[Bryan Fuller]

Preview 2020: Heuristics And Stupid Prediction Comment Count

Brian October 24th, 2020 at 12:46 PM

Previously: The Story. Podcast 12.4A, 12.4B, 12.4C. Quarterback. Running Back. Wide Receiver. Tight End. Interior OL. Offensive Tackle. Defensive End. Defensive Tackle. Linebacker. Cornerback. Safety. Special Teams. 5Q5A: Offense. 5Q5A: Defense.

Heuristicland

Turnover Margin

9674598390_9cc93827ae_o

The theory of turnover margin: it is pretty random. Teams that find themselves at one end or the other at the end of the year are likely to rebound towards the average. So teams towards the top will tend to be overrated and vice versa. Nonrandom factors to evaluate: quarterback experience, quarterback pressure applied and received, and odd running backs like Mike Hart who just don't fumble.

Year Margin Int + Fumb + Sacks + Int - Fumb - Sacks -
2007 0.15 (41st) 14 15 2.46(33rd) 14 13 2.17 (67th)
2008 -.83 (104th) 9 11 2.42(33rd) 12 18 1.83 (57th)
2009 -1.00 (115th) 11 5 1.83(68th) 15 13 2.33 (83rd)
2010 -0.77(109th) 12 7 1.38(98th) 15 14 0.85(10th)
2011 +0.54 (25th) 9 20 2.31 (29th) 16 6 1.38 (33rd)
2012 -0.69 (99th) 7 11 1.69 (69th) 19 8 1.38 (28th)
2013 +0.38(33rd) 17 9 1.9 (64th) 13 8 2.77 (109th)
2014 -1.33 (124th) 5 5 2.4 (49th) 18 8 2.2 (63rd)
2015 -0.31 (92nd) 10 2 2.5 (32nd) 10 6 1.4 (28th)
2016 +0.54 (24th) 13 6 3.54(5th) 7 5 1.69 (39th)
2017 -0.31 (90th) 10 7 3.23(8th) 10 11 2.77 (111th)
2018 +0.38 (35th) 11 6 10.5% (3rd) 9 3 5.4% (43rd)
2019 +0 9 11 9.0% (16th) 9 11 6.1% (61st)

Michigan was dead even a year ago and shouldn't be expecting a major swing to the good or bad. You would expect QB turnovers to increase with a new starter who's just a sophomore. One point in Michigan's favor: despite having outstanding pass protection their sack rate allowed was middling, which goes back to QB play. They probably won't be facing a big spike in QB pressure events that are the most frequent source of TOs.

[After the JUMP: one ominous switch]

Position Switches

33729603308_948b54a47e_k

your starting SAM [Patrick Barron]

Theory of position switches: if you are starting or considering starting a guy who was playing somewhere else a year ago, that position is in trouble. There are degrees of this. Flipping sides of the ball is very bad. Sliding an OT to OG is probably fine. Sliding an OG to OT… might be bad. Flipping ILB slots is nothing.

One big deal and not much else. In descending order of concern:

Sammy Faustin to CB. Safety to corner is usually a move that signals a lack of faith in the corner group and Faustin was completely off the radar last year. He appears to be on the two deep.

Ben VanSumeren to SAM. This is an offense to defense flip that is no doubt driven by Gattis's fullback aversion. VanSumeren is the nominal starter at the position, which would be a real problem if SAM wasn't a luxury position that doesn't need to play at all.

Mike Sainristil to outside WR(?). This is a projection and not certain but it speaks to Michigan's lack of depth on the outside in a post-Nico world.

Various minor moves. Ronnie Bell to outside WR, Josh Ross back to WLB, Carlo Kemp (probably) back to three-tech, Julius Welschof to DT: meh. Bell's demonstrated he can play the outside. Ross and Kemp are moving back to spots they're better at, and Welschof was a long term project who we were hoping would balloon up and move inside.

An Embarrassing Prediction, No Doubt

Worst Case Barring Extreme Injury Scenarios: Injury scenarios do not have to be extreme for a team with very little experienced depth at QB, WR, LB, CB, and S. This is a very young team; there are no nonconference cupcakes; it's going to be a weird, weird year. Probably not weird enough that MSU, Rutgers, or Maryland is going to do anything about it, and probably not weird enough that Michigan gets skunked the rest of the year. 4-5 could happen.

Best Case: 7-2. Wisconsin and OSU are going to be tough outs, and even if they get one of those—likely Wisconsin—someone else is going to be the beneficiary of a Young Team Does Dumb Stuff And Loses spectacular.

Final Verdict

Note that Michigan plays the projected top two teams in the West and rematches are avoided for the bonus game. A season that doesn't see them win the division title will likely pit them against Iowa or Purdue.

Conference
10/24 @ Minnesota Tossup
10/31 Michigan State Must win
11/7 @ Indiana Lean to win
11/14 Wisconsin Lean to loss
11/21 @ Rutgers Must win
11/28 Penn State Tossup
11/10 Maryland Must win
11/17 @ Ohio State Likely loss
11/24 Bonus game Lean to win
Absent:

Nebraska, Northwestern, Illinois, Purdue/Iowa

 Assuming these games all get played and COVID discipline is a wash this looks like 6-3. Pretty big assumptions in the previous sentence.

Comments

Erik_in_Dayton

October 24th, 2020 at 1:00 PM ^

My two cents: it will be best to think of this season as a warm up for 2021. The youth of this team and its question marks at QB, CB, and DT make a doing anything significant this year seem pretty unlikely. 

LabattsBleu

October 24th, 2020 at 1:14 PM ^

Young team, old team... honestly, does that even mean anything anymore in Year 6? Michigan has had veteran team lose dumb games and young teams lose dumb games.

 

Wolverine 73

October 24th, 2020 at 1:39 PM ^

Every time I see old pictures with jerseys featuring stripes on the shoulders or illegible numbers of whatever other crappy things we did before Harbaugh showed up, I am thankful that he cut that crap out and has gone with a consistently classic look.

stephenrjking

October 24th, 2020 at 2:27 PM ^

Seasons usually get judged by their losses, not their wins. What’s the difference between 9-4 and 8-4? Not much.

Thats important here. 6-2 is pretty good. 5-3 is meh average. 4 losses is bad in our case. The smaller number of wins is a function of COVID.

A bad season here puts Harbaugh on the hot seat in 2021, IMO. A good season results in optimism that could be wrecked by departures.

Joe Milton could change a lot of things. 

DoubleB

October 24th, 2020 at 2:59 PM ^

I just don't see Michigan firing Harbaugh unless 1) he embarrasses the program--probation, personal foibles, etc. or 2) the program completely implodes--the return of the RichRod era.

I think he's too good of a coach for 2 to happen and I think he would avoid 1 at all costs due to his affinity for Michigan in general. Which means Michigan is really in a bind. He's probably not good enough to get over the Ohio State hump and he won't be bad enough for Michigan to be forced to let him go. Best case scenario is a Carr like career with one meteoric season like 1997 where the stars align.

trueblueintexas

October 24th, 2020 at 3:57 PM ^

OSU got rid of John Cooper because he could beat everyone but Michigan and look at the run they have been on since, I think Harbaugh is the right coach for Michigan and love what he does beyond the field because I think in life it matters. But, 0-7, 0-8 etc against OSU and you eventually have to move on into the unknown next phase.

CLord

October 24th, 2020 at 3:05 PM ^

Harbaugh will be in no hot seat even with 4-4.  We just have institutional disadvantages that no coach will come in and fix unless he plans to fall below the integrity bar this school requires in order to recruit at a higher clip.

stephenrjking

October 24th, 2020 at 3:20 PM ^

“Hot seat” is not the same as “fired.” Michigan has some headwinds, but it should still be a top program.

Its not just the OSU issue, though that’s big. If Michigan were winning 11 every year and just couldn’t get over the hump against OSU, we’d hate it, but everyone understands that.

But there is no reason, none at all, that Michigan shouldn’t be consistently better than, say, Wisconsin. Or Iowa.

A rough season here would set up a serious question next season. Harbaugh would have to answer that question on the field.