On being a fan

Submitted by OregonWolverine on

I first learned what it really meant to be a football fan when I was 13. Mike Lantry missed a field goal, by inches. Then he missed another - by inches. And a group of unaccountable, brutally unfair adults got together and decided that 10-10 meant that Ohio State won, and should go to Rose Bowl, while Michigan stayed home for the holidays.

I wasn't quite the same for weeks. Every morning, there was a brief interval between waking up and remembering that Michigan hadn't won - and then the slightly nauseating feeling hit again. I was old enough already to realize that this was irrational, but not old enough to stop it. I'm still not old enough, really.

Lantry missed again the next year. Ricky the Peach Leach put the HEI in Heisman before Michigan got knocked off by one of the Little 8. By the time I actually got degrees from Michigan, my Michigan football fandom was not an allegiance, not a choice. It was a permanent condition, an extra lobe in my brain connected to a fifth chamber of my heart.

Those extra vital organs experienced plenty of euphoria through the years. And a lot of scars, too. Every year, the hope that this year was the year - the year we'd break through, and prove ourselves to the world. Decades of starting that Fall climb of Everest, only to be turned back hundreds of feet from the summit while smarter or better prepared or more ambitious climbers went to plant the flag at the top. And then the disappointment, upon finally reaching the summit, of finding that someone else had climbed the other side to share the credit. Decades of screaming "throw the f--king football" at the future hall of fame coach, and wondering how other great  teams always seemed to get it just a little more. Decades of believing that we just needed a little bit more, that this might be the year ...

And the question - sometimes the outright conviction - that we might not have the right leader to do it. The awful symmetry of reading the gently mocking assessment of a USC coach after the '77 Rose Bowl, that they knew when Michigan would pass because "the receivers turn cartwheels when they break the huddle", and hearing the faint echoes 30 years later from a USC defender after shutting down the most talented Michigan offense ever: "they didn't do anything we didn't expect".

Along the way, in '05, I found this blog. Written by someone who could mix intense passions for writing, humor, analysis, and M football into a remarkably addictive cocktail. It worked for the Engineer in me, and the football fan in me, and I was not alone. I became a more educated, more involved, more insightful fan, able to understand and look for outcomes besides just final scores and records. And I shared Brian's hope  that Rich Rodriguez was, at last, the kind of leader that might begin to pay back decades of lost hopes.

It didn't happen. About 12:00 PM PST Jan. 1, the M fan organs went into temporary shutdown. And I have to tell you, they aren't exactly healthy yet. A January hire of a lifetime 47-50 coach just didn't provide enough voltage to jolt them fully back into rhythm.

This is not fair, you say. I must give the new leader a chance before passing judgement, and anyway, who can really project? And I respond that projection is what being a fan is all about. Whether it's "We're gonna kick their ass", or a multi-thousand word analytical piece from Mathlete or Misopogon, trying to figure out what might happen next, and putting your hope and conviction behind it, is what constitutes this crazy affliction. And if skeptically projecting that you are not likely to achieve full success while fervently hoping you are wrong is unfair, it is an unfairness which can't and shouldn't be eradicated. Bo Schembechler and his kids never lost a game because of my screaming conviction that he should pass more, and Bo wouldn't have had a job at all but for people like me.

It is true that there are no closed-form solutions to predicting the future. Two star recruits sometimes become All Americans. A sixth round draft pick becomes an NFL and Super Bowl MVP winning quarterback. A guy with no experience running anything bigger than a tailor shop becomes an iconic U.S. President. But there are reasons why such stories are so inspirational: they're exceptional. Much more often, past is prologue.

So if you'll forgive me, and those like me, I'll not subject myself just yet to the enthusiastic belief that we've found football Harry Truman. I'll leave it to those of you who are younger or less cynical or maybe more naive or maybe just happier. And I won't judge you for being what I once was, and you won't judge me for what I've become. We'll all root for Michigan and Brady Hoke, and we won't mistake apparently undue optimism or pessimism for moral failure. Maybe it's a deal we all could make.

OregonWolverine

January 14th, 2011 at 9:55 PM ^

"Should go in a diary". Pardon my ignorance, is that me who needs to take an action, or some great diary manager in the sky?

Edit: Duh, never mind, got it. Would you believe that I'm a former software CTO? That's a rhetorical question, don't answer it.

BlueDragon

January 14th, 2011 at 8:55 PM ^

Harry Truman was a bit of a no-name when he assumed power after Roosevelt's death.  Many people thought he didn't have what it took to negotiate with Stalin and Churchill at Yalta.  After the war he launched the Marshall Plan to rebuild Great Britain and Western Europe, one of the most successful rebuilding/aid programs in human history.

Truman's big war was the Korean War, A.K.A. the "Forgotten War" to many history buffs.  The war ended in stalemate between North and South Korea and to this day there has never been a formal peace treaty signed between the two powers.  Besides halting Pyongyang's invasion of the South, Truman also reigned in General MacArthur, who violated his express orders not to cross the 49th parallel and invade the North.  MacArthur also talked of using nuclear weapons to "win" the war in the Korean theater, which would have created a whole new ball-game for the remaining four decades of Cold War drama.

Truman is also credited with launching the Truman Doctrine, which called for Western powers to oppose the expansion of Communism anywhere in Europe and the Western Hemisphere.  Later this doctrine was expanded to Asia and the rest of the world.

My point is, truly great leaders like Truman are defined by what they do in office, not their resumes before they take the job.  The RR era was a whisker away from DOOM, but to RR's credit, he rebuilt the roster and breathed new life into a stagnant program.  There is material for Hoke to work with now, unlike in 2008, but it's going to take a master to bring all these disparate elements together and forge a new team.  Bringing back Fred and Denard is a good first step.  Now we need a recruiting class.

Desmonlon Edwoodson

January 14th, 2011 at 9:15 PM ^

Pessimism is fine, and yes it provides some protection for your soul dong. 

However

The sheer volume of parade urination and speculative criticism that has saturated this blog since coach Hoke was hired has been both uncalled for and divisive.

There are "fans" on this blog who would rather be right than have Michigan succeed.  They did not get their way in the coaching hire, so now they are going to pout and carry on like a two year old who wants his nookie.  By all means, protect your sould dong.  Expect the worst, hope for the best.  But if you're going to try to ridicule our coach, who has done nothing but show his love for the University of Michigan, and all that it stands for...I suppose the internet is a safe place for you.  Otherwise you had better speak softly, and  you had better watch your back.

OregonWolverine

January 14th, 2011 at 10:38 PM ^

I don't like ridicule, either - in the sense of intended emotional harm to another person. But parody, sarcasm, skepticism, humor are simply part of how people understand each other and the world. And the greater the position of responsibility you accept, the more you must learn to understand that. I'm a former corporate type myself, and I know well that even the best explanations of any decision will not convince everyone - and thank god for that, because corporate types often do not tell the truth. Not because they are liars, but because they don't actually know the truth much of the time and are just guessing.

Brady Hoke is a big boy, in more ways than one. I don't know how smart he is yet as a football coach, but he is obviously more than smart enough to know that public opinion is far from taken for granted, and smart enough to manipulate it in his direction - vital skills for a Michigan football coach. I really don't think he needs you to watch his back, or that of anybody else. Remember - football is the most important game ever invented. The most important *game*. Adjust your behavior accordingly.

JTGoBlue

January 14th, 2011 at 9:17 PM ^

I think some time during the Jamie Morris years...but my first real heartbreak game was 1990..you remember.  After reading this, it reminds me how close...oh so close our beloved Wolverines have come to reaching the summit over the years.  Always enjoy the journey, though.  The last three years have been surreal in that hopelessness set in so soon during the season; I'm looking forward to the  game against that team from Ohio becoming monumental again!

Y0ST

January 14th, 2011 at 9:19 PM ^

I'm somewhat younger but feel the same as you. I often wonder what I could have accomplished had I not spent so much time obsessing over Michigan football.

WFBlue

January 14th, 2011 at 9:47 PM ^

Unless I am mistaken (or we have some mysterious power of which I am unaware), we have no ability to influence the outcome of the next game, season or decade of football (or recruiting for that matter).  Since it is out of our control it seems the easiest approach is to sit back and see how it unfolds, while madly cheering on our team.  

ST3

January 15th, 2011 at 12:38 AM ^

Sports Illustrated had an interesting piece this week on the "home field advantage." They reported on a study that loked at thousands of football, baseball, soccer, and basketball games, and showed that athletes' performances aren't really effected by the home field advantage. For example, FT% is almost exactly the same for home and away teams. However, there is a definite home field advantage in terms of winning percentage. When they dug deeper into the stats, they found a home field advantage in the referees calls. This makes sense psychologically because the refs are influenced by the group subconsciously. I'm not getting this all accurate, but I recommend you read the article. The point is, you do have some control. Go to the games. Get loud. Get a little crazy. I know (at least I believe this to be true) when I was going to high school basketball games, when I saw a traveling call, I yelled it out. In a high school gym, the refs can hear you (and unfortunately, that's true all too often at Crisler.) Maybe that triggers something in their subconscious and they say yeah, that was a travel and they make the call. I've reffed some games and let me also advise you to never yell at the refs. You want them to think they are part of the group, not against it.

You can also effect the next decade by representing your University with dignity and class. UofM has a world class reputation because of the alumni it produces. High school kids want to be associated with greatness. You likely will never interact with the next Denard Robinson, but you never know how your actions will effect others. Represent and Go Blue.

BlueDragon

January 15th, 2011 at 1:39 AM ^

As an alum, I try to be as good a representative to the university as I possibly can.  People look at you differently when you say you're a Michigan grad.  I noticed that even when I was a kid.  I wanted people to sit up and take notice of me for the hard work I did, and last year, my dream came true.  I'm not above getting a little rowdy at home games either.

You sir are a much needed touch of classiness on this blog, especially at half-past 1 on a Saturday morning.

HoldTheRope

January 14th, 2011 at 10:00 PM ^

It's interesting how fandom evolves as you get older...I'll be honest, I sort of miss the days when I was a little kid and didn't know who the players were coming in, or who the defensive coordinator was, or any of the endless parade of statistics that we all hold dear (or not so dearly) once we're old enough to know what they are. Ignorance is bliss, I guess. With age comes a sort of "responsibility" as a fan, or, to put it in Coach Hoke's own words, a sort of accountability. And yes, with age comes cynicism, but to let that take hold of you entirely is a disservice to one's self and to Michigan (not saying that this is you, OP). 

Whatever your allegiances to Coach Rod or Coach Hoke, one thing is clear: we all root for Michigan, and although our support isn't really quantifiable in any meaningful way, it does matter. We need to keep our heads held high, now more than ever. 

Tater

January 14th, 2011 at 11:33 PM ^

Whatever your allegiances to Coach Rod or Coach Hoke, one thing is clear: we all root for Michigan, and although our support isn't really quantifiable in any meaningful way, it does matter. We need to keep our heads held high, now more than ever.
Supporting RR and supporting Hoke don't have to be mutually exclusive. I didn't agree with the hire, but I am going to support whoever is in the office with the plate that says, "Head Coach" over the door. I am very apprehensive about the next four or five years, but for me it just feels a lot better to look for as many positives in the situation as possible. It's sorta like making an agreement with myself to subjugate my cynicism until it is proven right or wrong beyond a reasonable doubt. I just wish that more "fans" outside of the mgoblog community could realize that they can support Hoke without slamming RR and vice-versa. Luckily, though, we have a place like mgoblog where there are mostly reasonable fans who can discuss differing opinions without turning it into a pissing match of RR vs Hoke.

Wolfman

January 14th, 2011 at 11:48 PM ^

Now though, with Brandon deciding he wouldn't take it seriously, I decided the same thing.

I've grown weary of 9 wins being acceptable and being out of the NC hunt in Sep. We finally get a man that can take us to the next level. We have the most dangerous player in college who was going to be complemented by the best available rb until the change.

The D is reaching puberty and would have been good enough to stop opponents at less than 3 1/2 tds which would have taken us to the next level, albeit in the proper manner. We won't even compete for true pros like the sec and usc, et. al. 

When Brandon decided to make over the M program w/inferior products at less expense, not unlike he did at Domino's, it showed me he was worried more about product being good enough to produce an acceptable profit margin, but he was satisfied with status quo as built under Lo.

Brady Carr?  I just can't get excited. My allegiance will have to be earned again. I've already stopped all donations.

HoldTheRope

January 15th, 2011 at 12:20 AM ^

Oh, I agree completely (maybe I didn't express my point precisely enough). Even though I have apprehensions of my own, I will support Coach Hoke unequivocally, despite the emotional sunk cost that went into the RR era for me, personally. I have faith that they don't have to be mutually exclusive, but this is a rift in the fanbase that will only be rectified by two things: time and wins. 

ST3

January 15th, 2011 at 1:01 AM ^

I'm pretty sure we had already switched to the maize pants for road games by then. I remember seeing the early 70's UM-Osu games on ESPN classic a couple decades later and being shocked that UofM was wearing white pants. Tradition has always been such a huge part of the program that I thought they always wore maize pants and black Nikes way back to Yost's days. And I know Nike only dates back to the late 60's/early 70's.

Milty87

January 15th, 2011 at 9:49 AM ^

Very similar memories, though I'm just a few years younger.  That game is the first Michign football game that I remember vividly.  The other very early game that I have a hazy memory of is the Rose Bowl loss to Stanford 13-12, in January 1972, when I was 7.  Thanks for the eloquent diary!