War On Students Over: Students Win Comment Count

Brian

image

For a brief period a few years ago, there was some weirdo in the student section who would head up to the concessions at halftime, drop fifty bucks on hot dogs, return to his seat, wave his arms about, and chuck foil-clad meat missiles at the most enthusiastic folks around him. He was a hero. A couple games into this era, the students started a rhythmic chant for him.

"HOT. DOG. GUY."

"HOT. DOG. GUY."

This was fun! It was ours.

Michigan kicked him out of three consecutive games, until he stopped. Or stopped coming.

----------------------

It's time for another internet-wide fret about the kids and how they don't like the live football anymore, this one spawned by a Darren Rovell article. (I know, I know. This article is good and does not expose you to Rovell's personality.) In said article, there's the usual platter of disturbing stats…

Arizona sold 10,376 student season tickets this year. But 47.6 percent of those students, for an average game, didn't even show up.

This year, the University of Michigan drew the most fans of any school for the 16th year in a row. But 26 percent of students who paid for their tickets didn't show up at an average home game this season. That's an increase from 25 percent last year and 21 percent in 2011.

…fretful quotes…

"We have to solve this because we are talking about the season ticket-holders of tomorrow," said Oklahoma athletic director Joe Castiglione. "But interests and attitudes are changing so rapidly it's not easy to quickly identify what we need to do."

…and the hope that having wifi will fix everything, which it won't. (But don't let that stop you.)

While this is a nationwide problem, Rovell's article touches on Michigan specifically in a couple spots. He talks to a reasonable-sounding Michigan senior:

"I've kind of accepted that I'm not getting reception in and around Michigan Stadium," [Adam] Stillman said. "The problem is in all the other areas. There's nothing to do while I'm waiting on line for an hour to get into the stadium, and there's little added value from being in the stands watching the game."

I was pro-general admission when it was announced, but if its goal was to get more students to the game on time, it is a failed policy. The slight increase in no-shows is worse than it looks—possibly much worse. 2012's home schedule had one attraction, Michigan State. The other games were against Air Force, UMass, Illinois, Northwestern, and a 4-8 Iowa. 2013 had a night game against Notre Dame, Nebraska, and Ohio State. The only games after the season took a turn for the grim in East Lansing were those Nebraska and OSU games. What is the no-show rate going to be next year? I'd be shocked if Michigan doesn't crack 30%.

Is there anything that can be done about this? I mean, you're just not going to reach the people I had to deal about ten years ago who would wander in during the second quarter smelling like an overturned truck of Jack Daniels. Those folks seem to be proliferating, and the only thing you can do is figure out ways to punish them and drive them away.

The university's attempts to rein in bad actors with first the validation program and then general admission have made it difficult to flip student tickets and then made them unattractive to non-students. Tickets remain cheap enough that a large chunk of the students don't care about wasting that money. The result is large pockets of empty seats.

It's time to end the war on crappy student fans

H-DrugsWin_400x400_2_jpg_400x400_upscale_q85[1]

Yes, some of these 18-year-olds are intolerable. But fighting them doesn't do anything for you. The main thing it does is make things worse for the 75% who do show up. Michigan has continually raised the bar on the students at the same time their interest level is dropping. The results are, in retrospect, predictable.

The alternative is to offer carrots instead of sticks. Michigan tried that with the "HAIL" program, which was a failure in year one, totally revamped in year two, and is probably two or three years away from being quietly assassinated in an alley. This is because it offers you a t-shirt; it was always an attempt to give the appearance of a carrot without spending any money.

The right move is to be good to your fans. Michigan has gotten continually worse. Blasting an ad—and yes, it is an ad—for renting out the stadium or exhorting people to follow you on twitter is unpleasant. Having to scream at the person next to you to be heard is the kind of thing that makes you walk out of a restaurant. Michigan does that at every available opportunity. Ever-increasing prices, hour-long waits to get into the stadium, ushers who kick you out for throwing marshmallows… all of these things are a drag on your future revenue base.

It's time to be less focused on the next quarter's budget and more focused on building an environment that will induct the next generation into your cult.

Instead, the athletic department is more concerned with policing behavior that they cannot change. The current generation of suits spent their days at Michigan buying tickets for their kegs and throwing toilet paper willy-nilly. These days, a weirdo who buys hot dogs at halftime and tosses them around the section gets kicked out.

Football is supposed to be fun, and it's not really that much fun these days. The athletic department took the initiative to stomp on every student tradition they found 1% threatening. Now the students have taken the initiative away from the athletic department by not caring anymore. They win.

I'm not sure trying to make Michigan athletics the most awesome place in the country to see a game is going to work, but it's clear that something has to change if this slide is going to be arrested. Being mean didn't work. Try being nice. Meaningfully.

Comments

ChelseaRick

February 20th, 2014 at 1:40 PM ^

Sports TV coverage has gotten much better with big screens and HD formatting.  I like away football games because I get to watch them on TV.  I'm a season ticket holder of Football, Basketball and Hockey and the in-game experience is losing it's luster on me.  Maybe I'm just getting old.  Get Off My Lawn!

mvp

February 20th, 2014 at 2:43 PM ^

There's a ton that the AD is doing wrong.  But I'm not sure on this part.

Everything is different in a post 9/11 world.  There are very real terrorist threats out there and I don't envy the AD's role in having to prevent them.  When you add in the crazy litigious society we live in and realize the liability the University would face if something did happen, I sort of understand it.

The challenge is figuring out where to draw the line and how to enforce any subjectivity that remains.  The AD has taken the position that they will simply remove all subjectivity.  You can argue that the pendulum has swung too far, but not that there isn't a very real problem to be addressed.

BiSB

February 20th, 2014 at 3:22 PM ^

"It's because of 9/11" is a cop-out. If terrorists want to bring in a bomb/thing of poison stuff/container of angry bees so small that they fit in a seat cushion or a water bottle, they will probably, like PUT THEM IN THEIR POCKETS. The only people who it will affect are people who want to use seat cushions and water for sitting and drinking, respectively (I really hope 'respectively').

They stopped letting water into the stadium because they SELL water. They tried to stop letting seat cushions into the stadium because the RENT cushions. If they could make you take your shoes off airport-style and rent you stadium-approved Freedom Slippers, they'd consider it.

Litigiousness is also a BS argument. Again, you can bludgeon someone to death with a shoe, but unless the University breached a standard of care, they aren't responsible.

dahblue

February 20th, 2014 at 4:04 PM ^

The water issue goes a bit further than what you're saying and, I think, it demonstrates the overall problem perfectly.  It shows that Dave Brandon (who brags about his extremely detailed involvement in gameday event prep) does a terrible job in housing events.  If you will not allow water in, and water is a HUGE seller, then you MUST beef up in-seat sales.  You're taking away an item that the people want and doing a shit job of selling it to them quickly.  Put tons of vendors in the seats and you'll have happier "customers", staying in seats and spending more money.   Instead, the AD focuses on billboards, JockJamz and other nonsense.  Brandon needs to step away from the gameday event and give that control to someone who understands hospitality.

BiSB

February 20th, 2014 at 4:35 PM ^

There are probably ways to ban water bottles that cause people to just say, "eh, whatever." Sell water at a reasonable price, make a bunch more "watering stations" available, etc. But when you make it obvious that you don' give a shit, people will notice.

UMxWolverines

February 20th, 2014 at 3:24 PM ^

Has there ever been a terrorist threat on a sports venue? Ever? 

I hate the way 9/11 changed the way we do everything. Everything is about safety, safety, safety even though your chances of tripping on the sidewalk and hitting your head and killing yourself is much higher than you ever running into a terrorist. Terrorists are a very smart group and if they really wanted to they could target any concert or sporting event rather easily. People have to stop living in fear. 

GoBLUinTX

February 20th, 2014 at 3:56 PM ^

started what, 20 years ago?  But I can tell you this, containers of liquids are no longer allowed into stadiums and arenas...anywhere.  Thank you DHS.  

As for the seat cushions, when did that start?  Admittedly the last time I was at a home game was OSU 2011, but we were able to bring in seat cushions then.  Or are you talking about the folding seat back contraptions?

SC Wolverine

February 20th, 2014 at 1:30 PM ^

There is something about the "school administrator" mentality that makes it impossible to see the students as customers -- which they are.  To be sure, there is a parental aspect to college administration that has to be upheld.  But you are dead on target with the carrot over stick approach when it comes to customers making decisions with their own time and money.

denardogasm

February 20th, 2014 at 1:24 PM ^

What really steams my beans is that they really think lack of Wifi is the main reason kids don't come. How can you be that out of touch? "Kids these days.. All they care about is their tweeter and their facebox. If there's a place they can be on those phones for 3 hours they'll go there." Yeah. It's called home. I never gave a shit about a lack of wifi in the stadium. Lack of phone service got annoying sometimes but only when trying to find someone and most of the time if a message got through they didn't look at their phones til halftime anyway.

lazyfoot10

February 20th, 2014 at 1:25 PM ^

Excellent read. 

Both general admission and HAIL are total failures. 

Hit the nail on the head with HAIL. A free t-shirt ain't doing jack shit to get me to go to a women's basketball game. Sorry. I still think the only reward that would get me to care about HAIL is either a discount on future tickets (fat chance) or priority seating for the bigger games. 

General Admission was a disaster too. When I went to one of the games, me and some buddies showed up early enough to get row 20, but we sat down in row 60 because we liked those seats better. We were forced to move down or we got kicked out. 

Or the time they held ropes for the Notre Dame game to make sure every damn person got a certain seat. It took forever and a "Fuck Dave Brandon" chant even broke out. 

By the end of the season, I just stopped caring and showed up ~5-10 min before kickoff, not because I don't care (please don't accuse me of that), but because the system was so terrible I'd rather show up late, not deal with the lines (as much, that is) and get a higher seat (which I actually prefer). The system was supposed to make me show up early. I did the opposite.

Good job, good effort.

samsoccer7

February 20th, 2014 at 1:28 PM ^

I think one important point us that students seem to have a hard time selling tickets for games they don't attend. Validation was the first hurdle, and now GA has seemingly killed that market. So tickets previously sold and used are now just unused. Did the department make that much from validating tickets? If not, then forget it and allow other fans to buy those seats.

Tater

February 20th, 2014 at 1:30 PM ^

David Brandon has brought scorched earth "business practices" to the University of Michigan.  The no-shows are the "fruit" that can't grow in said soil.  Fire David Brandon first.   As long as his style of "business" is conducted at the University of Michigan, user experience will only deterioirate while prices will continue to rise.  

David Brandon is sucking the soul out of University of Michigan athletics.  The program is in great danger of becoming "just another reveune stream."

funkywolve

February 20th, 2014 at 5:39 PM ^

Most of these administrators won't be in these same positions or even at UM in 15, 20, 30 years, but if their goal is to ensure the long term future of UM athletics they need to do something soon.  When your students aren't interested and/or feel as though there is an 'us against them' mentality with the Athletic Department, thd odds of those students being long term customers probably isn't very good.

At the same time when you have alumni and long time fans growing tired and frustrated with their experience at Ann Arbor on Saturdays in the fall, it's almost a double whammy.  You have unhappy customers and customers who might not be taking or reducing the amount of time they take their kids to Ann Arbor on Saturdays.  My dad and I went to lots of games together in the 80's and that's how I really developed my love for UM football.

goblueritzy92

February 20th, 2014 at 1:29 PM ^

Bring back assigned seating! GA has been and will be a total failure and 95% of the students hate it. That same 95% are the people that won't wait in line 3 hours before game time and then try to show up by kickoff and be forced to wait in long hectic lines that seem to go nowhere. As a student I can say there is a major disconnect between the AD and the students. Most of us are sick and tired of their bullshit policies that cater to what they want and not what the students want. They forget we are students and taking out 8 hours on a Saturday including getting up early is not the best time management/most desirable thing for most us. Also get rid of whatever the heck this basketball student ticket policy is. It sucks

BLUEintheface

February 20th, 2014 at 1:36 PM ^

Michigan is not that good at football right now and the quality of opponent has dropped significantly.  Fix these issues and the attendance and fun problem is eliminated.  Also, it makes all the other stupid bells and whistles irrelevant and easily ignorable.  Easier said then done of course.  

DaBoss90

February 20th, 2014 at 1:38 PM ^

It's always too simplistic to draw conclusions when there isn't any real data.  Take my son, for example, who is a senior at Michigan this year.  He had student season tickets for his first three years, and did not miss a game.  This last year he decided to try out for the MMB Drumline.  Of course, they don't know if they make it in until a week or so before the season starts... so he had to decide what to do re a ticket.  This obviously would have been a bigger decision if it wasn't for GA... he would have been gambling on losing his seat priority.  He bought his ticket, made the Band, and was then stuck with a very difficult ticket to sell for the rest of the season.  It wouldn't really seem fair to "punish" someone in this kind of situation for not attending the games (which of course he was, just in a different seat) by some of the methods that have been suggested -- such as not allowing a student to buy a ticket if they had attended less than "x" games the prior year.  Obviously just an example, and probably an exception...  but stil, there are often explanations other than "lazy."

JayMo4

February 20th, 2014 at 1:40 PM ^

Problem solved in two easy steps:

1.  Allow "Hot Dog Guy" back into stadium

2.  Replace hot dogs with Chipotle burritos.

College kids love Chipotle.  This is economics 101.

 

kzooblue2016

February 20th, 2014 at 1:40 PM ^

As an MGoStudent, I keep hearing about glory days of marshmallows and toilet paper. I think the students on MGoBlog need to mobilize and bring this tradition back.

On the other stuff, I don't know what to do.

mGrowOld

February 20th, 2014 at 1:55 PM ^

"Bring back glory days of toilet paper and marshmellows?"

Son - when I was there (78-81) we could bring in ANYTHING as long as it wasnt in a glass container so nice metal kegs became part of the "game day experience".  Oh.....and because marijuanna had been decrimilized and possession of less than two ouces was a $5.00 fine in AA the sweet smell of cannibis was fairly prevelant as well.

You want to make the student section a hell of a lot more fun?  Bring back the stuff WE used to take in.  Not that stuff.

wile_e8

February 20th, 2014 at 2:08 PM ^

Other problem compared to your day - back then, didn't the NCAA limit teams to two television appearances per year? Meaning that you needed season tickets if you wanted to see more than a couple games per year. Now it's an outrage if a game only gets regional primetime coverage, softening the blow for those not wanting to pay for tickets.

SwordDancer710

February 20th, 2014 at 1:42 PM ^

I remember when we couldn't fill up Crisler. Our basketball team sucked, student sections were empty, and even with general admission, the arena didn't fill up until halftime. Cheap tickets and free food incentives didn't really do much.

Then our basketball team got good. We expanded the student section to a second lower bowl, and then we filled up several upper deck sections. Ticket prices increased, but Crisler still sold out. Even crappy games like Nebraska had great attendance.

I honestly don't care about RAWK, ads, expensive food, or racking up points to get a free T-shirt. If I'm going to leave my HDTV, beer, and warm house to watch a game in person, there's got to be something good on the field. Put a good football team on the field, and you'll get the students to show up, pay hundreds of dollars, and stay for the whole game.

UMMAN83

February 20th, 2014 at 1:54 PM ^

If the students buy tickets they can do whatever they want with them and show up when they like ... just like every other fan !!!

Other facts downgrading the situation;

1. Schedule blows

2.  Prices are through the roof to pay for all the non-revenue generating entitlement programs

3.  Tickets cannot be sold for face .... see #1

4.  Ushers are rude and non-existent at the end of games or during evacuations

5.  Exist from the stadium takes 30 mins.  Ref. #4 plus fans are also useless since they feel they are better than every other fan and run up the seat section.  Kinda like the morons on the highway that get over to exit at the last possible minute

6.  I'm sure there is more ... see other posts.

 

 

 

BlueMan80

February 20th, 2014 at 1:53 PM ^

My daughter got to be a senior just in time to endure the general admission policy.  She went through 4 years at Michigan and never got a sniff of seat past the end zone.  I got to sit on the 40 yard line when I was a senior...with my friends, too.

When I was at Michigan, if you wanted to see football, well, you had to get out of your chair and go to the stadium.  Every game wasn't on TV.  Now that you can see every game on TV, some seats on the 40 yard line with your friends might seem attractive enough to get to the stadium.   With all the things they have at the stadium now that they didn't have when I was an undergrad, you'd think there would be a way to leverage them to create student demand, not destroy it!

modabomb

February 20th, 2014 at 1:54 PM ^

As a student ticket holder, I am 100% in favor of a general admission policy. I think the university should reward real fans by giving the best seats available to those who are willing to show up early. However, I think the school botched the execution of general admission. I showed up early to UTLII and Minnesota, and was forced to sit near the field, as they were trying to fill the student section from the bottom up. But, as most fans know, those aren't the best seats to watch the game! So it was actually more rewarding for me as a football fan to show up 15 minutes to a half-hour before gametime, so that I could sit in rows 30-40 and be able to see the whole field. I think the GA policy would work better if the students who showed up early could just sit wherever in the student section. The student section wouldn't be as densely packed, so it wouldn't necessarily be as aesthetically pleasing, maybe, on the TV, but it'd make for an overall better experience for both those who show up early and those who show up near kickoff and want to sit up close.

That being said, the schedule next year sucks, the team is not very good, and the tickets cost too much anyway. So there's not much the school can do about that.

And I'm all for the face-punching of the students complaining about cell phone service. Get over it. You're there to watch football with your fellow students. What, on your phone, could possibly be more fulfilling or entertaining than that?

Come On Down

February 20th, 2014 at 1:56 PM ^

I'm not sure that having a winning team is necessarily going to do wonders for student attendance. Granted it will probably help some but low attendance is not just an issue at Michigan. This article discusses the fact that even Alabama has had problems with it. I really think that HDTV and skyrocketing ticket pricess are the biggest culprits here.

pdxblue

February 20th, 2014 at 1:56 PM ^

I remember when they went to GA, the upperclassmen who had waited their turn for good seats were pissed.  The reality is that people want to sit with their friends AND have good seats.   Freshman have no idea who their friends are and I think a lot of the moving around was with Fr and So students.

I would make Fr. and So tickets true GA.   Let them sit wherever they want in their sections.  It would also stop the section from looking so empty at the start of the game.  Jrs and Seniors and Grads can pay one price and sit in GA or pay a small premium for assigned seats that are in better sections. 

Let them sell the tickets.   The University needs to stop worrying about the "lost revenue" of students selling seats.  Especially given its partnership with StubHub,  I think it will actually result in more loyal fans.  Students often have friends and family visit and would love to bring them to the game.

 

kingrichardx

February 20th, 2014 at 2:02 PM ^

This is my seventh year on this campus (UG + Law school). I go to the games and wish other people did too, but I don't fault the people who don't. 

I care deeply about Michigan football, but I care about it increasingly like I care about a pro sports team rather than a team that I personally, viscerally identify with. I attribute this mostly to the athletic department's drive to wring every cent it can out of the football experience. Of course there's the obnoxious ads, but it extends further than that. You can't buy a Michigan sweatshirt on this campus for less than $80. A t-shirt is $30. Constantly being gouged robs you of a feeling that something is "yours." It just makes you feel like a customer. And when a business doesn't respond to the desires of its customers (trifling complaints like cell phone service), its customers leave.

The righteous indignation from on-high comes from the fact that you interact with the team differently than this 'generation' of fan. The team was good and it was yours. As such, you take offense when someone acts disrespectful to it. Sure, you can sell less student tickets so that you feel better when you're at the game, but you're only going to push away the group even further. I'm not sure what the solution is, but I guarantee you it's not coming from Dave Brandon. 

TatersGonnaTate

February 20th, 2014 at 2:04 PM ^

Thank God I wasn't around for the quasi-GA bullshit.  That would piss me off to no end to be handheld down to my seat by the ushers and not be able to move UP rows for a better view.  It's not quite as bad as the student ticket prices, which nearly doubled over the 4 years I was in school.  Then I have to listen DB say he's raising the prices, not for money, but so students "value their investment."  Right.

Adding conference reallignment into the mix, college football has gone from something I loved to something I love to hate.   Honestly I am ready for the bubble to burst.  There needs to be some massive change in direction in college athletics in general or that organic quality about college football we all loved will be forever lost.

ish

February 20th, 2014 at 2:04 PM ^

while i agree that the punitive measures didn't work, i think there's one punitive measure that could work, when coupled with new developments incentives to reward students.

i would create a ticket system as follows: first, shrink the student section.  then, at the beginning of the year, students to receive season tickets in the student section by giving the athletic department your credit card.  they charge your card for tickets to the first three games.  they also devise a set of criteria by which you earn the right to buy future tickets.  in the future, if you've proven that you're coming to games, you're credit card is automatically charged and you're emailed a game ticket during the week prior to the game.  if you do not earn those tickets, your credit card is not charged and your tickets are released for sale. 

for instance, if you don't show up to any of the first three games, your credit card is not charged for the remainder of the season and the tickets that you've forfeited go on the market.  as the season progresses, the formula is adjusted and if you stop going to games, then the week of a game, your ticket will be released and you won't be charged.

the formula would be generous to students, but at the same time, the university sets up a marketplace for single game ticket purchases for students only.  if you lost your regular seats, you still can buy single game tickets, at a higher price.  if a student purchases that ticket, he or she is likely to attend the game.  three days before the game, the single game student tickets not purchased go to the pubic for sale.

this system accomplishes a few things.  first, it isn't entirely punitive, but strikes a balance between letting students know that there's a value to attending games and if you don't see that value, we'll find someone who does.  second, it allows students to stop going to games if they don't want to, while not having to pay for the ticket and giving that ticket to someone who both will pay and is likely to show up.  by giving students notice of the conditions, you leave the choice in their hands.  and by releasing unsold tickets just prior to the game, you decrease the likelihood that the tickets will be sold to fans of the visiting team.

students that are big fans and go to games would have no problem with this system; they are going to get tickets no matter what.