[Eric Upchurch]

Preview 2019: Wrap Comment Count

Brian August 31st, 2019 at 2:28 PM
Stephen Osentoski / MGoFish

Hello. You have reached the end. This year's season preview checks in at 53,598 words and approximately three hours of podcast. There are a lot of quotes; thanks to everyone who wrote some of them.

STUFF I STEPPED ON

Preview: Middle Tennessee State. The plan is to replace the GO … BLUE cheer with GIDDY … POTTS, okay?

Opponent Watch, Part I. Rutgers is going to a b—nevermind.

Opponent Watch, Part II. Frames, post Moorhead.

THE STORY

Unsigned Hype. They come and they go.

OFFENSE

Quarterback.Patterson's wheelhouse, and an ostrich.

Running Back. Charbonnet will break the curse.

Wide Receiver. Three number ones.

Tight End, No Friends. Aw can we give them one murderfriend named Mason?

Tackles. Big analogy energy.

Interior OL. Goodbye, sweet Ghostbusters photoshop.

5Q5A: Offense. Innovative again.

DEFENSE

Defensive End. Now with Scottish twitter!

Defensive Tackle. What's a what's a Dwumfour for.

Linebacker. How can we point all of these guys at the QB simultaneously?

Cornerback. The last picture of Lavert Hill.

Safety. Hawkins, the hinge.

5Q5A: Defense. Fighting the last war.

MISCELLANEOUS

Special Teams. Bombs away.

Podcast 11.0A. Podcast 11.0B. Podcast 11.0C. wsgs Ace and Seth.

Heuristics and Stupid Prediction. 11-1.

ELSEWHERE

Coug Center:

“Nothing in the educational regime of our higher institutions perplexes the European visitor so much as the role that organized athletics play. On a crisp November afternoon he finds many thousands of men and women, gathered in a great amphitheater, wildly cheering a group of athletes who are described to him as playing a game of football, but who seem to the visitor to be engaged in a battle. He is the more mystified when he discovers that of the thousands of onlookers, not one in a hundred understands the game or can follow the strategy of the two teams. At the end, the vast majority of the onlookers only know, like old Kaspar of Blenheim, that “ ‘twas a famous victory” for one university or the other.

When the visitor from the European university has pondered the matter, he comes to his American university colleagues with two questions:

”What relation has this astonishing athletic display to the work of an intellectual agency like a university?”

”How do students, devoted to study, find either the time or the money to stage so costly a performance?”

That was part of the preface of a 1929 Carnegie Foundation report on the growing influence of college football in higher education. How much more bizarre must it look now? This arrangement makes no damn intellectual sense whatsoever on really any level. In virtually every other country, an athlete’s pursuit of a professional sports career takes them to actual professional organizations by the time they’re in their teens; the universities in those countries are for the rest of us who can’t run fast or kick/shoot/hit the balls well to get serious about preparing to become productive adults; trade schools provide another avenue to a career.

Bring Your Champions, They're Our Meat:

College football’s innovators have come up with several key methods to examine whether a team is better than another one such as having them play games against each other. This method, though, remains fraught with uncertainty. The vagaries of a single game resolve little. After all, football analytics specialists tell us that games decided by seven points or fewer are basically random tossups. And even more decisive victories can be explained away by other issues—in 2015, for example, Stanford lost to Northwestern in the opening game and spent the rest of the season claiming that it should not count because the effect of flying to Evanston for an 11:00AM kickoff had so disrupted their Body Clocks that only an uncaring philistine ignorant in the basics of human physiology would expect them to have been able to win. Other hazards of games include poorly-timed injuries and athletics scandals, and, most importantly, uncalled holding penalties, a particular malady that aggrieves internet message board commenters.

------------------------------

This is the first season where one of my kids has a reasonable chance of understanding what's going on. Remember it? Probably not. Correctly identify the sport being played? 50/50. Understand that dad's got some sort of weird emotional disease that erupts weekly for a third of the year? Certainly.

I take comfort in the fact that he knows nothing about Michigan's season-ending futility over these many years, and that there are hundred of stories yet to be written in his immediate future. Some of them are going to be glorious. Maybe this year. Maybe not.

30991153037_c13335bfb2_k

[Bryan Fuller]

Go Blue.

Comments

stephenrjking

August 31st, 2019 at 2:32 PM ^

When football is shared between parent and child, winning and losing aren’t what matters. It is the time and the memories. I’m looking forward to making some. 

After the kids are in bed, the results matter. 

Make memories. Win games. Go Blue. 

Bill22

August 31st, 2019 at 5:01 PM ^

“Understand that dad's got some sort of weird emotional disease that erupts weekly for a third of the year? Certainly.”

That’s fucking hilarious.

KBLOW

August 31st, 2019 at 5:25 PM ^

Go Blue!

I am so excited to watch a season of Michigan football where one or two stalled drives in the 1st Q doesn't already mean we have to rely on the defense to win. Here's to #SpeedinSpace! May it be real, may it bring us a championship!

Blue Vet

August 31st, 2019 at 7:23 PM ^

Brian writes us a book every year, as EvenYouBrutus points out! For free! (Unless you count the cost of snark about URP — the Unwritten Rules of Posting.)

And as a bonus, he points us to "Bring Your Champions, They're Our Meat," another oasis in a desert of harrumphing and haranguing. Or another dessert in a desert.

Go Blue!