already built, not start from scratch in the shadow of a magical two-year run that's about to end abruptly.