BTN Analyzes Michigan's 2017 Schedule

Submitted by SpikeFan2016 on

The analysis on this piece is nothing noteworthy and the writing isn't great, but May is one of the slowest of OT months so I figured might as well put some content out there. 

The Big Ten Network's writers are in the process of doing a 2017 schedule analysis for all of the Big Ten teams in alphabetical order and it was just Michigan's turn: http://btn.com/2017/05/10/2017-football-schedule-analysis-michigan-wolverines/

In BTN's opinion, here are some highlights of our schedule:

  • Hardest Game: vs. Ohio State 
  • Easiest Game: vs. Rutgers (LOL that Rutgers is easier than either of our Group of 5 non-conference opponents)
  • Best Chance to Pull an Upset: @Penn State
  • Best Chance to Be Upset: @Indiana (vs. Air Force was an honorable mention). 
  • "Must Win": vs. Michigan State

 

 

Again, nothing groundbreaking or suprising, besides maybe Indiana as the pick of most likely to upset us. I understand that the timing is primed for a let down (sandwiched between a rivalry game vs. MSU and a night road game at Penn State), but IU seems to be on a down swing given the staff turnover and Bloomington is one of the few places where "being on the road" doesn't make much difference.

Minnesota at home feels more dangerous than Indiana to me. 

war-dawg69

May 12th, 2017 at 5:58 AM ^

I believe that is very possible being that Michigan and OSU are the most talented teams in the big ten. We shall see how it plays out, but Michigan goes as far as the 0-line and QB play will take them. Just like last year as I feel the defense will be solid and probably top three every year Coach Brown is here. Even though this team is young, I feel it will be more physical with teams. Whoever is the QB must hit the long ball as Harbaugh constantly runs plays to set it up. If they can do that this team is dangerous and will be favored in more games then they are know.

Mr. Yost

May 11th, 2017 at 10:48 PM ^

What if it was played at Ford Field and run by Michigan, with a Michigan crowd, home uniforms, just like a game at Michigan Stadium?

Just curious on your philosophy. Because in the literal since, yes...the UF game is a road game.

However, when using sports terms...it is not. It's a neutral site game. It's a 50/50 crowd (in theory) and neither team is on its home campus. So sure, it's literally a road game for both teams...which in sports is called a neutral site game.

FYI - when a QB throws a "bomb"...it's not an explosive. It's a deep pass.

SpikeFan2016

May 11th, 2017 at 6:28 PM ^

When I think of "Must Win", I think more of what would happen if we were to lose....

I cannot even imagine how horrendous it would be to lose twice in a row in Ann Arbor to them, coming off a 3-9 season (when we will be ranked in the Top 15 preseason). 

It would be a disaster. We NEED one more win over them in a row in order to finally erase the stench of the 1-7 stretch from 2008-2015. 

SpikeFan2016

May 12th, 2017 at 10:54 AM ^

I think it also depends on the context of what is necessary and expected for a "successful season". 

 

Most rational people would consider this season a success if we finished 10-2 or 9-3 but didn't win the conference. Also, nobody outside of some among our own fanbase are "expecting" Michigan to win the Big Ten this year.

Last year everyone thought it would be Michigan or Ohio State; this year, the general consensus is Penn State or Ohio State. But hey, the expected winner hasn't won since arguably 2010 or 2011. 

 

Anyways, I can't think of a definition of a successful season that includes losing to MSU at home given where their program is at. 

 

 

JHumich

May 11th, 2017 at 9:23 PM ^

that aren't planning to win them all. 

For us, every single game is "Must Win," because the goal is a National Championship.

But, by your measure, I can't imagine being more horrified (or hindered for the future) by another loss than I would be if we lost to MSU... so I can see that.

lhglrkwg

May 11th, 2017 at 8:39 PM ^

We'll be fine and generally on an upward trajectory win or lose. I think MSU losing again and doing nothing in conference again will be the death knell for their national aspirations. At this point they can point last year as a 'down year', another one is a pattern

Cali Wolverine

May 11th, 2017 at 11:51 PM ^

We haven't beaten Urbz (at Ohio State)...enough is enough. We are going to beat Michigan State. It would be nice to beat Penn State. But we will never win the Division, win the BIG, and control our own destiny for a College Playoff birth unless we beat Ohio State. That is The must win game...period.

Cali Wolverine

May 12th, 2017 at 10:28 PM ^

called Florida in a small conference called the SEC. A Michigan team led by Coach Lloyd Carr put the beat down on Urbz and Tebow, Coach Carr was carried off the field on the shoulders of players.

UM Fan from Sydney

May 11th, 2017 at 7:45 PM ^

MSU is absolutely a must win, especially since the game is in Ann Arbor. We have a superior team and staff. There is no excuse losing to them. Do you think it is fun going through an off season after MSU wins? It is not fun. They are some of the most insufferable humans in this sector of the galaxy.

Stringer Bell

May 11th, 2017 at 8:10 PM ^

They're insufferable regardless.  They went 3-9 last year, finished 6th in the division and lost at home to us and the only thing they can talk about is how Harbaugh can't finish better than 3rd.  They'll talk shit regardless of whether or not their team can back it up.

GoBLUE_SemperFi

May 16th, 2017 at 7:20 AM ^

That Sparty just beat Michigan at the Big House, with a mediocre team, at best. Now you understand that game is a "must-win", just like Indiana, just like Air Force. Michigan may not be there with OSU (yet), but they are better than dropping games to the likes of Sparty and Indiana and having that be acceptable. Not to mention, that game is a must win to keep Sparty in their box for another year.

g_reaper3

May 11th, 2017 at 5:44 PM ^

Losing to a secondary rival 2 out of 3 years is pretty bad. Especially when we have a decent chance of being 0-3 against OSU. Being 1-5 against our two main rivals that we play regularly is a terrible start. Especially with 4 of those games in the Big House.

corundum

May 11th, 2017 at 5:55 PM ^

Nah, they are due to come back to Earth. They had some fluky wins after McSorley connected on a ridiculous amount of prayer bombs. Also, Franklin isn't a coaching mastermind. Their OOC schedule is pitiful but they should still drop at least three games - Michigan, OSU, and one of Iowa/Wisconsin/Nebraska.

SpikeFan2016

May 11th, 2017 at 6:20 PM ^

Agreed.

 

Their schedule is also harder this year. Road games at Iowa and Ohio State, plus a potentially tricky road game at Northwestern. (Northwestern is the only Big Ten team besides Michigan that James Franklin has played multiple times but hasn't beat; also, a lot of people are picking NW as a sleeper pick for the Big Ten West, I think they return most of their production/will be experienced). 

Also, if I was a Penn State fan, I'd be scared of the MSU game. Nittany Lions have to travel to East Lansing after playing Michigan and Ohio State in back to back weeks, timing is horrendous. 

 

 

mastodon

May 12th, 2017 at 11:44 PM ^

While I can see this happening, cuz OSU is looking for blood, I wonder how PSU plays them if the week before they drop that whiteout game to UM.  Does that suck the life out of the rest of their season?  Or do they convert that pain to must-win survival mode and take it to OSU at the shoe?  Would love to see the latter.  PSU is the must-win strategic game on the schedule.

bronxblue

May 11th, 2017 at 6:23 PM ^

They feel a lot like Houston last year, in that they had a really good year but it required a bunch of things to go well, and in the second year, with all the hype, those breaks don't go your way and you drop 2-3 games. Their defense still has questions, their offensive line is fine but not remotely as solid as the fans will tell you, and they are still relying on a QB with sub -60% accuracy to not make mistakes. Maybe that will all happen, but I'm going to reserve judgement until they play someone with a pulse.

doggdetroit

May 11th, 2017 at 6:56 PM ^

That's really only true of the first half of the season and more specifcally the Minnesota and OSU games, which they won in fluky fashion.

After the OSU game, they closed out the B1G regular season by beating everyone by at least 2 TDs. They beat Iowa by 4 TDs, (and Iowa completely shut down Michigan), put up 45 against Indiana (which contained Michigan even before the snow storm), went on a 31-3 run against Wisconsin in the title game, put up 49 against USC in the Rose Bowl (USC was widely regarded as the hottest team in the country at that point) before blowing the game.

I get that you are not allowed to give credit to PSU here on MGoBlog, but they turned into a good team by the end of last year and I expect them to be better this year. They return almost everyone of note and they will be in the second year of OC Moorhead's system. If Michigan had the same season last  year and returned virtually their entire roster, MGoBlog would be calling for a national championship. In fact, I think that's what happened after Harbaugh's first season.