Si, io stai. [Patrick Barron]

Harbaugh's Contract Details Comment Count

Seth February 17th, 2022 at 1:32 PM

The Athletic’s Austin Meek won the race to FOIA Harbaugh’s new contract.

I’ve put a full copy of it on our site if you’d like to see it yourself.

Let’s discuss.

1. How much is it?

The number I came up with is an average of $8,486,000/year counting his base salary, additional compensation, the retirement contribution, and an easily achievable (for him at least) bonus for team academic performance.

For whatever reason the "base" is a paltry $655k/year with "additional compensation" representing the bulk. Together those parts increase annually from $7.05M to $7.6M, plus a $1 million/year contribution to his retirement fund and other doodads like an extra $150k/year for academic progress rate scores of 960+, and a summer football camp using school facilities from which Harbaugh gets to keep the profits. The sum is on par with what Ryan Day gets from Ohio State, and what Harbaugh was making on his 2015-2020 contract. The incentive structure of his 2021 contract seems to be unchanged.

image

Big Ten Coach of the Year would be $50,000, or $75,000 if one of the national selectors name him Numero Uno.

This is in line with what Sam Webb reported earlier this week. It’s sensible: Michigan wasn’t going to try to match the deals that Franklin and Tucker extracted from their schools but it isn’t so significantly different that Harbaugh’s going to be living a different lifestyle than the best-compensated college coaches in America.

[After THE JUMP: The buyout and the buyout.]

2. How much is the buyout?

Not much. This is the big deal, because a sizeable buyout would likely end any further opportunity for Harbaugh to leave for the NFL. The buyout for Harbaugh is $3 million if he leaves before January 11, 2023, which since the threat is the NFL that’s pretty unlikely. The more important number is the $2.5 million buyout after January 11, 2023, which drops to just $1.5 million on January 11, 2024,  $750,000 in 2025, and then zero.

image

We’ve been saying that the buyout is the key because as we saw in this round of NFL openings, the league’s interest in Harbaugh is as tepid as the journalists who cover it are not. The Vikings were the closest he got, and that happened because of a connection to one of Harbaugh’s top lieutenants, but even there the Vikings were looking to rebuild like the Rams—based on analytics—and it’s my interpretation of events that their ownership seemed surprised to find themselves sitting across from the Jim Harbaugh Experience instead.

This buyout would not significantly deter NFL interest. The $3,000,000 start is a fig leaf; while mid-January is on the late side to get a college coach, that’s relatively early in the NFL coaching carousel; if Harbaugh is offered an NFL job next year, the timing of that would be either after the $3M buyout’s expiration date, or so close to January 11 that they could just wait it out.

$2,250,000 is a lot of money to you or me, but well within Harbaugh’s ability to cover himself, and any NFL team that hires him would be likely to cover all or part of it over the course of his deal. It drops significantly from there, to the point where I think their rivals will use it against them in recruiting.

We can compare it with the other two Big Ten East restructured deals this offseason. Even Mel Tucker’s buyout, which we mocked because it wasn’t that high to begin with and didn’t change a scratch when they restructured his deal, isn't significantly different. Here’s a comparison (with the date the buyout number goes into effect) of those three contracts:

Last season Harbaugh Tucker (MSU) Franklin (PSU)
2021 $3,000,000 (1/11/22) $2.500,000 (1/16/22) $12,000,000 (4/1/22)
2022 $2,250,000 (1/11/23) $2,000,000 (1/16/23) $8,000,000 (12/31/23)
2023 $1,500,000 (1/11/24) $1,500,000 (1/16/24) $2,000,000 (12/31/24)
2024 $750,000 (1/11/25) $1,000,000 (1/16/25) $1,000,000 (12/31/25)
2025+ $0  (1/11/2026) $1,000,000 (1/16/26) $1,000,000 (12/31/26)

The dates matter. Franklin’s new deal came with a “you ain’t going nowhere this offseason” end date of April 1, 2022, for that $12 million (the dates for the other buyout points are all December 31), while Tucker’s deal set the date at a late-for-college January 16th. Also keep in mind that Penn State and Michigan State, to different degrees, are worried about their coaches leaving for more desirable college jobs, whereas Michigan’s only competition would be an NFL job. Having to wait to announce until January 16th to save half a million might deter a hypothetical SEC or ACC school interested in Tucker, whereas any NFL team is naturally operating one row down on the chart.

If you’re a 2023 recruit, you’re going to look at that and see it would cost Harbaugh less than $1 million to leave after your true freshman season, and nothing to be gone by the time you’re likely to be on the field. In other words, it’s a negligible deterrence.

3. How much to fire him?

The other fear, of course, is what if 2021 was a one-off and the program descends into mediocrity. As I read this contract, there's a very hefty buyout to fire Harbaugh on the surface, but if you dig deeper they would realistically not have to pay it. Let me explain: 

One of the benefits of the extension they signed a year ago, for Michigan, was that it made it a lot easier for them to broom out Harbaugh and his assistants if things didn’t go well. Technically, that is no longer the case, simply because these terms didn’t change…

image

…and now we’re talking about a lot more money.

Season Contract Dates Base Salary Add'l Compensation If fired right after...
2022 Today-1/10/'23 $655,000 $6,395,000 $36,680,000
2023 to 1/10/2024 $655,000 $6,535,000 $29,630,000
2024 to 1/10/2025 $655,000 $6,678,000 $22,440,000
2025 to 1/10/2026 $655,000 $6,824,000 $15,107,000
2026 to 1/10/2027 $655,000 $6,973,000 $7,628,000

The school would be let off the hook if Harbaugh were to take a head coaching job in the NFL or college football. The contract provides for relief by whatever he’s making, but in practice (e.g. when we had Jedd Fisch), whoever would hire him in that case would sign him to a minimal deal and let Michigan cover the bulk.

Importantly, the dates of the contract don’t change, so Michigan would have to wait until January 11th to roll over a season, IE they would be jumping into the head coaching market late in the cycle. If say Michigan didn’t make a bowl game in 2022 or 2023, they would be faced with a choice between an almost $30 million buyout in early December, or waiting another 6 weeks to get that down to $22.4 million.

More realistically, in the case that they want to fire Harbaugh, the school would find some way to do so for cause, or more likely, to use the threat of it to negotiate a settlement. Anything from breaking recruiting rules, to getting fined, looking for an NFL job without telling Warde personally, or “offends public decency or morality, as shall be determined by standards prevailing in the community” could trip the “for cause” clause. Via one attorney, “a halfway decent lawyer could drive a truck through that,” and I take it that Harbaugh is aware.

Overall thoughts?

What this means is that the contract was signed with a Big House’s worth of good faith between the parties. Harbaugh knows Michigan can screw him if they want, and is comfortable that they won’t. Michigan knows Harbaugh could be very expensive—and litigational—to be removed, and doesn’t really anticipate having to make that call.

From Harbaugh’s point of view, this is the kind of contract you sign if you want to keep a door open to the NFL, and want to be compensated like Michigan has themselves an NFL-caliber head coach who wants to be at Michigan.

From Michigan’s point of view, this is the kind of contract you sign if you believe you won’t have to fire your head coach, but understand there’s a risk that you might have to. What they did not get in this contract was much assurance that Harbaugh will stop flirting with the NFL. Their buyout is high; his is low.

Fortunately for them, we just went through a cycle with a very good mix of conditions to draw Harbaugh back to the NFL, and the interest in him just wasn’t there. Unfortunately for them, an “Our coach wanted to go to the pros, we won’t stop him if he does, and the only reason he hasn’t already is they don’t want him” truth isn’t as ideal as “Michigan beat out the NFL for our coach” on the recruiting trail.

The likelihood is good that Harbaugh will fulfill the terms of this contract, at least  until it’s time in a few years to extend it or negotiate a new one to reflect a new truth at that time. His rivals will continue to tell recruits that Harbaugh’s leaving for the NFL any day, because his rivals evidently believe they have to lie to convince recruits not to go to Michigan. I think Harbaugh helped himself a lot by being honest with his 2022 class about his NFL interest, and I don’t think “Your head coach might be in a position to draft you” comes off as negatively to prospective NFL players as it does to those of us who know we’ll get left behind.

Certainly, those of us who cover the team, especially the insider services, are going to pay more attention to those questions and be on the lookout for any signs that Harbaugh’s wavering from promises made after the Vikings job fell through.

Just because his buyout gives Harbaugh a path to the NFL doesn’t mean the weirdo is not absolutely serious about his intention to coach Michigan for the duration. A contract is a legal document that becomes most relevant in the eventuality of a bad breakup that requires legal intervention; it’s not a full representation of the parties’ faith in each other. Two attorneys I’ve spoken to characterized this contract by its informality, or for having a stunning lack of specificity. It speaks to a negotiating stance between both of them that there’s a lot more to the working relationship between Michigan and Harbaugh than what they could be bothered to put on paper. The “what if you screw me” clauses are perfunctory, open, or boilerplate, while the “What do we want from each other?” parts focus on things like academic performance, a comfortable retirement, health care, can I run my football camp, how many tickets can I give out, and “please don’t embarrass us.”

This is really just a guess, but I would bet Harbaugh got his low buyout because Michigan was willing to gamble that the peak of the NFL threat has passed, and Michigan got their easy out clauses because Harbaugh was willing to gamble that he’ll never give them reason to want him gone.

For Jim, that means he gets to go coach Michigan again for as long as he doesn’t blow it. For the athletic director and the regents he answers to, it means they should plan on having Harbaugh around for awhile, but also have a playbook ready just in case the NFL ever changes its mind.

Comments

patrickdolan

February 17th, 2022 at 1:47 PM ^

Given the youth on the staff, including people who have left, here's hoping the next coach is an obvious choice--young, up and coming, and with a good idea of what he's getting into in Ann Arbor.

bronxblue

February 17th, 2022 at 1:55 PM ^

It seems like the financial aspect of any contract isn't that important to Harbaugh (in general terms, obviously - he wasn't happy taking a 50% pay cut last year), and that makes sense.  Unlike a lot of coaches (but like fellow Wolverine Juwan Howard) he was a millionaire many times over before he ever took up the headset from his days as an NFL player.  It was joked in a podcast that Harbaugh is the type of guy who doesn't really check his bank account as much as know he's got enough in it to do what he wants.

I don't think the buyout ever really mattered - if an NFL team wanted Harbaugh they'd easily eat the $4/$5M number UM could attach to his contract.  Buyouts make sense for other college teams because even rich athletic departments would balk at that outflow to nab Harbaugh; the average value of an NFL franchise is $3.5B and only going up.  UM isn't keeping Harbaugh from an NFL team if they want him.

Overall, this feels like a decent contract.  I don't worry about recruits - LOTS of people around the program and on other teams wanted to shitcan him going into last year and the class held together fine.  Recruits can leave via the portal pretty easily, so the specter of being tied to a program when a coach leaves isn't as daunting.  And if James Franklin can go .500 in conference over 3 years and Mel Tucker can openly flirt with every half-decent coaching job in America while MSU pays him absurd money to stay without a buyout and do well recruiting, I think your average recruit doesn't give a shit.

I assume we'll also see some nice salary bumps for assistant coaches over the next couple of years as well.

Anyway, excited for 2022 and look forward to the team building on last year's success.

bronxblue

February 17th, 2022 at 3:38 PM ^

To me, it comes down to this year.  Last year he won a bunch of 1-score games and got a Heisman-level RB for the depth charts of WF.  That's an unlikely grand slam, and so if he can build on that and continue to develop talent then he'll be a pain.  But I saw him in 2020 and his team looked really poorly coached, and there were times last year where MSU just looked completely lost if they couldn't get Walker going.  Their defense wasn't great and survived because they had a decent pass rush but as the season progressed that fell apart as teams compensated.  And the Pitt win was one of the weakest I've seen; Pitt was down to their 3rd-string QB and some backup corners and MSU still needed some dumb luck to win.  

He's recruiting well and has made some nice staff signings.  If he keeps that up he'll be an upper-half of the conference team.

Don

February 17th, 2022 at 6:50 PM ^

If Manuel had insisted on a $10 million buyout, our recruiting rivals would spin it as “Michigan thinks he’s going to try to leave again soon.” It doesn’t matter what kind of contract Harbaugh signs, OSU/MSU/ND/et al will spin it negatively. It’s the way the world works.

Oldadguy

February 17th, 2022 at 1:56 PM ^

Seems reasonable to me on both sides honestly. If you pressed Jim too hard, legally, to stay, he'd balk and look harder at the NFL. The school won't press their advantage unless the program significantly deteriorates on and off the field, also unlikely to happen

ERdocLSA2004

February 17th, 2022 at 5:40 PM ^

I’m really not sure Jim could’ve looked any harder at the NFL.  The salary details look very reasonable, but the buyout man.  “Their buyout is high; his is low.”.  This sounds like a typical Warde contract that we are somehow justifying because he wasn’t an attractive prospect to the NFL?  I don’t get it.  We say he won’t leave for any job other than the NFL…and apparently $3mil is nothing.  So why not make it $6 or $8mil?  At least we get something in return if he does leave.  Did we make the buyout low because we were afraid he wasn’t going to sign?  We want him to leave for the NFL? Or just like screwing ourselves if he does?  Also, why does the buyout get cheaper the farther we get into January?  Having to conduct a coaching search in February is probably the worst time. I dunno, seems like JH wrote his own contract and Warde signed it.  Weak sauce.  

stephenrjking

February 17th, 2022 at 1:57 PM ^

So this contract seems meh to me. Ok money, about the same. Seems to be enough for Harbaugh to be happy with it. The buyout is... uh... 

Well, Harbaugh has a track record of being truthful. He is a lot of things, some of them odd or hard to track, but a dissembler he is not. When he was interested in the NFL he told the people that mattered, even recruits. When he wasn't, as a few years ago, he was firm and public in his absence of interest. 

So he told Warde that this won't "re-occur." I believe he means that, fully. But that buyout leaves him room to change his mind. I guess it doesn't matter; if he did really change his mind, Michigan wouldn't be able to hang on to him (edit: see bronxblue's post above), but putting a high buyout could be perceived as insulting, and after the hard-bargain contract of last year, Warde probably needed to keep things friendly.

Oh well. We'll see what happens; hopefully a lot of winning. Maybe even a pay bump with another excellent season. 

UMinSF

February 17th, 2022 at 2:19 PM ^

IMO it's simple.

Harbaugh will honor his commitment that he won't SEEK an NFL job. He's proven to be a straight shooter; there's no reason to doubt him.

However, he kept his NFL dream alive by limiting barriers if a GM reaches out to him. I think he'd feel comfortable answering the call.

The simplicity of the contract is probably as much because inexplicably JH apparently doesn't have an agent as any good faith on both parties. Dude is old-school.

This is good. Be happy we have him, quirks and all.

This whole episode gives Michigan time to prepare for a post-Harbaugh future, whenever that may be. Much, much, much better than a sudden departure.

Brian Griese

February 17th, 2022 at 3:59 PM ^

I think Seth said it best when discussing the possibility of the NFL, you're going to need to find an organization that is ready for the "Jim Harbaugh Experience".  

Unless Michigan goes on a three-five year run consistently knocking out 2021-esque seasons (we can dream) I do not see Harbaugh getting the right 'fit' in the NFL for him to make the jump.  

What is his 'fit'? To me it is: 1) Hands off ownership and 2) some, if not all, say in personnel.  I think Harbaugh realizes that going into an NFL team with a new GM and a team that's been lousy for somewhere between 1-3 years is probably not going to end well for him long term as conflict will eventually arise like it did in San Fran and/or the front office won't get him the players necessary to turn things around.

Maybe an ownership group decides in a couple years that is the direction they want to take and we see this flirting again but I am inclined to doubt it - there just seems to be too many ownership groups that want to meddle in front office activities (as is their right) and there are only a couple of coaches (I think) with total control of personnel.  

 

DoubleB

February 17th, 2022 at 7:11 PM ^

I think the fit for an NFL team would be one that believes the missing piece is the head coach. Dallas would be the quintessential team for that this year (I get JJ isn't a fit at all). Maybe the Chargers in a few years if Staley can't get them over the 9-8 hump? The Colts? Teams that have a lot of pieces already. And it would work for Harbaugh as well--the "Jim Harbaugh Experience" looks a lot better if there are potential rings at the end of it. 

Jonesy

February 17th, 2022 at 6:40 PM ^

He also told Warde when he was hired that he'd give Michigan seven years before looking at the NFL. Well guess what, this NFL dalliance was after his seventh season, and according to the first Viking reporter he said no thanks and then went back to Michigan. I'm not worried about Harbaugh being like most coaches who say what others want to hear and then does whatever he wants. If he said he's not going to do this again I believe him.

DonAZ

February 17th, 2022 at 1:59 PM ^

According to this article, Harbaugh comes it at #11, with Mel Tucker at #4, and Saban (3), Kelly (2), and Lincoln Riley (1).

What will be interesting is whether we're near market top, or there's more room to go.  The forces compelling things up are, of course, the money to be made by a successful program.  The forces that might check the upwards growth is a small-but-growing sense of it getting out of hand. 

I have no idea which way that needle goes.

DonAZ

February 17th, 2022 at 3:14 PM ^

You missed the point of my post.

What I'm wondering is whether there will come a point in time when the colleges come to realize that throwing that kind of money at head coaches might not have the return they hoped for. 

Take for example Mel Tucker -- a good coach, but whether he's a generational coach is very much unknown.  Let's say he does well at MSU, but can't break through consistently, going 8-4 or 9-3 with the 7-5 record every so often?  Or Brian Kelly at LSU: let's say he fails to bring them back to the promised land (and I predict he won't: he'll be gone in 3 years).  Or Lincoln Riley at USC, if he doesn't get to the playoffs and do well there.  At what point -- if ever? -- do the universities step back and rethink the idea of just throwing a truckload of money at a head coach as the answer?

There are more examples of failed HC experiments than spectacularly successful ones. Will there ever be a re-thinking of the pay-any-amount strategy?

newtopos

February 17th, 2022 at 2:00 PM ^

Even Mel Tucker’s buyout, which we mocked because it wasn’t that high to begin with and didn’t change a scratch when they restructured his deal, is significantly higher.

The numbers posted do not seem to support that.  Mel Tucker's buyout, like Harbaugh's, is small.  If, for example, Texas wants to give Tucker a massive MSU-like contract, and Tucker wants to jump ship, there is almost no financial disincentive.    

rc15

February 17th, 2022 at 2:00 PM ^

Did we really think the buyout was going to change from the offer that was on the table in January? Before the Vikings/NFL interest.

That's an awkward conversation between Jim and Warde. "I trust you... But please take this concession in the contract to show you're trustworthy."

Only way the buy-out would've been raised was if Jim offered it as a signal to recruits. But even if you are committed to someplace, it's hard to believe someone would negotiate against themselves, especially when there is still going to be a new president, etc. at the school.

Seth

February 17th, 2022 at 2:29 PM ^

You make a very good point. My thinking was the NFL already showed they were not interested in Harbaugh at his current value. A few million dollars might make a difference. They also could have come up with a big number if Harbaugh was really done with the NFL.

stephenrjking

February 17th, 2022 at 3:26 PM ^

I can see your thinking, and you might be right. In my opinion, though, the way Harbaugh refused to lie about his NFL interest, and the wise dissemination of sourced reports of what he was telling recruits, does as much to reassure recruits as a large buyout would.

The ability to look them in the eye and say “I was telling the truth then and I’m telling the truth now” is valuable. 

Blue In NC

February 17th, 2022 at 2:40 PM ^

Caveat: I have not downloaded the contract and looked at the full language - only the snippet above (at work).  That said, I have negotiated coaching contracts before and in general terms, getting a cheap buyout of a coach you want to fire isn't as easy as just claiming you are firing him "for cause".  Yes, you can claim that and it may settle the case for SLIGHTLY less, but the lawyers, judges or an arbitrators reviewing this all will know that a minor recruiting violation is not a "for cause" event that justifies a firing.  Cause is a relatively high bar to meet under these circumstances (major scandal, major breach, etc.).  I have not reviewed all of details and there could be very weak and specific events but I doubt it.  And barring a major event, if Michigan wants to fire Harbaugh, it would be "without cause."

Blue In NC

February 17th, 2022 at 2:53 PM ^

Edit: Now I have looked at Sec 4.02 (for cause) - damnit you curiosity!  Cause is very limited (as is typical) basically to material breaches not cured w/in 30 days, fraud, felonies, morality clauses, Level I and II violations where the coach is directly responsible, and the football program on probation (which is a bit of an out potentially). 

But the last one (h) is particularly interesting - "participation in any job searches or outside employment without the knowledge of the AD."  This is a huge one and an outlier.  In effect, Warde could fire Jim "for cause" if Jim is interviewing without Warde's knowledge. So unless Jim wants to take a huge risk, he will never interview for another job without the AD's advance notice. This is a HUGE backstop to Jim's verbal promise (at least unless the AD knows in advance) and makes it much more than Jim's verbal promise.

Blue In NC

February 17th, 2022 at 3:04 PM ^

One other curious item - at least to me - the contract intro says that this agreement replaces all previous agreements between the parties, including the one dated Sep 27, 2021.  I just found it interesting that Jim was coaching the team in season for a full month before the renegotiated contract was signed.  That late date was not how it remembered it.

Blue In NC

February 17th, 2022 at 3:40 PM ^

Thanks.  I didn't remember that Sep one so that was a bit weird to see but makes sense.

This new contract is a relatively standard one in form, with a few changes and deviations in a couple of areas.  And Jim may not have an agent, but apparently he does have an NY lawyer working on this for him.

Optimism Attache

February 17th, 2022 at 3:31 PM ^

The more I think about it, I believe you’re right. I think the point was that neither Michigan nor Harbaugh think they’d have any interest in dragging a for cause firing through the ringer after a couple four win seasons. Of course, no coach expects that kind of situation, but if it came down to it and Harbaugh didn’t see any other attractive opportunities out there, he’d sure want his contractually owed money. Pretty much anyone would.
 

I’ve seen few attempted for cause firings for truly ticky tack contract violations among major head coaches. I mean Auburn is in dire straits right now and they seem to not have been able to negotiate a low cost exit for Harsin on threat of a for cause firing, despite obviously trying quite hard. This suggests to me it isn’t really that easy. 

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

February 17th, 2022 at 2:45 PM ^

The transfer portal is quickly starting to become an entrenched reality, and something that high school recruits grow up with as a fact of life, rather than a new and mysterious event.

Ergo, I suspect that "if you go to that school you will outlast your NFL-flirtatious coach" will be less and less of a useful recruiting tactic.  Reasonably savvy recruits will shrug and say "fine, if that happens, I can transfer."

HateSparty

February 17th, 2022 at 2:50 PM ^

I really like this deal.  Coach determines his destiny, he is paid respectfully but not insane and there is a commitment to the guy that he can sell on the recruiting trail.  It will be his job to sell whether he is committed and his face to face time will permit that.  There is no worries about the university changing their mind.  Their buyout is steep for a while.  I've said it before, he shows no signs that caging him is wise.

 

moetown91

February 17th, 2022 at 2:51 PM ^

Seth---you are the man!   Thanks for breaking this down in a way that makes sense for a scenario that hasn't made sense for some time!

I look at it this way (and it seems to be something Michigan fans forget)...if the NFL comes calling after the 22 or 23 seasons than it means more than likely we had something to celebrate.  That's a good thing!  If he he can overcome negative recruiting with his honesty than i guess I'll take the tradeoff!