Sometimes, it's just too easy for Luke Hughes (Bill Rapai)

Michigan Hockey Game #30: Michigan 4, Michigan State 3 (OT) Comment Count

David February 11th, 2023 at 11:49 PM

CLICK HERE for Game Recap from Kristy McNeil and other pertinent information and HERE for current Pairwise Rankings.

 

What just happened (TL;DR): Michigan was down two of their top four defensemen, two of their top six forwards, and get absolutely jobbed on a head shot non-call in the third…and finally Michigan State can tie the game. That’s what it took. It was finally a mostly even game after Michigan played without half of their top players. BUT NOT LUKE HUGHES! A little bit of magic from the top five pick helped Hughes beat the OT buzzer and give Michigan the extra point. How often do you seen hockey buzzer beaters?! The Iron D stays in Ann Arbor another year.

FINAL CORSI NUMBERS (www.collegehockeynews.com)

 

Total Attempts

Even Strength

Power Play

Close (within 1)

Even Strength %

Michigan State

60

47

13

37

46%

Michigan

75

55

20

42

54%

Forward Notes.

-This game was much more even than last night, for sure. Michigan skated well and created chances, but they did not rip through the Spartans with multiple lines the way that they did on Friday night. Playing without Adam Fantilli and Rutger McGroarty was very noticeable. But that’s what it took to create a relatively even game. Michigan still won…and maybe should have in regulation, as well, too…but we don’t really need to go there…yet.

-Frank Nazar started to look a little dangerous. His goal was almost not contested, so it’s tough to rave too much, but he made some plays around the net and got to some dangerous areas with the puck. Give him another week and load this lineup back up and hoo boy. Dylan Duke also had a Duke Goal on a deft tip in front of the crease. He’s just an absolute menace down low. We won’t talk about his OT giveaway and ensuing penalty…

Defense Notes.

-LUKE HUGHES BUZZER BEATER! This game was not without some Hughes gaffes. He turned the puck over in his own end that started the sequence on the first MSU goal (Ethan Edwards also played a role). He also had a couple more curious giveaways that we haven’t seen for a while. However, given the state of Michigan’s defense, he shouldered another massive load and skated down so many loose pucks. He also created so much in the offensive zone as no Spartan could come close to skating with him. Then the presence of mind just to get that puck on net as timed almost ran out. Luke Hughes!

-Jay Keranen has been an unsung hero on this team. In his career, he’s bounced from forward to defense to the bench to the press box. With the slew of injuries on defense, he's getting top four minutes and plenty of time of special teams as well. He’s also looked pretty good. Definitely on Saturday night. Luke is in a category by himself, but Jay Karenen was Michigan’s next best defenseman. The senior is going to be heavily called upon down the stretch on the backed for Michigan. So far, he looks up to it.

The Iron D (Bill Rapai)

 

SPECIAL TEAMS CHART

 

PP Opportunities

PP Corsi For

PP Shots/Minute

Michigan State

1/6

20

.76 (8/10.5)

Michigan

1/4

13

1 (6/6)

Power Play. Michigan scored a power play goal late in the first period. Mackie Samoskevich took a shot that ricocheted across the ice to TJ Hughes. Hughes fired a shot through a couple of Spartan defenders and Dylan St. Cyr to give Michigan an early lead. It was definitely a fortunate play, but as it is said “That’s why you throw it at the net.” Michigan actually had a very good power play in the third period. They moved the puck well, held the zone, and got multiple great chances, including one that St. Cyr just leaked wide. Without four normal power play skaters, this was a positive performance overall.

Penalty Kill. Too many penalties. Again. Maybe this is just college hockey reffing; maybe it’s Michigan’s lack of discipline; maybe it’s the types of games that teams play against then. Probably a mix of the three. The Wolverines penalty kill was pretty good, overall. They just need to not have to use it so often. The one goal was a nice shot through screens that found an open area of net. It happens.

Mackie Samoskevich was clearly hit in the chin by a shoulder midway through the third period. He went down and didn’t get up right away. This wasn’t called right away, but it was reviewed…and called clean. Most of the time (with these rules and refs and all of the rest of the nonsense), I never have super strong takes on what hits are clean or not or if it’s a major, etc. BUT…based on what I have seen called this year, that was DEFINITELY a major. It probably isn’t a penalty in the NHL. But in college hockey…the way it’s been called in Michigan games…there is no doubt in my mind. Alas, no call…I literally now have no idea what we’re doing here and/or if any rules apply or when.

 

Somewhere, Brian is happy (Bill Rapai)

GOALTENDING CHART

 

Michigan Shots Faced (House)

Michigan State Shots Faced (House)

First Period

6

8

Second Period

11

6

Third Period

15

13

Overtime

1

3

TOTAL

33

30

Notes. What an up and down night for Erik Portillo. What a weird year. It looked like Portillo got a little lost on both goals. The puck was bouncing around in front of him on the first one, but he just couldn’t grab it and it ended up on the stick of Miroslav Mucha (both defensemen also gaffed before, so that one is not totally on him, though). On the third goal…I don’t know. It looked like he just…didn’t see the shot? Maybe he was screened, but Alex has been talking about his inability to track the puck all season. I can’t really disagree. That is hard to figure out. Erik Portillo also saved the game multiple times for Michigan, as well. He made an all-world kick save off a end boards bounce, right out in front of an open net on a penalty kill. That might have been the save of the year. He also had a handful of other beauties sprinkled throughout the game. It wasn’t a necessarily a poor performance (it was actually pretty good overall). There are just those moments that are a bit befuddling.

ODD MAN RUSH CHART

Defense

Rushes

Advs

Escape%

Offense

Rushes

Advs

Scoring%

1st Period

n/a

n/a

n/a

 

n/a

n/a

n/a

2nd Period

1

4v2

100%

 

2

2v1, 3v1

50%

3rd Period

n/a

n/a

n/a

 

1

2v1

0%

OT

n/a

n/a

n/a

 

n/a

n/a

n/a

Total

1

4v2

100%

 

3

2v1 x2, 3v1

33%

Notes. Michigan State got one rush and had a decent look from straightaway, but Erik Portillo came out to grab it easily. That’s it. That’s all MSU could muster in transition.
Michigan got a few chances in transition. Frank Nazar scooped up a loose puck that a Krygier lost as he skated by the ref, leaving the zone. On the 3v1, Nazar was allowed to walk right in on Dylan St. Cyr, made a little fake, and lifted his shot above the smaller netminder to give Michigan a 3-2 lead. Luke Hughes also had a 2v1, but could not beat St. Cyr with his chance.

FINAL THOUGHTS

That was a weekend. I’m glad Michigan is (probably) done with MSU this season. They’re definitely a better hockey team. They play well and do smart things. They just don’t have the players to compete, yet. Plus, all of the craphousery…I’m done with that. In the end, a 5 Point weekend for Michigan. Notre Dame took 5 of 6 from OSU. Michigan is now in firm control of 2nd place in the Big Ten, and they’re 3rd overall in Pairwise. Next up: OSU on Thursday at 7pm on BTN+.

Comments

stephenrjking

February 12th, 2023 at 12:18 AM ^

Old-time feel with a full LCA, a Michigan State team that is competent, and a barn-burner of a game. Michigan still has an oh-so-narrow grip on a top 4 pairwise spot (they haven't lost since they shouldered their way in, I'd expect them to drop the moment they do) and might even get a decent B1G playoff seed. Nazar is coming around, Fantilli is red-hot when he's playing, the trials of the early season have forced guys to be ready to play in tough roles when guys are out...

This team is putting some things together down the stretch. That Minnesota series was a tough road split and absolutely did signal a turn in the level of this team. 

kyle.aaronson

February 12th, 2023 at 12:30 AM ^

A game like this feels like a pretty classic Michigan hockey game these days. They were clearly the more talented team, but also clearly the less disciplined team (see: penalties and giveaways).

I was very confused by Jagger Joshua's ten minute misconduct. He ran into Portillo purposefully, but why was there no two minute penalty to boot? Does anyone know the rule there?

I also thought it was hilarious when the color commentator said, after the Luke Hughes OT goal, "They're still gonna have to drop this puck with 0.6 seconds left on the clock!"

Mr. Robot

February 12th, 2023 at 12:39 AM ^

It's actually pretty normal for a 10 minute misconduct to be handed out without a minor penalty. It is generally used as a way to get someone to cool their jets before they do something stupid AND dangerous and it's okay for it to be 10 minutes because you're not going down a man as a result. Also of course for things that aren't necessarily minor penalties but for which the referee needs to rein in, like getting a little too personal with chirping. If you did something that was worthy of a minor penalty, even for unsportsmanlike conduct, you go down a man and that makes up for the 8 less minutes.

It's not impossible to get a minor penalty and a 10 minute misconduct, but it's pretty rare... if you did something naughty enough to warrant a penalty AND a misconduct you've generally earned a game misconduct and they just throw you out.

Mr. Robot

February 12th, 2023 at 1:16 AM ^

I'm just telling you in general how that tends to work, not what should have happened here. All of these things are at the referees discretion. I didn't see the incident in question, I only noticed when he suddenly started skating in the box, so I can't comment on that specifically. Perhaps the referee didn't think it was hard enough contact to warrant a penalty for roughing or something like that, but because it was obviously done with intent to be a pest, being that's his role, it warranted 10 minutes. Not saying that's right, but it would explain the call.

kyle.aaronson

February 12th, 2023 at 3:10 AM ^

Were you at the game? They showed a pretty clear replay on TV.

It definitely wasn't hard enough to be roughing, and Michigan had the puck, so I don't think it can be called for goalie interference. If there was any minor there, it would be for unsportsmanlike conduct. Perhaps I'm coming at this from the perspective of a fan who would prefer a power play to Jagger Joshua sitting out three shifts.

Blue In NC

February 12th, 2023 at 8:41 AM ^

I was surprised that it was not called 2 minutes.  I believe MSU was on the power play at that point and that was a typical "even it up" type of penalty.  What really grinds me is the review and no call on the 5 min major.  That was clearly targeting the head/chin and I believe that gets called even in the NHL.  Crazy that they just let it go when we see so many other things called majors.

enlightenedbum

February 12th, 2023 at 11:27 AM ^

The 10 wasn't for running into Portillo but for "abuse of official."

I think what happened was that Narauto was annoyed by Joshua pulling that shit from the prior night and asked the refs to keep a close eye on him.  And so when he did it but in a way that would have been a pretty weak minor, they gave him a warning.  He then said something to the official in response and that's what the 10 was for because 10 is usually that.

Mr. Robot

February 12th, 2023 at 12:34 AM ^

From my roommate, who doesn't really sports very much but we brought along for the day of pre-gaming and to experience a hockey game at LCA:

"Is that Michigan State's coach? He looks like the kind of guy who eats his cereal with water"

Unfortunately I think we just have to live with the fact we're going to get screwed on penalties at this point. We do a lot of dumb stuff to earn them on our own, but then to pile on we get called for a major for pretty much everything while never getting that same standard in return. The penalty Samoskevich got for holding the stick of the guy who is just shoving it right up into his torso from behind... I just don't know how to explain this shit anymore. There's always a few games a year where I feel like the referees are intentionally trying to screw us but at this point it's hard to even get mad anymore. They're pretty much just owning it and what do you even do at that point? Sacrifice one game to send a message and just throw the bench onto the ice?

YaterSalad

February 12th, 2023 at 7:11 AM ^

I have a call at the end of this past years college semifinal that would argue targeting is still not fully understood or applied correctly.  
 

I think contact to the head, while important for player safety, comes with such a high penalty that refs are now erring on the other side of caution.  It’s as if the punishment in the game context becomes the more important judgement factor.  That’s sad.  

Team 101

February 12th, 2023 at 8:01 AM ^

A big problem is the inconsistency of the officiating.  When you compare the Edwards hit on Friday night to the it on Samoskevich last night, it is incomprehensible how one is a five minute major and the other is nothing.  On the play on Friday night, the Spart's momentum carried is head into Edwards's shoulder.  The play night was just a cheap shot.

The problem is these plays alter the outcomes of games and the rule is sus to begin with and the officiating more sus.

Glad we got the OT win and it was exciting but if they had called the five minute major it could have been a regulation win.

JonnyHintz

February 12th, 2023 at 12:56 PM ^

A big problem is the inconsistency of the officiating.  When you compare the Edwards hit on Friday night to the it on Samoskevich last night, it is incomprehensible how one is a five minute major and the other is nothing.
 

What makes this more mind boggling is the fact that it was the same officiating crew. It’s not even that it’s a judgement call and each official goes about it differently. It’s the fact that the SAME official can’t even consistently call it. 

lhglrkwg

February 12th, 2023 at 4:39 AM ^

The 3rd Portillo goal was weird. For some reason he concluded a pass was coming to his right even though none of the traffic in front of him really implied that was happening? It was just kind of well…okay

Legendary ball kicking of FYS here. To go from a PP thats set to nearly end OT…to getting pretty much zilch on it and then giving up the OT winner with 0.6 left. Great stuff

bronxblue

February 12th, 2023 at 7:36 AM ^

I still don't know what's a head shot penalty anymore.  I don't think every hit near the head should be a penalty; you're moving so fast in hockey, in skates to boot, that incidental contact does happen.  It was the same in football.  But you can't have a year where UM gets hit for multiple penalties near the head and then not call that MSU hit as one.  It's not going to stop those types of plays or protect players because the rule is being enforced inconsistently that no lesson is learned.

Anyway, great to take 5 points.  MSU is going to be competent going forward; not great, but good enough that they'll win some of these.  Hopefully once they have some talent they'll cut out the bullshit but who am I kidding.

93Grad

February 12th, 2023 at 10:30 AM ^

That game was the antithesis of the hoops game.  It was a wild, fun filled ride where you felt comfortable that Michigan’s superior talent would pull it out in the end, and boy did they ever do it in fine fashion!  Like I said, the complete opposite of the hoops game. 

Alton

February 13th, 2023 at 11:32 AM ^

Since 2020/21, Michigan has played 10 overtime games in the Big Ten.  In 2 of them Michigan scored the tying goal, and in 8 the Opponents scored the tying goal.

Overall it's 5 tying goals for Michigan, 10 for the opponents, and 1 overtime game (against MTU) that did not have a goal.