OT: NCAA Ineptitude Reaches a New Level

Submitted by Steeveebr on

NCAA President Mark Emmert continues to amaze.  Here he is saying that Ayton would not be instructed to sit because there was no investigation or process underway, just a yahoo report.

President Emmert made the choice to exclude himself from the decision to hold either Coach Miller or Ayton accountable for the allegations. During an interview with CBS, Emmert said, “First and foremost, that a decision the school has to make. We don’t reach in and tell a school that a player can or can’t play tonight, unless there is an open investigation going on that’s already been through a whole process. There’s been no process here. We’ve got a report in the media. I’ll let everyone make their own determination on the credibility of that.”

Emmert Link

However, Arizona lawyer Paul Kelly in stating why Ayton was elligible to play said the following:

“Over the past several months, Mr. Ayton has voluntarily submitted to several interviews, by federal prosecutors and the FBI, by University and PAC-12 compliance officials, by representatives of the NCAA, and by Steptoe & Johnson, the independent law firm engaged by the University to review these matters,” the statement said.

Kelly Link

Interesting contradiction here.  It could all be about that word "process", but I wonder why Emmert would lead everyone to believe that no investigation had taken place and that this was just a report?  It's definitely looking like the NCAA has no interest in punishing dirty schools and instead is considering rule changes as a fix.

greatlakestate

February 26th, 2018 at 8:27 PM ^

I don't want to see college ball players get paid. That's a rabbit hole I just don't think it makes sense for universities to go down.  But there is no reason not to let athletes who are good enough go straight to the pros out of high school. One and done is ruining college Bball.

bo_lives

February 26th, 2018 at 7:40 PM ^

It would take a lot of big players banding together to get that to happen though. Ironically, the BIG 10 is probably in the best position to do something about it, but they're just as incompentent as the NCAA.

I would prefer a system where we get rid of this "playing school" nonsense and turn college football and basketball into the minor leagues.

FrozeMangoes

February 26th, 2018 at 7:47 PM ^

Public officals are elected, private corps it is either the owner or the BOD selects. But, an orginization like the NCAA, who decides who is in charge?  This guy has been a running joke as long as I can remember but how would he even get replaced?

CriticalFan

February 26th, 2018 at 7:56 PM ^

What should I as a fan of one of the clean teams want done with those 35 teams that were implicated? A) they sit any players rumored to have taken money, and go on losing streaks, coach is fired. B) they play them, then those wins are taken away later, coach is fired C) system is blown up, players can take money from boosters & endorsers; Beilein goes back to Div II

MGoStretch

February 26th, 2018 at 9:41 PM ^

Somewhere, Jamal Crawford is like, "man, you gotta be kidding me. Back when I was in school..." I'll never forget being in the stands for that msu game and wondering where he was and then why he wasn't dressed.

nb

February 26th, 2018 at 11:58 PM ^

There is a lot of smoke here. I suspect lower level NCAA employees will be implicated but Emmert will go free. Sneaker companies, agencies, and who else knew? There are too many instances for not a single whistle blower to tell the NCAA...especially when many (~300 member) coaches are clean. I’m surprised none of these ‘bad loans’ went sideways in a public way. Makes me believe some ‘enforcement’ was afoot.

Mpfnfu Ford

February 27th, 2018 at 12:17 PM ^

In punishing stray offenders, because it lets them keep the artifiace that their system is working and amateurism is viable. This investigation doesn't allow them to do it, because it pulls back the curtain to reveal the entirety of amateurism is a ludicrous sham invented to get away with paying the talent a fraction of their worth.