LSA Aught One

June 1st, 2013 at 8:20 AM ^

I just woke up from a very long nightmare that Michigan was losing the first game of the season to a cupcake. I'm pretty sure it was a dream since they had the name "galactic" on their uniforms. I need to stop sniffing glue before bed.

Bodogblog

June 1st, 2013 at 9:49 AM ^

Winovich to announce at 5:30 today, per the M Block (and confirmed by TVH) 

EDIT: don't see that on M Block twitter page, may have been deleted. But it's included in the ESPN forum. Maybe shouldn't have posted, but assumed it was public with the Coach Brown tweet 

EDIT II: since I can't find the Coach Brown tweet, and Tom wasn't as definitive (and I feel a little bad having posted Tom's ESPN Insider), maybe for now this should be revised to say, IF anything happens today, it will be later in the day. I'm sure there will be an update later.  A Coach Brown tweet does say Winovich knows where he's going to commit 

CRISPed in the DIAG

June 1st, 2013 at 11:37 AM ^

Winovich is a 3-star according to Rivals and 247 and he sounds like a smart kid - a solid addition to our depth at LB. But can someone tell me why we are breathless over a 3-star? Have guys like Green and Peppers spoiled me? Or is he rated higher or received a late bump that hasn't shown up on the web pages.

gwkrlghl

June 1st, 2013 at 11:41 AM ^

but recruiting services are obviously not the be-all-end-all to a HS players abilities. If you're a linebacker in the midwest and both Michigan and Ohio State are pursuing you heavily, then you are a great linebacker. I doubt we're fighting over a guy who both schools see as a depth player. It's nice to see 4 or 5 stars next to a guys name, but Winovich has gotten the Brady-Urban stamp of approval which is just about as good to me

Magnus

June 1st, 2013 at 11:57 AM ^

That depends on who's doing the evaluating. Urban Meyer has been accused of relying on recruiting services for his information, and he's not really renowned as a great talent evaluator. People said part of him getting run down at Florida was because he disliked the recruiting process, talent evaluation, etc. He just got sick of it. Who's to say he won't have the same problem at OSU? And I don't really see his guys from Florida tearing it up in the NFL, so I guess I don't put a ton of stock in OSU's offer. Honestly, I'd be more impressed with a Penn State offer, because those guys are great at evaluating and developing linebackers.

DavidP814

June 1st, 2013 at 12:28 PM ^

Isn't the accusation that Urban sometimes relies on recruiting services for his information MORE of an indication of talent in this case?

If Urban usually uses Scout/ESPN/247 for his information and Winovich is just a middling 3-star, AND Ohio State is still pursuing him hard, in a year OSU is (mildly) handicapped by NCAA scholly restrictions, in a position where they already have 3 highly rated commits and a lead for a near 5-star (Raekwon) that would make 4 LBs...  That would indicate that the OSU staff has identified Winovich specifically amongst all the other 3-stars in Ohio as a larger talent

Magnus

June 1st, 2013 at 12:31 PM ^

I don't know. I don't know who Ohio State has offered and why. Winovich has long had an affinity for them, so it's possible that they offered him over some other 3-star guy partly because they thought they could get him. It's also possible that some LB coach at OSU knows Winovich's uncle's dad's barber, and he thought he might have a shot because of it.

The bottom line is that some good programs (Michigan, Ohio State, Miami, Oregon, Virginia Tech, Florida State) have offered, while lots of other good ones (USC, Alabama, Florida, Texas, Texas A&M, Georgia, etc.) have not. He's a 3-star to every recruiting service.  He might be good.  He might not. Regardless, he will be the same player whether he's the #535 overall player (which he's currently ranked by 247's Composite ranking) or #250.

dennisblundon

June 1st, 2013 at 2:01 PM ^

So that wasn't you who posted that if not for the OSU offer no one would care? I think a reasonably intelligent person would deduce from your posts that you don't think much of the recruit or Meyer's capability to identify talent and that Hoke will get a pass on this one because of pooping gold.

WolvinLA2

June 1st, 2013 at 3:08 PM ^

But don't you think the fact that both UM and OSU have made him such a priority (and early on, no less) that that's a pretty good indicator of his talent? Both schools are in on a lot of talented players, and at this point, neither need a lot more LBs (for OSU, because they already have a few committed) so they have the luxury of being picky. Yet they both clearly really want him. He might not be a Peppers level recruit, but that's good enough for me.

Magnus

June 1st, 2013 at 3:39 PM ^

Hah. Find where I've said that he's not talented. Here's what I said:

"If he didn't have an OSU offer, I doubt there would be this much hype."

That's all I said, and it was in response to a question about why there's so much hype.  People need to stop twisting my words.

sum1valiant

June 1st, 2013 at 3:52 PM ^

Hah! (just starting a post with "hah" is an incredible indicator of how much of a tool the poster is).  Maybe magnus needs to realize that perception is reality. Everyone read your words, and everyone interpreted them to be critical of the opinions of both staffs regarding Winovich. No one is "twisting your words", we're just not in the "magnus poops gold" camp. Get over yourself.  

WolvinLA2

June 1st, 2013 at 4:33 PM ^

Here's what I took from that sentence you quoted: that you feel his hype is from his OSU offer and not from him being a very good linebacker. I disagree, I think his OSU offer came from him being very good (the M offer as well) and the hype followed from both his offers and his talent.

elaydin

June 1st, 2013 at 1:34 PM ^

That's certainly not an accusation anyone who knows what they're talking about would make. It would mean Urban Meyer never goes after a prospect before the recruiting services make their ratings and would never go after a 3 star recruit.  Neither one is the case.  OSU has offers out to, and commits from plenty of 3 star types.  

Also, even though the HC might have the final say, I would think the position coaches have a lot more to do with who gets an offer and who doesn't.

turd ferguson

June 1st, 2013 at 2:00 PM ^

So we should follow Penn State's linebacker recruiting because of guys like Matt Millen, LaVar Arrington, and Paul Posluszny? I don't know if you noticed, but PSU had a coaching change recently. Unless you think it's the buildings in State College that have been evaluating LB talent over the last few decades, that argument is ridiculous.

turd ferguson

June 1st, 2013 at 2:42 PM ^

So you think they're Linebacker U because of one position coach who has been there for a decade? Plus, even if they had kept the same exact staff together for the last 40 years, wouldn't it seem more likely that they produce good linebackers because they're good at developing them over four years as opposed to spotting talent that no one else can see in a couple of hours of grainy high school highlights?

Magnus

June 1st, 2013 at 3:42 PM ^

I think if Bill O'Brien is smart - and he seems to be - he'll give Coach Vanderlinden and Coach Johnson some freedom to evaluate their players.  Like it or not, I trust Bill O'Brien and Ron Vanderlinden to find linebacker talent over Urban Meyer and Luke Fickell.

Leaders And Best

June 1st, 2013 at 4:02 PM ^

The hype is getting a little out of control. Bill O'Brien had near zero input in player personnel decisions at New England. Hell, he was the OC in New England for only one year.

PSU didn't have a terrible roster of players last year. JoePa didn't exaclty leave the cupboards bare there. He had a promising first season that exceeded expectations, but we still have very little data on his ability to evaluate and develop players. Let's wait a couple years before we crown his ass.

Magnus

June 1st, 2013 at 4:03 PM ^

I don't really give a rat's patoot about Bill O'Brien.

Ron Vanderlinden and Larry Johnson are the linebacker and defensive line coach, respectively, and I'm sure they do a ton of the evaluating of their positions, if not others as well.  Vanderlinden's counterpart is Luke Fickell.  I really shouldn't have to say any more.

Leaders And Best

June 1st, 2013 at 4:50 PM ^

Maybe Tom Bradley was calling the shots the last 10 years. Maybe Everitt Withers has a lot of input on personnel at Ohio State. None of us knows for sure. I agree with you that I think Vanderlinden is a better coach than Fickell, but neither is the only coach on their respective staff. And considering Urban Meyer's track record with assistants versus Bill Belichick, I think I would put  more faith in an Ohio State offer right now than PSU.

Magnus

June 1st, 2013 at 3:44 PM ^

PSU's linebackers coach is Ron Vanderlinden, who has coached numerous excellent linebackers in the forms of Pat Fitzgerald, Paul Posluszny, Navorro Bowman, Michael Mauti, Sean Lee, etc.

Luke Fickell has coached...umm...Ryan Shazier?

Yeah, I'll take Vanderlinden and Co.

white_pony_rocks

June 1st, 2013 at 2:35 PM ^

i've never understood why people say things about how well a player from U of M does in the NFL.  I guess its good to see, but if i had to choose, i would rather the player be a great college player than a great nfl player, I want U of M to win more than I care about the quality of the players career once he leave.  And yes great college players usually mean great NFL players, but sometimes you can win with players who don't project to the next level but tear it up in college 

ThWard

June 1st, 2013 at 3:10 PM ^

But I took from your original comment that you think fans overrate Hoke's evaluation (I.e. scholarship offers), or at least whoever evals UM recruits. And I take from your second comment that OSU offers may be overrated, insofar a they reflect the decision of second year coach U Meyer, insofar as he just based it on scout services (query why he'd offer a 3 star, given that that's the point of this original reply thread). But you'd respect the eval of Penn State, which had a brand new staff as well an a second year HC?