Technical Flyover: Why Michigan lost to Michigan State (again) Comment Count

Ian Boyd November 2nd, 2021 at 4:05 PM

Which team out-rushes who is not as meaningful a statistic as it's often made out to be. In a rivalry game like Michigan vs Michigan State, when one team out-rushes the other 199-146, it's no more meaningful.

Michigan out-gained the Spartans 406-196 in the passing game, which would seem to seriously outweigh the run game deficit. They also matched the Spartans in the turnover department, each team had two and it appeared Michigan State should have had three.

None of those factors were the problem for Michigan in this game.

The problem was this:

  • Blake Corum and Hassan Haskins: 27 carries, 104 rushing yards, 3.9 ypc, ZERO rushing touchdowns
  • Kenneth Walker: 23 carries, 197 rushing yards, 8.6 ypc, FIVE rushing touchdowns

"Didn't you just say it doesn't matter so much who out-rushes who?"

What matters is that those three players happened to be the three best offensive players for these two teams. Cade McNamara was able to produce 383 passing yards at 8.7 ypa with two touchdowns and a single interception late when the game was already all but lost. None of this damage was enough, it couldn't stick. Michigan isn't built to beat teams throwing the ball with Cade McNamara to this Ronnie Bell-less cast of receivers and while they did a credible job, they couldn't do quite enough without Corum and Haskins doing the heavy lifting. In particular, they could pile up yards between the 20s but they couldn't find the end zone.

Meanwhile, Sparty routinely got big plays from their star running back Kenneth Walker who repeatedly found the end zone and converted several key downs.

You can out-gain an opponent and beat them up and down the box score but if they make a few key plays that virtually ALWAYS end with the running back in the end zone, you will still lose.

[HOW DID MICHIGAN STATE GAME THE MATCHUPS? MORE AFTER THE JUMP]

McNamara's big day

Michigan did have some good stuff rolling in the passing game they used to hammer away at the Spartan defense. The Spartans rolled with big Darius Snow at Sam linebacker in this game, their hybrid nickel backer spot, and his 6-foot-1, 220 pound frame was very useful in containing the Michigan run game.

Xavier Henderson also predictably played around the box to help stifle the Wolverine ground game. Consequently, Michigan was in 3rd-and-long an awful lot. This was okay early but ultimately doomed the Wolverines.

Between 3rd down and 4th down passing attempts, Cade McNamara was 9-16 for 212 yards at 13.3 ypa with eight conversions. Pretty fantastic.

Yet down the stretch, on the final seven attempts, he was 2-7 for 50 yards at 7.1 ypa with two conversions. In other words, they started scorching hot on passing downs and then cooled all the way down to freezing temperatures by the end of the game.

I'm including some of Michigan's early successful conversions, but first...

pic.twitter.com/WbvXVwwljs

— Asst to the Minister of Culture (@Ian_A_Boyd) November 2, 2021

...you gotta love it. Long winding, double A-gap and double B-gap zone blitzes of the Pat Narduzzi mold. Sparty wasn't up to their old standards on these and gave up this nonsense after a few bad ones early.

A good chunk of Michigan's early passing down success was the result of effective usage of a particular shallow cross passing concept.

pic.twitter.com/Hc96PzSale

— Asst to the Minister of Culture (@Ian_A_Boyd) November 2, 2021

Erick All did a lot of his 10 catches for 98 yards damage on these dig routes, they were routinely putting the Spartan linebackers and down safety in conflict trying to navigate the risk of letting a shallow run wide open underneath them to getting enough depth to stop the dig routes.

On the three GIF'd examples they caught Xavier Henderson either dropping deep and vacating the underneath hook zone the dig route would threaten or blitzing. They also beat him a few times dropping into the flat. Here's how it looked on the board against such a snap from State:

The linebackers for Michigan State simply aren't very good in coverage. They don't always get good depth, they don't change direction super well, and generally look like fish out of water trying to find and match patterns in the middle of the field. This was known going in and a reason I gave for confidence in a solid day from McNamara.

The over/under threat from Blake Corum on a shallow cross and Erick All running behind the linebackers on a dig was a bit too much for the Spartans. At least early on.

Later in the game the killer plays were 3rd-and-3 and then 4th-and-3 on the second to last drive. Michigan was driving with a chance to get down the field and score the game-winning touchdown with time expiring. On 3rd-and-3 they took a slot fade which McNamara barely over threw. Underneath Michigan had the tight end and the other slot (it was a 3x2 formation) run quick ins under the linebackers. A quick throw to either was a bit iffy on whether or not they'd secure the catch as Michigan State was doubling both of them with a linebacker and a safety.

Great play-call by Michigan State to squeeze those inside routes which had tortured them all day and forcing Michigan to make a play throwing down the field and outside against the much better defensive backs on the team.

On 4th-and-3 they ran a pick play against press-man coverage and McNamara rushed a throw Cornelius Johnson couldn't get to because he ran into the defender trailing the other slot receiver.

Ultimately, Michigan couldn't make a play throwing to their actual receivers when they needed it most and State was doubling All.

Walker's big runs

Walker had three scoring runs of 27, 23, and 58 yards in this game. Take them out of the average and he was 20-89 yards at 4.5 ypc and two rushing touchdowns. In other words, Michigan played pretty good run defense except when they didn't.

One of the other two touchdown runs came on a simple lead outside zone play where Michigan State hurried into the formation and ran the play quickly before the Wolverines were set. They repeated the trick later on at least two occasions.

The first was on a 3rd-and-4 in which they lined up quickly to run the play and the Wolverines didn't get outside linebacker Jaylen Harrell in proper position to set the edge. He seemed confused about whether he had to cover the slot receiver (he didn't, Daxon Hill spun down late) and was hesitant to set the edge, leading to getting kicked out by the tight end and opening a big crease for the 58-yard score by Walker.

The next time they hurried into the play Michigan stopped the run but still gave away a first down because of a substitution infraction. Tough day at the office for the Michigan defense, giving away two touchdown runs and another first down simply because they were caught out of position by tempo.

Some of the other big plays also came on coaching wrinkles from the Spartans which proved decisive.

Here was the coup de grace, the 23-yard score which occurred after the J.J. McCarthy fumble.

It's a zone-read play but the right tackle folds and the right guard blocks out on the defensive end. The read element is what beat Michigan.

The boundary outside linebacker (B here) is playing contain on the quarterback but the strong safety doesn't want to let the tight end run open and uncontested so he matches him, leaving two of the front seven defenders containing the backside with no one in the backside A-gap. Such are the perils of a 5-2 front with only one inside linebacker. Said linebacker fit the frontside and when the folding right tackle helped clear out the nose tackle it made a massive downhill lane for Walker.

The free safety, who was disguising a deep safety alignment, couldn't get over with a good angle and missed and then it was time for the fight song.

This was a nice wrinkle, as was the Wildcat formation for Walker which picked up a big conversion running "quarterback GT counter" with Walker as the quarterback and Payton Thorne flexed out wide, harmlessly by the sideline.

Michigan State landed the early 27-yard score and the 58-yarder on the 5-2 front as well. If you crease the front, there's not much behind it to fix the problem and a player like Walker is liable to find a crease and then explode through it for a big gain. Overall this was a weaker dimension to the Michigan gameplan, which was otherwise mostly effective at denying deep shots from Thorne and inflicted two (should have been three) turnovers.

With the game on the line, Michigan State had ammo for their best player while Michigan was counting on their quarterback to hit a less established wide receiver corps.

Is the season ruined?

There are two or three obvious complaints for Michigan in this game. I don't understand how the officials overturned the fumble they recovered in the end zone for a defensive touchdown which would have made the game 27-14. Truly a bizarre decision on the review.

J.J. McCarthy getting crucial "four minute offense" snaps makes sense to me. You really want to run the ball there in order to run clock and it was hard to run the ball against State without involving the mobile quarterback in the option game. He fumbled. Freshman make freshman mistakes on the road, such is life.

This was a game in which everyone wonders if the Wolverines' limitations at quarterback would ultimately come back to bite them, and they sort of did, McNamara's big early success notwithstanding. However, the outlook for the rest of the season depends heavily on how the matchups with Penn State and Ohio State go. Honestly, it's hard for me to imagine Michigan beating Ohio State and anyone seeing this season as anything other than a resounding success.

Whether or not Ohio State can successfully gum up the works for the run game, force McNamara to make throws to beat them, and then not give away the game against him as they nearly did against Penn State seems to be the question of the year.

In the meantime, on to Indiana and pursuit of the season's 8th win.

Comments

maskedavenger

November 2nd, 2021 at 4:23 PM ^

You're the employee of the blog, but the interception took place on a play that was snapped from the Michigan 48 with 1:00 left. 

ESPN Drive Chart - 

  • 1st & 10 at MICH 33

    (1:15 - 4th) MCNAMARA, Cade pass to the left incomplete intended for ANTHONY, Andrel thrown to the MIC37. PENALTY MSU Roughing the Passer on JORDAN, Drew enforced 15 yards from the MIC33 to the MIC48 and results in automatic 1ST DOWN [NHSG]. NO PLAY (replay the down).

  • 1st & 10 at MICH 48

    (1:00 - 4th) Cade McNamara pass intercepted return for no gain to the MchSt 40

Ian Boyd

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:09 PM ^

They weren't going to complete the pass. McNamara was rattled by the 3rd and 4th down failures. Play before the INT he was also struggling. Was struggling all down the stretch, that's what I was trying to say.

When the game was put on his shoulders and Sparty was bracketing the inside receivers he wasn't going to convert, essentially. Wasn't going to happen.

MGoFoam

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:44 PM ^

Wow. Talk about BPONE! It looked to my untrained eyes to have been a pretty good pass. Schoonmaker went up for it and it was inches from hitting him in the hands when Brantley came across and made a great play on it. Now maybe you can argue that the coverage was good and the pass wasn't going to be completed, but I don't think it's fair to say McNamara was "rattled" by previous failures and was "struggling." I respect your review, but I think this is a really bad take.

caup

November 2nd, 2021 at 6:30 PM ^

Wow, Ian Boyd sucks at this.

p.s. the check-down receiver (Corum) wasn't bracketed.  So even though he made an accurate pass to the TE, he needed to check it down to Corum because MSU switched their coverage.  Cade admitted this in his post-game presser.

But for this Ian Boyd guy (who?) to make it sound like Cade was "struggling" like a 2017 O'Korn or a 2012 Russell Bellomy is pure garbage.

Sorry, but get out of here with that shitty, shitty take.

Dr. Funkenstein

November 2nd, 2021 at 8:59 PM ^

ummm......what? what evidence do you have he was "rattled" and "wasn't going to convert" with the game on the line....I thought at first this was a typical knee jerk reaction from a random yahoo in the comment section, not someone this site pays to write articles....too bad as this site normally avoids this type of nonsense and I thought they had higher standards than this...

Dr. Funkenstein

November 3rd, 2021 at 12:53 PM ^

right.... because no QB has ever bounced back from a bad drive or a receiver made a big snag with the game on the line after having a few drops earlier...that never happens in sports in a 1 score game.... seems like as a poster said below, you came in with a Skip Bayless/Stephen Smith hot take based on what you were feeling as a frustrated fan and are choosing to die on this hill instead of just acknowledging you should stick to more factual stuff and leave these opinions to screaming heads on morning call-in shows... 

Ian Boyd

November 3rd, 2021 at 1:06 PM ^

I’m not really a Michigan fan, more of a local observer.

Obviously you can feel free to disagree on the likelihood of McNamara converting a TD drive there. I’m not afraid to hold a hill though.

State dared McNamara to beat them. In those moments they were daring him to beat them throwing to the outside receivers. Poor prognosis for Michigan.

Dr. Funkenstein

November 3rd, 2021 at 2:50 PM ^

I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the "likelihood" of McNamara leading a TD drive there...a poster above referenced an expected win % rating of 20% and he's not a top NFL QB so it's certainly not "likely"....I'm saying you have no idea whatsoever that Cade was rattled, unless you have sources who were on the sidelines that you are referencing.  You also don't know for sure in the moment that he wasn't going to convert, despite the statistics being against him (and not the near 0% stats that might as well be 0% stats).  You can go with hindsight and say "well he didn't convert" but you cant accurately say that he wasn't going to convert in the moment or after the fact when it was a 1 score game where UM had already shown an ability to move the ball through the air.  The final play was one of a million "game of inches" plays that could have gone either way if you replayed it 100 times.  Saying, "well he obviously wasn't going to get it done" is the kind of hot take stuff that has dominated sports writing/media in the past and still is strong to this day unfortunately.  It's also something that I think this site has tried to move beyond and I find it disappointing to see it here.  

andrewgr

November 2nd, 2021 at 9:24 PM ^

Before you decide to die on this hill, you should pause, breathe, and ask yourself how ,much your ego and desire not to be wrong is at work.

The game was well within reach when the final interception took place.  Your column seems to be an attempt to explain X's and O's, to be somewhat objective.  To claim that McNamara was so flustered and so off that he couldn't complete two or three passes in a minute is pure "feelings ball".  It's unproveable. 

It's also quite likely to be complete horseshit.  Fans are way, way, way more emotionally fragile than top athletes are, and it would be wise to refrain from projecting how you would react to how they did react.  If Cade was such a delicate flower that he would in his own head, anxious and afraid, with one minute to go and a real shot at becoming a Michigan legend, he almost certainly never would have played and competed well enough to earn a scholarship at a P5 program in the first place.  It's far more likely that he was pumped, excited, and focused on doing what he needed to do. 

With one minute and no time outs, you need to take a chance or two; the MSU player made one hell of a one handed interception with his back to the line of scrimmage, and it didn't work out.  If you legitimately think McNamara was so rattled that he couldn't have moved them 50 yards in a minute, that says more about your defeatist mindset than it does about Cade or the Michigan football team.

Carpetbagger

November 3rd, 2021 at 11:08 AM ^

I don't get why the authors here think that athletes are the same fragile little bitches we non-athletes are. Alex(?) implored people not to rag on McCarthy too much about his fumble because of this same nonsense. Sure, some athletes crack, but the vast vast majority don't care one whit what fans say because we don't have a clue what they go through on a daily basis.

I use we to include myself. I stopped playing football when it started hurting because my fellow humans were getting big. I whine about a stubbed toe, these guys routinely pop joints back into the socket and go back out for the next play.

Most are just as mentally tough too.

I figured we wouldn't score because State had made enough adjustments to blunt our offense through the last 20 minutes. And we never could run the ball effectively. Tell me why those two things happened, and you have done something.

Don

November 2nd, 2021 at 4:15 PM ^

Tough day at the office for the Michigan defense, giving away two touchdown runs and another first down simply because they were caught out of position by tempo. Some of the other big plays also came on coaching wrinkles from the Spartans which proved decisive.

IOW, we were outcoached.

Again.

jdemille9

November 2nd, 2021 at 4:25 PM ^

This is where Don Brown would have adjusted at halftime and we'd have avoided the substitution issues. 

Macdonald is young and, so people keep saying including Harbaugh, this was a personnel/match up game he was playing and Macdonald simply lost because you can't substitute like this in college.

Now, will he learn from his egregious mistakes? That is yet to be seen, given how the year has played out so far I'm hopeful. But I won't hold my breath either.

RJWolvie

November 2nd, 2021 at 4:45 PM ^

I saw a lot of Barnhart early abd I think throughout. Who were we missing on O line? That had to have had a little to do with lack of better run performance, no?

TrueBlue2003

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:48 PM ^

yes, if you want to blame anything on the offense, it was the unforced errors: the Corum drop, the Corum fumble, the Anthony hold (which I maintain was a very bad call), the false start on 4th and 1.  And perhaps the staff's unwillingness to go for it on fourth down a couple times when they should have.

Nothing more to discuss other than they made some critical mistakes in execution.  The game plan and structure of the offense was very good by all accounts.

The defense, on the other hand, was completely unprepared for tempo and I think the decision to play more linemen and fewer LBs was a big mistake.  Why change it up?  Do what had been working great all season.  Instead they allowed the most points to an opponent (a not even very good offensive opponent) by a lot.

TrueBlue2003

November 2nd, 2021 at 6:50 PM ^

Yes, on the first: the Anthony hold, and then subsequent two JJ plays where it was obvious they were running and then the decision to still not go for it on the 4rd and 3 was bad.

On the second, the decision to just run three times from the 28 and then punt on 4th and 2 was also a bad decision.

Both drives they took the ball out of Cade's hands and then went too conservative.  I was watching with a former player that argued the first decision to kick was a good one to get up two scores.  I was like, it's the first quarter! Two scores means nothing right now.  Maybe in the forth quarter that means more but gotta get more points now.

I Like Burgers

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:57 PM ^

Both sides lost the game.

Defense got burned by substitution issues — which has been an issue throughout the season.

Offense got burned by being inept in the red zone — which has been an issue throughout the season. They are 84th in the country at converting red zone trips to TDs.

MSU identified the defensive issue and exploited it in big moments, and the coaches never figured out answers to the red zone issues and settled for field goals. And that was the game.

The Homie J

November 2nd, 2021 at 7:01 PM ^

I definitely think these are two biggest issues.  Maybe you can argue that we prioritized stopping the explosive pass plays more than stopping Walker (unlike Sparty who let us have whatever through the air but spent a ton on stopping the run knowing that pass plays get harder in the redzone).  But at the end of the day, it's redzone efficiency for the offense.  On defense, tempo absolutely has to get fixed.  If MacDonald gets caught with the wrong personel on the field, you have to use a timeout or just run with the dudes on the field until an opportunity comes up to sub them out.

But you know what's great?  Both of those are somewhat easy fixes.  Scoring in the redzone is a lot easier to fix than a broken run game or a broken pass game.  Tempo and substitutions will without a doubt be the single number one thing MacDonald addresses the rest of the season and also seems super easy to fix (literally use your timeouts or sub less or let the dudes on the field play until you can sub).

We've been correcting issues week by week, I don't see any reason why these issues won't be fixed.  Like I said, these are things which are somewhat simple to address.  This isn't even close to Don Brown having to wholesale scheme up a new defense because we no defensive tackles or cornerbacks who can match with an average WR in the B1G