Some more info on Michigan's new font

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on

An eagle-eyed user on Twitter pointed this out to me this morning.

On the Michigan Athletics twitter page, they have been releasing a graphic every day counting down to the Nike launch.

In those graphics, they have been using the font we have seen on the new gear that's been released. Have a look-

I gathered together the new jersey number font and put it together.

Not only has the #2 changed drastically, but the #4 has severely changed along with the #5 that has been slightly altered.

 

Old

rob f

July 30th, 2016 at 11:19 PM ^

hosted Georgia in 1965, losing 15-7.

UGA and Michigan have only tangled twice, with the first game (also in Ann Arbor) in 1957 ending in a 26-0 Michigan shutout victory;  the all-time series stands at 1 win apiece.

I love that picture of the two teams playing each other in their home uniforms.  Wish teams could do that more often.

Prince Lover

July 31st, 2016 at 2:32 AM ^

And I am not snarking or criticizing or saying anything because this topic is fun and trivial like we all know it is. But my question is in regards to your #5 comment, isn't that just a shadow of his face mask on the number? Or is that the real design?

xtramelanin

July 31st, 2016 at 8:35 AM ^

look at his right arm, particularly his hand on the back of 71's jersey.  his fingers are cut off and there are no shadows.   his face mask is obviously wrong too.  also, with the exception of a screen pass (and that's not how we ever ran it/taught anyone in my life how to do it), there is no way two O-lineman are letting some dude just waltz past them as if he's not even there,as they release to....nobody.  

there are other more subtle clues, but that pic was photo shop'd.  see the coach kneeling on the field in the background?  this was a pic probably taken during warm ups. 

Ghost of Fritz…

July 30th, 2016 at 11:35 PM ^

what about Willis Ward's 6? 

On a serious note, from internet searches is seems that numbers first appeared on Michigan football uniforms in 1930. 

From a photo on wikipedia, in 1930 they used the 'Ford style 4' but the 'Woodson style 2.' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1930_Michigan_Wolverines_football_team

Photos on the Bentley Library web site from 1950, 1960 show use of  the 'Ford 4' and 'Woodson 2.'  Oddly, in 1940 they did not have the 'Ford 4.'

By 1970 the 'Ford 4' was gone (maybe dispearing at some point in the '60s) and the numbers looked more or less like what they have used up until today.

http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/football/football.htm

maizenbluedevil

July 30th, 2016 at 6:32 PM ^

Are we being trolled? Where's Ashton?

What in the actual fuck? I mean you have to be LOOKING for things to fuck up if you fuck up how the numbers look. Unbelievable. Can we not just have the normal, crisp, classic look that is what Michigan has always been?

How does Penn St not get fucked with like this and we do perpetually?



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

CorkyCole

July 30th, 2016 at 6:58 PM ^

You guys keep on complaining about font changes, but what you don't understand is that it now allows for us to reuse the old numbers that were previously retired in the new font and keep the old fonted numbers retired! This is the world we now live in. How else do you think we will have any numbers left to use in 1000 years? Run out of numbers? Change the font!

BlowGoo

July 30th, 2016 at 7:02 PM ^

Someday we'll look back fondly on the Air Jerseys with nostalgic because we'll be associating them with winning consistently, fugly or no.

Roland Deschain

July 30th, 2016 at 8:39 PM ^

So let me get this straight. Michigan's new font has actual historical significance, from the time we won national championships, and people are pissed off about it? Geez...we are a rough bunch to please!



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad